|
A Sample Of The Supporters Pro-No-Code WT 05-235
Yes, some idiot really sent this to the FCC.
Proceeding: 05-235 Type Code: CO Date Received/Adopted: 08/02/05 Date Released/Denied: Document Type: COMMENT Total Pages: 1 File Number/Community: DA/FCC Number: Filed on Behalf of: John Q. Public Filed By: Attorney/Author Name: Document Date: Complete Mailing Address: 101 main street Houston, TX 77043 Brief Comment i glad u guys got red of the morris cod. i nevir liked morris da kat either. Thanc now i kan use dat raydeo I stoles from dat kar at da hamfeast. |
K4YZ wrote: Yes, some idiot really sent this to the FCC. And speaking of idiots, I see Lennie didn't get past the first of his five pages of comments without lying or mentioning his 1950's era Army career! Sheesh! Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote: K4YZ wrote: Yes, some idiot really sent this to the FCC. And speaking of idiots, I see Lennie didn't get past the first of his five pages of comments without lying or mentioning his 1950's era Army career! Sheesh! Oooops...forgot to mention, The last footnote in Lennie's comments: "Any change in the license examination regulations will primarily affect license applicants. That does not directly affect those already licensed and have already passed any test given under older regulations...despite the displayed spite in a few Comments who had worked hard to pass the morse code tests and are disturbed that applicants in the future might not have to do the same. The Commission is in no way responsible to hold thigs in perpetuity or to insure feeding of emotional sustanance to those already licensed. Of course his comments were laced with the usual amount of "mythology", "tribal" and other insulting inferences that we have become used to here. The biggest lie being his suggestion on page 1 that he was a potential Amateur Radio licensee. Too bad there's not a method for filing charges of perjury on filings. Steve, K4YZ |
It's a plant from a fanatic CW'er. He writes like he takes code over the
air waves. "K4YZ" wrote in message oups.com... Yes, some idiot really sent this to the FCC. Proceeding: 05-235 Type Code: CO Date Received/Adopted: 08/02/05 Date Released/Denied: Document Type: COMMENT Total Pages: 1 File Number/Community: DA/FCC Number: Filed on Behalf of: John Q. Public Filed By: Attorney/Author Name: Document Date: Complete Mailing Address: 101 main street Houston, TX 77043 Brief Comment i glad u guys got red of the morris cod. i nevir liked morris da kat either. Thanc now i kan use dat raydeo I stoles from dat kar at da hamfeast. |
K4YZ wrote: K4YZ wrote: K4YZ wrote: Yes, some idiot really sent this to the FCC. realy tlaking to yourself today ole boy And speaking of idiots, I see Lennie didn't get past the first of his five pages of comments without lying or mentioning his 1950's era Army career! of course he does a bio is part of establish ones bono fides Sheesh! Oooops...forgot to mention, The last footnote in Lennie's comments: "Any change in the license examination regulations will primarily affect license applicants. That does not directly affect those already licensed and have already passed any test given under older regulations...despite the displayed spite in a few Comments who had worked hard to pass the morse code tests and are disturbed that applicants in the future might not have to do the same. The Commission is in no way responsible to hold thigs in perpetuity or to insure feeding of emotional sustanance to those already licensed. Of course his comments were laced with the usual amount of "mythology", "tribal" and other insulting inferences that we have become used to here. The biggest lie being his suggestion on page 1 that he was a potential Amateur Radio licensee. Too bad there's not a method for filing charges of perjury on filings. more libel stevie and more stupidity on your part Steve, K4YZ |
I sure hope you are kidding. If this is real ..... well, it staggers the
imagination. 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA |
Jim Hampton wrote: I sure hope you are kidding. If this is real ..... well, it staggers the imagination. 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA I doubt it but then I suspect that He or Dave of another ProCoder submitted that coment, simliar stuff happen in the last round's NPRM |
K4YZ wrote: Yes, some idiot really sent this to the FCC. Proceeding: 05-235 Type Code: CO Date Received/Adopted: 08/02/05 Date Released/Denied: Document Type: COMMENT Total Pages: 1 File Number/Community: DA/FCC Number: Filed on Behalf of: John Q. Public Filed By: Attorney/Author Name: Document Date: Complete Mailing Address: 101 main street Houston, TX 77043 Brief Comment i glad u guys got red of the morris cod. i nevir liked morris da kat either. Thanc now i kan use dat raydeo I stoles from dat kar at da hamfeast. Ho, hum. Was his name "DeShawn?" |
K4YZ wrote: K4YZ wrote: Yes, some idiot really sent this to the FCC. And speaking of idiots, I see Lennie didn't get past the first of his five pages of comments without lying or mentioning his 1950's era Army career! Sheesh! Steve, K4YZ Yawn. |
an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: K4YZ wrote: K4YZ wrote: Yes, some idiot really sent this to the FCC. realy tlaking to yourself today ole boy And speaking of idiots, I see Lennie didn't get past the first of his five pages of comments without lying or mentioning his 1950's era Army career! of course he does a bio is part of establish ones bono fides No, it doesn't. Not a one of the other comments I read are so obviously grandstanding. Sheesh! Oooops...forgot to mention, The last footnote in Lennie's comments: "Any change in the license examination regulations will primarily affect license applicants. That does not directly affect those already licensed and have already passed any test given under older regulations...despite the displayed spite in a few Comments who had worked hard to pass the morse code tests and are disturbed that applicants in the future might not have to do the same. The Commission is in no way responsible to hold thigs in perpetuity or to insure feeding of emotional sustanance to those already licensed. Of course his comments were laced with the usual amount of "mythology", "tribal" and other insulting inferences that we have become used to here. The biggest lie being his suggestion on page 1 that he was a potential Amateur Radio licensee. Too bad there's not a method for filing charges of perjury on filings. more libel stevie and more stupidity on your part What libel? I quoted Lennie's comments word-for-word, Markie...Go read them yourself. Furthermore, Lennie has, on numerous occassions in this forum, stated that he has no intention of getting an Amateur Radio license, yet he says just the opposite to the FCC in his opening comments. So one way or the other he lied. Again. So again I ask you..."what libel"...?!?! Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote: K4YZ wrote: K4YZ wrote: Yes, some idiot really sent this to the FCC. And speaking of idiots, I see Lennie didn't get past the first of his five pages of comments without lying or mentioning his 1950's era Army career! Sheesh! Oooops...forgot to mention, The last footnote in Lennie's comments: "Any change in the license examination regulations will primarily affect license applicants. That does not directly affect those already licensed and have already passed any test given under older regulations...despite the displayed spite in a few Comments who had worked hard to pass the morse code tests and are disturbed that applicants in the future might not have to do the same. The Commission is in no way responsible to hold thigs in perpetuity or to insure feeding of emotional sustanance to those already licensed. Steve, you might want to end a direct quote with quotation marks so that we can separate Len's comments from your rantings. In any event, Len is correct. Of course his comments were laced with the usual amount of "mythology", "tribal" and other insulting inferences that we have become used to here. Mythology??? Did he mention seven hostile actions? The biggest lie being his suggestion on page 1 that he was a potential Amateur Radio licensee. Or being "A" NCOIC of a MARS station in Okinawa. Did he say that "MARS IS Amateur Radio!" ? Too bad there's not a method for filing charges of perjury on filings. Steve, K4YZ You could always start proceedings to impeach Len. Do you still have the dress? |
an old friend wrote: Jim Hampton wrote: I sure hope you are kidding. If this is real ..... well, it staggers the imagination. 'fraid so, Jim...Check the header I quoted in the ECFS Comments. I doubt it but then I suspect that He or Dave of another ProCoder submitted that coment, simliar stuff happen in the last round's NPRM. Uh huh...Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight . Steve, K4YZ |
an old friend wrote: Jim Hampton wrote: I sure hope you are kidding. If this is real ..... well, it staggers the imagination. 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA I doubt it but then I suspect that He or Dave of another ProCoder submitted that coment, simliar stuff happen in the last round's NPRM It looks like the work of a disgruntled PCTA Extra, such as Bruce/WA8ULX. That Steve would be sucked in by it's idiotic simplicity speaks volumes. |
b.b. wrote: an old friend wrote: Jim Hampton wrote: I sure hope you are kidding. If this is real ..... well, it staggers the imagination. 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA I doubt it but then I suspect that He or Dave of another ProCoder submitted that coment, simliar stuff happen in the last round's NPRM It looks like the work of a disgruntled PCTA Extra, such as Bruce/WA8ULX. That Steve would be sucked in by it's idiotic simplicity speaks volumes. It was an admitted fake. Discussed on the QRZ forum - which makes this group seem tame. John |
b.b. wrote: an old friend wrote: Jim Hampton wrote: I sure hope you are kidding. If this is real ..... well, it staggers the imagination. 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA I doubt it but then I suspect that He or Dave of another ProCoder submitted that coment, simliar stuff happen in the last round's NPRM It looks like the work of a disgruntled PCTA Extra, such as Bruce/WA8ULX. That Steve would be sucked in by it's idiotic simplicity speaks volumes. It is called "willing suspenion of Disbelief" stevie so wants to believe that is the general sort of person that opposes code testing and so he jumps at it It is sad realy but the FCC will see right though it |
b.b. wrote:
K4YZ wrote: K4YZ wrote: Yes, some idiot really sent this to the FCC. And speaking of idiots, I see Lennie didn't get past the first of his five pages of comments without lying or mentioning his 1950's era Army career! Sheesh! Steve, K4YZ Yawn. I'm with you, "bb". That was my reaction to reading Leonard's comments. Dave K8MN |
From: "b.b." on Sat 6 Aug 2005 08:03
K4YZ wrote: K4YZ wrote: K4YZ wrote: Yes, some idiot really sent this to the FCC. And speaking of idiots, I see Lennie didn't get past the first of his five pages of comments without lying or mentioning his 1950's era Army career! Sheesh! Oooops...forgot to mention, The last footnote in Lennie's comments: "Any change in the license examination regulations will primarily affect license applicants. That does not directly affect those already licensed and have already passed any test given under older regulations...despite the displayed spite in a few Comments who had worked hard to pass the morse code tests and are disturbed that applicants in the future might not have to do the same. The Commission is in no way responsible to hold thigs in perpetuity or to insure feeding of emotional sustanance to those already licensed. Steve, you might want to end a direct quote with quotation marks so that we can separate Len's comments from your rantings. Stebie likes to plagiarize...and try to get away with it...:-) But, in truth, he only STARTED the quote with quote marks...but FAILED to end with it. In any event, Len is correct. Quite. Of course his comments were laced with the usual amount of "mythology", "tribal" and other insulting inferences that we have become used to here. Mythology??? Did he mention seven hostile actions? Stebie IMPLIED his "participation" in those "seven hostile actions" yet did NOT GET SPECIFIC as to date or location of HIS actual participation. The "morse myths" are the stuff of legend and abound among the really Olde-Tymers who repeat the stories and tales of the Older Olde-Tymers and their Mighty Morse Machines. :-) The biggest lie being his suggestion on page 1 that he was a potential Amateur Radio licensee. Or being "A" NCOIC of a MARS station in Okinawa. Did he say that "MARS IS Amateur Radio!" ? Tsk, tsk, tsk. ANYONE is a POTENTIAL AMATEUR licensee. I've been a COMMERCIAL licensee since 1956...and IN the HF comms activity before AND after that year...AND working IN the electronics industry of the southern California Aerospace "community" from 1956 onwards...AND as a hobbyist in radio and electronics since 1947 (non-transmitting electronics and radio do NOT need any license). As for ACTUAL, 24/7 HF communications, in the military, I have that documented at: http://kauko.hallikainen.org/history/equipment/ in three separate papers, each with illustrations from military or personal sources. The point in those was to show what Big Time HF Communications WERE back a half century ago. There was NO manual or automatic morse code mode employed in those big 24/7 communications networks of the United States military way back then. None has been used since for the vast majority of communications that have taken place. Too bad there's not a method for filing charges of perjury on filings. Steve, K4YZ You could always start proceedings to impeach Len. Do you still have the dress? My attorney and I will see him in civil court. The Superior Court judges need the entertainment! :-) bar non |
Dave Heil wrote: b.b. wrote: K4YZ wrote: K4YZ wrote: Yes, some idiot really sent this to the FCC. And speaking of idiots, I see Lennie didn't get past the first of his five pages of comments without lying or mentioning his 1950's era Army career! Sheesh! Steve, K4YZ Yawn. I'm with you, "bb". But I've never worked out of band Frenchmen on 6 meters. That was my reaction to reading Leonard's comments. Dave K8MN The part Steve tried to quote looked good to me, too. |
K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: K4YZ wrote: K4YZ wrote: Yes, some idiot really sent this to the FCC. realy tlaking to yourself today ole boy And speaking of idiots, I see Lennie didn't get past the first of his five pages of comments without lying or mentioning his 1950's era Army career! of course he does a bio is part of establish ones bono fides No, it doesn't. sure does Not a one of the other comments I read are so obviously grandstanding. again you are not empowered as a style cop Sheesh! Oooops...forgot to mention, The last footnote in Lennie's comments: "Any change in the license examination regulations will primarily affect license applicants. That does not directly affect those already licensed and have already passed any test given under older regulations...despite the displayed spite in a few Comments who had worked hard to pass the morse code tests and are disturbed that applicants in the future might not have to do the same. The Commission is in no way responsible to hold thigs in perpetuity or to insure feeding of emotional sustanance to those already licensed. Of course his comments were laced with the usual amount of "mythology", "tribal" and other insulting inferences that we have become used to here. The biggest lie being his suggestion on page 1 that he was a potential Amateur Radio licensee. Too bad there's not a method for filing charges of perjury on filings. more libel stevie and more stupidity on your part What libel? accusing someone of perjury is libel I quoted Lennie's comments word-for-word, Markie...Go read them yourself. Furthermore, Lennie has, on numerous occassions in this forum, stated that he has no intention of getting an Amateur Radio license, yet he says just the opposite to the FCC in his opening comments. not as I recall the only way you say that is take his statements of context, which is nothing new for you So one way or the other he lied. Again. only in your twisted mind So again I ask you..."what libel"...?!?! accsuing someone of perjury in a document not even under oath is libel stevie Even if he is lying he can't comit perjury, he has to be under oath for that so you remarks are false on the face of them, and therefore you have no defense against a chrage of libel for them Steve, K4YZ |
b.b. wrote: Dave Heil wrote: b.b. wrote: K4YZ wrote: K4YZ wrote: Yes, some idiot really sent this to the FCC. And speaking of idiots, I see Lennie didn't get past the first of his five pages of comments without lying or mentioning his 1950's era Army career! Sheesh! Steve, K4YZ Yawn. I'm with you, "bb". But I've never worked out of band Frenchmen on 6 meters. No...you just bootleggted from a UN-controlled zone without proper authority. What Dave did was legal...What YOU did wasn't. Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote: b.b. wrote: Dave Heil wrote: b.b. wrote: K4YZ wrote: K4YZ wrote: Yes, some idiot really sent this to the FCC. And speaking of idiots, I see Lennie didn't get past the first of his five pages of comments without lying or mentioning his 1950's era Army career! Sheesh! Steve, K4YZ Yawn. I'm with you, "bb". But I've never worked out of band Frenchmen on 6 meters. No...you just bootleggted from a UN-controlled zone without proper authority. What Dave did was legal...What YOU did wasn't. Steve, K4YZ That's merely your interpretation. Given your propensity for lying, and not having seen you in Somalia for you to make such a judgement, I'm highly suspicious of your statements. In fact, I'd say you are lying. Nothing new there. |
an old friend wrote: b.b. wrote: an old friend wrote: Jim Hampton wrote: I sure hope you are kidding. If this is real ..... well, it staggers the imagination. 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA I doubt it but then I suspect that He or Dave of another ProCoder submitted that coment, simliar stuff happen in the last round's NPRM It looks like the work of a disgruntled PCTA Extra, such as Bruce/WA8ULX. That Steve would be sucked in by it's idiotic simplicity speaks volumes. It is called "willing suspenion of Disbelief" stevie so wants to believe that is the general sort of person that opposes code testing and so he jumps at it It is sad realy but the FCC will see right though it Most of these not-so old-timers have lost it. Just like Dave can't understand that "OSOSOSOSOSOSOSOSOS" just might be a distress call. I pity the units that he supposedly served. |
K4YZ wrote: b.b. wrote: Dave Heil wrote: b.b. wrote: K4YZ wrote: K4YZ wrote: Yes, some idiot really sent this to the FCC. And speaking of idiots, I see Lennie didn't get past the first of his five pages of comments without lying or mentioning his 1950's era Army career! Sheesh! Steve, K4YZ Yawn. I'm with you, "bb". But I've never worked out of band Frenchmen on 6 meters. No...you just bootleggted from a UN-controlled zone without proper authority. What Dave did was legal...What YOU did wasn't. when did you become Lord High Comissioner of the ITU? Steve, K4YZ |
b.b. wrote: an old friend wrote: b.b. wrote: an old friend wrote: Jim Hampton wrote: I sure hope you are kidding. If this is real ..... well, it staggers the imagination. 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA I doubt it but then I suspect that He or Dave of another ProCoder submitted that coment, simliar stuff happen in the last round's NPRM It looks like the work of a disgruntled PCTA Extra, such as Bruce/WA8ULX. That Steve would be sucked in by it's idiotic simplicity speaks volumes. It is called "willing suspenion of Disbelief" stevie so wants to believe that is the general sort of person that opposes code testing and so he jumps at it It is sad realy but the FCC will see right though it Most of these not-so old-timers have lost it. Just like Dave can't understand that "OSOSOSOSOSOSOSOSOS" just might be a distress call. I pity the units that he supposedly served. wonder what they do with transmision "ayday...ayday ....ayday...b9wdy...lling...ayday" the dots being static, something liek sorry ole boy we migh help you when you fix your radio Indeed If truely stuck and needing help but with a big batery Id just send ...---...--- and hope for the best at interavals as long that battery would still make sparks but Dave and prehaps a good many other MMM would not help me |
b.b. wrote: K4YZ wrote: b.b. wrote: Dave Heil wrote: b.b. wrote: K4YZ wrote: K4YZ wrote: Yes, some idiot really sent this to the FCC. And speaking of idiots, I see Lennie didn't get past the first of his five pages of comments without lying or mentioning his 1950's era Army career! Sheesh! Steve, K4YZ Yawn. I'm with you, "bb". But I've never worked out of band Frenchmen on 6 meters. No...you just bootlegged from a UN-controlled zone without proper authority. What Dave did was legal...What YOU did wasn't. Steve, K4YZ That's merely your interpretation. And the matter of regulations for foreces operating under UN authority on foreign soil. Given your propensity for lying...(SNIP) You mean my propensity for rubbing YOUR nose in YOUR lies, Brain... and not having seen you in Somalia for you to make such a judgement, I'm highly suspicious of your statements. What's to be suspicious of? YOU stated you operated from Somalia. (Your words) YOU stated your "commander" gave you permission to do so. (Your words) Unless your "commander" was appointed by appropriate UN authority to do so, that "permission" was inappropriately given. In short...You were illegal. Based upon YOUR words.... In fact, I'd say you are lying. Then if I am "lying", it's based upon bogus information YOU provided. Nothing new there. Now THAT would be correct...Nothing new there when it comes to bogus information from Brian P. Burke. Steve, K4YZ |
b.b. wrote: K4YZ wrote: b.b. wrote: Dave Heil wrote: b.b. wrote: K4YZ wrote: K4YZ wrote: Yes, some idiot really sent this to the FCC. And speaking of idiots, I see Lennie didn't get past the first of his five pages of comments without lying or mentioning his 1950's era Army career! Sheesh! Steve, K4YZ Yawn. I'm with you, "bb". But I've never worked out of band Frenchmen on 6 meters. No...you just bootlegged from a UN-controlled zone without proper authority. What Dave did was legal...What YOU did wasn't. Steve, K4YZ That's merely your interpretation. And the matter of regulations for foreces operating under UN authority on foreign soil. Given your propensity for lying...(SNIP) You mean my propensity for rubbing YOUR nose in YOUR lies, Brain... and not having seen you in Somalia for you to make such a judgement, I'm highly suspicious of your statements. What's to be suspicious of? YOU stated you operated from Somalia. (Your words) YOU stated your "commander" gave you permission to do so. (Your words) Unless your "commander" was appointed by appropriate UN authority to do so, that "permission" was inappropriately given. In short...You were illegal. Based upon YOUR words.... In fact, I'd say you are lying. Then if I am "lying", it's based upon bogus information YOU provided. Nothing new there. Now THAT would be correct...Nothing new there when it comes to bogus information from Brian P. Burke. Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote: b.b. wrote: K4YZ wrote: b.b. wrote: Dave Heil wrote: b.b. wrote: K4YZ wrote: K4YZ wrote: Yes, some idiot really sent this to the FCC. And speaking of idiots, I see Lennie didn't get past the first of his five pages of comments without lying or mentioning his 1950's era Army career! Sheesh! Steve, K4YZ Yawn. I'm with you, "bb". But I've never worked out of band Frenchmen on 6 meters. No...you just bootlegged from a UN-controlled zone without proper authority. What Dave did was legal...What YOU did wasn't. Steve, K4YZ That's merely your interpretation. And the matter of regulations for foreces operating under UN authority on foreign soil. You would have to speak to the feces under UN control. I wasn't part of that game. Given your propensity for lying...(SNIP) You mean my propensity for rubbing YOUR nose in YOUR lies, Brain... No. I said your propensity for lying. and not having seen you in Somalia for you to make such a judgement, I'm highly suspicious of your statements. What's to be suspicious of? You have no first hand knowledge of the situation, yet you make judgements. Face it, Steve, you were a non-participant, so your opinion just doesn't matter (hi Len). YOU stated you operated from Somalia. (Your words) YOU stated your "commander" gave you permission to do so. (Your words) Unless your "commander" was appointed by appropriate UN authority to do so, that "permission" was inappropriately given. My commander was appointed my the first Bush president. He does not work for the UN. BTW, neither does his son. In short...You were illegal. Based upon YOUR words.... In short, you've got your head up your rectum. You must like the view... In fact, I'd say you are lying. Then if I am "lying", it's based upon bogus information YOU provided. You assume that my unit was under UN control. That's where you went wrong. Nothing new there. Now THAT would be correct...Nothing new there when it comes to bogus information from Brian P. Burke. Steve, K4YZ Your continued ignorance of the facts is what's not new. |
From: b.b. on Aug 9, 9:31 am
K4YZ wrote: b.b. wrote: K4YZ wrote: b.b. wrote: Dave Heil wrote: b.b. wrote: K4YZ wrote: K4YZ wrote: And speaking of idiots, I see Lennie didn't get past the first of his five pages of comments without lying or mentioning his 1950's era Army career! Sheesh! [poor Stebie, still resentful, jealous, and angry...] But I've never worked out of band Frenchmen on 6 meters. No...you just bootlegged from a UN-controlled zone without proper authority. What Dave did was legal...What YOU did wasn't. That's merely your interpretation. [mostly his imagination following the lead of his spiteful nature] And the matter of regulations for foreces operating under UN authority on foreign soil. You would have to speak to the feces under UN control. I wasn't part of that game. Sigh...Stebie squeaks like he IS the UN. He had too many cups of 'Kofi.' :-) Given your propensity for lying...(SNIP) You mean my propensity for rubbing YOUR nose in YOUR lies, Brain... No. I said your propensity for lying. Stebie has all the symptoms of a congenital sociopath. and not having seen you in Somalia for you to make such a judgement, I'm highly suspicious of your statements. What's to be suspicious of? You have no first hand knowledge of the situation, yet you make judgements. Face it, Steve, you were a non-participant, so your opinion just doesn't matter (hi Len). Stebie has presented NO proof, references, or anything else that he was ever in any of his claimed "seven hostile actions" during any part of his 18 years in the USMC. YOU stated you operated from Somalia. (Your words) YOU stated your "commander" gave you permission to do so. (Your words) Unless your "commander" was appointed by appropriate UN authority to do so, that "permission" was inappropriately given. My commander was appointed my the first Bush president. He does not work for the UN. BTW, neither does his son. Stebie must think he is part of Navy JAG...:-) In short...You were illegal. Based upon YOUR words.... In short, you've got your head up your rectum. You must like the view... That's his natural element... In fact, I'd say you are lying. Then if I am "lying", it's based upon bogus information YOU provided. You assume that my unit was under UN control. That's where you went wrong. Tsk. Stebie "went wrong" long before he came in here...:-) Now THAT would be correct...Nothing new there when it comes to bogus information from Brian P. Burke. Your continued ignorance of the facts is what's not new. Stebie's just on the road to going completely nuts. shrug not new |
wrote: From: b.b. on Aug 9, 9:31 am K4YZ wrote: b.b. wrote: K4YZ wrote: b.b. wrote: Dave Heil wrote: b.b. wrote: K4YZ wrote: K4YZ wrote: And speaking of idiots, I see Lennie didn't get past the first of his five pages of comments without lying or mentioning his 1950's era Army career! Sheesh! [poor Stebie, still resentful, jealous, and angry...] His problem. But I've never worked out of band Frenchmen on 6 meters. No...you just bootlegged from a UN-controlled zone without proper authority. What Dave did was legal...What YOU did wasn't. That's merely your interpretation. [mostly his imagination following the lead of his spiteful nature] His problem. And the matter of regulations for foreces operating under UN authority on foreign soil. You would have to speak to the feces under UN control. I wasn't part of that game. Sigh...Stebie squeaks like he IS the UN. He had too many cups of 'Kofi.' :-) His problem. Given your propensity for lying...(SNIP) You mean my propensity for rubbing YOUR nose in YOUR lies, Brain... No. I said your propensity for lying. Stebie has all the symptoms of a congenital sociopath. His problem. and not having seen you in Somalia for you to make such a judgement, I'm highly suspicious of your statements. What's to be suspicious of? You have no first hand knowledge of the situation, yet you make judgements. Face it, Steve, you were a non-participant, so your opinion just doesn't matter (hi Len). Stebie has presented NO proof, references, or anything else that he was ever in any of his claimed "seven hostile actions" during any part of his 18 years in the USMC. He can't. The Stolen Valor people are waiting to pounce on this fake hero. Definitely his problem. YOU stated you operated from Somalia. (Your words) YOU stated your "commander" gave you permission to do so. (Your words) Unless your "commander" was appointed by appropriate UN authority to do so, that "permission" was inappropriately given. My commander was appointed my the first Bush president. He does not work for the UN. BTW, neither does his son. Stebie must think he is part of Navy JAG...:-) His problem. In short...You were illegal. Based upon YOUR words.... In short, you've got your head up your rectum. You must like the view... That's his natural element... And his problem. In fact, I'd say you are lying. Then if I am "lying", it's based upon bogus information YOU provided. You assume that my unit was under UN control. That's where you went wrong. Tsk. Stebie "went wrong" long before he came in here...:-) Wish the VA would take care of this problem; get it off the streets. Now THAT would be correct...Nothing new there when it comes to bogus information from Brian P. Burke. Your continued ignorance of the facts is what's not new. Stebie's just on the road to going completely nuts. shrug not new He arrived at that station a long time ago. |
My own comments
To the persons reading comments for the FCC greetings, With regard to main body of the NPRM I am a favor of dropping all code tests at once, however there are a few points concerning related matters I wish to discuss and respect insist that FCC made something on these points clear when the R&O is issued. The privileges of the entry class, Technician, after this action are frankly unclear to me. As perhaps one of the few members of that class making comments it is a subject near and dear to my heart. It is also a question vital to the future of the ARS, and thus in some degree the safety and future of the USA. I believe the privileges should be what was known as Before the 1998 NPRM as Tech plus, this si because I have frankly observed that many new Techs tend to get struck on FM repeaters, a fine mode but hard to break out of, and being hard to break out tends to depress the chances that they will, ( I refer the FCC to prices on allmode rigs with VHF frequencies compared to FM rigs) In addition to issues of cost with the propagation of VHF there are many times that there is no one out there that a novice operator can find and work. From personal experience, I can tell you that this is a hard thing to do, and thus tends to imped the progress of the Techs and separate them from the rest of the ARS. This separation is not god for the ARS or it abilities to serve in the public interest . |
an_old_friend wrote:
My own comments To the persons reading comments for the FCC greetings, With regard to main body of the NPRM I am a favor of dropping all code tests at once, however there are a few points concerning related matters I wish to discuss and respect insist that FCC made something on these points clear when the R&O is issued. The privileges of the entry class, Technician, after this action are frankly unclear to me. As perhaps one of the few members of that class making comments it is a subject near and dear to my heart. It is also a question vital to the future of the ARS, and thus in some degree the safety and future of the USA. I believe the privileges should be what was known as Before the 1998 NPRM as Tech plus, this si because I have frankly observed that many new Techs tend to get struck on FM repeaters, a fine mode but hard to break out of, and being hard to break out tends to depress the chances that they will, ( I refer the FCC to prices on allmode rigs with VHF frequencies compared to FM rigs) In addition to issues of cost with the propagation of VHF there are many times that there is no one out there that a novice operator can find and work. From personal experience, I can tell you that this is a hard thing to do, and thus tends to imped the progress of the Techs and separate them from the rest of the ARS. This separation is not god for the ARS or it abilities to serve in the public interest . Where's that pool of typists when you really need it? Dave K8MN |
Dave Heil wrote: an_old_friend wrote: My own comments To the persons reading comments for the FCC greetings, With regard to main body of the NPRM I am a favor of dropping all code tests at once, however there are a few points concerning related matters I wish to discuss and respect insist that FCC made something on these points clear when the R&O is issued. The privileges of the entry class, Technician, after this action are frankly unclear to me. As perhaps one of the few members of that class making comments it is a subject near and dear to my heart. It is also a question vital to the future of the ARS, and thus in some degree the safety and future of the USA. I believe the privileges should be what was known as Before the 1998 NPRM as Tech plus, this si because I have frankly observed that many new Techs tend to get struck on FM repeaters, a fine mode but hard to break out of, and being hard to break out tends to depress the chances that they will, ( I refer the FCC to prices on allmode rigs with VHF frequencies compared to FM rigs) In addition to issues of cost with the propagation of VHF there are many times that there is no one out there that a novice operator can find and work. From personal experience, I can tell you that this is a hard thing to do, and thus tends to imped the progress of the Techs and separate them from the rest of the ARS. This separation is not god for the ARS or it abilities to serve in the public interest . Where's that pool of typists when you really need it? Dave K8MN Dave, are you volunteering for 702 duty? |
an_old_friend wrote: b.b. wrote: an old friend wrote: b.b. wrote: an old friend wrote: Jim Hampton wrote: I sure hope you are kidding. If this is real ..... well, it staggers the imagination. 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA I doubt it but then I suspect that He or Dave of another ProCoder submitted that coment, simliar stuff happen in the last round's NPRM It looks like the work of a disgruntled PCTA Extra, such as Bruce/WA8ULX. That Steve would be sucked in by it's idiotic simplicity speaks volumes. It is called "willing suspenion of Disbelief" stevie so wants to believe that is the general sort of person that opposes code testing and so he jumps at it It is sad realy but the FCC will see right though it Most of these not-so old-timers have lost it. Just like Dave can't understand that "OSOSOSOSOSOSOSOSOS" just might be a distress call. I pity the units that he supposedly served. wonder what they do with transmision "ayday...ayday ...ayday...b9wdy...lling...ayday" the dots being static, something liek sorry ole boy we migh help you when you fix your radio They walk down the hall to the vending machine and by a bag of chips. Indeed If truely stuck and needing help but with a big batery Id just send ...---...--- and hope for the best at interavals as long that battery would still make sparks but Dave and prehaps a good many other MMM would not help me Dave is special, but not unique. |
b.b. wrote:
Dave Heil wrote: an_old_friend wrote: My own comments To the persons reading comments for the FCC greetings, With regard to main body of the NPRM I am a favor of dropping all code tests at once, however there are a few points concerning related matters I wish to discuss and respect insist that FCC made something on these points clear when the R&O is issued. The privileges of the entry class, Technician, after this action are frankly unclear to me. As perhaps one of the few members of that class making comments it is a subject near and dear to my heart. It is also a question vital to the future of the ARS, and thus in some degree the safety and future of the USA. I believe the privileges should be what was known as Before the 1998 NPRM as Tech plus, this si because I have frankly observed that many new Techs tend to get struck on FM repeaters, a fine mode but hard to break out of, and being hard to break out tends to depress the chances that they will, ( I refer the FCC to prices on allmode rigs with VHF frequencies compared to FM rigs) In addition to issues of cost with the propagation of VHF there are many times that there is no one out there that a novice operator can find and work. From personal experience, I can tell you that this is a hard thing to do, and thus tends to imped the progress of the Techs and separate them from the rest of the ARS. This separation is not god for the ARS or it abilities to serve in the public interest . Where's that pool of typists when you really need it? Dave K8MN Dave, are you volunteering for 702 duty? To assist Mark? No way. He had a pool of trained typists at his beck and call and has turned down a job paying nearly a quarter million per year. I'd have thought that he'd have run his comments through his staff. Dave K8MN |
b.b. wrote:
an_old_friend wrote: b.b. wrote: an old friend wrote: b.b. wrote: an old friend wrote: Jim Hampton wrote: I sure hope you are kidding. If this is real ..... well, it staggers the imagination. 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA I doubt it but then I suspect that He or Dave of another ProCoder submitted that coment, simliar stuff happen in the last round's NPRM It looks like the work of a disgruntled PCTA Extra, such as Bruce/WA8ULX. That Steve would be sucked in by it's idiotic simplicity speaks volumes. It is called "willing suspenion of Disbelief" stevie so wants to believe that is the general sort of person that opposes code testing and so he jumps at it It is sad realy but the FCC will see right though it Most of these not-so old-timers have lost it. Just like Dave can't understand that "OSOSOSOSOSOSOSOSOS" just might be a distress call. I pity the units that he supposedly served. wonder what they do with transmision "ayday...ayday ...ayday...b9wdy...lling...ayday" the dots being static, something liek sorry ole boy we migh help you when you fix your radio They walk down the hall to the vending machine and by a bag of chips. Indeed If truely stuck and needing help but with a big batery Id just send ...---...--- and hope for the best... Those who heard this transmission would no doubt think that things were so so. Dave K8MN |
Dave Heil wrote: To assist Mark? No way. He had a pool of trained typists at his beck and call and has turned down a job paying nearly a quarter million per year. I'd have thought that he'd have run his comments through his staff. thinking not realy your strong suit No staff I hire out of a pool when i choose to pay for the temps, I choose not to pay for the temps Dave K8MN |
Dave Heil wrote: b.b. wrote: an_old_friend wrote: b.b. wrote: an old friend wrote: b.b. wrote: an old friend wrote: Jim Hampton wrote: I sure hope you are kidding. If this is real ..... well, it staggers the imagination. 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA I doubt it but then I suspect that He or Dave of another ProCoder submitted that coment, simliar stuff happen in the last round's NPRM It looks like the work of a disgruntled PCTA Extra, such as Bruce/WA8ULX. That Steve would be sucked in by it's idiotic simplicity speaks volumes. It is called "willing suspenion of Disbelief" stevie so wants to believe that is the general sort of person that opposes code testing and so he jumps at it It is sad realy but the FCC will see right though it Most of these not-so old-timers have lost it. Just like Dave can't understand that "OSOSOSOSOSOSOSOSOS" just might be a distress call. I pity the units that he supposedly served. wonder what they do with transmision "ayday...ayday ...ayday...b9wdy...lling...ayday" the dots being static, something liek sorry ole boy we migh help you when you fix your radio They walk down the hall to the vending machine and by a bag of chips. Indeed If truely stuck and needing help but with a big batery Id just send ...---...--- and hope for the best... Those who heard this transmission would no doubt think that things were so so. indeed proving the devotion of the Procoders to the aiding of others Dave K8MN |
an_old_friend wrote: My own comments To the persons reading comments for the FCC greetings, With regard to main body of the NPRM I am a favor of dropping all code tests at once, however there are a few points concerning related matters I wish to discuss and respect insist that FCC made something on these points clear when the R&O is issued. Started off strong, Mark. But then your mouth over ran common sense and you started rambling again. E N G L I S H C O M P O S I T I O N The privileges of the entry class, Technician, after this action are frankly unclear to me. I guess you missed the part where the FCC said it was dismissing all those other petitions and was focusing on the Code issue at the moment. As perhaps one of the few members of that class making comments it is a subject near and dear to my heart. Also guess you haven't been paying attention to some of the demographics of the respondents. You are far and away from being "...one of the few...", Mark... It is also a question vital to the future of the ARS, and thus in some degree the safety and future of the USA. Let's see if Lennie ahs the same Field Day with THAT as he does anytime any of the REST of us suggest even the remotest degree of importance or relevance of the Amateur Radio Service... I believe the privileges should be what was known as Before the 1998 NPRM as Tech plus, this si because I have frankly observed that many new Techs tend to get struck on FM repeaters, a fine mode but hard to break out of, and being hard to break out tends to depress the chances that they will, ( I refer the FCC to prices on allmode rigs with VHF frequencies compared to FM rigs) In addition to issues of cost with the propagation of VHF there are many times that there is no one out there that a novice operator can find and work. Congratulations. 104 words before you managed to get a period in there. And the FCC could care less about the price of radios. From personal experience...(SNIP) Goat sacrifice counts here? I can tell you that this is a hard thing to do, and thus tends to imped the progress of the Techs and separate them from the rest of the ARS. The only thing that impedes ANY licensee from operating on ANY band or mode is just DOING it. I know several NCT's who rarely touch a 2 meter rig. This separation is not god for the ARS or it abilities to serve in the public interest . Signing this comment with an Amateur Radio callsign will be even WORSE for the Amateur Service. Steve, K4YZ |
an old friend wrote: Dave Heil wrote: b.b. wrote: an_old_friend wrote: Indeed If truely stuck and needing help but with a big batery Id just send ...---...--- and hope for the best... Those who heard this transmission would no doubt think that things were so so. indeed proving the devotion of the Procoders to the aiding of others Whoa right there, Mark...... (1) Dave was, again, correct. What you typed was "SOSO" (2) You've already demonstrated that you WON'T help yourself despite having acknowledged that numerous resources are at your disposal and within your capabilites to use and implement. So why would Dave (or anyone else, for that matter..??) waste any time on you for anything? (3) As for "procoders" aiding others, I have "elmered" and/or proctored tests for dozens of folks and helped who-knows-how-many folks ON the radio...regardless of thier class of license. You've "helped"...how many...?!?! Steve, K4YZ |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:16 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com