Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#131
|
|||
|
|||
KØHB wrote:
"Cmdr Buzz corey" wrote So where did all the matter in the universe orginially come from? If it had no beginning, the it just "was". If it did indeed have a beginning, the what was before that? Since there was no universe, there was no time. If there was no time, there obviously was no "before". If there were no time, then there could never have been anything, since it would take even the smallest fraction of time for the "big bang" to begin. |
#132
|
|||
|
|||
John Smith wrote:
In fact, it was this professor who first told me to look either for angels or aliens--before he finally settled on the angels (intelligence NOT from a mud puddle as you could ever find upon an earth-like planet)... I just flat do not know what to think, it is all too impossible... perhaps the answers are out there... X-Files-theme-plays-in-the-background ... or, perhaps there is a very simple explanation we just have not thought of--yet... any guess is as valid as another... John The balance between the universe (as we know it) existing and not existing is very delicate. Take the gravitional constant (the force of gravity). If the gravitional constant were larger, stars would form no bigger than the earth and would burn up in a very short time (less than a year). If the gravitional constant were smaller, expansion of matter would proceed at such a fast pace that gravity could not keep stars together and ignite nuclear burning of their cores. So how did this force of gravity come to be just the right amount of force to allow creation of stars and planets? By accident or by design? A question not likely to be answered anytime soon, if ever, but curious minds want to know. |
#133
|
|||
|
|||
Frank Gilliland wrote: On 29 Aug 2005 07:50:39 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote in .com: snip And if you'e going to come at me with assertions of what is and isn't "The Real Marine Corps", at least have the decency of having Honorably served that same Marine Corps. YOU DIDN'T. You made a PROMISE when you enlisted and you FAILED to keep up your end of the bargain. Not once, but twice, by your own admission. Yes, by my own admission. Yes, I could have walked right up to the commanding General, but I didn't. I chose a different course of action based on the circumstances. If you had ever been in a grunt unit you would understand those circumstances, but you weren't so don't try. But this discussion isn't about me, Dudly -- it's about YOU and the bogus claims you have made about your service (if you even served at all). Sorry, Frankie of Silliland..it IS about you. You "served" 1/4th as long as I did and got court martialed twice. Then you want to come in here throwing your "reputation" around to try and diminish MY service. Sorry, putz...You don't add up to the top of my jump boots. Steve, K4YZ |
#134
|
|||
|
|||
On 30 Aug 2005 02:05:50 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote in
.com: Frank Gilliland wrote: On 29 Aug 2005 07:50:39 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote in .com: snip And if you'e going to come at me with assertions of what is and isn't "The Real Marine Corps", at least have the decency of having Honorably served that same Marine Corps. YOU DIDN'T. You made a PROMISE when you enlisted and you FAILED to keep up your end of the bargain. Not once, but twice, by your own admission. Yes, by my own admission. Yes, I could have walked right up to the commanding General, but I didn't. I chose a different course of action based on the circumstances. If you had ever been in a grunt unit you would understand those circumstances, but you weren't so don't try. But this discussion isn't about me, Dudly -- it's about YOU and the bogus claims you have made about your service (if you even served at all). Sorry, Frankie of Silliland..it IS about you. I see you made your choice. You "served" 1/4th as long as I did You still haven't proven that you served -at all-! and got court martialed twice. "Court martialed" isn't even a word, Dudly. Then you want to come in here throwing your "reputation" around Wrong. I challenged you with facts. Once again, Dudly, it's not about me -or- my "reputation" whether be it good -or- bad. to try and diminish MY service. You haven't provided -any- proof that you served -at all-! Nor have you described anything about your service that could be "diminished", except for your few claims that resulted in you "diminishing" yourself because they were contradicted by facts. It was YOU that lied about your "service" -- don't blame me for the consequences of your lies. Sorry, putz...You don't add up to the top of my jump boots. "Jump boots"? LOL! ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#135
|
|||
|
|||
Frank of Silliland wrote: On 29 Aug 2005 16:02:15 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote in .com: wrote: Frank of Silliland wrote: On 28 Aug 2005 05:54:46 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote in Since the chain of command was already in the field I couldn't request mast, so I refused the order. He then ordered me to serve on mess duty while awaiting office hours, which I also refused (since I was supposed to be on light-duty). The result was a summary court-martial, a month in the brig and reduction back down to private. And a big hit on my conduct marks. It's all becoming very, very clear. Was the shop chief an "A" NCOIC with a God complex? It wouldn't matter. Frankie took a spill over one of his own "trip ups". A Marine has the RIGHT to Request Mast to HIGHER headquarters irrespective of the consent or advice of the lower level command. That his "chain of command" was "in the field" was irrelevent. He had recource. He didn't pursue it. Obviously the OIC of the Court Martial wasn't impressed with Frankie's story, either. USMC Court Martials don't like having judgements overturned on appeal anymore than civilian courts do, and had Frankie had VALID reason for refusing an order, they would have, at the very least, returned the issue back to his commander for Article 15 (Office Hours). Seemingly he HAD that reason. There's more to the "big story" than Frankie's telling of it... Nothing that you couldn't figure out from what I told you already. The presiding officer ("OIC of the Court Martial"? LOL!) made his decision based on the evidence and testimony presented, which -didn't- include the medical evaluation from mainside hospital because that had not yet occured. You also missed the part about the shop chief getting a reprimand for lifting my light-duty chit and giving me an illegal order. It's clear that you can't comprehend anything that doesn't fit into your twisted little fantasies. I understand them fine. You violated a lawful order and took your chances for it. And if there was mitigating evidence as to your culpability in your court martials, they could have been overturned on appeal. Obviously they weren't. And as far as "trip ups" are concerned, let's take a closer look at your postings lately...... Since I started confronting your lies with facts your entire personality has changed. You used to be relatively calm and controlled, but now your posts are filled with nothing but repititious 'Hermanesque' catch-phrases and buzzwords that only -you- think are effective at bolstering your credibility. My "credibility" doesn't hinge on one tour in the USMC that was pock-marked with not one but two court martials. You're the one in the credibility deficit, Frankie. Nor does my "credibility" in this NG count on ANY of my service in the Corps...This is an Amatuer Radio forum, and I am an Amateur Radio operator. You're not. Nor is Lennie. And it shows. (And that's NOT a "positive" thing...) You used to try and exert control over your challengers by starting new threads with almost every reply, yet for the past week you can't seem to break out of -this- thread. If you were paying attention, Frankie, the threads were in response to MARKIE'S frequent changes. And it seems to me that "Laying Waste To Frank of Silliland's Silliness" is pretty appropriate. You used to be the spelling cop, but now almost every post by you has several spelling errors because of the frantic rage that comes over you when replying to my posts. No more than any other, Frankie. Nice try. And you ahve tried to make some "points" about typing mistakes I ahve made, yet have had a few of your own..Big deal. All your defensive tag-team parters have abandoned you. So someone doesn't post for 24 hours and they've "abandoned" the thread? Or maybe they just realize that you're the loser you've turned out to be... In your frenzy of hatred you don't even realize that you frequently contradict your previous claims, sometimes even in the same sentence; e.g, "My original says 'HONORABLE.'" Yes it does, Dudly, but you left out a few words, like "General under 'Honorable' conditions". And if your "original" was honorable then there's no need to get it changed. Mine just says "HONORABLE", Your Busted-to-Nonratedness. JUST "Honorable". No qualifiers. And again you try to base what happened to YOU as the one-and-only truthfulness of the Marine Corps. You're a disgraced loser, Frankie. There's nothing I can do to fix that. And now it appears that "liar" is appropriate for you, too. Just one more bogus excuse after another. Rarely do you reply to any post that confronts you with hard facts -- instead you seek posts that you think you can spin and maybe bluff yourself into a positive light. Even when you -do- address hard facts you are always wrong; e.g, the USMC didn't use cutting scores for promotions in the '70's, either. Lie, lie and more lie, Frankie. Stop it. You're embarrassing yourself. You're embarrassing me. I tell the truth about my service, good or bad; but while all you do is try to crush my credibility by dwelling on my mistakes, you don't even realize that openly admitting my mistakes gives me more credibility than you will -ever- achieve. Congratulations on being able to look yourself in the mirror and convince yourself that having been court martialed twice is a prideful thing, Frankie. Maybe you can teach that technique to some of the folks who appear on "America's Most Wanted". And then there's the biggie: You put -so much- effort into protecting your story when it would be so much easier to just scan your DD-214, or discharge certificate, or dog-tag, etc, block out the important info just like I did, and post it. The issue would be resolved and you wouldn't be challenged any more. But you don't because your claims are nothing but lies and you -love- the attention. And you...?!?! You need to learn how to use effective paragraphs, Frankie. As for the rest, I've provided more than a few public resources to validate my "claims", as you call them through... YOUR answer was to claim that they were, most likely, just someone with a similar name claiming someone else's "service". Even if I do provide a copy of my -214, I expect no less than the same claims of "it's a forgery" or other such silliness. And you accuse -ME- of making "trip ups"? You're a fraud, Dudly. Your stories are a fraud, your USMC career is a fraud, your personality is a fraud, and your life is a fraud. Nope. But your stories about it are. Frank Gilliland is a liar. Now I'm going to give you a suggestion: Take a couple weeks off from the newsgroups. Go camping, get some fresh air, a fresh perspective, and get laid if you can. Then come back here, come clean about your lies, and be yourself. What lies? The only one's being told here are by you and The Feeble Five Bretheren. You will catch some flack to be sure, but that will eventually die down after a few months. Maybe you don't realize this but people -will- respect you for who you are even if you haven't accomplished much with your life -- heck, I should know! People already respect me for who I am, what I have accomplished in my life, even my REAL failures...Not the one's you've tried to manufacture here. But if you keep up with this ridiculous facade then don't expect things to improve because they won't. Of course if you really -like- all this negative attention then..... well, just know that it's people like you who keep state-funded mental health agencies in business. And it's people like you that keep me from WANTING to discuss my service in public. You're a humiliation to yourself and the Marine Corps, Gilliland... You're that drunk at the end of the bar I was talking about. So what'll it be, Dudly? I'll just keep making fun of your lying and deceit, Frankie. You've not "proved" a thing other than you are a disgraced non-rate and a newsgroup scoufflaw. A loser. Steve, K4YZ |
#136
|
|||
|
|||
Frank Gilliland wrote: On 30 Aug 2005 02:05:50 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote in .com: Frank Gilliland wrote: On 29 Aug 2005 07:50:39 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote in .com: snip And if you'e going to come at me with assertions of what is and isn't "The Real Marine Corps", at least have the decency of having Honorably served that same Marine Corps. YOU DIDN'T. You made a PROMISE when you enlisted and you FAILED to keep up your end of the bargain. Not once, but twice, by your own admission. Yes, by my own admission. Yes, I could have walked right up to the commanding General, but I didn't. I chose a different course of action based on the circumstances. If you had ever been in a grunt unit you would understand those circumstances, but you weren't so don't try. But this discussion isn't about me, Dudly -- it's about YOU and the bogus claims you have made about your service (if you even served at all). Sorry, Frankie of Silliland..it IS about you. I see you made your choice. No...YOU did. You "served" 1/4th as long as I did You still haven't proven that you served -at all-! I missed the part where a disgraced ex-serviceman had any "authority" to demand anything, Frankie... and got court martialed twice. "Court martialed" isn't even a word, Dudly. Yet it's a common term in both military and civilian conversation, Frankie. Then you want to come in here throwing your "reputation" around Wrong. I challenged you with facts. Once again, Dudly, it's not about me -or- my "reputation" whether be it good -or- bad. No, you have NOT "challenged (me) with facts"... You've made allegations and barroom taunts meant only to salve your disgraced ego. to try and diminish MY service. You haven't provided -any- proof that you served -at all-! I still haven't found the part that says I owe you one, Frankie. Nor have you described anything about your service that could be "diminished", except for your few claims that resulted in you "diminishing" yourself because they were contradicted by facts. It was YOU that lied about your "service" -- don't blame me for the consequences of your lies. I've not lied. Sorry, putz...You don't add up to the top of my jump boots. "Jump boots"? LOL! I didn't designate the nomenclature, Frankie. Steve, K4YZ |
#137
|
|||
|
|||
K4YZ wrote: wrote: Frank of Silliland wrote: On 28 Aug 2005 05:54:46 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote in Since the chain of command was already in the field I couldn't request mast, so I refused the order. He then ordered me to serve on mess duty while awaiting office hours, which I also refused (since I was supposed to be on light-duty). The result was a summary court-martial, a month in the brig and reduction back down to private. And a big hit on my conduct marks. It's all becoming very, very clear. Was the shop chief an "A" NCOIC with a God complex? It wouldn't matter. Says the "A" NCOIC with a God complex. Frankie took a spill over one of his own "trip ups". Did he trip over seven hostile actions? Or was that you? A Marine has the RIGHT to Request Mast to HIGHER headquarters irrespective of the consent or advice of the lower level command. That his "chain of command" was "in the field" was irrelevent. He had recource. He didn't pursue it. Obviously the OIC of the Court Martial wasn't impressed with Frankie's story, either. USMC Court Martials don't like having judgements overturned on appeal anymore than civilian courts do, and had Frankie had VALID reason for refusing an order, they would have, at the very least, returned the issue back to his commander for Article 15 (Office Hours). Seemingly he HAD that reason. There's more to the "big story" than Frankie's telling of it... Steve, K4YZ You've got is bass ackwards. Anyone offered Article 15 has the right to refuse it and go to court instead. Once it goes to court you will be judged there. |
#139
|
|||
|
|||
Frank Gilliland wrote: On 29 Aug 2005 16:02:15 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote in .com: wrote: Frank of Silliland wrote: On 28 Aug 2005 05:54:46 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote in Since the chain of command was already in the field I couldn't request mast, so I refused the order. He then ordered me to serve on mess duty while awaiting office hours, which I also refused (since I was supposed to be on light-duty). The result was a summary court-martial, a month in the brig and reduction back down to private. And a big hit on my conduct marks. It's all becoming very, very clear. Was the shop chief an "A" NCOIC with a God complex? It wouldn't matter. Frankie took a spill over one of his own "trip ups". A Marine has the RIGHT to Request Mast to HIGHER headquarters irrespective of the consent or advice of the lower level command. That his "chain of command" was "in the field" was irrelevent. He had recource. He didn't pursue it. Obviously the OIC of the Court Martial wasn't impressed with Frankie's story, either. USMC Court Martials don't like having judgements overturned on appeal anymore than civilian courts do, and had Frankie had VALID reason for refusing an order, they would have, at the very least, returned the issue back to his commander for Article 15 (Office Hours). Seemingly he HAD that reason. There's more to the "big story" than Frankie's telling of it... Nothing that you couldn't figure out from what I told you already. The presiding officer ("OIC of the Court Martial"? LOL!) made his decision based on the evidence and testimony presented, which -didn't- include the medical evaluation from mainside hospital because that had not yet occured. Oooops! Gulp! RE4YZ missed that part. You also missed the part about the shop chief getting a reprimand for lifting my light-duty chit and giving me an illegal order. The shop chief could have refused the Article 15 and goen to court. Wonder why he didn't? It's clear that you can't comprehend anything that doesn't fit into your twisted little fantasies. To borrow a phrase from Col Jessup, "CRYSTAL." And as far as "trip ups" are concerned, let's take a closer look at your postings lately...... Since I started confronting your lies with facts your entire personality has changed. He has many of them, you know. You used to be relatively calm and controlled, but now your posts are filled with nothing but repititious 'Hermanesque' catch-phrases and buzzwords that only -you- think are effective at bolstering your credibility. You used to try and exert control over your challengers by starting new threads with almost every reply, yet for the past week you can't seem to break out of -this- thread. Mark Morgan has recently borrowed this tactic. I think RE4YZ likes having his name in the spotlight. You used to be the spelling cop, but now almost every post by you has several spelling errors because of the frantic rage that comes over you when replying to my posts. All your defensive tag-team parters have abandoned you. Sayonara! In your frenzy of hatred you don't even realize that you frequently contradict your previous claims, sometimes even in the same sentence; e.g, "My original says 'HONORABLE.'" Yes it does, Dudly, but you left out a few words, like "General under 'Honorable' conditions". And if your "original" was honorable then there's no need to get it changed. RE4YZ protesteth too much. Just one more bogus excuse after another. Rarely do you reply to any post that confronts you with hard facts -- instead you seek posts that you think you can spin and maybe bluff yourself into a positive light. Even when you -do- address hard facts you are always wrong; e.g, the USMC didn't use cutting scores for promotions in the '70's, either. I tell the truth about my service, good or bad; but while all you do is try to crush my credibility by dwelling on my mistakes, you don't even realize that openly admitting my mistakes gives me more credibility than you will -ever- achieve. And then there's the biggie: You put -so much- effort into protecting your story when it would be so much easier to just scan your DD-214, or discharge certificate, or dog-tag, etc, block out the important info just like I did, and post it. The issue would be resolved and you wouldn't be challenged any more. But you don't because your claims are nothing but lies and you -love- the attention. He craves it. Even negative attention. And you accuse -ME- of making "trip ups"? You're a fraud, Dudly. Your stories are a fraud, your USMC career is a fraud, your personality is a fraud, and your life is a fraud. Now I'm going to give you a suggestion: Take a couple weeks off from the newsgroups. Go camping, get some fresh air, a fresh perspective, and get laid if you can. Then come back here, come clean about your lies, and be yourself. You will catch some flack to be sure, but that will eventually die down after a few months. Maybe you don't realize this but people -will- respect you for who you are even if you haven't accomplished much with your life -- heck, I should know! But if you keep up with this ridiculous facade then don't expect things to improve because they won't. Of course if you really -like- all this negative attention then..... well, just know that it's people like you who keep state-funded mental health agencies in business. So what'll it be, Dudly? RE4YZ is gonna keep on keepin on. |
#140
|
|||
|
|||
wrote: From: on Aug 28, 6:02 pm Dave Heil wrote: wrote: Dave Heil wrote: wrote: Dave Heil wrote: wrote: wrote: From: on Aug 25, 2:42 pm K4YZ wrote: Dave Heil wrote: Frank Gilliland wrote: The PCTA, including Jim Miccolis/N2EY, immediately set upon discrediting Len's comments and opinions. Correct. Questioning or discrediting is not what you claimed. What you said was that Len wasn't permitted to comment. You were incorrect. We were instructed to discard Len's comments. In the end, if they cannot lay waste to Len's comments with rational argument(s)... I've seen any number of Len's comments made to look like the product of one who has little experience. As Len has questioned your net control capabilities. Not quite true either side. I was citing Heil as a CONTROL FREAK that he appears to be from all his postings to me. Evident to all. Closing a net with CW? I have experience in radio. A considerable amount. Most of it is PROFESSIONAL radio...that kind that pays money for services rendered. Heil must not equate government employ in the Department of State as "professional" yet he obviously got MONEY for that, PLUS living expenses. Obviously he's not professional. ...they claim that his opinions are simply no good because Len isn't a ham. Sometimes Len's opinions are no good because they are issued because he has no experience in amateur radio. Sometimes his opinions are no good because they are the rantings of a geezer with an ax to grind. Often, he makes factual errors and there have been numerous times when he deliberately fabricates. You want us to believe that all of Len's comments are to be discarded. Heil doesn't like my commenting, therefore I am to be "discarded," discredited, demeaned, and some other "d" I can't think of. :-) demonized. David Heil/K8MN is a primary culprit in that tactic, but Jim has used it as well. Oh no, I've by no means been "a primary culprit", but I have participated over a period of years. Can you guess how many times you've commented that Len isn't an amateur radio operator? He has a macro sentence generator for that. :-) And there is a purpose for his stating that you're not an amateur. I've never said I had an amateur radio license. From day one in here I've stated that I do not. I have a Commercial radio license. But, that constant repetition of "not having a license" masks Heil's INABILITY to reply ON the subject of what he was challenged for. He tries to wiggle out of a challenge by semi-denigrative, moral something or others implying that I should NOT be posting in here. Every time. Len isn't involved in amateur radio. He wraps himself in bunting and writes of his Constitutional rights of free speech and to petition his government. Well, he has done those things. Nothing on this planet can prevent me from lauging at him or ridiculing him or his ideas. Nor him you. Heil is a bundle of laughs. :-) Among other things. Len writes of being denigrated or insulted by those who do not agree with his him but he often insults and denigrates those who have the opposite point of view. Perhaps Len is correct to do so. Tsk tsk tsk. Heil thinks he has some special dispensation that allows him to insult others but others are "not permitted" to fire right back at him. He reaps what he sows. He is quick to tell others that they are not discussing amateur radio policy, Get a clue, he's giving it back to you. He's been told that he is not an amateur radio operator and should be here. This is a place only of amateurs and amateur things. Supposedly. Lots of different things are discussed in here. One such seems to be winding down: The one about evolution versus creationists. All of radio hasn't been around more than 109 years and fits NEITHER. :-) then he goes on a multi-post rant having everything to do with personalities and nothing to do with amateur radio. Have you ever thought of reigning in Robeson? When you do, get back to me about Len and we'll talk some more. Heil must LIKE Dudly...because Dudly attacks me. Heil is living vicariously, enjoying another personally-insult me. "An enemy of an enemy is his friend" to slightly paraphrase an old folk saying. I can't imagine anyone "liking" RE-4YZ. Steve merely serves a purpose. Heil doesn't realize that Dudly's fraudulent behavior is HURTING the image of U.S. amateur radio. Miccolis can't rein-in Dudly. Hans Brakob couldn't hold him down. Katapult Kellie doesn't seem to have tried either way. Jeswald hasn't said much. NOT a good case for building a good image of U.S. amateur radio to the public. Noop! But if that's who they want out in front creating a new thread or five every day.... |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
K8CPA Email | CB |