Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
From: "John Smith" on Fri 22 Jul 2005 21:08
Geesh... You guys are for real huh? You think code and a radio makes you special guys? It does in their minds. They are the PCTA *Extras*! Was the license really so difficult for you, you believe the rest of us with much different opinions are stupid and find it that big a challenge? Yes they do. :-) PCTA extras are the Gods of Radio! [amateur radio, that is] I started building tesla coils at ~10, I got my novice ticket and built my first single tube transmitter when I was 12, my first degree was in electronic engineering in '72... I ate this chit up... I was bored and didn't know what I wanted to be--until they invented the computer... I returned to college in 1978 and got my BS in CS in 1981 along with a BA in journalism, I completed my MS in CS in '83... since then I have always taught a night class at the local jr. college and continue to take classes at the local university to stay current and be with fresh young minds... Careful, John, careful. Gonad the Librarian (K4YZ) will come in here and totally denounce "night classes" as something for immigrants or "stupids." :-) Get real... lay down the opium pipe and step out of the gutter! That be a bit strong, John. Tom/Garique is basically an OK kind of guy. It's the OTHER PCTA extras in here who need their hairy legs (covered by jackboots) shaved a bit (words toned down considerably to be 'courteous' to the arrogant). And, I just consider myself an average guy (you should see my sister, she has all the brains in the family!)... of course, I do live in a nice neighborhood and have nice neighbors... Oh, no...another segue into Real Estate and Mortgages! :-) That's even worse than "ham balloons reaching the threshold of space!" [which others have already done but one in here wants congratulatory messages praising him for announcing he is "going to do it!"] There can be NO controversial commentary on the code test for radio amateurs in here. All MUST do it to show their dedication and committment to the amateur community! It has always been that way and it must always be! It is the heart and soul of U.S. amateur radio! CW uber alles!! Sieg heil!!! Oops, got carried away with PCTA spirit words there... :-) bit bit |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Geesh... You guys are for real huh? You think code and a radio makes you special guys? Ah com' on John ....did you ever hear me say anything about CW being special ...... in fact the older I get the less "specialness" means to be ..... as if it really meant anything back then ..... Was the license really so difficult for you, you believe the rest of us with much different opinions are stupid and find it that big a challenge? Never studpidity ....motivation .... well based on some of the arguments I have seen here and in my ham d'jour life ....it just seems that if someone really wanted HF privlidges then suck it up ...study a bit ...pass and have the ritualistic back yard key burial .......then get on with life ..... but that apparently will not be necessary now .....no carping ...just fact .....and I will welcome anyone to the bands and if they are on CW without being tested ...no big deal. I call that a win for band useage which we need and for ham radio in general .... I started building tesla coils at ~10, I got my novice ticket and built my first single tube transmitter when I was 12, my first degree was in electronic engineering in '72... I ate this chit up... I was bored and didn't know what I wanted to be--until they invented the computer... I returned to college in 1978 and got my BS in CS in 1981 along with a BA in journalism, I completed my MS in CS in '83... since then I have always taught a night class at the local jr. college and continue to take classes at the local university to stay current and be with fresh young minds... Gee John ...then why are your posts so bizzare ??? I really don't like to prejudge anyone but your comments over the last several months really don't reflect the above ...I am sorry if I say this but I am a bit surprized .... I deal a lot with "old timers" in my profession .....and I find them interesting and their journey through this life more so in a positive rather then a negative ..... Also comments about people with problems, disabilities and diseases don't fit. Get real... lay down the opium pipe and step out of the gutter! Huh .....???? oh well ...never tried the stuff thank God but I do like a couple of beers now and then .... And, I just consider myself an average guy (you should see my sister, she has all the brains in the family!)... of course, I do live in a nice neighborhood and have nice neighbors... John I'm glad you do ...as I have good ones also ....have to tell you one of these days about my old ones ... .."adventures in paradise" ...... complete with the pit bulls and multiple 20 second visits from strangers throughout the day .... Take care John ...73 Tom KI3R |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Joe Guthart wrote I am glad the FCC finally took charge of the situation and decided to drop the code requirements. Here's why ... "I like Amateur Radio and want it to be a life-long hobby for me ... however, I just plainly can't take time to effectively study the code at this point in my life . . . I got my Technician license about two and a half years ago . . because it was a neat little challenge for me to combine radio communications with some of the newer digital modes . .. . Basically, it was fun, not really technical challenging, but a nice way to relax. I do enjoy making contacts on 6 meters. I would play around with some different radio, antenna, and computer configurations and started to develop a relationship with some fellow ham buddies." - - - - If you had the time to do all that you had the time to learn 5wpm. - - - - "Fellow hams need to sit back and take an objective look at this hobby because it is dying a rapid death!" - - - - The hobby will have to "die" by about 80% before the number of hams becomes the same as it was when I first got on the bands. - - - - "Take a look at the declining number of amateur radio manufacturers and radios. How could any business justify spending a lot on research and development in a market that is collapsing?" - - - - Within the past 2-3 years the ham equipment manufacturers have introduced or are about to introduce at least new top-of-the-line HF xcvrs, the least expensive $3,500, the most expensive, the Icom 7800 costs around $10.5k. Icom didn't thnk they'd sell more than 200 of them in this country. They sold the whole batch in six weeks. This is a "collapse"?! You've been listening to the wrong talking heads and you're simply parroting them and/or rationales are where you find 'em eh? . - - - - "This will not kill our hobby, but will inject more life into it." - - - - For maybe two years. Then what? - - - - 73's to All, Joe / KG4YJS w3rv |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Within the past 2-3 years the ham equipment manufacturers have introduced or are about to introduce at least *three* new top-of-the-line HF xcvrs . . . |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
kelly:
Yep, really dynamic chit goin' on here. Just a quick tune across those old HF's and you are taken back with the overcrowding and congestion, my gawd man--it is a damn nightmare! zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.... Ohhhh, that was just a dream, huh? Darn, was just starting to get interesting! (or, shortly will grin) John wrote in message oups.com... Joe Guthart wrote I am glad the FCC finally took charge of the situation and decided to drop the code requirements. Here's why ... "I like Amateur Radio and want it to be a life-long hobby for me ... however, I just plainly can't take time to effectively study the code at this point in my life . . . I got my Technician license about two and a half years ago . . because it was a neat little challenge for me to combine radio communications with some of the newer digital modes . . . Basically, it was fun, not really technical challenging, but a nice way to relax. I do enjoy making contacts on 6 meters. I would play around with some different radio, antenna, and computer configurations and started to develop a relationship with some fellow ham buddies." - - - - If you had the time to do all that you had the time to learn 5wpm. - - - - "Fellow hams need to sit back and take an objective look at this hobby because it is dying a rapid death!" - - - - The hobby will have to "die" by about 80% before the number of hams becomes the same as it was when I first got on the bands. - - - - "Take a look at the declining number of amateur radio manufacturers and radios. How could any business justify spending a lot on research and development in a market that is collapsing?" - - - - Within the past 2-3 years the ham equipment manufacturers have introduced or are about to introduce at least new top-of-the-line HF xcvrs, the least expensive $3,500, the most expensive, the Icom 7800 costs around $10.5k. Icom didn't thnk they'd sell more than 200 of them in this country. They sold the whole batch in six weeks. This is a "collapse"?! You've been listening to the wrong talking heads and you're simply parroting them and/or rationales are where you find 'em eh? . - - - - "This will not kill our hobby, but will inject more life into it." - - - - For maybe two years. Then what? - - - - 73's to All, Joe / KG4YJS w3rv |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Joe Guthart wrote: I am glad the FCC finally took charge of the situation and decided to drop the code requirements. Well, it's what they're proposing to do, anyway. Here's why ... I like Amateur Radio and want it to be a life-long hobby for me ... however, I just plainly can't take time to effectively study the code at this point in my life. I think my story is pretty common for most of the new people entering Amateur Radio today. I am a 43 year old married father of three children. I have a background in Aerospace Engineering and my full time work is in the high technology sector working with many well known computing infrastructure companies. I got my Technician license about two and a half years ago because it was a neat little challenge for me to combine radio communications with some of the newer digital modes. Basically, it was fun, not really technical challenging, but a nice way to relax. I do enjoy making contacts on 6 meters. I would play around with some different radio, antenna, and computer configurations and started to develop a relationship with some fellow ham buddies. Soon I became limited with the VHF/UHF band and wanted to hop onto HF. Of course, by the current rules one would have to jump on and take on learning Morse Code. I am absolutely sure I could do this if I had enough time. Having an ongoing career and being a family man, doesn't really leave a whole lot of time to practice dits and dahs. I have actually played around with the code several times, but real life events and changing priorities always got in the way; not en excuse just reality. I really do see learning the code as similar to my older engineering brethren making me learn how to use a slide rule; it's kind of neat, but not really effective for me, or most folks, given the advance of other computing methods and devices. So what that boils down to is this, Joe: You don't want to spend the time or effort needed to learn enough Morse Code to pass the test. What about the written tests for General and Extra? In order to use digital modes on HF, you need at least a General Class license. Fellow hams need to sit back and take an objective look at this hobby because it is dying a rapid death! How do you figure? When I became a ham in 1967, there were about 260,000 US hams. Now there are over 650,000. The peak was about two years ago, but there have been ups and downs before. Amateur Radio needs me and people just like me to join in on the HF bands and to use our real world high tech expertise to help further Amateur Radio. OK, fine, how *exactly* will that happen? Will you design and build new high tech radios? Develop new high-performance modes of communication? Set up some sort of new radio network? Get more people interested in amateur radio by demos, articles, etc.? Where will the time come from to do that stuff? For that matter, where will the time come from for you to set up an HF station and operate it? Amateur Radio also needs my $$$$. Take a look at the declining number of amateur radio manufacturers and radios. Did that in another part of this thread. The trend is opposite to what you're saying. How could any business justify spending a lot on research and development in a market that is collapsing? Well, the manufacturers don't think it's collapsing! Finally, I honor all those of you who are code proficient. Thank you! I too may one day still be code proficient even if there is no formal testing. Why not now? 20-45 minutes a day for 4-6 weeks should get you to 5 wpm. There are freeware Morse Code trainers that will run on most PCs. I recommend the G4FON one. However, I do think that the right decision has been made by the FCC and will ultimately be finalized with little changes. I don't think it's the right thing, but I'm afraid FCC will do it anyway. This will not kill our hobby, but will inject more life into it. I hope you're right. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
From: on Jul 24, 6:26 pm
Joe Guthart wrote: I am glad the FCC finally took charge of the situation and decided to drop the code requirements. Well, it's what they're proposing to do, anyway. You thought that out by yourself from Notice of PROPOSED Rule Making (NPRM)? :-) Here's why ... I like Amateur Radio and want it to be a life-long hobby for me ... however, I just plainly can't take time to effectively study the code at this point in my life. I think my story is pretty common for most of the new people entering Amateur Radio today. I am a 43 year old married father of three children. I have a background in Aerospace Engineering and my full time work is in the high technology sector working with many well known computing infrastructure companies. I got my Technician license about two and a half years ago because it was a neat little challenge for me to combine radio communications with some of the newer digital modes. Basically, it was fun, not really technical challenging, but a nice way to relax. I do enjoy making contacts on 6 meters. I would play around with some different radio, antenna, and computer configurations and started to develop a relationship with some fellow ham buddies. Soon I became limited with the VHF/UHF band and wanted to hop onto HF. Of course, by the current rules one would have to jump on and take on learning Morse Code. I am absolutely sure I could do this if I had enough time. Having an ongoing career and being a family man, doesn't really leave a whole lot of time to practice dits and dahs. I have actually played around with the code several times, but real life events and changing priorities always got in the way; not en excuse just reality. I really do see learning the code as similar to my older engineering brethren making me learn how to use a slide rule; it's kind of neat, but not really effective for me, or most folks, given the advance of other computing methods and devices. So what that boils down to is this, Joe: You don't want to spend the time or effort needed to learn enough Morse Code to pass the test. Amazing intellect you display, Jimmie! However, before you slide into more snide remarks, try to understand that NOT everybody lives a life of radiotelegraphy. True! What about the written tests for General and Extra? In order to use digital modes on HF, you need at least a General Class license. Tsk, tsk. Misdirecting into the writtens again, are you? Let's get back to the MORSE CODE TEST NPRM, WT Docket 05-235. NOTHING in that NPRM proposes to change anydamnthing in the WRITTEN test elements. Fellow hams need to sit back and take an objective look at this hobby because it is dying a rapid death! How do you figure? Is morse code ANYTHING in radio in this new millennium besides being a niche interest area for a bunch of olde-tyme hammes stuck on telegraphy? When I became a ham in 1967, there were about 260,000 US hams. Now there are over 650,000. The peak was about two years ago, but there have been ups and downs before. Tsk. There has been a slow but STEADY decline in licenses for two years. Amateur Radio needs me and people just like me to join in on the HF bands and to use our real world high tech expertise to help further Amateur Radio. OK, fine, how *exactly* will that happen? Will you design and build new high tech radios? Develop new high-performance modes of communication? Set up some sort of new radio network? Get more people interested in amateur radio by demos, articles, etc.? Let's put it this way: It AIN'T gonna be by "designing and building state-of-the-art VACUUM TUBE transmitters in the 1990s!" :-) Where will the time come from to do that stuff? What...are you now a time-study man for the "amateur community" management?!? For that matter, where will the time come from for you to set up an HF station and operate it? Isn't it about time YOU came up with some solid-state designs yourself?!? The solid-state era in all electronics happened 40 years ago. Finally, I honor all those of you who are code proficient. Thank you! Jimmie, you are an absolute CREDIT to amateur radio...of the 1940s. I too may one day still be code proficient even if there is no formal testing. Why not now? Why EVER? 20-45 minutes a day for 4-6 weeks should get you to 5 wpm. There are freeware Morse Code trainers that will run on most PCs. I recommend the G4FON one. Gosh, Jimmie, a half hour to an hour a day studying solid- state circuitry could get you into shape to "design and build your very own TRUE state-of-the-art transmitter!" Why, heck and darn, all your neighbors could come over and admire it, go oooh and aaahh and you explain every solid- state bit of it! However, I do think that the right decision has been made by the FCC and will ultimately be finalized with little changes. I don't think it's the right thing, but I'm afraid FCC will do it anyway. Have courage. Do not be afraid! The sun will come up...tomorrow...down music This will not kill our hobby, but will inject more life into it. I hope you're right. He IS right, sweetums. All this radiotelegraphy was beginning to stagnate in-place. Gangrene is sure to follow. New, BETTER blood needed, stuff that doesn't want to revert to 1940s and 1930s in standards and practices! But...YOUR amateur radio world looks dark and dreary indeed. No more will you be able to show off your "federally authorized" morsemanship rank/title/privileges! What will your neighbors say then? dot dot |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
wrote: From: on Jul 24, 6:26 pm For that matter, where will the time come from for you to set up an HF station and operate it? Isn't it about time YOU came up with some solid-state designs yourself?!? The question was " . . . you to set up an HF station and operate it?" When was the last time you set up your personally-owned station and operatated it yourself solid state or otherwise Sweetums? Thought so. One more laughable pot calling the kettle black pile of bafflegab from the bowels of L.A. But...YOUR amateur radio world looks dark and dreary indeed. No more will you be able to show off your "federally authorized" morsemanship rank/title/privileges! Nah, all we have to do is quietly show up at a Field Day getogether and go brasspounding and watch the crowd of codeless wonders gather 'round in amazement. I'm sure that the world of amateur radio looks bleak indeed to a sourball standing on the outside, looking in. Morse Code testing or no, Mr. Anderson will still be on the outside looking in. There isn't a snowball's chance in hell that Leonard will obtain his "Extra right out of the box" before he completes his mission of taking up space and using up oxygen. Dave K8MN |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Dave Heil wrote: wrote: wrote: From: on Jul 24, 6:26 pm For that matter, where will the time come from for you to set up an HF station and operate it? Isn't it about time YOU came up with some solid-state designs yourself?!? The question was " . . . you to set up an HF station and operate it?" When was the last time you set up your personally-owned station and operatated it yourself solid state or otherwise Sweetums? Thought so. One more laughable pot calling the kettle black pile of bafflegab from the bowels of L.A. But...YOUR amateur radio world looks dark and dreary indeed. No more will you be able to show off your "federally authorized" morsemanship rank/title/privileges! Nah, all we have to do is quietly show up at a Field Day getogether and go brasspounding and watch the crowd of codeless wonders gather 'round in amazement. I'm sure that the world of amateur radio looks bleak indeed to a sourball standing on the outside, looking in. Morse Code testing or no, Mr. Anderson will still be on the outside looking in. And he built that wall around himself himself. Unbelievable . . . There isn't a snowball's chance in hell that Leonard will obtain his "Extra right out of the box" before he completes his mission of taking up space and using up oxygen. Yeah but yoicks would you really like to have him show up on the bands?? Ye Gods . . ! Maybe we oughta just leave well enough alone before he goes ape and climbs over his wall and does something we'll regret. Dave K8MN w3rv |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
LAPD getting rid of "Code 2-High" calls on 5/16 | Scanner | |||
Morse Code: One Wonders... and Begins to Think ! [ -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. . ] | Shortwave | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy | |||
My response to Jim Wiley, KL7CC | Policy | |||
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy |