RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Policy (https://www.radiobanter.com/policy/)
-   -   another point of Info (https://www.radiobanter.com/policy/73828-another-point-info.html)

KØHB July 5th 05 02:46 PM


"K4YZ" wrote

KØHB wrote:
"an_old_friend" wrote

) Look at all the embarrassment you could have saved yourself if you
)had just put "Part 97" into the search engine and read it for
yourself.

What embarrsihment are you refering to?


Nobody refer(r)ed to any embarrsihment.


I did, Hans.


The embarrasment of ......


Oh, OK. I'm so embarrsi'd that I didn't know "embarrsihment" was the same as
"embarrassment".

73, de Hans, K0HB






b.b. July 6th 05 01:57 AM



an_old_friend wrote:
Hmm Brain responding to a post i haven't seen yet

b.b. wrote:
K4YZ wrote:


Also, (is this guy REALLY this stupid...?!?!) the "60 meter band"
DOES fall below 30Mhz, Markie.


Actually, you are. He is the one who stated, "interesting that a band
rquiring code testing forbids code use." Morse Code testing is for
"below 30MHz."


well said

The FCC could of course have allowed it to techs and frankly they
should have


There's a frequency, I think 5.170 off the top of my head, that all
amateurs in Alaska are allowed to use for emergencies. Includes
Technicians. Oooops. Violates the defunct treaty.

FYI...Since you've been in a time warp (and obviously enjoy making
a fool out of yourself rather than use a search engine to do some
research),


You're the one who made the mistake then attacked Mark over it. Makes
you the idiot.

the United States STILL requires that an Amateur licensee to
have passed Element 1 to operate below 30Mhz.


No it does not it requires them to be tested on bands assigned to the
general and extra bands


Techs can use Morse Code on VHF and above. I knew one who did
Quitefine at it.


an_old_friend July 6th 05 02:33 AM



b.b. wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
Hmm Brain responding to a post i haven't seen yet

b.b. wrote:
K4YZ wrote:


Also, (is this guy REALLY this stupid...?!?!) the "60 meter band"
DOES fall below 30Mhz, Markie.

Actually, you are. He is the one who stated, "interesting that a band
rquiring code testing forbids code use." Morse Code testing is for
"below 30MHz."


well said

The FCC could of course have allowed it to techs and frankly they
should have


break

There's a frequency, I think 5.170 off the top of my head, that all
amateurs in Alaska are allowed to use for emergencies. Includes
Technicians. Oooops. Violates the defunct treaty.


you sure it requires even a Ham License I had heard ANY could us the
Alaska freq


FYI...Since you've been in a time warp (and obviously enjoy making
a fool out of yourself rather than use a search engine to do some
research),

You're the one who made the mistake then attacked Mark over it. Makes
you the idiot.

the United States STILL requires that an Amateur licensee to
have passed Element 1 to operate below 30Mhz.


No it does not it requires them to be tested on bands assigned to the
general and extra bands


Techs can use Morse Code on VHF and above. I knew one who did
Quitefine at it.



K4YZ July 6th 05 11:16 AM

b.b. (Brian P Burke, N0IMD) wrote:

an_old_friend (Mark C Morgan, KB9RQZ) wrote:


Hmm Brain responding to a post i haven't seen yet


Ya gotta love seeing Markie responding to Burke's posts calling
him "Brain"...

b.b. wrote:
K4YZ wrote:


Also, (is this guy REALLY this stupid...?!?!) the "60 meter band"
DOES fall below 30Mhz, Markie.

Actually, you are. He is the one who stated, "interesting that a band
rquiring code testing forbids code use." Morse Code testing is for
"below 30MHz."


well said

The FCC could of course have allowed it to techs and frankly they
should have


Why?

The 5Mhz channels still fall below 30Mhz.

There's a frequency, I think 5.170 off the top of my head, that all
amateurs in Alaska are allowed to use for emergencies. Includes
Technicians. Oooops. Violates the defunct treaty.


Several points:

(1) The exact frequency is 5167.5KHz...or 5.1675MHz if you
prefer) ...However it's restricted to stations (ALL FCC licensed
stations...) in or within 50 miles of the State of Alaska, and is
strictly for Emergency use only. One discreet channel. And it's not
an "Amateur" channel. Amateurs are allowed on this frequency as an
accomodation to safety. A real stretch to cite it as a "violation" of
any treaty.

(2) The treaty you refer to is NOT "defunct". It is still very
much in force. It HAS been ammended, however present United States
rules and regulations as they pertain to the treaty are in compliance
with said treaty.

FYI...Since you've been in a time warp (and obviously enjoy making
a fool out of yourself rather than use a search engine to do some
research),

You're the one who made the mistake then attacked Mark over it. Makes
you the idiot.

the United States STILL requires that an Amateur licensee to
have passed Element 1 to operate below 30Mhz.


No it does not


Yes, it does.

it requires them to be tested on bands assigned to the
general and extra bands


Uh huh....Which are...?!?!

BELOW 30MHZ ! ! ! ! !

QUICK, MARKIE! REVIEW TIME!

What are the four exceptions that allow a "Technician" to act as
control operator of an Amateur Radio station below 30MHz...?!?!?

And WHAT common thread do each of those exceptions have in common
with the present Novice, General, Advanced and Extra class licensees?

Techs can use Morse Code on VHF and above. I knew one who did
Quitefine at it.


Techs can use Morse Code on HF, too. But hey, I thought YOU
insisted that SOMEone has chased all the Techs away...?!?!

Another QuiteWrongLie it seems.

Steve, K4YZ


an_old_friend July 6th 05 02:31 PM



K4YZ wrote:
b.b. (Brian P Burke, N0IMD) wrote:

an_old_friend (Mark C Morgan, KB9RQZ) wrote:


Hmm Brain responding to a post i haven't seen yet


Ya gotta love seeing Markie responding to Burke's posts calling
him "Brain"...


he doesn't mind

BTW nobody gotta love Stevie just because you say so


b.b. wrote:
K4YZ wrote:


Also, (is this guy REALLY this stupid...?!?!) the "60 meter band"
DOES fall below 30Mhz, Markie.

Actually, you are. He is the one who stated, "interesting that a band
rquiring code testing forbids code use." Morse Code testing is for
"below 30MHz."

well said

The FCC could of course have allowed it to techs and frankly they
should have


Why?


Because it is a NoCode band and logicaly should not require a code test
to use it if code is forbidden


The 5Mhz channels still fall below 30Mhz.


So what?

Is it a newsflash to you that S25.2 has changed?

There is NO LEGAL magic at 30Mhz there was but no more


There's a frequency, I think 5.170 off the top of my head, that all
amateurs in Alaska are allowed to use for emergencies. Includes
Technicians. Oooops. Violates the defunct treaty.


Several points:

(1) The exact frequency is 5167.5KHz...or 5.1675MHz if you
prefer) ...However it's restricted to stations (ALL FCC licensed
stations...) in or within 50 miles of the State of Alaska, and is
strictly for Emergency use only. One discreet channel. And it's not
an "Amateur" channel. Amateurs are allowed on this frequency as an
accomodation to safety. A real stretch to cite it as a "violation" of
any treaty.

(2) The treaty you refer to is NOT "defunct". It is still very
much in force. It HAS been ammended, however present United States
rules and regulations as they pertain to the treaty are in compliance
with said treaty.


so he should have defunct provision

grow up


FYI...Since you've been in a time warp (and obviously enjoy making
a fool out of yourself rather than use a search engine to do some
research),

You're the one who made the mistake then attacked Mark over it. Makes
you the idiot.

the United States STILL requires that an Amateur licensee to
have passed Element 1 to operate below 30Mhz.

No it does not


Yes, it does.


nope

it requires them to be tested on bands assigned to the
general and extra bands


Uh huh....Which are...?!?!


well known to you. till they are avalable to me I'll not bother to
learn


BELOW 30MHZ ! ! ! ! !


So what


QUICK, MARKIE! REVIEW TIME!

What are the four exceptions that allow a "Technician" to act as
control operator of an Amateur Radio station below 30MHz...?!?!?


none that apply to me

and what I think you are referring isbad decision of the FCCto end
thech vs thech plus license

hopefully that mistake will be fixed


And WHAT common thread do each of those exceptions have in common
with the present Novice, General, Advanced and Extra class licensees?


so?


Now on to turth

Nothing prevents the FCC from allowing hambands anywhere in the
spectrum and assigning them to Tech class, and allowing techs without
code tests to use them

NOTHING but tradition perhaps


Techs can use Morse Code on VHF and above. I knew one who did
Quitefine at it.


Techs can use Morse Code on HF, too. But hey, I thought YOU
insisted that SOMEone has chased all the Techs away...?!?!


indeed he has you chase them away not all stay away

Another QuiteWrongLie it seems.


nope


Steve, K4YZ



b.b. July 7th 05 03:09 AM



Arnold Schwarzenegger wrote:
no

no girly men on that frequency

now you go stand in corner

arnold


Now that's some on-topic policy discussion.


b.b. July 7th 05 03:56 AM



K4YZ (idiot savante) wrote:

b.b. wrote:

an_old_friend wrote:


Hmm Brain responding to a post i haven't seen yet


Ya gotta love seeing Markie responding to Burke's posts calling
him "Brain"...


Only Robber's Son would enjoy making fun of a disabled person's
disability.

b.b. wrote:
K4YZ wrote:


Also, (is this guy REALLY this stupid...?!?!) the "60 meter band"
DOES fall below 30Mhz, Markie.

Actually, you are. He is the one who stated, "interesting that a band
rquiring code testing forbids code use." Morse Code testing is for
"below 30MHz."

well said

The FCC could of course have allowed it to techs and frankly they
should have


Why?

The 5Mhz channels still fall below 30Mhz.


No treaty issues anymore. So why not?

There's a frequency, I think 5.170 off the top of my head, that all
amateurs in Alaska are allowed to use for emergencies. Includes
Technicians. Oooops. Violates the defunct treaty.


Several points:

(1) The exact frequency is 5167.5KHz...or 5.1675MHz if you
prefer) ...


I can handle either. Would you like to attempt a hertz conversion?

I've got a pretty good memory (and can remember most of your lies), and
it was previously posted in Part 97 as 5.170 MHz.

The regs have been rewritten to allow for people who don't understand
the bandwidth of an J3E or R3E emission. Congratulations. You
qualify.

Don't believe me? Ask amateur historian Jim.

However it's restricted to stations (ALL FCC licensed
stations...) in or within 50 miles of the State of Alaska, and is
strictly for Emergency use only. One discreet channel. And it's not
an "Amateur" channel. Amateurs are allowed on this frequency as an
accomodation to safety.


Yes, that's what I said, "There's a frequency, I think 5.170 off the
top of my head, that all amateurs in Alaska are allowed to use for
emergencies."

Thanks for your unnecessary confirmation. You're Extra special.

A real stretch to cite it as a "violation" of any treaty.


No stretch. It was the law. This provision has been in place since
I've been an amateur (Jan 87), and don't know how far back it goes.
Clearly a violation of S25 as No Code Techs were authorized to use it.
The frequency was below 30MHz. No Code Techs (obviously) didn't have
to show any proficiency in Morse Code. I think that pretty much
unravels up your claim of stretch. It was a clear violation. Robber's
Son desperate attempts fail to make an issue. bb prevails.

And it could easily be rewritten to read all licensed stations on U.S.
soil, and within 200nm offshore. No?


b.b. July 7th 05 04:15 AM



an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
b.b. (Brian P Burke, N0IMD) wrote:

an_old_friend (Mark C Morgan, KB9RQZ) wrote:


Hmm Brain responding to a post i haven't seen yet


Ya gotta love seeing Markie responding to Burke's posts calling
him "Brain"...


he doesn't mind


I've cashed government checks made out to "Brain." I think they're on
to something.

BTW nobody gotta love Stevie just because you say so


Few could love Steve. My best guess is his overdominant mother. His
wife probably hangs around for his VA disability check.

b.b. wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

Also, (is this guy REALLY this stupid...?!?!) the "60 meter band"
DOES fall below 30Mhz, Markie.

Actually, you are. He is the one who stated, "interesting that a band
rquiring code testing forbids code use." Morse Code testing is for
"below 30MHz."

well said

The FCC could of course have allowed it to techs and frankly they
should have


Why?


Because it is a NoCode band and logicaly should not require a code test
to use it if code is forbidden


Not so fast. Where is Steve's apology to Mark for making false
accusations of stupidity, and getting the "below 30MHz" wrong???

Fess up Steve. You got it ALL wrong. Admit it. Apologize.

The 5Mhz channels still fall below 30Mhz.


So what?

Is it a newsflash to you that S25.2 has changed?

There is NO LEGAL magic at 30Mhz there was but no more


The gears of tyranny usually turn slowly.

There's a frequency, I think 5.170 off the top of my head, that all
amateurs in Alaska are allowed to use for emergencies. Includes
Technicians. Oooops. Violates the defunct treaty.


Several points:

(1) The exact frequency is 5167.5KHz...or 5.1675MHz if you
prefer) ...However it's restricted to stations (ALL FCC licensed
stations...) in or within 50 miles of the State of Alaska, and is
strictly for Emergency use only. One discreet channel. And it's not
an "Amateur" channel. Amateurs are allowed on this frequency as an
accomodation to safety. A real stretch to cite it as a "violation" of
any treaty.

(2) The treaty you refer to is NOT "defunct". It is still very
much in force. It HAS been ammended, however present United States
rules and regulations as they pertain to the treaty are in compliance
with said treaty.


so he should have defunct provision

grow up


Impossible. One of Steve's personalities is related to Dick Clark,
America's oldest teenager.

FYI...Since you've been in a time warp (and obviously enjoy making
a fool out of yourself rather than use a search engine to do some
research),

You're the one who made the mistake then attacked Mark over it. Makes
you the idiot.

the United States STILL requires that an Amateur licensee to
have passed Element 1 to operate below 30Mhz.

No it does not


Yes, it does.


nope


Sorry. Except in the 5.170MHz/Alaska provision that I cited, it does.

it requires them to be tested on bands assigned to the
general and extra bands


Uh huh....Which are...?!?!


well known to you. till they are avalable to me I'll not bother to
learn


160, 80/75, 60, 30, 20, 17, 15, 12, and 10M.

BELOW 30MHZ ! ! ! ! !


So what


I've already verified Robber's Sons wrongness. No need to go rubbing
his nose in it. And it wouldn't matter anyway. He's a brown noser
from the gitgo! The smell never changes.

QUICK, MARKIE! REVIEW TIME!

What are the four exceptions that allow a "Technician" to act as
control operator of an Amateur Radio station below 30MHz...?!?!?


none that apply to me

and what I think you are referring isbad decision of the FCCto end
thech vs thech plus license

hopefully that mistake will be fixed

And WHAT common thread do each of those exceptions have in common
with the present Novice, General, Advanced and Extra class licensees?


so?

Now on to turth

Nothing prevents the FCC from allowing hambands anywhere in the
spectrum and assigning them to Tech class, and allowing techs without
code tests to use them

NOTHING but tradition perhaps


The gears of tyranny turn slowly.

Techs can use Morse Code on VHF and above. I knew one who did
Quitefine at it.


Techs can use Morse Code on HF, too. But hey, I thought YOU
insisted that SOMEone has chased all the Techs away...?!?!


indeed he has you chase them away not all stay away


A Tech can use morse code on HF with a General, Advanced, or Extra
control operator at his/her side.

Another QuiteWrongLie it seems.


nope


Robber's Son can't be wrong. You must accept his flaws.


K4YZ July 8th 05 03:01 PM



an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
b.b. (Brian P Burke, N0IMD) wrote:

an_old_friend (Mark C Morgan, KB9RQZ) wrote:


Hmm Brain responding to a post i haven't seen yet


Ya gotta love seeing Markie responding to Burke's posts calling
him "Brain"...


he doesn't mind


Sure he does.

BTW nobody gotta love Stevie just because you say so


And where did I say so, Markie?

The FCC could of course have allowed it to techs and frankly they
should have


Why?


Because it is a NoCode band and logicaly should not require a code test
to use it if code is forbidden


(A) It's not a "band". It's five discreet channels.

(B) The mode restriction is due to other adjacent channel users
that we must dovetail with...Not due to any altruistic debate over
Morse Code use or testing.

The 5Mhz channels still fall below 30Mhz.


So what?

Is it a newsflash to you that S25.2 has changed?

There is NO LEGAL magic at 30Mhz there was but no more


Sure there is.

YOU need to read how it's worded.

The international treat gives individual administrations the
OPTION of requiring code testing.

Guess what...?!?!

The United States is in compliance with the treaty.

There's a frequency, I think 5.170 off the top of my head, that all
amateurs in Alaska are allowed to use for emergencies. Includes
Technicians. Oooops. Violates the defunct treaty.


Several points:

(1) The exact frequency is 5167.5KHz...or 5.1675MHz if you
prefer) ...However it's restricted to stations (ALL FCC licensed
stations...) in or within 50 miles of the State of Alaska, and is
strictly for Emergency use only. One discreet channel. And it's not
an "Amateur" channel. Amateurs are allowed on this frequency as an
accomodation to safety. A real stretch to cite it as a "violation" of
any treaty.

(2) The treaty you refer to is NOT "defunct". It is still very
much in force. It HAS been ammended, however present United States
rules and regulations as they pertain to the treaty are in compliance
with said treaty.


so he should have defunct provision


What? Huh?

grow up


I have. And someday you will too. But not today, apparently.

the United States STILL requires that an Amateur licensee to
have passed Element 1 to operate below 30Mhz.

No it does not


Yes, it does.


nope


Oh?

Markie...You're either disagreeing for arguments sake, or you are
again demonstrating your absolute ignorance of United States policy as
it pertains to the Amateur Radio service.

Or just lying again.

it requires them to be tested on bands assigned to the
general and extra bands


Uh huh....Which are...?!?!


well known to you. till they are avalable to me I'll not bother to
learn


So...Got slapped around and now you gonna schlep away with your
tail between your legs!

BBBWWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
! ! ! ! ! !

BELOW 30MHZ ! ! ! ! !


So what


So you're patently wrong again.

QUICK, MARKIE! REVIEW TIME!

What are the four exceptions that allow a "Technician" to act as
control operator of an Amateur Radio station below 30MHz...?!?!?


none that apply to me


Absolutely correct.

and what I think you are referring isbad decision of the FCCto end
thech vs thech plus license


They only eneded their admistrative tracking of it. The license,
in practice, still exisits.

hopefully that mistake will be fixed


The FCC has clarly demonstrated that they are all about "less"
regulation and administrative burden...not more.

And WHAT common thread do each of those exceptions have in common
with the present Novice, General, Advanced and Extra class licensees?


so?


"so?" was the wrong answer. You lose.

Now on to turth


Turth? Is that near Intercourse, Pennsylvania?

Nothing prevents the FCC from allowing hambands anywhere in the
spectrum and assigning them to Tech class, and allowing techs without
code tests to use them

NOTHING but tradition perhaps


And nothing but it's current policy that takes advantage of treaty
language that gives administrations the priviledge of determining their
own course.

I DO agree that the FCC COULD have immediately enacted interim
"policy" that could have allowed licensees who pass the higher class
WRITTEN exams to exercise those privileges without the benefit of
passing Element 1 until it had been "officially" dealt with.

But they didn't, so it's still here. Oh well.

Techs can use Morse Code on VHF and above. I knew one who did
Quitefine at it.


Techs can use Morse Code on HF, too. But hey, I thought YOU
insisted that SOMEone has chased all the Techs away...?!?!


indeed he has you chase them away not all stay away


I haven't chased anyone away, Markie. My VHF log has many, many
NCT's on 6 and 2M SSB.

Another QuiteWrongLie it seems.


nope


Yep.

Steve, K4YZ


K4YZ July 8th 05 04:01 PM



b.b. wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

b.b. wrote:

an_old_friend wrote:


Hmm Brain responding to a post i haven't seen yet


Ya gotta love seeing Markie responding to Burke's posts calling
him "Brain"...


Only Robber's Son would enjoy making fun of a disabled person's
disability.


He's not disabled.

He's lazy.

Massive snip of usual Brain P Burke deceptions and lies...his kids
will have enough to deal with when they get older...

There's a frequency, I think 5.170 off the top of my head, that all
amateurs in Alaska are allowed to use for emergencies. Includes
Technicians. Oooops. Violates the defunct treaty.


Several points:

(1) The exact frequency is 5167.5KHz...or 5.1675MHz if you
prefer) ...


I can handle either. Would you like to attempt a hertz conversion?

I've got a pretty good memory (and can remember most of your lies)


Then you've got a lot of unused storage space available.

You've not yet substantiated a single one of your "lie"
accusations.

it was previously posted in Part 97 as 5.170 MHz.


Not in recent history...recent being back into the 80's when I
first remember seeing it.

The regs have been rewritten to allow for people who don't understand
the bandwidth of an J3E or R3E emission. Congratulations. You
qualify.

Don't believe me? Ask amateur historian Jim.


No, I don't believe you. You're a chronic liar.

And what you don't lie about, you manage to get wrong as a
consequence of inadequate experience or research.

Either way, a "bet" on information provided by you would be money
lost.

Steve, K4YZ



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:46 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com