K4YZ wrote:
Bert Craig wrote:

I will go on the record with the prediction that Element 1 will NOT go
away completely as first thought. It will be dropped for Tech "+" and
General privies, but retained for the Extra.

I am willing to bet that you've got the right combination, at
least for now, Bert.

I see a two class license structure on the next "restructuring"
round. That's not to say I like it or support it, but I bet that's
where we end up.

Ayup. Sounds reasonbable to me.

K4YZ wrote:
Bert Craig wrote:

I will go on the record with the prediction that Element 1 will NOT go
away completely as first thought. It will be dropped for Tech "+" and
General privies, but retained for the Extra.

I am willing to bet that you've got the right combination, at
least for now, Bert.

I see a two class license structure on the next "restructuring"
round. That's not to say I like it or support it, but I bet that's
where we end up.

I'd vote for all of it myself. Problem is though that crystal-balling
what the FCC actually comes up with is like playing Russian roulette
with three rounds in the cylinder. Maybe four rounds . . . Like Shultz
would say "I doan bet on NOTTING!". In this game. Which is why I
haven't. And won't.

I think enough folks have
written to the FCC, as well as their elected officials, (Some of whom
have a say in the FCC's budget.) and expressed their wishes that we not
follow suit with the nations that have completely dropped the code from
their licensing process.

A-yup.

73

Steve, K4YZ

w3rv

ammussingly enough I expect for once Stevie that you are right on on
the result

K4YZ wrote:
Bert Craig wrote:

I will go on the record with the prediction that Element 1 will NOT go
away completely as first thought. It will be dropped for Tech "+" and
General privies, but retained for the Extra.

I am willing to bet that you've got the right combination, at
least for now, Bert.

I see a two class license structure on the next "restructuring"
round. That's not to say I like it or support it, but I bet that's
where we end up.

I think enough folks have
written to the FCC, as well as their elected officials, (Some of whom
have a say in the FCC's budget.) and expressed their wishes that we not
follow suit with the nations that have completely dropped the code from
their licensing process.

OTH I suspect it more some of the last influence of the ARRL at the FCC
that will carry the day

A-yup.

73

Steve, K4YZ

an_old_friend wrote:
ammussingly enough I expect for once Stevie that you are right on on
the result

Top posting, Markie?

Your written gulash is ahrd enough to follow, but now you top post
too?

OTH...(SNIP)

You meant "OTOH", perhaps? OTH in radio terms is "Over The
Horizon".

I suspect it more some of the last influence of the ARRL at the FCC
that will carry the day

What? Huh?

Steve, K4YZ

Usenet Nazi

K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
ammussingly enough I expect for once Stevie that you are right on on
the result

Top posting, Markie?

Your written gulash is ahrd enough to follow, but now you top post
too?

OTH...(SNIP)

You meant "OTOH", perhaps? OTH in radio terms is "Over The
Horizon".

again you understand

I suspect it more some of the last influence of the ARRL at the FCC
that will carry the day

What? Huh?

Gee I can't even largely agree with you and have be civil or not hack
my posts apart

Steve, K4YZ

As I said before at least you have drop the Flaso polite 73's from your
posts