| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#22
September 10th 05, 09:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
an_old_friend wrote: wrote: an Old friend wrote: an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: quoting you stevie To which I will reply: ( 1. ) I wasn't there to verify the participants at the act of conception. If calling me a ******* makes you feel better, then have at it ( 2 ) I am a 9 time USMC Rifle Expert Mark. If I want something shot, even in Illinois, I will hit the target. One shot, one kill. I don't waste the govenments ammunition hitting targets that are not of consequence. YOU are not of ANY consequence that I am aware of, but situations ARE subject to change! Unquote the last sentence is particularly ilumanting wrote: wrote: cut --------------------- Brian said: "There never was an insinuation, Mr. Robeson. It was a case of your misunderstanding and a dose of your wishful thinking." Then Steve said: "I don't think that your previously archived comments might be read that way. For an offense to have occured, it onl;y requires that it be perceived as such." -------------------- Steve only has to perceive a threat, but he says the rest of us have to have the courts decide. and therefore according to stevie as the one who received the threat I decide if it was threatening It would appear that way. But there's always a double-standard at work in this newsgripe, so the usual rules of logic don't always work. I wonder if if realy the NG do we have any eveidence that lgic ever works on stevie BTW did you catch Stevie that he never cliamed to be an expert on anything? Yeh, not worth arguing his obvious contradictions. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
