| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
August 23rd 05, 01:50 AM
|
|||
|
|||
K4YZ wrote:
Mark, cutting I said: Geez, Mark, and I just thought we were getting to get to be buddies. Guess the engagement's off, huh? Stevie making a pass at me Mark said: That is your best shot. I notice that you don't disagree To which I will reply: ( 1. ) I wasn't there to verify the participants at the act of conception. If calling me a ******* makes you feel better, then have at it ( 2 ) I am a 9 time USMC Rifle Expert Mark. If I want something shot, even in Illinois, I will hit the target. One shot, one kill. I don't waste the govenments ammunition hitting targets that are not of consequence. YOU are not of ANY consequence that I am aware of, but situations ARE subject to change! a nice clear death threat no way that is anything but a death threat no tlak by stevie of debate or tlaking at nothing but going on about shooting and killing |
|
#2
August 23rd 05, 01:53 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Mark, cutting I said: Geez, Mark, and I just thought we were getting to get to be buddies. Guess the engagement's off, huh? Stevie making a pass at me Mark said: That is your best shot. I notice that you don't disagree To which I will reply: ( 1. ) I wasn't there to verify the participants at the act of conception. If calling me a ******* makes you feel better, then have at it ( 2 ) I am a 9 time USMC Rifle Expert Mark. If I want something shot, even in Illinois, I will hit the target. One shot, one kill. I don't waste the govenments ammunition hitting targets that are not of consequence. YOU are not of ANY consequence that I am aware of, but situations ARE subject to change! a nice clear death threat no way that is anything but a death threat no tlak by stevie of debate or tlaking at nothing but going on about shooting and killing Steve loves charades. His favorite is the "I'm almost going to make a threat, but I am going to make you think I made a threat" charade. |
|
#3
August 25th 05, 10:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#5
August 26th 05, 01:57 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
an_old_friend wrote: wrote: wrote: an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Mark, cut no tlak by stevie of debate or tlaking at nothing but going on about shooting and killing Steve loves charades. His favorite is the "I'm almost going to make a threat, but I am going to make you think I made a threat" charade. --------------------- Brian said: "There never was an insinuation, Mr. Robeson. It was a case of your misunderstanding and a dose of your wishful thinking." Then Steve said: "I don't think that your previously archived comments might be read that way. For an offense to have occured, it onl;y requires that it be perceived as such." -------------------- Steve only has to perceive a threat, but he says the rest of us have to have the courts decide. In all fairness I beleive Stevie allows this power also the MMM Ah, those Morsemen. The Mighty Macho Morsemen! As long as they realize that the Dud (as in UXO) has bestowed such privelege upon them. |
|
#6
September 8th 05, 12:15 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
an old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote: quoting you stevie To which I will reply: ( 1. ) I wasn't there to verify the participants at the act of conception. If calling me a ******* makes you feel better, then have at it ( 2 ) I am a 9 time USMC Rifle Expert Mark. If I want something shot, even in Illinois, I will hit the target. One shot, one kill. I don't waste the govenments ammunition hitting targets that are not of consequence. YOU are not of ANY consequence that I am aware of, but situations ARE subject to change! Unquote the last sentence is particularly ilumanting wrote: wrote: cut --------------------- Brian said: "There never was an insinuation, Mr. Robeson. It was a case of your misunderstanding and a dose of your wishful thinking." Then Steve said: "I don't think that your previously archived comments might be read that way. For an offense to have occured, it onl;y requires that it be perceived as such." -------------------- Steve only has to perceive a threat, but he says the rest of us have to have the courts decide. and therefore according to stevie as the one who received the threat I decide if it was threatening |
|
#7
September 10th 05, 04:06 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
an Old friend wrote: an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: quoting you stevie To which I will reply: ( 1. ) I wasn't there to verify the participants at the act of conception. If calling me a ******* makes you feel better, then have at it ( 2 ) I am a 9 time USMC Rifle Expert Mark. If I want something shot, even in Illinois, I will hit the target. One shot, one kill. I don't waste the govenments ammunition hitting targets that are not of consequence. YOU are not of ANY consequence that I am aware of, but situations ARE subject to change! Unquote the last sentence is particularly ilumanting wrote: wrote: cut --------------------- Brian said: "There never was an insinuation, Mr. Robeson. It was a case of your misunderstanding and a dose of your wishful thinking." Then Steve said: "I don't think that your previously archived comments might be read that way. For an offense to have occured, it onl;y requires that it be perceived as such." -------------------- Steve only has to perceive a threat, but he says the rest of us have to have the courts decide. and therefore according to stevie as the one who received the threat I decide if it was threatening It would appear that way. But there's always a double-standard at work in this newsgripe, so the usual rules of logic don't always work. |
|
#8
September 10th 05, 04:27 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
wrote: an Old friend wrote: an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: quoting you stevie To which I will reply: ( 1. ) I wasn't there to verify the participants at the act of conception. If calling me a ******* makes you feel better, then have at it ( 2 ) I am a 9 time USMC Rifle Expert Mark. If I want something shot, even in Illinois, I will hit the target. One shot, one kill. I don't waste the govenments ammunition hitting targets that are not of consequence. YOU are not of ANY consequence that I am aware of, but situations ARE subject to change! Unquote the last sentence is particularly ilumanting wrote: wrote: cut --------------------- Brian said: "There never was an insinuation, Mr. Robeson. It was a case of your misunderstanding and a dose of your wishful thinking." Then Steve said: "I don't think that your previously archived comments might be read that way. For an offense to have occured, it onl;y requires that it be perceived as such." -------------------- Steve only has to perceive a threat, but he says the rest of us have to have the courts decide. and therefore according to stevie as the one who received the threat I decide if it was threatening It would appear that way. But there's always a double-standard at work in this newsgripe, so the usual rules of logic don't always work. I wonder if if realy the NG do we have any eveidence that lgic ever works on stevie BTW did you catch Stevie that he never cliamed to be an expert on anything? |
|
#9
September 10th 05, 09:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
an_old_friend wrote: wrote: an Old friend wrote: an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: quoting you stevie To which I will reply: ( 1. ) I wasn't there to verify the participants at the act of conception. If calling me a ******* makes you feel better, then have at it ( 2 ) I am a 9 time USMC Rifle Expert Mark. If I want something shot, even in Illinois, I will hit the target. One shot, one kill. I don't waste the govenments ammunition hitting targets that are not of consequence. YOU are not of ANY consequence that I am aware of, but situations ARE subject to change! Unquote the last sentence is particularly ilumanting wrote: wrote: cut --------------------- Brian said: "There never was an insinuation, Mr. Robeson. It was a case of your misunderstanding and a dose of your wishful thinking." Then Steve said: "I don't think that your previously archived comments might be read that way. For an offense to have occured, it onl;y requires that it be perceived as such." -------------------- Steve only has to perceive a threat, but he says the rest of us have to have the courts decide. and therefore according to stevie as the one who received the threat I decide if it was threatening It would appear that way. But there's always a double-standard at work in this newsgripe, so the usual rules of logic don't always work. I wonder if if realy the NG do we have any eveidence that lgic ever works on stevie BTW did you catch Stevie that he never cliamed to be an expert on anything? Yeh, not worth arguing his obvious contradictions. |
|
#10
August 23rd 05, 02:01 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Mark, cutting I said: Geez, Mark, and I just thought we were getting to get to be buddies. Guess the engagement's off, huh? Stevie making a pass at me Nope. Mark said: That is your best shot. I notice that you don't disagree To which I will reply: ( 1. ) I wasn't there to verify the participants at the act of conception. If calling me a ******* makes you feel better, then have at it ( 2 ) I am a 9 time USMC Rifle Expert Mark. If I want something shot, even in Illinois, I will hit the target. One shot, one kill. I don't waste the govenments ammunition hitting targets that are not of consequence. YOU are not of ANY consequence that I am aware of, but situations ARE subject to change! a nice clear death threat Nope. no way that is anything but a death threat It's a lot of things...A death threat isn't one of them. no tlak by stevie of debate or tlaking at nothing but going on about shooting and killing "tlak" "tlaking" Just responding to your "is that your best shot" comment in kind. "...I don't waste the govenments ammunition hitting targets that are not of consequence. YOU are not of ANY consequence that I am aware of, but situations ARE subject to change!..." And STILL no death threat! Give it up, DelusionBoy! That was no more a "death threat" than your "I am a Colonel in the Army Chemical Corps" was true! Steve, K4YZ |
Hybrid Mode
