| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#12
June 12th 05, 09:53 PM
|
|||
|
|||
K4YZ wrote: bb wrote: wrote: It seems very odd that I'd be accused of having a stranglehold in a thread where all I did was post people's opinions about when FCC would drop Element 1. I've learned that people's opinions are now assertions of fact. As assertions of fact, they are either right or wrong, truthful or intentionally decitful (lies). At the end of the day, you either had a right opinion, or you lied. You have Robeson to thank for that. The problem, Brain, is that you don't learn when to express your opinon AS an opinion, and when to express something as an assertion. You obviously didn't either. During your three week lying spree, not once did you say "In my opinion..." Hi! You STATED that "...the role of the ARES is overblown..", yet the very day you did it there were no less than three new items on various sites about third-party agencies lauding ARES volunteers. So? You then also STATED that ARES will not be able to respond because, allegedly, too many of the members are over extended on commitments. Is that what I said? You're welcome to quote it at any time. I've asked you over and over to provide some substantiation of those comments, but you simply dodge the questions. You're the original Dodgeful Arter. What seven hostile actions? Where is your documentation for your claims of "A" NCOIC of Okinawa MARS? |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Question Pool vs Book Larnin' | Policy | |||
| The Pool | Policy | |||
| From the Extra question pool: The dipole | General | |||
| REQ:latest Ham University with curent tech pool willing to share?/sell cheep | Equipment | |||
Threaded Mode
