an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
ammussingly enough I expect for once Stevie that you are right on on
the result

Top posting, Markie?

Your written gulash is ahrd enough to follow, but now you top post
too?

OTH...(SNIP)

You meant "OTOH", perhaps? OTH in radio terms is "Over The
Horizon".

again you understand

No, I didn't...hence the request to clarify your intent.

You've not done that yet.

I suspect it more some of the last influence of the ARRL at the FCC
that will carry the day

What? Huh?

Gee I can't even largely agree with you and have be civil or not hack
my posts apart

How can I tell you're agreeing with me or disagreeing when your
replies are a rape of the English language, Markie?

And if you were agreeing with me, why "Stevie"..?!?!

On those few occassions where it appeared as though you might act
reasonable, I refer to you as Mark, address you by your callsign and
add a "73" to the post.

You seem to not do that.

As I said before at least you have drop the Flaso polite 73's from your
posts

"Flaso"...?!?! Sounds like an Italian or Baltic name. Who's
Flaso?

I had dropped "73" from you a loooooooooooooooooooooong time ago.
Not so with others who are civil and mature in their responses.

Steve, K4YZ