Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
From: on Jul 24, 6:26 pm
Joe Guthart wrote: I am glad the FCC finally took charge of the situation and decided to drop the code requirements. Well, it's what they're proposing to do, anyway. You thought that out by yourself from Notice of PROPOSED Rule Making (NPRM)? :-) Here's why ... I like Amateur Radio and want it to be a life-long hobby for me ... however, I just plainly can't take time to effectively study the code at this point in my life. I think my story is pretty common for most of the new people entering Amateur Radio today. I am a 43 year old married father of three children. I have a background in Aerospace Engineering and my full time work is in the high technology sector working with many well known computing infrastructure companies. I got my Technician license about two and a half years ago because it was a neat little challenge for me to combine radio communications with some of the newer digital modes. Basically, it was fun, not really technical challenging, but a nice way to relax. I do enjoy making contacts on 6 meters. I would play around with some different radio, antenna, and computer configurations and started to develop a relationship with some fellow ham buddies. Soon I became limited with the VHF/UHF band and wanted to hop onto HF. Of course, by the current rules one would have to jump on and take on learning Morse Code. I am absolutely sure I could do this if I had enough time. Having an ongoing career and being a family man, doesn't really leave a whole lot of time to practice dits and dahs. I have actually played around with the code several times, but real life events and changing priorities always got in the way; not en excuse just reality. I really do see learning the code as similar to my older engineering brethren making me learn how to use a slide rule; it's kind of neat, but not really effective for me, or most folks, given the advance of other computing methods and devices. So what that boils down to is this, Joe: You don't want to spend the time or effort needed to learn enough Morse Code to pass the test. Amazing intellect you display, Jimmie! However, before you slide into more snide remarks, try to understand that NOT everybody lives a life of radiotelegraphy. True! What about the written tests for General and Extra? In order to use digital modes on HF, you need at least a General Class license. Tsk, tsk. Misdirecting into the writtens again, are you? Let's get back to the MORSE CODE TEST NPRM, WT Docket 05-235. NOTHING in that NPRM proposes to change anydamnthing in the WRITTEN test elements. Fellow hams need to sit back and take an objective look at this hobby because it is dying a rapid death! How do you figure? Is morse code ANYTHING in radio in this new millennium besides being a niche interest area for a bunch of olde-tyme hammes stuck on telegraphy? When I became a ham in 1967, there were about 260,000 US hams. Now there are over 650,000. The peak was about two years ago, but there have been ups and downs before. Tsk. There has been a slow but STEADY decline in licenses for two years. Amateur Radio needs me and people just like me to join in on the HF bands and to use our real world high tech expertise to help further Amateur Radio. OK, fine, how *exactly* will that happen? Will you design and build new high tech radios? Develop new high-performance modes of communication? Set up some sort of new radio network? Get more people interested in amateur radio by demos, articles, etc.? Let's put it this way: It AIN'T gonna be by "designing and building state-of-the-art VACUUM TUBE transmitters in the 1990s!" :-) Where will the time come from to do that stuff? What...are you now a time-study man for the "amateur community" management?!? For that matter, where will the time come from for you to set up an HF station and operate it? Isn't it about time YOU came up with some solid-state designs yourself?!? The solid-state era in all electronics happened 40 years ago. Finally, I honor all those of you who are code proficient. Thank you! Jimmie, you are an absolute CREDIT to amateur radio...of the 1940s. I too may one day still be code proficient even if there is no formal testing. Why not now? Why EVER? 20-45 minutes a day for 4-6 weeks should get you to 5 wpm. There are freeware Morse Code trainers that will run on most PCs. I recommend the G4FON one. Gosh, Jimmie, a half hour to an hour a day studying solid- state circuitry could get you into shape to "design and build your very own TRUE state-of-the-art transmitter!" Why, heck and darn, all your neighbors could come over and admire it, go oooh and aaahh and you explain every solid- state bit of it! However, I do think that the right decision has been made by the FCC and will ultimately be finalized with little changes. I don't think it's the right thing, but I'm afraid FCC will do it anyway. Have courage. Do not be afraid! The sun will come up...tomorrow...down music This will not kill our hobby, but will inject more life into it. I hope you're right. He IS right, sweetums. All this radiotelegraphy was beginning to stagnate in-place. Gangrene is sure to follow. New, BETTER blood needed, stuff that doesn't want to revert to 1940s and 1930s in standards and practices! But...YOUR amateur radio world looks dark and dreary indeed. No more will you be able to show off your "federally authorized" morsemanship rank/title/privileges! What will your neighbors say then? dot dot |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
LAPD getting rid of "Code 2-High" calls on 5/16 | Scanner | |||
Morse Code: One Wonders... and Begins to Think ! [ -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. . ] | Shortwave | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy | |||
My response to Jim Wiley, KL7CC | Policy | |||
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy |