RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Policy (https://www.radiobanter.com/policy/)
-   -   Navy Radiomen (https://www.radiobanter.com/policy/72761-navy-radiomen.html)

KØHB June 13th 05 03:41 PM

Navy Radiomen
 
by Bob 'Dex' Armstrong



In the old gravel-gut boat service, your only link with the civilized world was
via the radio shack. A cubby hole on Requin aft of the scope wells in the
control room... It was the home of the spark shufflers.

If you were in tight with a radioman, you could get ball scores. Sewer pipe
sailors lost touch with the teams they followed... A hazard common to submarine
sailors and people who take a moon walk and miss the ride home. Actually, we
lost touch with just about everything. In the war movies when they come across
some guy who claims to be an American, they ask him questions only an American
could answer. If they had picked me up and asked me anything but (A) The names
of Roy's and Gene's horses (B) Who won World War II and (C) Blaze Starr's bust
size, I would have been one 'up the creek' sonuvabitch. Hell, we didn't know
Jack Kennedy was the president until we snorkeled a day later.

Only a complete idiot would make a bet with a radioman. Chances were, the
radioman had the final score before you tossed your wampum on the mess table.

I remember one great night brought to us by the spark pushers in the radio
shack.

We had finished whatever nonsense they sent us out to do and were making turns
for home. The Old Man opened the showers... Guys were bumming razor blades and
rooting around in side lockers for something that would pass for a towel. Next
thing you know, the foo-foo juice came out. Now there's a myth that all smoke
boat sailors eventually bought into, sooner or later... Aqua Velva was never
meant to disguise poor personal hygene. No matter how much of the stuff you
poured on a dungaree shirt you had been inside of for two weeks, you were still
one disgustingly foul smelling sonuvabitch. You could spray French perfume on an
engineman with a fire hose and buzzards would still circle around the *******
when he went topside. But I digress...

A group of us were sitting around in the crew's mess drinking coffee and ragging
guys heading fore and aft. A radioman came in and told us we were in for one
helluva good laugh. He monkeyed around with the RBO and patched it into
something in the radio shack.

For those of you who never had the pleasure of riding diesel boats or other
seagoing steel-hulled garbage scows, I must explain something here.

You could make phone calls from a ship at sea. Here is how it worked. The
radioman would raise someone ashore called a 'marine operator'. Then the
radioman would give the marine operator the name and phone number of whoever the
bluejacket aboard ship wanted to call. The marine operator would then place a
collect call and when the party answered and accepted the charges, the marine
operator would form a radio link with the ship and 'Bill the Bluejacket' could
talk to his sweetie.

From sweetie to the marine operator was private and confidential... From the
marine operator to Barnicle Bill, it was up for grabs... Great evening
entertainment.

"Poopsie, is that you?"

"Yes ducky doo, it's me."

"You miss me, peach blossom?"

"Oh yes... YES, darling!"

"Miss me a lot?"

"Oh, I miss you soooo much I can't wait to hold you and..."

"Okay darling... Are you going to meet the ship?"

"No sweetheart, I parked the car in the pier head lot... Keys are under the
mat."

"Why aren't you meeting the boat, sweetheart?"

"Oh, it was supposed to be a suprise... If you must know, the kids are spending
the night with the Webbers. I bought a new nightie and I figured we'd break it
in tonight."

The animals would cheer,
"LET'S HEAR IT FOR MAMMA AND HER NEW NIGHTIE!!"

And so it went. Bluejackets phoning in after six months in the Med... Great
entertainment.

"Darlin' can't wait... Just you and me and a can of Crisco!"

We heard it all... It was great... Laugh after laugh. A very memorable
evening... Best and cheapest fun we ever had on Requin.

There were times... Moments that we took for granted and that passed with little
notice. It's funny how they come back late in life when you have the time to
reshuffle your memories... The collected moments that constitute your life.

Radiomen linked us with the world. Another thing we just took for granted and
that was so damned important looking back. Never thanked them... Should have.

Great guys, all of them.




Poor Hans June 13th 05 04:52 PM


"KØHB" wrote in message
ink.net...
by Bob 'Dex' Armstrong

In the old gravel-gut boat service, ////drivel flushed/////




Poor Hans. The guys down at the Legion Hall have forbidden Hans
from telling any more of his borrrrrrrrring sea tales.





Jim Hampton June 13th 05 07:47 PM


"KØHB" wrote in message
ink.net...
by Bob 'Dex' Armstrong



In the old gravel-gut boat service, your only link with the civilized

world was
via the radio shack. A cubby hole on Requin aft of the scope wells in the
control room... It was the home of the spark shufflers.

If you were in tight with a radioman, you could get ball scores. Sewer

pipe
sailors lost touch with the teams they followed... A hazard common to

submarine
sailors and people who take a moon walk and miss the ride home. Actually,

we
lost touch with just about everything. In the war movies when they come

across
some guy who claims to be an American, they ask him questions only an

American
could answer. If they had picked me up and asked me anything but (A) The

names
of Roy's and Gene's horses (B) Who won World War II and (C) Blaze Starr's

bust
size, I would have been one 'up the creek' sonuvabitch. Hell, we didn't

know
Jack Kennedy was the president until we snorkeled a day later.

Only a complete idiot would make a bet with a radioman. Chances were, the
radioman had the final score before you tossed your wampum on the mess

table.

I remember one great night brought to us by the spark pushers in the radio
shack.

We had finished whatever nonsense they sent us out to do and were making

turns
for home. The Old Man opened the showers... Guys were bumming razor blades

and
rooting around in side lockers for something that would pass for a towel.

Next
thing you know, the foo-foo juice came out. Now there's a myth that all

smoke
boat sailors eventually bought into, sooner or later... Aqua Velva was

never
meant to disguise poor personal hygene. No matter how much of the stuff

you
poured on a dungaree shirt you had been inside of for two weeks, you were

still
one disgustingly foul smelling sonuvabitch. You could spray French perfume

on an
engineman with a fire hose and buzzards would still circle around the

*******
when he went topside. But I digress...

A group of us were sitting around in the crew's mess drinking coffee and

ragging
guys heading fore and aft. A radioman came in and told us we were in for

one
helluva good laugh. He monkeyed around with the RBO and patched it into
something in the radio shack.

For those of you who never had the pleasure of riding diesel boats or

other
seagoing steel-hulled garbage scows, I must explain something here.

You could make phone calls from a ship at sea. Here is how it worked. The
radioman would raise someone ashore called a 'marine operator'. Then the
radioman would give the marine operator the name and phone number of

whoever the
bluejacket aboard ship wanted to call. The marine operator would then

place a
collect call and when the party answered and accepted the charges, the

marine
operator would form a radio link with the ship and 'Bill the Bluejacket'

could
talk to his sweetie.

From sweetie to the marine operator was private and confidential... From

the
marine operator to Barnicle Bill, it was up for grabs... Great evening
entertainment.

"Poopsie, is that you?"

"Yes ducky doo, it's me."

"You miss me, peach blossom?"

"Oh yes... YES, darling!"

"Miss me a lot?"

"Oh, I miss you soooo much I can't wait to hold you and..."

"Okay darling... Are you going to meet the ship?"

"No sweetheart, I parked the car in the pier head lot... Keys are under

the
mat."

"Why aren't you meeting the boat, sweetheart?"

"Oh, it was supposed to be a suprise... If you must know, the kids are

spending
the night with the Webbers. I bought a new nightie and I figured we'd

break it
in tonight."

The animals would cheer,
"LET'S HEAR IT FOR MAMMA AND HER NEW NIGHTIE!!"

And so it went. Bluejackets phoning in after six months in the Med...

Great
entertainment.

"Darlin' can't wait... Just you and me and a can of Crisco!"

We heard it all... It was great... Laugh after laugh. A very memorable
evening... Best and cheapest fun we ever had on Requin.

There were times... Moments that we took for granted and that passed with

little
notice. It's funny how they come back late in life when you have the time

to
reshuffle your memories... The collected moments that constitute your

life.

Radiomen linked us with the world. Another thing we just took for granted

and
that was so damned important looking back. Never thanked them... Should

have.

Great guys, all of them.


Hello, Hans

You should have seen the RM1s on Guam when they wanted to find out results
as to who made chief.

Grab the orderwire to Hono. Ask for a patch to San Diego. Ask for a patch
to Washington ....

Had the results in 15 minutes LOL :))


73 from Rochester, NY
Jim AA2QA




Tom June 13th 05 09:49 PM


"Jim Hampton" wrote in message
...

"KØHB" wrote in message
ink.net...
by Bob 'Dex' Armstrong



In the old gravel-gut boat service, your only link with the civilized

world was
via the radio shack. A cubby hole on Requin aft of the scope wells in the
control room... It was the home of the spark shufflers.

If you were in tight with a radioman, you could get ball scores. Sewer

pipe
sailors lost touch with the teams they followed... A hazard common to

submarine
sailors and people who take a moon walk and miss the ride home. Actually,

we
lost touch with just about everything. In the war movies when they come

across
some guy who claims to be an American, they ask him questions only an

American
could answer. If they had picked me up and asked me anything but (A) The

names
of Roy's and Gene's horses (B) Who won World War II and (C) Blaze Starr's

bust
size, I would have been one 'up the creek' sonuvabitch. Hell, we didn't

know
Jack Kennedy was the president until we snorkeled a day later.

Only a complete idiot would make a bet with a radioman. Chances were, the
radioman had the final score before you tossed your wampum on the mess

table.

I remember one great night brought to us by the spark pushers in the
radio
shack.

We had finished whatever nonsense they sent us out to do and were making

turns
for home. The Old Man opened the showers... Guys were bumming razor
blades

and
rooting around in side lockers for something that would pass for a towel.

Next
thing you know, the foo-foo juice came out. Now there's a myth that all

smoke
boat sailors eventually bought into, sooner or later... Aqua Velva was

never
meant to disguise poor personal hygene. No matter how much of the stuff

you
poured on a dungaree shirt you had been inside of for two weeks, you were

still
one disgustingly foul smelling sonuvabitch. You could spray French
perfume

on an
engineman with a fire hose and buzzards would still circle around the

*******
when he went topside. But I digress...

A group of us were sitting around in the crew's mess drinking coffee and

ragging
guys heading fore and aft. A radioman came in and told us we were in for

one
helluva good laugh. He monkeyed around with the RBO and patched it into
something in the radio shack.

For those of you who never had the pleasure of riding diesel boats or

other
seagoing steel-hulled garbage scows, I must explain something here.

You could make phone calls from a ship at sea. Here is how it worked. The
radioman would raise someone ashore called a 'marine operator'. Then the
radioman would give the marine operator the name and phone number of

whoever the
bluejacket aboard ship wanted to call. The marine operator would then

place a
collect call and when the party answered and accepted the charges, the

marine
operator would form a radio link with the ship and 'Bill the Bluejacket'

could
talk to his sweetie.

From sweetie to the marine operator was private and confidential... From

the
marine operator to Barnicle Bill, it was up for grabs... Great evening
entertainment.

"Poopsie, is that you?"

"Yes ducky doo, it's me."

"You miss me, peach blossom?"

"Oh yes... YES, darling!"

"Miss me a lot?"

"Oh, I miss you soooo much I can't wait to hold you and..."

"Okay darling... Are you going to meet the ship?"

"No sweetheart, I parked the car in the pier head lot... Keys are under

the
mat."

"Why aren't you meeting the boat, sweetheart?"

"Oh, it was supposed to be a suprise... If you must know, the kids are

spending
the night with the Webbers. I bought a new nightie and I figured we'd

break it
in tonight."

The animals would cheer,
"LET'S HEAR IT FOR MAMMA AND HER NEW NIGHTIE!!"

And so it went. Bluejackets phoning in after six months in the Med...

Great
entertainment.

"Darlin' can't wait... Just you and me and a can of Crisco!"

We heard it all... It was great... Laugh after laugh. A very memorable
evening... Best and cheapest fun we ever had on Requin.

There were times... Moments that we took for granted and that passed with

little
notice. It's funny how they come back late in life when you have the time

to
reshuffle your memories... The collected moments that constitute your

life.

Radiomen linked us with the world. Another thing we just took for granted

and
that was so damned important looking back. Never thanked them... Should

have.

Great guys, all of them.


Hello, Hans

You should have seen the RM1s on Guam when they wanted to find out results
as to who made chief.

Grab the orderwire to Hono. Ask for a patch to San Diego. Ask for a
patch
to Washington ....

Had the results in 15 minutes LOL :))


73 from Rochester, NY
Jim AA2QA



I knew two guys who were court martialed for doing exactly
what you say.

Tom




John Smith June 13th 05 11:27 PM

.... that almost makes me miss the ancient drums my
great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-etc. ancestors used to
use to communicate with in the primordial jungles... I wonder if we
could bring those back to?

... perhaps require the new licensees to beat out a fancy tempo on one
of those turkeys before we gave 'em a license!
evil-grin

Warmest regards,
John

"Jim Hampton" wrote in message
...

"KØHB" wrote in message
ink.net...
by Bob 'Dex' Armstrong



In the old gravel-gut boat service, your only link with the civilized

world was
via the radio shack. A cubby hole on Requin aft of the scope wells in
the
control room... It was the home of the spark shufflers.

If you were in tight with a radioman, you could get ball scores.
Sewer

pipe
sailors lost touch with the teams they followed... A hazard common to

submarine
sailors and people who take a moon walk and miss the ride home.
Actually,

we
lost touch with just about everything. In the war movies when they
come

across
some guy who claims to be an American, they ask him questions only an

American
could answer. If they had picked me up and asked me anything but (A)
The

names
of Roy's and Gene's horses (B) Who won World War II and (C) Blaze
Starr's

bust
size, I would have been one 'up the creek' sonuvabitch. Hell, we
didn't

know
Jack Kennedy was the president until we snorkeled a day later.

Only a complete idiot would make a bet with a radioman. Chances were,
the
radioman had the final score before you tossed your wampum on the
mess

table.

I remember one great night brought to us by the spark pushers in the
radio
shack.

We had finished whatever nonsense they sent us out to do and were
making

turns
for home. The Old Man opened the showers... Guys were bumming razor
blades

and
rooting around in side lockers for something that would pass for a
towel.

Next
thing you know, the foo-foo juice came out. Now there's a myth that
all

smoke
boat sailors eventually bought into, sooner or later... Aqua Velva
was

never
meant to disguise poor personal hygene. No matter how much of the
stuff

you
poured on a dungaree shirt you had been inside of for two weeks, you
were

still
one disgustingly foul smelling sonuvabitch. You could spray French
perfume

on an
engineman with a fire hose and buzzards would still circle around the

*******
when he went topside. But I digress...

A group of us were sitting around in the crew's mess drinking coffee
and

ragging
guys heading fore and aft. A radioman came in and told us we were in
for

one
helluva good laugh. He monkeyed around with the RBO and patched it
into
something in the radio shack.

For those of you who never had the pleasure of riding diesel boats or

other
seagoing steel-hulled garbage scows, I must explain something here.

You could make phone calls from a ship at sea. Here is how it worked.
The
radioman would raise someone ashore called a 'marine operator'. Then
the
radioman would give the marine operator the name and phone number of

whoever the
bluejacket aboard ship wanted to call. The marine operator would then

place a
collect call and when the party answered and accepted the charges,
the

marine
operator would form a radio link with the ship and 'Bill the
Bluejacket'

could
talk to his sweetie.

From sweetie to the marine operator was private and confidential...
From

the
marine operator to Barnicle Bill, it was up for grabs... Great
evening
entertainment.

"Poopsie, is that you?"

"Yes ducky doo, it's me."

"You miss me, peach blossom?"

"Oh yes... YES, darling!"

"Miss me a lot?"

"Oh, I miss you soooo much I can't wait to hold you and..."

"Okay darling... Are you going to meet the ship?"

"No sweetheart, I parked the car in the pier head lot... Keys are
under

the
mat."

"Why aren't you meeting the boat, sweetheart?"

"Oh, it was supposed to be a suprise... If you must know, the kids
are

spending
the night with the Webbers. I bought a new nightie and I figured we'd

break it
in tonight."

The animals would cheer,
"LET'S HEAR IT FOR MAMMA AND HER NEW NIGHTIE!!"

And so it went. Bluejackets phoning in after six months in the Med...

Great
entertainment.

"Darlin' can't wait... Just you and me and a can of Crisco!"

We heard it all... It was great... Laugh after laugh. A very
memorable
evening... Best and cheapest fun we ever had on Requin.

There were times... Moments that we took for granted and that passed
with

little
notice. It's funny how they come back late in life when you have the
time

to
reshuffle your memories... The collected moments that constitute your

life.

Radiomen linked us with the world. Another thing we just took for
granted

and
that was so damned important looking back. Never thanked them...
Should

have.

Great guys, all of them.


Hello, Hans

You should have seen the RM1s on Guam when they wanted to find out
results
as to who made chief.

Grab the orderwire to Hono. Ask for a patch to San Diego. Ask for a
patch
to Washington ....

Had the results in 15 minutes LOL :))


73 from Rochester, NY
Jim AA2QA






[email protected] June 13th 05 11:39 PM


K=D8HB wrote:
by Bob 'Dex' Armstrong



And so it went. Bluejackets phoning in after six months in the Med... Gre=

at
entertainment.

"Darlin' can't wait... Just you and me and a can of Crisco!"


.. . . a can of CRISCO??!

No wonder the Navy keeps these guys underwater . .=20

w3rv


Dan/W4NTI June 14th 05 12:33 AM


"KØHB" wrote in message
ink.net...


Great guys, all of them.



Excellent Hans,

In the Army those in the know knew you had to know;

A. Supply Sgt.
B. Chief Cook.
C. Commo Sgt.

Not necessarily in that order.

Dan/W4NTI



Dan/W4NTI June 14th 05 12:36 AM


"Jim Hampton" wrote in message
...



Hello, Hans

You should have seen the RM1s on Guam when they wanted to find out results
as to who made chief.

Grab the orderwire to Hono. Ask for a patch to San Diego. Ask for a
patch
to Washington ....

Had the results in 15 minutes LOL :))


73 from Rochester, NY
Jim AA2QA


I was so far out in the boonies on one or more TDY I had to use my KWM2-A HF
transciever for a Shortwave receiver to keep the "troops" entertained.

(sure liked those big crystal packs).. hi

Dan/W4NTI



Dan/W4NTI June 14th 05 12:37 AM


"Tom" wrote in message
...

"Jim Hampton" wrote in message
...

"KØHB" wrote in message
ink.net...
by Bob 'Dex' Armstrong



In the old gravel-gut boat service, your only link with the civilized

world was
via the radio shack. A cubby hole on Requin aft of the scope wells in
the
control room... It was the home of the spark shufflers.

If you were in tight with a radioman, you could get ball scores. Sewer

pipe
sailors lost touch with the teams they followed... A hazard common to

submarine
sailors and people who take a moon walk and miss the ride home.
Actually,

we
lost touch with just about everything. In the war movies when they come

across
some guy who claims to be an American, they ask him questions only an

American
could answer. If they had picked me up and asked me anything but (A) The

names
of Roy's and Gene's horses (B) Who won World War II and (C) Blaze
Starr's

bust
size, I would have been one 'up the creek' sonuvabitch. Hell, we didn't

know
Jack Kennedy was the president until we snorkeled a day later.

Only a complete idiot would make a bet with a radioman. Chances were,
the
radioman had the final score before you tossed your wampum on the mess

table.

I remember one great night brought to us by the spark pushers in the
radio
shack.

We had finished whatever nonsense they sent us out to do and were making

turns
for home. The Old Man opened the showers... Guys were bumming razor
blades

and
rooting around in side lockers for something that would pass for a
towel.

Next
thing you know, the foo-foo juice came out. Now there's a myth that all

smoke
boat sailors eventually bought into, sooner or later... Aqua Velva was

never
meant to disguise poor personal hygene. No matter how much of the stuff

you
poured on a dungaree shirt you had been inside of for two weeks, you
were

still
one disgustingly foul smelling sonuvabitch. You could spray French
perfume

on an
engineman with a fire hose and buzzards would still circle around the

*******
when he went topside. But I digress...

A group of us were sitting around in the crew's mess drinking coffee and

ragging
guys heading fore and aft. A radioman came in and told us we were in for

one
helluva good laugh. He monkeyed around with the RBO and patched it into
something in the radio shack.

For those of you who never had the pleasure of riding diesel boats or

other
seagoing steel-hulled garbage scows, I must explain something here.

You could make phone calls from a ship at sea. Here is how it worked.
The
radioman would raise someone ashore called a 'marine operator'. Then the
radioman would give the marine operator the name and phone number of

whoever the
bluejacket aboard ship wanted to call. The marine operator would then

place a
collect call and when the party answered and accepted the charges, the

marine
operator would form a radio link with the ship and 'Bill the Bluejacket'

could
talk to his sweetie.

From sweetie to the marine operator was private and confidential... From

the
marine operator to Barnicle Bill, it was up for grabs... Great evening
entertainment.

"Poopsie, is that you?"

"Yes ducky doo, it's me."

"You miss me, peach blossom?"

"Oh yes... YES, darling!"

"Miss me a lot?"

"Oh, I miss you soooo much I can't wait to hold you and..."

"Okay darling... Are you going to meet the ship?"

"No sweetheart, I parked the car in the pier head lot... Keys are under

the
mat."

"Why aren't you meeting the boat, sweetheart?"

"Oh, it was supposed to be a suprise... If you must know, the kids are

spending
the night with the Webbers. I bought a new nightie and I figured we'd

break it
in tonight."

The animals would cheer,
"LET'S HEAR IT FOR MAMMA AND HER NEW NIGHTIE!!"

And so it went. Bluejackets phoning in after six months in the Med...

Great
entertainment.

"Darlin' can't wait... Just you and me and a can of Crisco!"

We heard it all... It was great... Laugh after laugh. A very memorable
evening... Best and cheapest fun we ever had on Requin.

There were times... Moments that we took for granted and that passed
with

little
notice. It's funny how they come back late in life when you have the
time

to
reshuffle your memories... The collected moments that constitute your

life.

Radiomen linked us with the world. Another thing we just took for
granted

and
that was so damned important looking back. Never thanked them... Should

have.

Great guys, all of them.


Hello, Hans

You should have seen the RM1s on Guam when they wanted to find out
results
as to who made chief.

Grab the orderwire to Hono. Ask for a patch to San Diego. Ask for a
patch
to Washington ....

Had the results in 15 minutes LOL :))


73 from Rochester, NY
Jim AA2QA



I knew two guys who were court martialed for doing exactly
what you say.

Tom


Thats when you need to know the Company Clerk.... hi.

Dan/W4NTI



[email protected] June 14th 05 12:38 AM

K=D8HB wrote:
by Bob 'Dex' Armstrong


(great story snipped)

Great guys, all of them.


Thanks, Hans. Keep 'em coming!

73 de Jim, N2EY


robert casey June 14th 05 04:22 AM



From sweetie to the marine operator was private and confidential... From the
marine operator to Barnicle Bill, it was up for grabs... Great evening
entertainment.

"Poopsie, is that you?"

"Yes ducky doo, it's me."



I'd add: "and everyone aboard the sub. Not much privacy
aboard a crowded sub; they all can hear this". Thus warning
her not to give too much detail on private matters..."

People on a sub would have to know, at least after the
first call to someone's sweetie was placed....

robert casey June 14th 05 04:26 AM

John Smith wrote:

... that almost makes me miss the ancient drums my
great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-etc. ancestors used to
use to communicate with in the primordial jungles... I wonder if we
could bring those back to?

... perhaps require the new licensees to beat out a fancy tempo on one
of those turkeys before we gave 'em a license!
evil-grin


Imagine the drum DX contests those people in the
jungle used to have. :-) Though everyone had
only one air "channel" to share. Must have been
some bad QRM at times....

John Smith June 14th 05 04:30 AM

Robert:

You paint a good visual picture--good humor... grin

Warmest regards,
John

"robert casey" wrote in message
nk.net...
John Smith wrote:

... that almost makes me miss the ancient drums my
great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-etc. ancestors used
to use to communicate with in the primordial jungles... I wonder if
we could bring those back to?

... perhaps require the new licensees to beat out a fancy tempo on
one of those turkeys before we gave 'em a license!
evil-grin


Imagine the drum DX contests those people in the
jungle used to have. :-) Though everyone had
only one air "channel" to share. Must have been
some bad QRM at times....




Jim Hampton June 14th 05 06:34 AM


"John Smith" wrote in message
...
... that almost makes me miss the ancient drums my
great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-etc. ancestors used to
use to communicate with in the primordial jungles... I wonder if we
could bring those back to?

... perhaps require the new licensees to beat out a fancy tempo on one
of those turkeys before we gave 'em a license!
evil-grin

Warmest regards,
John



Perhaps, John


But consider that some of us can send and receive cw faster than most folks
can type.

I know you may be good at "cut and paste", but that doesn't necessarily cut
it LOL.

Sure, voice appears faster, but when you get names and addresses that are
hard to pronounce ....

Not saying that CW is the best, but some folks better come up with something
superior to AM and FM. There are a number of modes, but most folks want to
"talk". That won't cut it for 85 watt moonbounce on 24 GHz.

:)


73 from Rochester, NY
Jim AA2QA
ps - when I talk send and receive cw faster than some folks type, I'm not
talking a nice, leisurely chat at 30 or 35 words per minute ...




John Smith June 14th 05 07:23 AM

It was never about anyone stopping you from sending cw was it...

It is about stopping you from forcing others to learn cw when they would
never use it...

Always when one is being forced to do something they do not wish to,
they should question everything in sight... just as you began when you
thought someone was going to force you to quit...

.... let's at least keep my comment about the drums straight...

Warmest regards,
John

"Jim Hampton" wrote in message
...

"John Smith" wrote in message
...
... that almost makes me miss the ancient drums my
great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-etc. ancestors used
to
use to communicate with in the primordial jungles... I wonder if we
could bring those back to?

... perhaps require the new licensees to beat out a fancy tempo on
one
of those turkeys before we gave 'em a license!
evil-grin

Warmest regards,
John



Perhaps, John


But consider that some of us can send and receive cw faster than most
folks
can type.

I know you may be good at "cut and paste", but that doesn't
necessarily cut
it LOL.

Sure, voice appears faster, but when you get names and addresses that
are
hard to pronounce ....

Not saying that CW is the best, but some folks better come up with
something
superior to AM and FM. There are a number of modes, but most folks
want to
"talk". That won't cut it for 85 watt moonbounce on 24 GHz.

:)


73 from Rochester, NY
Jim AA2QA
ps - when I talk send and receive cw faster than some folks type, I'm
not
talking a nice, leisurely chat at 30 or 35 words per minute ...






K4YZ June 14th 05 10:21 AM



John Smith wrote:
It was never about anyone stopping you from sending cw was it...

It is about stopping you from forcing others to learn cw when they would
never use it...

Always when one is being forced to do something they do not wish to,
they should question everything in sight... just as you began when you
thought someone was going to force you to quit...

... let's at least keep my comment about the drums straight...


By the very nature of "testing" we are "forced" to do something we
generally don't want to do.

When I took my General, I had no intent on doing any RTTY operation
yet had to know RTTY theory and practice.

Good news is that now you don't HAVE to "learn" anything...Just
memorize those quesitons and answers...Whish is what gives me a good
laugh with the more arrogant NCT types (read that Lennie...)

They are "OK" with open pools and memorized tests, but they hate
memorized sounds...what's up with that? Sheesh...the FCC even delete
the requirement to demonstrate SENDING the Code.

There's no more work to memorizing the Code than there is to
memorizing the written questions...Unless you have a VALID medical
decicit.

Steve, K4YZ


[email protected] June 14th 05 05:32 PM

John Smith wrote:
It was never about anyone stopping you from sending cw was it...


A few anticode folks have stated they want Morse Code *use* by hams to
end, not just the test. They are a small minority, but they do exist.

It is about stopping you from forcing others to learn cw when they would
never use it...


Who is "forced" to learn Morse Code?

It's a requirement if someone wants an FCC-issued amateur license with
HF privileges, that's all.

Always when one is being forced to do something they do not wish to,
they should question everything in sight... just as you began when you
thought someone was going to force you to quit...


The argument you present boils down to this: If someone doesn't want to
use Morse Code in ham radio, they shouldn't be required to learn it
just
to pass a test (even a simple, basic test) to get a ham radio license.
Those who choose to use it can learn it on their own.

Is that about right?

The problem is that the same argument can be made against almost
everything
in the written tests. For example, if someone doesn't intend to use
certain
bands, why are they forced to learn the band edges of every band their
license allows? If someone doesn't intend to use more than a few watts
of
transmitted power, why must they learn all that RF exposure stuff?
Indeed,
if someone doesn't intend to homebrew, why are they *forced* to learn
all
that theory stuff?

Sure, the written tests look easy to someone with a background in
radio,
electronics, computers or other related fields. But to someone from an
unrelated field, they're not easy.

Suppose you met a retired gentleman who had been a radioman in the
military 50+ years ago. He'd always wanted to be a ham but never had
the time or resources. Now he finds that ham radio still exists, and
he wants in.

The gent can still do code well, and remembers the basics of theory
as it was 50+ years ago. He gets an HF receiver and listens to the
lovely Morse Code signals on the low ends of the HF bands.

But in order to join the folks on 7010 or 3520, he needs an Extra.
And the written test is full of stuff he's never seen before, and
that he will never use.

Why must he learn all that stuff he will never use just to pass the
tests?

Sure, the stuff is easy for *you*, but not for *him*.

... let's at least keep my comment about the drums straight...


Let's see...

Warmest regards,
John

"Jim Hampton" wrote in message
...

"John Smith" wrote in message
...
... that almost makes me miss the ancient drums my
great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-etc. ancestors used
to
use to communicate with in the primordial jungles... I wonder if we
could bring those back to?


Invalid analogy.

Drums for communication aren't in wide use.

Morse Code for communication is in wide use in ham radio. Doesn't
need to be brought back because it's right here.

... perhaps require the new licensees to beat out a fancy tempo on
one
of those turkeys before we gave 'em a license!
evil-grin

Warmest regards,
John



Perhaps, John


But consider that some of us can send and receive cw faster than most
folks can type.


Yup.

I know you may be good at "cut and paste", but that doesn't
necessarily cut
it LOL.

Sure, voice appears faster, but when you get names and addresses that
are
hard to pronounce ....


Bingo.

For any message that needs to be written down, the speed limitation is
usually the writing speed of the receiving op. The fact that someone
can theoretically talks 150 wpm doesn't mean anything if the person
on the receiving end can only write legibly at 15 wpm.

Text modes are great if you have the hardware for them and if you
are in a situation where you can look at a screen to read them.

Not saying that CW is the best, but some folks better come up with
something
superior to AM and FM. There are a number of modes, but most folks
want to
"talk". That won't cut it for 85 watt moonbounce on 24 GHz.

:)


73 from Rochester, NY
Jim AA2QA
ps - when I talk send and receive cw faster than some folks type, I'm
not
talking a nice, leisurely chat at 30 or 35 words per minute ...

Yup.

Good Morse ops can chat at speeds approaching those of voice ops
because
they use abbreviations and eliminate redundancies.

73 de Jim, N2EY


John Smith June 14th 05 06:20 PM

.... absolutely not... I work with young men who take great pride in
their ability to pass difficult tests with ease... who are thankful for
their gifted IQ's...

.... but who see no reason to learn code... indeed, the courses which
they take, and their level of education make any amateur exam look
trivial...

Warmest regards,
John
"K4YZ" wrote in message
oups.com...


John Smith wrote:
It was never about anyone stopping you from sending cw was it...

It is about stopping you from forcing others to learn cw when they
would
never use it...

Always when one is being forced to do something they do not wish to,
they should question everything in sight... just as you began when
you
thought someone was going to force you to quit...

... let's at least keep my comment about the drums straight...


By the very nature of "testing" we are "forced" to do something we
generally don't want to do.

When I took my General, I had no intent on doing any RTTY operation
yet had to know RTTY theory and practice.

Good news is that now you don't HAVE to "learn" anything...Just
memorize those quesitons and answers...Whish is what gives me a good
laugh with the more arrogant NCT types (read that Lennie...)

They are "OK" with open pools and memorized tests, but they hate
memorized sounds...what's up with that? Sheesh...the FCC even delete
the requirement to demonstrate SENDING the Code.

There's no more work to memorizing the Code than there is to
memorizing the written questions...Unless you have a VALID medical
decicit.

Steve, K4YZ




John Smith June 14th 05 06:22 PM

.... the amateur tests are a trivial problem to men with real
educations...

.... the cw part makes as much sense as learning to play a "jew's
harp"--a lot of sense if you wish to, none if you don't...

Warmest regards,
John

wrote in message
oups.com...
John Smith wrote:
It was never about anyone stopping you from sending cw was it...


A few anticode folks have stated they want Morse Code *use* by hams to
end, not just the test. They are a small minority, but they do exist.

It is about stopping you from forcing others to learn cw when they
would
never use it...


Who is "forced" to learn Morse Code?

It's a requirement if someone wants an FCC-issued amateur license with
HF privileges, that's all.

Always when one is being forced to do something they do not wish to,
they should question everything in sight... just as you began when
you
thought someone was going to force you to quit...


The argument you present boils down to this: If someone doesn't want
to
use Morse Code in ham radio, they shouldn't be required to learn it
just
to pass a test (even a simple, basic test) to get a ham radio license.
Those who choose to use it can learn it on their own.

Is that about right?

The problem is that the same argument can be made against almost
everything
in the written tests. For example, if someone doesn't intend to use
certain
bands, why are they forced to learn the band edges of every band their
license allows? If someone doesn't intend to use more than a few watts
of
transmitted power, why must they learn all that RF exposure stuff?
Indeed,
if someone doesn't intend to homebrew, why are they *forced* to learn
all
that theory stuff?

Sure, the written tests look easy to someone with a background in
radio,
electronics, computers or other related fields. But to someone from an
unrelated field, they're not easy.

Suppose you met a retired gentleman who had been a radioman in the
military 50+ years ago. He'd always wanted to be a ham but never had
the time or resources. Now he finds that ham radio still exists, and
he wants in.

The gent can still do code well, and remembers the basics of theory
as it was 50+ years ago. He gets an HF receiver and listens to the
lovely Morse Code signals on the low ends of the HF bands.

But in order to join the folks on 7010 or 3520, he needs an Extra.
And the written test is full of stuff he's never seen before, and
that he will never use.

Why must he learn all that stuff he will never use just to pass the
tests?

Sure, the stuff is easy for *you*, but not for *him*.

... let's at least keep my comment about the drums straight...


Let's see...

Warmest regards,
John

"Jim Hampton" wrote in message
...

"John Smith" wrote in message
...
... that almost makes me miss the ancient drums my
great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-etc. ancestors
used
to
use to communicate with in the primordial jungles... I wonder if
we
could bring those back to?


Invalid analogy.

Drums for communication aren't in wide use.

Morse Code for communication is in wide use in ham radio. Doesn't
need to be brought back because it's right here.

... perhaps require the new licensees to beat out a fancy tempo
on
one
of those turkeys before we gave 'em a license!
evil-grin

Warmest regards,
John


Perhaps, John


But consider that some of us can send and receive cw faster than
most
folks can type.


Yup.

I know you may be good at "cut and paste", but that doesn't
necessarily cut
it LOL.

Sure, voice appears faster, but when you get names and addresses
that
are
hard to pronounce ....


Bingo.

For any message that needs to be written down, the speed limitation is
usually the writing speed of the receiving op. The fact that someone
can theoretically talks 150 wpm doesn't mean anything if the person
on the receiving end can only write legibly at 15 wpm.

Text modes are great if you have the hardware for them and if you
are in a situation where you can look at a screen to read them.

Not saying that CW is the best, but some folks better come up with
something
superior to AM and FM. There are a number of modes, but most folks
want to
"talk". That won't cut it for 85 watt moonbounce on 24 GHz.

:)


73 from Rochester, NY
Jim AA2QA
ps - when I talk send and receive cw faster than some folks type,
I'm
not
talking a nice, leisurely chat at 30 or 35 words per minute ...

Yup.

Good Morse ops can chat at speeds approaching those of voice ops
because
they use abbreviations and eliminate redundancies.

73 de Jim, N2EY




Dan/W4NTI June 14th 05 10:35 PM


"robert casey" wrote in message
nk.net...
John Smith wrote:

... that almost makes me miss the ancient drums my
great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-etc. ancestors used to
use to communicate with in the primordial jungles... I wonder if we could
bring those back to?

... perhaps require the new licensees to beat out a fancy tempo on one
of those turkeys before we gave 'em a license!
evil-grin


Imagine the drum DX contests those people in the
jungle used to have. :-) Though everyone had
only one air "channel" to share. Must have been
some bad QRM at times....


Similar to "spark" and coher detectors, eh?

Dan/W4NTI



[email protected] June 14th 05 10:49 PM

John Smith wrote:
... the amateur tests are a trivial problem to men with real
educations...


What about women with real educations?

Would you consider someone with a BSEE from the University of
Pennsylvania and an MSEE from Drexel University to have
"a real education"?

... the cw part


Is an amateur test. And is a trivial problem to people with
real educations..

makes as much sense as learning to play a "jew's
harp"--a lot of sense if you wish to, none if you don't...


Then why require someone with no interest in VHF-UHF to learn
those techniques in order to operate on HF? Why require
knowedge of FSK, PSK and other data modes to operate voice?
Why require knowledge of transistors and ICs to operate
vacuum-tube equipment?

IOW, why require anyone to learn anything about a subject they
are not interested in, just to get a license to do the things
they *are* interested in?

--

Perhaps what bothers some people the most about the code test
is that it isn't something most people already know. And it
isn't something that can be learned by reading a book, watching
a video, etc. It's a skill, not "book learning".

In learning the code, a Ph.D in EE has to start at the same place
as a grade-schooler. And the grade schooler may learn faster and
do better! Perhaps it is this characteristic of the test - its
ability to act as a Great Equalizer - that causes some to resent
it so much.

--

Warmest regards,
John

wrote in message
oups.com...
John Smith wrote:
It was never about anyone stopping you from sending cw was it...


A few anticode folks have stated they want Morse Code *use* by hams to
end, not just the test. They are a small minority, but they do exist.

It is about stopping you from forcing others to learn cw when they
would
never use it...


Who is "forced" to learn Morse Code?

It's a requirement if someone wants an FCC-issued amateur license with
HF privileges, that's all.

Always when one is being forced to do something they do not wish to,
they should question everything in sight... just as you began when
you
thought someone was going to force you to quit...


The argument you present boils down to this: If someone doesn't want
to
use Morse Code in ham radio, they shouldn't be required to learn it
just
to pass a test (even a simple, basic test) to get a ham radio license.
Those who choose to use it can learn it on their own.

Is that about right?

The problem is that the same argument can be made against almost
everything
in the written tests. For example, if someone doesn't intend to use
certain
bands, why are they forced to learn the band edges of every band their
license allows? If someone doesn't intend to use more than a few watts
of
transmitted power, why must they learn all that RF exposure stuff?
Indeed,
if someone doesn't intend to homebrew, why are they *forced* to learn
all
that theory stuff?

Sure, the written tests look easy to someone with a background in
radio,
electronics, computers or other related fields. But to someone from an
unrelated field, they're not easy.

Suppose you met a retired gentleman who had been a radioman in the
military 50+ years ago. He'd always wanted to be a ham but never had
the time or resources. Now he finds that ham radio still exists, and
he wants in.

The gent can still do code well, and remembers the basics of theory
as it was 50+ years ago. He gets an HF receiver and listens to the
lovely Morse Code signals on the low ends of the HF bands.

But in order to join the folks on 7010 or 3520, he needs an Extra.
And the written test is full of stuff he's never seen before, and
that he will never use.

Why must he learn all that stuff he will never use just to pass the
tests?

Sure, the stuff is easy for *you*, but not for *him*.

... let's at least keep my comment about the drums straight...


Let's see...

Warmest regards,
John

"Jim Hampton" wrote in message
...

"John Smith" wrote in message
...
... that almost makes me miss the ancient drums my
great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-etc. ancestors
used
to
use to communicate with in the primordial jungles... I wonder if
we
could bring those back to?


Invalid analogy.

Drums for communication aren't in wide use.

Morse Code for communication is in wide use in ham radio. Doesn't
need to be brought back because it's right here.

... perhaps require the new licensees to beat out a fancy tempo
on
one
of those turkeys before we gave 'em a license!
evil-grin

Warmest regards,
John


Perhaps, John


But consider that some of us can send and receive cw faster than
most
folks can type.


Yup.

I know you may be good at "cut and paste", but that doesn't
necessarily cut
it LOL.

Sure, voice appears faster, but when you get names and addresses
that
are
hard to pronounce ....


Bingo.

For any message that needs to be written down, the speed limitation is
usually the writing speed of the receiving op. The fact that someone
can theoretically talks 150 wpm doesn't mean anything if the person
on the receiving end can only write legibly at 15 wpm.

Text modes are great if you have the hardware for them and if you
are in a situation where you can look at a screen to read them.

Not saying that CW is the best, but some folks better come up with
something
superior to AM and FM. There are a number of modes, but most folks
want to
"talk". That won't cut it for 85 watt moonbounce on 24 GHz.

:)


73 from Rochester, NY
Jim AA2QA
ps - when I talk send and receive cw faster than some folks type,
I'm
not
talking a nice, leisurely chat at 30 or 35 words per minute ...

Yup.

Good Morse ops can chat at speeds approaching those of voice ops
because
they use abbreviations and eliminate redundancies.

73 de Jim, N2EY



John Smith June 15th 05 01:21 AM

.... all the women I have ever tried to interest in radio... all have
declined doing anything towards getting a license... once they even see
a key and a code practice oscillator they look at me as if I am crazy
and ask, "You are kidding, right?"

Then they grab their net-to-phone and/or keyboard and being chatting
with canadians, so americans, mexicans, asians, aussies, brits, etc...

.... and at this point it is hard for me to pose a logical
argument--women are just smarter than men... you can't fool them...

John

wrote in message
oups.com...
John Smith wrote:
... the amateur tests are a trivial problem to men with real
educations...


What about women with real educations?

Would you consider someone with a BSEE from the University of
Pennsylvania and an MSEE from Drexel University to have
"a real education"?

... the cw part


Is an amateur test. And is a trivial problem to people with
real educations..

makes as much sense as learning to play a "jew's
harp"--a lot of sense if you wish to, none if you don't...


Then why require someone with no interest in VHF-UHF to learn
those techniques in order to operate on HF? Why require
knowedge of FSK, PSK and other data modes to operate voice?
Why require knowledge of transistors and ICs to operate
vacuum-tube equipment?

IOW, why require anyone to learn anything about a subject they
are not interested in, just to get a license to do the things
they *are* interested in?

--

Perhaps what bothers some people the most about the code test
is that it isn't something most people already know. And it
isn't something that can be learned by reading a book, watching
a video, etc. It's a skill, not "book learning".

In learning the code, a Ph.D in EE has to start at the same place
as a grade-schooler. And the grade schooler may learn faster and
do better! Perhaps it is this characteristic of the test - its
ability to act as a Great Equalizer - that causes some to resent
it so much.

--

Warmest regards,
John

wrote in message
oups.com...
John Smith wrote:
It was never about anyone stopping you from sending cw was it...

A few anticode folks have stated they want Morse Code *use* by hams
to
end, not just the test. They are a small minority, but they do
exist.

It is about stopping you from forcing others to learn cw when they
would
never use it...

Who is "forced" to learn Morse Code?

It's a requirement if someone wants an FCC-issued amateur license
with
HF privileges, that's all.

Always when one is being forced to do something they do not wish
to,
they should question everything in sight... just as you began
when
you
thought someone was going to force you to quit...

The argument you present boils down to this: If someone doesn't
want
to
use Morse Code in ham radio, they shouldn't be required to learn it
just
to pass a test (even a simple, basic test) to get a ham radio
license.
Those who choose to use it can learn it on their own.

Is that about right?

The problem is that the same argument can be made against almost
everything
in the written tests. For example, if someone doesn't intend to use
certain
bands, why are they forced to learn the band edges of every band
their
license allows? If someone doesn't intend to use more than a few
watts
of
transmitted power, why must they learn all that RF exposure stuff?
Indeed,
if someone doesn't intend to homebrew, why are they *forced* to
learn
all
that theory stuff?

Sure, the written tests look easy to someone with a background in
radio,
electronics, computers or other related fields. But to someone from
an
unrelated field, they're not easy.

Suppose you met a retired gentleman who had been a radioman in the
military 50+ years ago. He'd always wanted to be a ham but never
had
the time or resources. Now he finds that ham radio still exists,
and
he wants in.

The gent can still do code well, and remembers the basics of theory
as it was 50+ years ago. He gets an HF receiver and listens to the
lovely Morse Code signals on the low ends of the HF bands.

But in order to join the folks on 7010 or 3520, he needs an Extra.
And the written test is full of stuff he's never seen before, and
that he will never use.

Why must he learn all that stuff he will never use just to pass the
tests?

Sure, the stuff is easy for *you*, but not for *him*.

... let's at least keep my comment about the drums straight...

Let's see...

Warmest regards,
John

"Jim Hampton" wrote in message
...

"John Smith" wrote in message
...
... that almost makes me miss the ancient drums my
great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-etc. ancestors
used
to
use to communicate with in the primordial jungles... I wonder
if
we
could bring those back to?

Invalid analogy.

Drums for communication aren't in wide use.

Morse Code for communication is in wide use in ham radio. Doesn't
need to be brought back because it's right here.

... perhaps require the new licensees to beat out a fancy
tempo
on
one
of those turkeys before we gave 'em a license!
evil-grin

Warmest regards,
John


Perhaps, John


But consider that some of us can send and receive cw faster than
most
folks can type.

Yup.

I know you may be good at "cut and paste", but that doesn't
necessarily cut
it LOL.

Sure, voice appears faster, but when you get names and addresses
that
are
hard to pronounce ....

Bingo.

For any message that needs to be written down, the speed limitation
is
usually the writing speed of the receiving op. The fact that
someone
can theoretically talks 150 wpm doesn't mean anything if the person
on the receiving end can only write legibly at 15 wpm.

Text modes are great if you have the hardware for them and if you
are in a situation where you can look at a screen to read them.

Not saying that CW is the best, but some folks better come up
with
something
superior to AM and FM. There are a number of modes, but most
folks
want to
"talk". That won't cut it for 85 watt moonbounce on 24 GHz.

:)


73 from Rochester, NY
Jim AA2QA
ps - when I talk send and receive cw faster than some folks
type,
I'm
not
talking a nice, leisurely chat at 30 or 35 words per minute ...

Yup.

Good Morse ops can chat at speeds approaching those of voice ops
because
they use abbreviations and eliminate redundancies.

73 de Jim, N2EY





[email protected] June 15th 05 01:40 AM

From: on Tues 14 Jun 2005 09:32

John Smith wrote:
It was never about anyone stopping you from sending cw was it...



Good Morse ops can chat at speeds approaching those of voice ops
because they use abbreviations and eliminate redundancies.


Oh, my, THAT old brag.

Tsk, tsk, , listen in on any large FAA-tower airport
and, especially, the voice communications out of an FAA Center.

No morse used there, but plenty of abbreviations with elimination
of redundancies. Word rates are above 150 WPM equivalent and
often approach 250 WPM equivalent. No "test" required to learn
the abbreviations in TRACON talk.

Tsk, if morse code was so "efficient" and "speedy," it would have
been prime use in the REST OF THE RADIO WORLD. It isn't. Other
than the ham hobbyists ("on the lower ends of the 'bands' HF")
and some long-established automatic ID keyers, the REST OF THE
RADIO WORLD has given up on morse code.

To attempt countering the above, you MUST trot out the hoary old
maxim that "this is amateur radio!" as if the hobby is somehow
exulted and revered BECAUSE of morse code testing...and you will
state that "because there are still morse users in amateur radio,"
"newcomers 'must' learn/test for that skill to talk to them." :-)

[such always seems to happen as a "reason" for being...:-) ]

That "reply" (yet to come but as certain as there is a tomorrow)
might be augmented by some kind of "need" to "be able to talk to
those in foreign lands who do not speak English." One of the
truly specious and bereft of logic statements ever made in here!

Go ahead and "chat" on anything via morse code...use its unique
ability to express subtleties of opinion, the timbre and tone of
the sound, and all the other body language clues available
through morse. :-) Other than IDs, location, "the rig here is"
and WX, there isn't much more to the "chat," is there?

Please continue to praise the military morse ops, ,
especially those of the USN. The USN is NOT a branch of the
military you were in. Indeed, you weren't in ANY branch of the
military. You "served in other ways."


Bert Craig June 15th 05 01:56 AM

wrote in message
oups.com...
Perhaps what bothers some people the most about the code test
is that it isn't something most people already know. And it
isn't something that can be learned by reading a book, watching
a video, etc. It's a skill, not "book learning".

In learning the code, a Ph.D in EE has to start at the same place
as a grade-schooler. And the grade schooler may learn faster and
do better! Perhaps it is this characteristic of the test - its
ability to act as a Great Equalizer - that causes some to resent
it so much.


It was never really about the actual test, but rather the effort required to
successfully prepare for the test.


--
Vy 73 de Bert
WA2SI
FISTS #9384/CC #1736
QRP ARCI #11782

Snagged a TA2 and a 4X5 last night... IOW, the effort was well worth it.



John Smith June 15th 05 02:30 AM

Len:

Did I miss something here, if you know morse it gives you the ability to
speak and read french?

Hell, I know morse and still can't speak to the french, unless they
morse in english!!! Same with the Germans, Dutch, Spanish, etc....

ROFLOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

John

wrote in message
oups.com...
From: on Tues 14 Jun 2005 09:32

John Smith wrote:
It was never about anyone stopping you from sending cw was it...



Good Morse ops can chat at speeds approaching those of voice ops
because they use abbreviations and eliminate redundancies.


Oh, my, THAT old brag.

Tsk, tsk, , listen in on any large FAA-tower airport
and, especially, the voice communications out of an FAA Center.

No morse used there, but plenty of abbreviations with elimination
of redundancies. Word rates are above 150 WPM equivalent and
often approach 250 WPM equivalent. No "test" required to learn
the abbreviations in TRACON talk.

Tsk, if morse code was so "efficient" and "speedy," it would have
been prime use in the REST OF THE RADIO WORLD. It isn't. Other
than the ham hobbyists ("on the lower ends of the 'bands' HF")
and some long-established automatic ID keyers, the REST OF THE
RADIO WORLD has given up on morse code.

To attempt countering the above, you MUST trot out the hoary old
maxim that "this is amateur radio!" as if the hobby is somehow
exulted and revered BECAUSE of morse code testing...and you will
state that "because there are still morse users in amateur radio,"
"newcomers 'must' learn/test for that skill to talk to them." :-)

[such always seems to happen as a "reason" for being...:-) ]

That "reply" (yet to come but as certain as there is a tomorrow)
might be augmented by some kind of "need" to "be able to talk to
those in foreign lands who do not speak English." One of the
truly specious and bereft of logic statements ever made in here!

Go ahead and "chat" on anything via morse code...use its unique
ability to express subtleties of opinion, the timbre and tone of
the sound, and all the other body language clues available
through morse. :-) Other than IDs, location, "the rig here is"
and WX, there isn't much more to the "chat," is there?

Please continue to praise the military morse ops, ,
especially those of the USN. The USN is NOT a branch of the
military you were in. Indeed, you weren't in ANY branch of the
military. You "served in other ways."




Cmd Buzz Corey June 15th 05 03:05 AM

John Smith wrote:
It was never about anyone stopping you from sending cw was it...

It is about stopping you from forcing others to learn cw when they would
never use it...


So I guess you should never have to answer questions on the test about
RTTY, Packet, Amtor, SSTV, ect., ect., if you think you will never use
those modes. Or you shouldn't have to answer questions on theory such as
ohms law, if you never plan to build anything.
So how do you know that you will never want to operate those modes? Do
you want to take another test if you someday decide to operate another
mode? Should we have hams building and putting equipment on the air who
don't even know ohms law?
The fact is, all that is available to any licensed ham by virtue of
their license, so they should have some knowledge in these areas should
they ever want to persue them.

Always when one is being forced to do something they do not wish to,
they should question everything in sight... just as you began when you
thought someone was going to force you to quit...


No one is forceing you to do any of them, if fact, no one forced you to
get a license.

[email protected] June 15th 05 04:23 AM

From: John Smith on Jun 14, 9:30 pm

Len:

Did I miss something here, if you know morse it gives you the ability to speak and read french?


Any "good" morseman KNOWS EVERYTHING! :-)

That's the ONLY skill they need...and some have said so. :-)

Hell, I know morse and still can't speak to the french, unless they
morse in english!!! Same with the Germans, Dutch, Spanish, etc....


Way back two centuries ago, Sam (Morse) and Al (Vail) revised
Morse's original code (all numbers) into something representing
ENGLISH letters, numbers, and some punctuation marks. That was
roughly in the 1840s. After radio was demonstrated in 1896
(in Italy and Russia) as a communications medium, the good
(and always CORRECT) morsemen claimed it was an "international
language." :-)

"CW gets through when anything else will..." - B. Burke




Phil Kane June 15th 05 05:06 AM

On 14 Jun 2005 09:32:03 -0700, wrote:

A few anticode folks have stated they want Morse Code *use* by hams to
end, not just the test. They are a small minority, but they do exist.


Sounds like the same "reasoning" as when my late mother was in the
nursing home and would complain that the aides were talking about
her. When I asked her what they were saying about her, she replied
"I don't know - I don't speak minority foreign language".

--
73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane



Phil Kane June 15th 05 05:09 AM

On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 10:20:13 -0700, John Smith wrote:

.... absolutely not... I work with young men who take great pride in
their ability to pass difficult tests with ease... who are thankful for
their gifted IQ's...

.... but who see no reason to learn code... indeed, the courses which
they take, and their level of education make any amateur exam look
trivial...


Do they think that their sweat doesn't stink????

Wait 'till they hit the course or assignment that throws them back
into the mortal realm. We've all hit that point at one time or
another....

--
73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane



Phil Kane June 15th 05 05:16 AM

On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 17:21:00 -0700, John Smith wrote:

... all the women I have ever tried to interest in radio... all have
declined doing anything towards getting a license... once they even see
a key and a code practice oscillator they look at me as if I am crazy
and ask, "You are kidding, right?"


Tell that to our friend Claire who is the NCS of the Beaver State
(CW) Traffic Net - high-speed CW. And she's no dummy - retired PhD
in a specialized field of the biological sciences.

So much for generalizations.

--
73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane



John Smith June 15th 05 06:18 AM

.... the young person of today has a much great education than his/her
counterpart of even twenty years ago...

John

"Phil Kane" wrote in message
ganews.com...
On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 10:20:13 -0700, John Smith wrote:

.... absolutely not... I work with young men who take great pride in
their ability to pass difficult tests with ease... who are thankful
for
their gifted IQ's...

.... but who see no reason to learn code... indeed, the courses which
they take, and their level of education make any amateur exam look
trivial...


Do they think that their sweat doesn't stink????

Wait 'till they hit the course or assignment that throws them back
into the mortal realm. We've all hit that point at one time or
another....

--
73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane





John Smith June 15th 05 06:19 AM

well my gawd, we already have one then--we sure as hell don't need
another! ROFLOL

.... they are rarer then hens teeth...

John

"Phil Kane" wrote in message
ganews.com...
On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 17:21:00 -0700, John Smith wrote:

... all the women I have ever tried to interest in radio... all have
declined doing anything towards getting a license... once they even
see
a key and a code practice oscillator they look at me as if I am crazy
and ask, "You are kidding, right?"


Tell that to our friend Claire who is the NCS of the Beaver State
(CW) Traffic Net - high-speed CW. And she's no dummy - retired PhD
in a specialized field of the biological sciences.

So much for generalizations.

--
73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane





John Smith June 15th 05 06:22 AM

.... trust me, those cw'ers are going to grow very lonely--these new guys
have no use for code... they can scream and rant and rave and argue a
ridiculous point--just tune up grab your key and start finding out how
many out there are under 50... it ain't many!

John

wrote in message
oups.com...
From: on Tues 14 Jun 2005 09:32

John Smith wrote:
It was never about anyone stopping you from sending cw was it...



Good Morse ops can chat at speeds approaching those of voice ops
because they use abbreviations and eliminate redundancies.


Oh, my, THAT old brag.

Tsk, tsk, , listen in on any large FAA-tower airport
and, especially, the voice communications out of an FAA Center.

No morse used there, but plenty of abbreviations with elimination
of redundancies. Word rates are above 150 WPM equivalent and
often approach 250 WPM equivalent. No "test" required to learn
the abbreviations in TRACON talk.

Tsk, if morse code was so "efficient" and "speedy," it would have
been prime use in the REST OF THE RADIO WORLD. It isn't. Other
than the ham hobbyists ("on the lower ends of the 'bands' HF")
and some long-established automatic ID keyers, the REST OF THE
RADIO WORLD has given up on morse code.

To attempt countering the above, you MUST trot out the hoary old
maxim that "this is amateur radio!" as if the hobby is somehow
exulted and revered BECAUSE of morse code testing...and you will
state that "because there are still morse users in amateur radio,"
"newcomers 'must' learn/test for that skill to talk to them." :-)

[such always seems to happen as a "reason" for being...:-) ]

That "reply" (yet to come but as certain as there is a tomorrow)
might be augmented by some kind of "need" to "be able to talk to
those in foreign lands who do not speak English." One of the
truly specious and bereft of logic statements ever made in here!

Go ahead and "chat" on anything via morse code...use its unique
ability to express subtleties of opinion, the timbre and tone of
the sound, and all the other body language clues available
through morse. :-) Other than IDs, location, "the rig here is"
and WX, there isn't much more to the "chat," is there?

Please continue to praise the military morse ops, ,
especially those of the USN. The USN is NOT a branch of the
military you were in. Indeed, you weren't in ANY branch of the
military. You "served in other ways."




K4YZ June 15th 05 09:27 AM



John Smith wrote:
"K4YZ" wrote in message
oups.com...


John Smith wrote:
It was never about anyone stopping you from sending cw was it...

It is about stopping you from forcing others to learn cw when they
would
never use it...

Always when one is being forced to do something they do not wish to,
they should question everything in sight... just as you began when
you
thought someone was going to force you to quit...

... let's at least keep my comment about the drums straight...


By the very nature of "testing" we are "forced" to do something we
generally don't want to do.

When I took my General, I had no intent on doing any RTTY operation
yet had to know RTTY theory and practice.

Good news is that now you don't HAVE to "learn" anything...Just
memorize those quesitons and answers...Whish is what gives me a good
laugh with the more arrogant NCT types (read that Lennie...)

They are "OK" with open pools and memorized tests, but they hate
memorized sounds...what's up with that? Sheesh...the FCC even delete
the requirement to demonstrate SENDING the Code.

There's no more work to memorizing the Code than there is to
memorizing the written questions...Unless you have a VALID medical
decicit.


... absolutely not... I work with young men who take great pride in
their ability to pass difficult tests with ease... who are thankful for
their gifted IQ's...

... but who see no reason to learn code...


I do too...

They're called "lazy".

indeed, the courses which
they take, and their level of education make any amateur exam look
trivial...


"They" may, but since we have no milestones against which to know
those levels, we'll never know for sure.

In short: "I trust men wearing ski masks."

Steve, K4YZ


John Smith June 15th 05 09:34 AM

.... yep, too lazy to learn to send messages by primordial tribal drum
too ...

.... too lazy to learn how to play a jew's harp too ...

.... too lazy to take up knitting and crocheting too ...

.... yep, damn lazy bunch they are! ...

ROFLOL!!!!

John

"K4YZ" wrote in message
oups.com...


John Smith wrote:
"K4YZ" wrote in message
oups.com...


John Smith wrote:
It was never about anyone stopping you from sending cw was it...

It is about stopping you from forcing others to learn cw when they
would
never use it...

Always when one is being forced to do something they do not wish
to,
they should question everything in sight... just as you began
when
you
thought someone was going to force you to quit...

... let's at least keep my comment about the drums straight...

By the very nature of "testing" we are "forced" to do something
we
generally don't want to do.

When I took my General, I had no intent on doing any RTTY
operation
yet had to know RTTY theory and practice.

Good news is that now you don't HAVE to "learn" anything...Just
memorize those quesitons and answers...Whish is what gives me a
good
laugh with the more arrogant NCT types (read that Lennie...)

They are "OK" with open pools and memorized tests, but they hate
memorized sounds...what's up with that? Sheesh...the FCC even
delete
the requirement to demonstrate SENDING the Code.

There's no more work to memorizing the Code than there is to
memorizing the written questions...Unless you have a VALID medical
decicit.


... absolutely not... I work with young men who take great pride in
their ability to pass difficult tests with ease... who are thankful
for
their gifted IQ's...

... but who see no reason to learn code...


I do too...

They're called "lazy".

indeed, the courses which
they take, and their level of education make any amateur exam look
trivial...


"They" may, but since we have no milestones against which to know
those levels, we'll never know for sure.

In short: "I trust men wearing ski masks."

Steve, K4YZ




[email protected] June 15th 05 12:01 PM

John Smith wrote:
... all the women I have ever tried to interest in radio...
all have
declined doing anything towards getting a license...
once they even see
a key and a code practice oscillator they look at me as
if I am crazy
and ask, "You are kidding, right?"


With all due respect, perhaps your skill at getting them
interested needs some improvement....

Given your attitude towards Morse Code, you'd be as
effective as the chairman of the National Beef Council
trying to get people to be vegetarians..

Then they grab their net-to-phone and/or keyboard and being
chatting
with canadians, so americans, mexicans, asians, aussies, brits, etc...


Which takes no radio and no license. So it's not about Morse Code,
but about different interests.

... and at this point it is hard for me to pose a logical
argument--


;-)

women are just smarter than men... you can't fool them...

Not about fooling, but about what people are interested in.

wrote in message
oups.com...
John Smith wrote:
... the amateur tests are a trivial problem to men with real
educations...


What about women with real educations?

Would you consider someone with a BSEE from the University of
Pennsylvania and an MSEE from Drexel University to have
"a real education"?

... the cw part


Is an amateur test. And is a trivial problem to people with
real educations..

makes as much sense as learning to play a "jew's
harp"--a lot of sense if you wish to, none if you don't...


Then why require someone with no interest in VHF-UHF to learn
those techniques in order to operate on HF? Why require
knowedge of FSK, PSK and other data modes to operate voice?
Why require knowledge of transistors and ICs to operate
vacuum-tube equipment?

IOW, why require anyone to learn anything about a subject they
are not interested in, just to get a license to do the things
they *are* interested in?

--

Perhaps what bothers some people the most about the code test
is that it isn't something most people already know. And it
isn't something that can be learned by reading a book, watching
a video, etc. It's a skill, not "book learning".

In learning the code, a Ph.D in EE has to start at the same place
as a grade-schooler. And the grade schooler may learn faster and
do better! Perhaps it is this characteristic of the test - its
ability to act as a Great Equalizer - that causes some to resent
it so much.

--

Warmest regards,
John

wrote in message
oups.com...
John Smith wrote:
It was never about anyone stopping you from sending cw was it...

A few anticode folks have stated they want Morse Code *use* by hams
to
end, not just the test. They are a small minority, but they do
exist.

It is about stopping you from forcing others to learn cw when they
would
never use it...

Who is "forced" to learn Morse Code?

It's a requirement if someone wants an FCC-issued amateur license
with
HF privileges, that's all.

Always when one is being forced to do something they do not wish
to,
they should question everything in sight... just as you began
when
you
thought someone was going to force you to quit...

The argument you present boils down to this: If someone doesn't
want
to
use Morse Code in ham radio, they shouldn't be required to learn it
just
to pass a test (even a simple, basic test) to get a ham radio
license.
Those who choose to use it can learn it on their own.

Is that about right?

The problem is that the same argument can be made against almost
everything
in the written tests. For example, if someone doesn't intend to use
certain
bands, why are they forced to learn the band edges of every band
their
license allows? If someone doesn't intend to use more than a few
watts
of
transmitted power, why must they learn all that RF exposure stuff?
Indeed,
if someone doesn't intend to homebrew, why are they *forced* to
learn
all
that theory stuff?

Sure, the written tests look easy to someone with a background in
radio,
electronics, computers or other related fields. But to someone from
an
unrelated field, they're not easy.

Suppose you met a retired gentleman who had been a radioman in the
military 50+ years ago. He'd always wanted to be a ham but never
had
the time or resources. Now he finds that ham radio still exists,
and
he wants in.

The gent can still do code well, and remembers the basics of theory
as it was 50+ years ago. He gets an HF receiver and listens to the
lovely Morse Code signals on the low ends of the HF bands.

But in order to join the folks on 7010 or 3520, he needs an Extra.
And the written test is full of stuff he's never seen before, and
that he will never use.

Why must he learn all that stuff he will never use just to pass the
tests?

Sure, the stuff is easy for *you*, but not for *him*.

... let's at least keep my comment about the drums straight...

Let's see...

Warmest regards,
John

"Jim Hampton" wrote in message
...

"John Smith" wrote in message
...
... that almost makes me miss the ancient drums my
great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-etc. ancestors
used
to
use to communicate with in the primordial jungles... I wonder
if
we
could bring those back to?

Invalid analogy.

Drums for communication aren't in wide use.

Morse Code for communication is in wide use in ham radio. Doesn't
need to be brought back because it's right here.

... perhaps require the new licensees to beat out a fancy
tempo
on
one
of those turkeys before we gave 'em a license!
evil-grin

Warmest regards,
John


Perhaps, John


But consider that some of us can send and receive cw faster than
most
folks can type.

Yup.

I know you may be good at "cut and paste", but that doesn't
necessarily cut
it LOL.

Sure, voice appears faster, but when you get names and addresses
that
are
hard to pronounce ....

Bingo.

For any message that needs to be written down, the speed limitation
is
usually the writing speed of the receiving op. The fact that
someone
can theoretically talks 150 wpm doesn't mean anything if the person
on the receiving end can only write legibly at 15 wpm.

Text modes are great if you have the hardware for them and if you
are in a situation where you can look at a screen to read them.

Not saying that CW is the best, but some folks better come up
with
something
superior to AM and FM. There are a number of modes, but most
folks
want to
"talk". That won't cut it for 85 watt moonbounce on 24 GHz.

:)


73 from Rochester, NY
Jim AA2QA
ps - when I talk send and receive cw faster than some folks
type,
I'm
not
talking a nice, leisurely chat at 30 or 35 words per minute ...

Yup.

Good Morse ops can chat at speeds approaching those of voice ops
because
they use abbreviations and eliminate redundancies.

73 de Jim, N2EY




[email protected] June 15th 05 12:15 PM



Phil Kane wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 17:21:00 -0700, John Smith wrote:

... all the women I have ever tried to interest in radio... all have
declined doing anything towards getting a license... once they even see
a key and a code practice oscillator they look at me as if I am crazy
and ask, "You are kidding, right?"


Tell that to our friend Claire who is the NCS of the Beaver State
(CW) Traffic Net - high-speed CW. And she's no dummy - retired PhD
in a specialized field of the biological sciences.


.. . . then there was the legendary traffic handler Mae Burke W3CUL who
was a neighborhood housewife . .

So much for generalizations.


Gotta love it.

--
73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane


w3rv


Jim Hampton June 15th 05 02:37 PM

John,

You could make the same assertion about a driver's license. Memorize some
rules and take a road test.

Do you support eliminating motor vehicle tests? Perhaps only for college
educated folks?

Might it make sense to require folks to know where the band edges are, or
would you think it doesn't matter.

If you travel to the U.K., do you think it might be smart to understand that
they drive on the *left* side of the road rather than the right? Even if
you are a pedestrian?

I suspect you'd be upset if someone started transmitting on your Direct Tv
frequencies and killed your reception. There are rules and folks wishing
licenses are supposed to demonstrate some knowledge of those rules. These
rules do not require the calculus, yet even a college grad has to
demonstrate some knowledge of them.

73 from Rochester, NY
Jim AA2QA


"John Smith" wrote in message
...
... the amateur tests are a trivial problem to men with real
educations...

... the cw part makes as much sense as learning to play a "jew's
harp"--a lot of sense if you wish to, none if you don't...

Warmest regards,
John




Michael Coslo June 15th 05 02:50 PM



wrote:



With all due respect, perhaps your skill at getting them
interested needs some improvement....

Given your attitude towards Morse Code, you'd be as
effective as the chairman of the National Beef Council
trying to get people to be vegetarians..


Wouldn't that be better the other way around, Jim? A vegetarian who
hates meat trying to get people to come to say a pig roast? ;^)


- Mike KB3EIA -


Michael Coslo June 15th 05 02:57 PM



wrote:


Phil Kane wrote:

On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 17:21:00 -0700, John Smith wrote:


... all the women I have ever tried to interest in radio... all have
declined doing anything towards getting a license... once they even see
a key and a code practice oscillator they look at me as if I am crazy
and ask, "You are kidding, right?"


Tell that to our friend Claire who is the NCS of the Beaver State
(CW) Traffic Net - high-speed CW. And she's no dummy - retired PhD
in a specialized field of the biological sciences.



. . . then there was the legendary traffic handler Mae Burke W3CUL who
was a neighborhood housewife . .



I can't imagine any person becoming a Ham because they simply want to
"chat with someone around the world".

In the first place most of my DX contacts are pretty terse, and don't
fulfill any "chatting needs". Not that I have chatting needs!

There certainly are women in Ham radio, and although a minority, they
are probably no more of a minority than women's representation in other
technical fields. This would mean that any problem is shared with those
other technical fields, and not a Ham radio specific problem.

- Mike KB3EIA -





All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:28 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com