an Old friend wrote:
an old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

quoting you stevie
To which I will reply: ( 1. ) I wasn't there to verify the
participants at
the act of conception. If calling me a ******* makes you feel better,
then have
at it ( 2 ) I am a 9 time USMC Rifle Expert Mark. If I want
something
shot, even in Illinois, I will hit the target. One shot, one kill. I
don't
waste the govenments ammunition hitting targets that are not of
consequence.
YOU are not of ANY consequence that I am aware of, but situations ARE
subject
to change!

Unquote

the last sentence is particularly ilumanting

wrote:
wrote:
cut


---------------------
Brian said: "There never was an insinuation, Mr. Robeson. It was a
case of your misunderstanding and a dose of your wishful thinking."

Then Steve said: "I don't think that your previously archived comments
might be read that way. For an offense to have occured, it onl;y
requires that it be perceived as such."
--------------------

Steve only has to perceive a threat, but he says the rest of us have to
have the courts decide.

and therefore according to stevie as the one who received the threat I
decide if it was threatening

It would appear that way.

But there's always a double-standard at work in this newsgripe, so the
usual rules of logic don't always work.

an old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
Mark,

cutting

I said: Geez, Mark, and I just thought we were getting to get
to be
buddies. Guess the engagement's off, huh?

Stevie making a pass at me

Nope.

Mark said: That is your best shot. I notice that you don't
disagree


To which I will reply: ( 1. ) I wasn't there to verify the
participants at
the act of conception. If calling me a ******* makes you feel better,
then have
at it ( 2 ) I am a 9 time USMC Rifle Expert Mark. If I want
something
shot, even in Illinois, I will hit the target. One shot, one kill. I
don't
waste the govenments ammunition hitting targets that are not of
consequence.
YOU are not of ANY consequence that I am aware of, but situations ARE
subject
to change!


a nice clear death threat

Nope.

no way that is anything but a death threat

It's a lot of things...A death threat isn't one of them.

no tlak by stevie of debate or tlaking at nothing but going on about
shooting and killing

"tlak" "tlaking"

Just responding to your "is that your best shot" comment in kind.

"...I don't waste the govenments ammunition hitting targets that
are not of consequence. YOU are not of ANY consequence that I am aware
of, but situations ARE subject to change!..."

And STILL no death threat!

Give it up, DelusionBoy! That was no more a "death threat" than
your "I am a Colonel in the Army Chemical Corps" was true!

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
an old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
Mark,

cutting

I said: Geez, Mark, and I just thought we were getting to get
to be
buddies. Guess the engagement's off, huh?

Stevie making a pass at me

Nope.

yep you are in plain langauge


Mark said: That is your best shot. I notice that you don't
disagree


To which I will reply: ( 1. ) I wasn't there to verify the
participants at
the act of conception. If calling me a ******* makes you feel better,
then have
at it ( 2 ) I am a 9 time USMC Rifle Expert Mark. If I want
something
shot, even in Illinois, I will hit the target. One shot, one kill. I
don't
waste the govenments ammunition hitting targets that are not of
consequence.
YOU are not of ANY consequence that I am aware of, but situations ARE
subject
to change!


a nice clear death threat

Nope.

sure is


no way that is anything but a death threat

It's a lot of things...A death threat isn't one of them.

It can only be a death threat

It has nothing to do with hamradio

nothing to with the topic "Cw it more than just a mode"

it is and remains a death threat

no tlak by stevie of debate or tlaking at nothing but going on about
shooting and killing

"tlak" "tlaking"

Just responding to your "is that your best shot" comment in kind.

"...I don't waste the govenments ammunition hitting targets that
are not of consequence. YOU are not of ANY consequence that I am aware
of, but situations ARE subject to change!..."

And STILL no death threat!

sure is


Give it up, DelusionBoy! That was no more a "death threat" than
your "I am a Colonel in the Army Chemical Corps" was true!

Steve, K4YZ

nobodys old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
nobodys old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
Mark,

cutting

I said: Geez, Mark, and I just thought we were getting to get
to be
buddies. Guess the engagement's off, huh?

Stevie making a pass at me

Nope.

yep you are in plain langauge

Nope. More of your delusions of grandeur, Markie.

Mark said: That is your best shot. I notice that you don't
disagree


To which I will reply: ( 1. ) I wasn't there to verify the
participants at
the act of conception. If calling me a ******* makes you feel better,
then have
at it ( 2 ) I am a 9 time USMC Rifle Expert Mark. If I want
something
shot, even in Illinois, I will hit the target. One shot, one kill. I
don't
waste the govenments ammunition hitting targets that are not of
consequence.
YOU are not of ANY consequence that I am aware of, but situations ARE
subject
to change!


a nice clear death threat

Nope.

sure is

Nope.

Not then...Not today...

no way that is anything but a death threat

It's a lot of things...A death threat isn't one of them.

It can only be a death threat

Nope.

It has nothing to do with hamradio

The what were YOU doing making your own "best shot" comments?

nothing to with the topic "Cw it more than just a mode"

What were you doing making slanderous comments?

it is and remains a death threat

Nope. Double nope.

no tlak by stevie of debate or tlaking at nothing but going on about
shooting and killing

"tlak" "tlaking"

Just responding to your "is that your best shot" comment in kind.

"...I don't waste the govenments ammunition hitting targets that
are not of consequence. YOU are not of ANY consequence that I am aware
of, but situations ARE subject to change!..."

And STILL no death threat!

sure is

Nope.

Just more of your "self victimization" role.

Give it up, DelusionBoy! That was no more a "death threat" than
your "I am a Colonel in the Army Chemical Corps" was true!

Repeated for emphasis.

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
nobodys old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
nobodys old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
Mark,

cutting

I said: Geez, Mark, and I just thought we were getting to get
to be
buddies. Guess the engagement's off, huh?

Stevie making a pass at me

Nope.

yep you are in plain langauge

Nope. More of your delusions of grandeur, Markie.

nope more of you your sexual harassment


Mark said: That is your best shot. I notice that you don't
disagree


To which I will reply: ( 1. ) I wasn't there to verify the
participants at
the act of conception. If calling me a ******* makes you feel better,
then have
at it ( 2 ) I am a 9 time USMC Rifle Expert Mark. If I want
something
shot, even in Illinois, I will hit the target. One shot, one kill. I
don't
waste the govenments ammunition hitting targets that are not of
consequence.
YOU are not of ANY consequence that I am aware of, but situations ARE
subject
to change!


a nice clear death threat

Nope.

sure is

Nope.

Not then...Not today...

was then and remains today

no way that is anything but a death threat

It's a lot of things...A death threat isn't one of them.

It can only be a death threat

Nope.

It has nothing to do with hamradio

The what were YOU doing making your own "best shot" comments?

shots do not always involve gun or killing


nothing to with the topic "Cw it more than just a mode"

What were you doing making slanderous comments?

I was not making one

can't have been I could have been making libelous one, but I was doing
that either