| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jim Hampton wrote: Hello, Dan A 1X2 call starting with "W" or "K"? How many of these folks do you think are around that are *not* in possession of a vanity call? C'mon! Give us a break! The original holders of 1X2 calls are mostly, if not entirely, sk. A dear friend of mine, W2ZS (almost the end of the 1X2 calls) has been sk for decades. Like about 3 decades. My original call, issued in 1962, was WN2CJV. That would have made me WB2CJV had I passed the 13 word per minute code test. Unfortunately, it took me another year to get to 13 and I obtained WB2OSP in 1964. With the issuance of vanity call signs, most of the 1X3 calls are gone - mostly vanity call signs. Depending upon the call district, some of the states were as far as a WD prefix. Since I doubt many folks would spend money to get a call sign beginning with WA, WB, etc., those are the folks that you can be certain have been licensed since the early 60s. I did obtain WA3RJX in 1970, however, when I moved to Pennsylvania. Still, had I kept that call, it would be 35 years old! Moving back then might also require a call sign change - along with a "newbie" type call sign. When the FCC allowed extra class licensees to choose their own call sign in the early 70s, I obtained N2JH. At that point, I'm not sure if they would allow you to grab an old expired call. Once the gates were opened for vanity call signs, all bets are off as to how long an amateur has been licensed. My bet would be that the WA and WB type prefixes would be the only ones that would *almost* guarantee the individual has been licensed long enough to qualify for the quarter century club. It won't be long (and may have already happened) that there are some 5 word per minute folks with a 1X2 call (which means fairly new hams). I know a few with N8*** that are/were 5 wpm and were licensed in 1983 or earlier, I don't think that would make them fairly new hams. A few more years and they will qualify for the quarter century club. I have to ask what the heck you were thinking with your response that a 1X2 or 1X3 call indicates an old timer? ??? ![]() 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
KC8GXW wrote in
: Jim Hampton wrote: Hello, Dan A 1X2 call starting with "W" or "K"? How many of these folks do you think are around that are *not* in possession of a vanity call? C'mon! Give us a break! The original holders of 1X2 calls are mostly, if not entirely, sk. A dear friend of mine, W2ZS (almost the end of the 1X2 calls) has been sk for decades. Like about 3 decades. My original call, issued in 1962, was WN2CJV. That would have made me WB2CJV had I passed the 13 word per minute code test. Unfortunately, it took me another year to get to 13 and I obtained WB2OSP in 1964. With the issuance of vanity call signs, most of the 1X3 calls are gone - mostly vanity call signs. Depending upon the call district, some of the states were as far as a WD prefix. Since I doubt many folks would spend money to get a call sign beginning with WA, WB, etc., those are the folks that you can be certain have been licensed since the early 60s. I did obtain WA3RJX in 1970, however, when I moved to Pennsylvania. Still, had I kept that call, it would be 35 years old! Moving back then might also require a call sign change - along with a "newbie" type call sign. When the FCC allowed extra class licensees to choose their own call sign in the early 70s, I obtained N2JH. At that point, I'm not sure if they would allow you to grab an old expired call. Once the gates were opened for vanity call signs, all bets are off as to how long an amateur has been licensed. My bet would be that the WA and WB type prefixes would be the only ones that would *almost* guarantee the individual has been licensed long enough to qualify for the quarter century club. It won't be long (and may have already happened) that there are some 5 word per minute folks with a 1X2 call (which means fairly new hams). I know a few with N8*** that are/were 5 wpm and were licensed in 1983 or earlier, I don't think that would make them fairly new hams. A few more years and they will qualify for the quarter century club. I have to ask what the heck you were thinking with your response that a 1X2 or 1X3 call indicates an old timer? ??? ![]() 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA I became eligible for QCWA this year (it goes from January 1st of your 25th year since getting a ham licence of any class anywhere in the world), but there's no chapter near here, AFAIK, which makes me less inclined to join. I was first licenced in the UK (as a no-coder, LOL!) so my US call isn't indicative of when I was first licenced. I'm not sure exactly when the US call allocation system was changed, but I understand that it was more than 25 years ago, so there are some original 1x3 'N' calls that would be eligible for QCWA now. I beleive that someone with an N3C__ call told me it was issued in 1980. 73 de Alun, G8VUK, N3KIP Licensed since 29th February 1980 |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"KC8GXW" wrote in message ... Jim Hampton wrote: Hello, Dan A 1X2 call starting with "W" or "K"? How many of these folks do you think are around that are *not* in possession of a vanity call? C'mon! Give us a break! The original holders of 1X2 calls are mostly, if not entirely, sk. A dear friend of mine, W2ZS (almost the end of the 1X2 calls) has been sk for decades. Like about 3 decades. My original call, issued in 1962, was WN2CJV. That would have made me WB2CJV had I passed the 13 word per minute code test. Unfortunately, it took me another year to get to 13 and I obtained WB2OSP in 1964. With the issuance of vanity call signs, most of the 1X3 calls are gone - mostly vanity call signs. Depending upon the call district, some of the states were as far as a WD prefix. Since I doubt many folks would spend money to get a call sign beginning with WA, WB, etc., those are the folks that you can be certain have been licensed since the early 60s. I did obtain WA3RJX in 1970, however, when I moved to Pennsylvania. Still, had I kept that call, it would be 35 years old! Moving back then might also require a call sign change - along with a "newbie" type call sign. When the FCC allowed extra class licensees to choose their own call sign in the early 70s, I obtained N2JH. At that point, I'm not sure if they would allow you to grab an old expired call. Once the gates were opened for vanity call signs, all bets are off as to how long an amateur has been licensed. My bet would be that the WA and WB type prefixes would be the only ones that would *almost* guarantee the individual has been licensed long enough to qualify for the quarter century club. It won't be long (and may have already happened) that there are some 5 word per minute folks with a 1X2 call (which means fairly new hams). I know a few with N8*** that are/were 5 wpm and were licensed in 1983 or earlier, I don't think that would make them fairly new hams. A few more years and they will qualify for the quarter century club. I have to ask what the heck you were thinking with your response that a 1X2 or 1X3 call indicates an old timer? ??? ![]() 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA This is true; I had the call N2JH back in the 70s. The N prefix was made available to amateurs sometime in the late 60s, but I'm not sure exactly when. My point, however, is that a WA or WB prefix pretty well indicates someone who has been licensed for 40 years or so (depending upon district). My WB2OSP license was issued in 1964, so figure the WA2 calls were a few years earlier (WB2CJV would have been in May, 1962). My point was that no one, I suspect, would apply for a WA or WB prefix under the vanity callsign rules. This would, to me, certify that individual as an old-timer. As to the 1X3 calls with a prefix of "W" or "K", my point is that most of them have probably been issued as a vanity call after the FCC started that sometime in the 1990s. I knew Dwight Hill, K2BRE and he has been an sk for quite a while. Were he still alive, he would be close to 90 years old. Certainly, there are some still around with us with a 1X3 issued back in the 50s or earlier (Wayne, W2NSD comes to mind), but I suspect *most* current 1X3 or 1X2 holders are holders due to having a vanity call. Dan's point of a 1X3 being an indicator of an old timer does not hold water. I'd bet if you averaged all of the years the 1X3 tickets have had an amateur license, it would be *less* than the average of all the WA and WB prefixes (I could be wrong, but the WA WB prefixes are mostly well over 40 years old - at least in the second call district). My friend, Tim, WB2KAO, was licensed around 1963 and has his original call. He isn't an old timer due to that WB prefix? 42 years of being licensed? This would be typical of a WA or WB prefix. Unless you can tell me someone who got their WA or WB prefix using the vanity call system. 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Jim Hampton" wrote in message ... "KC8GXW" wrote in message ... Jim Hampton wrote: Hello, Dan A 1X2 call starting with "W" or "K"? How many of these folks do you think are around that are *not* in possession of a vanity call? C'mon! Give us a break! The original holders of 1X2 calls are mostly, if not entirely, sk. A dear friend of mine, W2ZS (almost the end of the 1X2 calls) has been sk for decades. Like about 3 decades. My original call, issued in 1962, was WN2CJV. That would have made me WB2CJV had I passed the 13 word per minute code test. Unfortunately, it took me another year to get to 13 and I obtained WB2OSP in 1964. With the issuance of vanity call signs, most of the 1X3 calls are gone - mostly vanity call signs. Depending upon the call district, some of the states were as far as a WD prefix. Since I doubt many folks would spend money to get a call sign beginning with WA, WB, etc., those are the folks that you can be certain have been licensed since the early 60s. I did obtain WA3RJX in 1970, however, when I moved to Pennsylvania. Still, had I kept that call, it would be 35 years old! Moving back then might also require a call sign change - along with a "newbie" type call sign. When the FCC allowed extra class licensees to choose their own call sign in the early 70s, I obtained N2JH. At that point, I'm not sure if they would allow you to grab an old expired call. Once the gates were opened for vanity call signs, all bets are off as to how long an amateur has been licensed. My bet would be that the WA and WB type prefixes would be the only ones that would *almost* guarantee the individual has been licensed long enough to qualify for the quarter century club. It won't be long (and may have already happened) that there are some 5 word per minute folks with a 1X2 call (which means fairly new hams). I know a few with N8*** that are/were 5 wpm and were licensed in 1983 or earlier, I don't think that would make them fairly new hams. A few more years and they will qualify for the quarter century club. I have to ask what the heck you were thinking with your response that a 1X2 or 1X3 call indicates an old timer? ??? ![]() 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA This is true; I had the call N2JH back in the 70s. The N prefix was made available to amateurs sometime in the late 60s, but I'm not sure exactly when. My point, however, is that a WA or WB prefix pretty well indicates someone who has been licensed for 40 years or so (depending upon district). My WB2OSP license was issued in 1964, so figure the WA2 calls were a few years earlier (WB2CJV would have been in May, 1962). My point was that no one, I suspect, would apply for a WA or WB prefix under the vanity callsign rules. This would, to me, certify that individual as an old-timer. As to the 1X3 calls with a prefix of "W" or "K", my point is that most of them have probably been issued as a vanity call after the FCC started that sometime in the 1990s. I knew Dwight Hill, K2BRE and he has been an sk for quite a while. Were he still alive, he would be close to 90 years old. Certainly, there are some still around with us with a 1X3 issued back in the 50s or earlier (Wayne, W2NSD comes to mind), but I suspect *most* current 1X3 or 1X2 holders are holders due to having a vanity call. They did not run out of sequentially issued 1x3 calls until sometime in 1993 (varying slightly by call area). Sequentially issued 1x2 calls were still available in come call areas into the early 1990s. The 1x2s really went fast in late 1980s and the very early 1990s. I knew a great many hams who had finally chosen to upgrade to Extra so that they could contribute to amateur radio by becoming VEs and got their 1x2s. Although you didn't have to be an Extra to be a VE, you were limited on who you could administer tests to if you were not. I received my call (N8UZE) in 1992 and my daughter received her call (N8ZNW) in 1993. Dan's point of a 1X3 being an indicator of an old timer does not hold water. Definitely not. Many holders of 1x3 calls got their licenses in the 1990s and many new licenses today are getting 1x3 calls through the vanity system since there are none available for sequential issue. However if one looks only at the sequentially issued calls, the Ws are older than the Ks which in turn are older than the Ns. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dee Flint" wrote in message ... "Jim Hampton" wrote in message ... "KC8GXW" wrote in message ... Jim Hampton wrote: Hello, Dan A 1X2 call starting with "W" or "K"? How many of these folks do you think are around that are *not* in possession of a vanity call? C'mon! Give us a break! The original holders of 1X2 calls are mostly, if not entirely, sk. A dear friend of mine, W2ZS (almost the end of the 1X2 calls) has been sk for decades. Like about 3 decades. My original call, issued in 1962, was WN2CJV. That would have made me WB2CJV had I passed the 13 word per minute code test. Unfortunately, it took me another year to get to 13 and I obtained WB2OSP in 1964. With the issuance of vanity call signs, most of the 1X3 calls are gone - mostly vanity call signs. Depending upon the call district, some of the states were as far as a WD prefix. Since I doubt many folks would spend money to get a call sign beginning with WA, WB, etc., those are the folks that you can be certain have been licensed since the early 60s. I did obtain WA3RJX in 1970, however, when I moved to Pennsylvania. Still, had I kept that call, it would be 35 years old! Moving back then might also require a call sign change - along with a "newbie" type call sign. When the FCC allowed extra class licensees to choose their own call sign in the early 70s, I obtained N2JH. At that point, I'm not sure if they would allow you to grab an old expired call. Once the gates were opened for vanity call signs, all bets are off as to how long an amateur has been licensed. My bet would be that the WA and WB type prefixes would be the only ones that would *almost* guarantee the individual has been licensed long enough to qualify for the quarter century club. It won't be long (and may have already happened) that there are some 5 word per minute folks with a 1X2 call (which means fairly new hams). I know a few with N8*** that are/were 5 wpm and were licensed in 1983 or earlier, I don't think that would make them fairly new hams. A few more years and they will qualify for the quarter century club. I have to ask what the heck you were thinking with your response that a 1X2 or 1X3 call indicates an old timer? ??? ![]() 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA This is true; I had the call N2JH back in the 70s. The N prefix was made available to amateurs sometime in the late 60s, but I'm not sure exactly when. My point, however, is that a WA or WB prefix pretty well indicates someone who has been licensed for 40 years or so (depending upon district). My WB2OSP license was issued in 1964, so figure the WA2 calls were a few years earlier (WB2CJV would have been in May, 1962). My point was that no one, I suspect, would apply for a WA or WB prefix under the vanity callsign rules. This would, to me, certify that individual as an old-timer. As to the 1X3 calls with a prefix of "W" or "K", my point is that most of them have probably been issued as a vanity call after the FCC started that sometime in the 1990s. I knew Dwight Hill, K2BRE and he has been an sk for quite a while. Were he still alive, he would be close to 90 years old. Certainly, there are some still around with us with a 1X3 issued back in the 50s or earlier (Wayne, W2NSD comes to mind), but I suspect *most* current 1X3 or 1X2 holders are holders due to having a vanity call. They did not run out of sequentially issued 1x3 calls until sometime in 1993 (varying slightly by call area). Sequentially issued 1x2 calls were still available in come call areas into the early 1990s. The 1x2s really went fast in late 1980s and the very early 1990s. I knew a great many hams who had finally chosen to upgrade to Extra so that they could contribute to amateur radio by becoming VEs and got their 1x2s. Although you didn't have to be an Extra to be a VE, you were limited on who you could administer tests to if you were not. I received my call (N8UZE) in 1992 and my daughter received her call (N8ZNW) in 1993. Dan's point of a 1X3 being an indicator of an old timer does not hold water. Definitely not. Many holders of 1x3 calls got their licenses in the 1990s and many new licenses today are getting 1x3 calls through the vanity system since there are none available for sequential issue. However if one looks only at the sequentially issued calls, the Ws are older than the Ks which in turn are older than the Ns. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE Hello, Dee I am pretty sure you are correct. I also believe that WV2 was the novice prefix which would turn into WA2 when the tech or general was obtained (no quick routes to the extra back then; you had to have some time with a license before you could even take the test). WN2 turned into WB2. Not sure about the K prefix. The novice goes back into the 50s, I believe. You are right, when the Ws were exhausted, they ran through the Ks. Then they started with WA and so on. The N prefix became available in the very late 60s or very early 70s. WA and WB predate the N prefix. Still haven't heard from Dan. Perhaps we could sked for a nice chat - as long as he can put up with a "newbie". Better keep it slow, say 30 words per minute cw with no automated copy devices. I suppose if he pushes me, I might consider 40. Not much more, however; I'm not up to that stuff anymore. Of course, if push came to shove .... I might be willing to give the high-speed stuff a crack, but don't expect much from a former WN prefix. If he *really* wants to push the envelope, I'd be willing to take a week and meet him using American Land-Line Morse. Should be good for a hoot. No more than 16, however, as I'd be using a mental look-up table. Not enough call for land-line Morse to make it worthwhile to get good at it. I only used it once in 1968. Of course, I hadn't copied Morse since 1969 when I retook the extra in 1993 .... at 20 words per minute .... ![]() 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA, newbie extrodinaire ps - the new guys and gals deserve respect too. I guess I just didn't care for his implication on the prefix. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Jim Hampton" wrote in message ... You are right, when the Ws were exhausted, they ran through the Ks. Then they started with WA and so on. The N prefix became available in the very late 60s or very early 70s. WA and WB predate the N prefix. I don't know about all area's but I can say this, for the 8th district...circa summer of 1961 they did indeed re-issue K calls. I received KN8BHH, my friend received KN8BBL, another friend received KN8DEN, etc. however just a month or so later another group of buds received WN8 which turned into WA8 calls. Go figure. Still haven't heard from Dan. Perhaps we could sked for a nice chat - as long as he can put up with a "newbie". Better keep it slow, say 30 words per minute cw with no automated copy devices. I suppose if he pushes me, I might consider 40. Not much more, however; I'm not up to that stuff anymore. Of course, if push came to shove .... I might be willing to give the high-speed stuff a crack, but don't expect much from a former WN prefix. If he *really* wants to push the envelope, I'd be willing to take a week and meet him using American Land-Line Morse. Should be good for a hoot. No more than 16, however, as I'd be using a mental look-up table. Not enough call for land-line Morse to make it worthwhile to get good at it. I only used it once in 1968. Of course, I hadn't copied Morse since 1969 when I retook the extra in 1993 .... at 20 words per minute .... ![]() Haven't heard from me? This is the first time I saw this. Sure I'll sked ya. I'm on 3.575 every evening at 1900CST, that would be 2000Z. On Sundays I am net control (local time). I have not used the railroad code in 40 years, so I'll pass on that one. The only thing that is automatic in my cw is my ability to copy. Should still do well at 50 or so. If not we qrs. Send me a e-mail and follow my SPAM catchers instructions. I don't give a rip who believe me here. Dan/W4NTI |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dan/W4NTI wrote:
"Jim Hampton" wrote in message ... You are right, when the Ws were exhausted, they ran through the Ks. Then they started with WA and so on. The N prefix became available in the very late 60s or very early 70s. WA and WB predate the N prefix. I don't know about all area's but I can say this, for the 8th district...circa summer of 1961 they did indeed re-issue K calls. Same in 5 land, my K call was a re-issue. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dan/W4NTI" wrote in message hlink.net... "Jim Hampton" wrote in message ... You are right, when the Ws were exhausted, they ran through the Ks. Then they started with WA and so on. The N prefix became available in the very late 60s or very early 70s. WA and WB predate the N prefix. I don't know about all area's but I can say this, for the 8th district...circa summer of 1961 they did indeed re-issue K calls. I received KN8BHH, my friend received KN8BBL, another friend received KN8DEN, etc. however just a month or so later another group of buds received WN8 which turned into WA8 calls. Go figure. Still haven't heard from Dan. Perhaps we could sked for a nice chat - as long as he can put up with a "newbie". Better keep it slow, say 30 words per minute cw with no automated copy devices. I suppose if he pushes me, I might consider 40. Not much more, however; I'm not up to that stuff anymore. Of course, if push came to shove .... I might be willing to give the high-speed stuff a crack, but don't expect much from a former WN prefix. If he *really* wants to push the envelope, I'd be willing to take a week and meet him using American Land-Line Morse. Should be good for a hoot. No more than 16, however, as I'd be using a mental look-up table. Not enough call for land-line Morse to make it worthwhile to get good at it. I only used it once in 1968. Of course, I hadn't copied Morse since 1969 when I retook the extra in 1993 .... at 20 words per minute .... ![]() Haven't heard from me? This is the first time I saw this. Sure I'll sked ya. I'm on 3.575 every evening at 1900CST, that would be 2000Z. On Sundays I am net control (local time). I have not used the railroad code in 40 years, so I'll pass on that one. The only thing that is automatic in my cw is my ability to copy. Should still do well at 50 or so. If not we qrs. Send me a e-mail and follow my SPAM catchers instructions. I don't give a rip who believe me here. Dan/W4NTI Hello, Dan Should be fun. I could well loose, who knows? But I'll tell you what, I hope both of us learn a bit of respect for each other. I honestly don't know how well I'll do much past 40 as it has been quite a few years - but I'm willing to give it a try. I will get your addy minus the spam catcher and explain further. Hang on to your shorts, it might be a bumpy ride LOL Seriously, Dan, I hope we can end this one on a friendly note. I get upset sometimes with some of the threads. I bear no ill will against newcomers nor old timers. I do hope you read what I stated concerning the 1X3 and 1X2 call signs. I was being honest there. In any case, I'll be in touch. Wanna bet that we'll hear from Len on this one? A beer? LOL BTW, you are right about the KN prefixes. Those became the KX3 calls. At the time, however, New York was the most populus state and the 2 district was into the WB2 calls. I've still got my original novice license issued in 1962 as WN2CJV which would have become a WB2 call. I'm willing to try and take a digital photo of it and send it to you if you wish. There are differences between districts. And I still abide by my thoughts that the average WA or WB has been licensed longer than the average 1X2 or 1X3 call simply because of the FCC and its' vanity call sign program. All other stuff aside, when did you use land-line? How long have you been licensed? I am not trying to say I'm a real old-timer; I'm not. I am simply making the argument that due to the vanity call sign program, a lot, if not most, of the 1X2 and 1X3 calls are vanity calls. I also was WA3RJX some 6 years *after* being WB2OSP. It is a matter of the call district. If you move, you loose (at least back in the days). I was N2JH in the early 70s, given the time to renew one's license, that was some 10 years and more after the WN2CJV (or even the WB2OSP) ticket. Heck, maybe after we get a time and frequency (and the 4 call district might be tough except for 40 meters), perhaps we can get a few others on the frequency. I'd almost bet that Hans could wipe us both out ... but we can see .... ![]() Tell ya what, if Lennie comes up on frequency on CW, I'm gonna quit right then and there! Let's give it a go. 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Jim Hampton" wrote in message ... [snip] I am simply making the argument that due to the vanity call sign program, a lot, if not most, of the 1X2 and 1X3 calls are vanity calls. I disagree. Most of the 1x2 and 1x3 calls seem to be "original issue" not vanity calls. I know only a handful of people that have gotten vanity calls and they have had a tough time finding a call that they liked as there just aren't (and haven't been) that many of the calls available. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
From: "Jim Hampton" on Sun 5 Jun 2005 06:01
"Dan/W4NTI" wrote in message thlink.net... "Jim Hampton" wrote in message ... Tell ya what, if Lennie comes up on frequency on CW, I'm gonna quit right then and there! Start packing. Pick up last check in Accounting Department. Fort Monmouth, NJ, a June afternoon in 1952, basic radio skills for Microwave Radio Relay MOS at the Signal School in a general purpose school building: Small 6AG7-6L6 MOPA transmitter on about 7.5 MHz, crystal controlled, CW only with a "straight key." Measure RF power into "dummy load" (light bulb), then connect to wire antenna and "load up," see difference in meter readings, hear keying from instructor's simple five-tube receiver. Hear instructor cuss out one for "sending nasty words on-air" with morse key. Sent "CQ" for "keying," nice easy pattern to beat of characters already memorized before service. Maybe 20 Watts RF output. Measure frequency with BC-221. Adjust crystal oscillator for exact frequency and see range of adjustment possible (not much). Satisfaction on getting very close to "on frequency." [not on ham band frequency but still legal for Signal School] 53 years later the boat anchor afficionados are still "peaking the grid, dipping the plate" on their glow-in-the-dark PAs. Ho hum. No big change. Improvement: Modern luggage much, much better. Easy handling, better packing. Let's give it a go. Good luck on your new whatever. :-) |
| Reply |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Supporting theory that Antennas "Match" to 377 Ohms (Free space) | Antenna | |||
| Record Real Media Stream | Broadcasting | |||
| IN THE REAL WORLD ANTI GIRLS CAN DO NOTHING TO STOP THIS... | CB | |||
| 50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? | Antenna | |||