RadioBanter - A Sample Of The Supporters Pro-No-Code WT 05-235

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)

- Policy (https://www.radiobanter.com/policy/)

- - A Sample Of The Supporters Pro-No-Code WT 05-235 (https://www.radiobanter.com/policy/75716-sample-supporters-pro-no-code-wt-05-235-a.html)

K4YZ wrote:
an old friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
b.b. wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:

Indeed If truely stuck and needing help but with a big batery Id just
send ...---...--- and hope for the best...

Those who heard this transmission would no doubt think that things were
so so.

indeed proving the devotion of the Procoders to the aiding of others

Whoa right there, Mark......

(1) Dave was, again, correct. What you typed was "SOSO"

break

(2) You've already demonstrated that you WON'T help yourself
despite having acknowledged that numerous resources are at your
disposal and within your capabilites to use and implement. So why
would Dave (or anyone else, for that matter..??) waste any time on you
for anything?

your bluff is called

carry out your threats or drop em

make the call to mental or shreff or FBI,

call the marines if you like

put up or shut up

(3) As for "procoders" aiding others, I have "elmered" and/or
proctored tests for dozens of folks and helped who-knows-how-many folks
ON the radio...regardless of thier class of license.

You've "helped"...how many...?!?!

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:

(2) You've already demonstrated that you WON'T help yourself
despite having acknowledged that numerous resources are at your
disposal and within your capabilites to use and implement. So why
would Dave (or anyone else, for that matter..??) waste any time on you
for anything?

Good question, Steve!

Why do you?

73 de Jim, N2EY

wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

(2) You've already demonstrated that you WON'T help yourself
despite having acknowledged that numerous resources are at your
disposal and within your capabilites to use and implement. So why
would Dave (or anyone else, for that matter..??) waste any time on you
for anything?

Good question, Steve!

Why do you?

becuase he is a Coward and a Bully

73 de Jim, N2EY

wrote in message
oups.com...
K4YZ wrote:

(2) You've already demonstrated that you WON'T help yourself
despite having acknowledged that numerous resources are at your
disposal and within your capabilites to use and implement. So why
would Dave (or anyone else, for that matter..??) waste any time on you
for anything?

Good question, Steve!

Why do you?

Good answer, Jim!

"Way back when" the Saturday Evening Post (or maybe Colliers) had a periodic
reader-contribution column called "The Perfect Squelch". With this, you'd have
won the $50.00 prize offered.

73, de Hans, K0HB

K=D8HB wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...
K4YZ wrote:

(2) You've already demonstrated that you WON'T help yourself
despite having acknowledged that numerous resources are at your
disposal and within your capabilites to use and implement. So why
would Dave (or anyone else, for that matter..??) waste any time on you
for anything?

Good question, Steve!

Why do you?

Good answer, Jim!

"Way back when" the Saturday Evening Post (or maybe Colliers) had a perio=
dic
reader-contribution column called "The Perfect Squelch". With this, you'=
d have
won the $50.00 prize offered.

if it works and shut's stevie rants down I'll pay you the 50$ less 5$
Shipping and handling of course

any one what to bet on wether it will squech Stevie?
=20
73, de Hans, K0HB

sorry I missed this one in your braodsides of ****
K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
cuting to the point
I guess you missed the part where the FCC said it was dismissing
all those other petitions and was focusing on the Code issue at the
moment.

No I read it clearly and was of course addressing the cleaning up of
details when the code test is riped out the of the regs

but then you are not bothhered by things like facts

As perhaps one of the few members of that class
making comments it is a subject near and dear to my heart.

Also guess you haven't been paying attention to some of the
demographics of the respondents. You are far and away from being
"...one of the few...", Mark...

without runing all of them I saw few techs mostly generals and extras
(more than a thousand)
no I can't tell

It is also
a question vital to the future of the ARS, and thus in some degree the
safety and future of the USA.

Let's see if Lennie ahs the same Field Day with THAT as he does
anytime any of the REST of us suggest even the remotest degree of
importance or relevance of the Amateur Radio Service...

Auf Anglish Bitte?

I believe the privileges should be what was known as Before the 1998
NPRM as Tech plus, this si because I have frankly observed that many
new Techs tend to get struck on FM repeaters, a fine mode but hard to
break out of, and being hard to break out tends to depress the chances
that they will, ( I refer the FCC to prices on allmode rigs with VHF
frequencies compared to FM rigs) In addition to issues of cost with the
propagation of VHF there are many times that there is no one out there
that a novice operator can find and work.
cuting pointless remarks

From personal experience...(SNIP)

Goat sacrifice counts here?

I'll leave your libelous and defamitory statement for all to see again

as "proof" of your respect for the faiths of others

I can tell you that this is a hard thing to do, and thus tends to imped
the progress of the Techs and separate them from the rest of the ARS.
cuting drivel

This separation is not god for the ARS or it abilities to serve in the
public interest .
ctuing more gratouious insults

Dave Heil wrote:
b.b. wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:

an_old_friend wrote:

My own comments

To the persons reading comments for the FCC greetings,
With regard to main body of the NPRM I am a favor of dropping all code
tests at once, however there are a few points concerning related
matters I wish to discuss and respect insist that FCC made something on
these points clear when the R&O is issued.

The privileges of the entry class, Technician, after this action are
frankly unclear to me. As perhaps one of the few members of that class
making comments it is a subject near and dear to my heart. It is also
a question vital to the future of the ARS, and thus in some degree the
safety and future of the USA.

I believe the privileges should be what was known as Before the 1998
NPRM as Tech plus, this si because I have frankly observed that many
new Techs tend to get struck on FM repeaters, a fine mode but hard to
break out of, and being hard to break out tends to depress the chances
that they will, ( I refer the FCC to prices on allmode rigs with VHF
frequencies compared to FM rigs) In addition to issues of cost with the
propagation of VHF there are many times that there is no one out there
that a novice operator can find and work. From personal experience, I
can tell you that this is a hard thing to do, and thus tends to imped
the progress of the Techs and separate them from the rest of the ARS.
This separation is not god for the ARS or it abilities to serve in the
public interest .

Where's that pool of typists when you really need it?

Dave K8MN

Dave, are you volunteering for 702 duty?

To assist Mark? No way. He had a pool of trained typists at his beck
and call and has turned down a job paying nearly a quarter million per
year. I'd have thought that he'd have run his comments through his staff.

Dave K8MN

Maybe he'll just assign you to his QSL buro staff.

You can handle the Out-Of-Band QSO's.

Best of Luck.

Dave Heil wrote:

Those who heard this transmission would no doubt think that things were
so so.

Dave K8MN

That just might match your amateur ethics (so so).

Would you respond to such a signal or not?