| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
May 26th 05, 12:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
bb wrote: K4YZ wrote: bb wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: wrote: Hello? This newsgroup is about AMATEUR RADIO POLICY. Military and international socio-political politics are another group. Then why do you go off on so many tangents, Len? You seem to be afraid to have a civil discussion about amateur radio policy here. In order to have a "civil discussion" on Amateur Radio policy, Lennie would have to have some sort of experience from which to make informed opinions or suggestions from. That never stopped Mike Powell or any of his predecessors. "Mike Powell (and his) predecessors" staff out assignmentss who ARE informed on the various issues. Like they were informed about refarming the 220 band to UPS? BPL? "UPS" was not the only entity involved in that "deal" Brain, and Amateur Radio operators are as responsible for that folly as anyone. We had more than andequate opportunity to get that band "loaded up" like 2 meters ('Use It Or Lose It") but didn't. BTW...remember the FIRST 'threat' to the 1.25m band and for what purpose? But it must Len. Len must be stopped "SOMEhow!" At any cost. I may or may not like the politics of Mr Powell, but whether he has said or done anyhing I didn't like, I can't say he was lying or obviously being deceitful in his dealings with Amateur Radio. The same does NOT hold true for Lennie. Or you. Definitely not you. I've neither lied nor been deceitful in any discussion on Amateur Radio, Brain. The same canNOT be said for you and Lennie. Shame on you both. Steve, K4YZ |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| N9OGL to bust 2 Meter band Plan With "Information Bulletin" Broadcasts | Policy | |||
| The FAQ (Well, Question 1, at least) | Homebrew | |||
| The FAQ (Well, Question 1, at least) | General | |||
| FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
| Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #651 | Dx | |||
Threaded Mode
