Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#251
|
|||
|
|||
Dave Heil wrote: an Old friend wrote: cut I noticed that you made no comments about "Colonel" Mark Morgan's recent outrageous lies about me. Why is that? Did you see the quoted Google material which revealed his claims to be a lie? Aren't you, by your own standards, responsible for his posts? because I wasn't lying at worst I was eeing things differently than you You posted baldfaced lies and when you were presented with facts, you chose to ignore them. In fact, you continued with additional lies. If you'd stoop to these lies, there's likely nothing about which you'd not lie. what bald faced lies? One thing you and Stvie need to learn is that disagreeing with isn't lying cut There was no disagreement. There was only your posting of deliberate, malicious untruths. You wrote that I was posting in a usenet "personals" group. I wasn't. You wrote that I was flirting with a woman. I wasn't. You wrote that I was flirting with a bisexual woman. I wasn't. You wouldn't know the truth if it whapped you in the face. you were posting in group consiting of nothing but presonal adds and sexual flirtations you were posting stuff of a flirting nature, directed toward a bisexual female I know the turth you lack a nodding understanding of it again One thing you and Stvie need to learn is that disagreeing with isn't lying You're one of the most sorry human beings I've ever encountered. you have nevr entounteed me thnak god Dave K8MN |
#252
|
|||
|
|||
Dave Heil wrote: an Old friend wrote: K=D8HB wrote: "an Old friend" wrote because I wasn't lying at worst I was eeing things differently than you Yup, draftee Colonel Morgan of the Chemical Corps. It's not a lie. At= worst, the US Army is just "eeing things differently than you". that stament of rank was alie as I admited years ago both you and Dave and stevie refuse to accept that "Both" is three people? I accept one of your lies as a lie. I accept a number of your lies as lies. You can't be counted upon to tell the truth. agreeded as I have said many times you can't count on me to tell the turth about where I am how to find me or my past. I don't think that is safe behavoir you and Stevie prove me right or adknowledge that a fellow has right to use what tols are at hand when threatened as stevie did Right. You lie and it is Steve Robeson's fault. I see. another of YOUR lies I choose to defnd myself I choose that path and it worked quite well stveie was posting for days about his efforts to track me down you refuse to accept that I know everyone lies I know you lie and Stevie lies and everyone else what I can't stand about you and some other your dishonesty about that central point and that you make up stuff that you claim someone said then say they leid in saying it Dave K8MN You support and endorse crime for goodness sake you will willing aid and abet it and you have admitted to this on hear |
#254
|
|||
|
|||
From: on Sun 4 Sep 2005 07:27
wrote: From: on Sep 3, 4:02 pm I'm still troubled about being a jerk for not giving Mike greif. I think I would have been better off if I had given him greif. Not to worry, Davie Heil gonna give you grief on the spelling of "greif." :-) Darnit, you stole my Heil bait. Maybe if we're quiet about it, he'll still go for it. Not to worry. Heil will simply look at the printouts he made of your posts a few months from now and REMIND you...and remind you...and remind you...all as if it is the MOST IMPORTANT thing in this newsgroup! :-) He will probably make a macro on that and remind you for years in lieu of his replying on some subject. :-) Be that as it may, the VEC ought to disband. Since newbies "don't know a thing about amateur radio" they can't possibly pass any tests for a license. Just have ONE VEC for the "upgraders" (those already licensed who want a nicer TITLE). Better all around and satisfies Davie's smug, arrogant "superiority." That's what I see, two license classes in the spirit of K0HBs vision. What we'll get is two license classes in the spirit of the Four Morsemen where all the old Extras bitch and moan as they always have. Speaking of bitching Extra's, I see Larry's back. I better go say "Hi!" Hi hi... :-) |
#255
|
|||
|
|||
From: on Sun 4 Sep 2005 06:09
Dave Heil wrote: wrote: From: on Aug 28, 8:18 am You know, the one which brought about the creation of Jim's apropos profile of your likely actions: N2EY: "Besides, here's a simple, plain fact: No matter what job, educational level, employer, or government/military service that a radio amateur has, if said radio amateur opposes Mr. Anderson's views, he/she will be the target of Mr. Anderson's insults, ridicule, name-calling, factual errors, ethnic slurs, excessive emoticons and general infantile behavior." Actually there's an updated version: No matter what employment, education, experience or government/military service a person has, if that person opposes Mr. Anderson's views, he/she will be the target of Mr. Anderson's insults, ridicule, name-calling, factual errors, ethnic/gender/racial slurs, excessive emoticons and general infantile behavior. Translation: JIMMIE DOES NOT TOLERATE DISSENT!!! :-) Wow...talk about "telling someone to 'shut up!'" :-) I've found it to be a very accurate predictor of Len's behavior on rrap. Len of course has parodied/plaigirized and in doing so simply provide more proof of its validity. Translation: JIMMIE IS *ALWAYS RIGHT*!!! :-) Note that the profile does not call Len names or other direct insults. It simply predicts his behavior when faced with opposition to his views. Yes, how DARE I speak against the Mighty Miccolis? :-) Perhaps Len considers such opposition to be the ultimate insult to him. Poor baby. Really hurting when you can't stomach the give-and-take in here? :-) What Jim hasn't done is to prevent or attempt to prevent Len from making those comments. Nor would I. What I have done is to point out errors in Len's reasoning and claims. And I backed it up with google quotes and other info. Tsk, tsk, tsk. Jimmie CANNOT "shut me up" so he tries the next best thing: Disingenuous insults in the form of the Profiler's "Prediction" wherein all who disagree (all those who DARE disagree that is) are uncivilly chastised in a "formal" manner. Tsk, tsk, tsk. Jimmie can't even reply directly to me. No guts, I suppose. shrug For example, some time back Len posted that all hams could continue to operate legally with licenses that were in the grace period. I showed that to be in error, by simply quoting the appropriate sections of Part 97. Len's behavior in response to that was typical of the profile. Right now, there's not a damn thing Jimmie can do about it... There's plenty that people "can do about it". No one chooses to. Not worth the time or effort. So...why all the "time and effort" to do this INDIRECT REPLY? :-) Slow down and regroup, Len. Jim has done nothing to prevent you from commenting to this newsgroup or to your government. Your rant is vapor. Dave, consider that perhaps Len considers *any* opposition to his views as an attempt to silence him. Poor baby. Still can't take the give-and-take in a newsgroup, can you? The PCTA, including Jim Miccolis/N2EY, immediately set upon discrediting Len's comments and opinions. Free speech includes the right to discredit other's comments and opinions if those comments and opinions are not based on facts and sound logical reasoning. Some of Len's comments and opinions are not based on facts and sound logical reasoning. Tsk, tsk, tsk. "Free speech" does not mean that opposition to the Words of the ARRL shall be silenced. Jimmie speaks as a parrot of the Words of the ARRL. Jimmie wants to re-argue and re-argue and re-argue OLD arguments that appeared in here, perhaps hoping to "win" one that he lost long ago? Yes, that is "free speech" but it does NOTHING. In the end, if they cannot lay waste to Len's comments with rational argument(s), they claim that his opinions are simply no good because Len isn't a ham. Actually the logic is quite different. It comes down to asking why Len is so interested in amateur radio policy even though Len is not a ham and has never been one. There has been a nocodetest amateur radio license in the USA since 1991, yet Len never got one. The maximum code test required for any US amateur radio license has been 5 wpm since 1990 (with medical waiver) and since 2000 without a waiver. Oh, my, Mighty Miccolis the Moral Minder, meandering the morass of MOTIVES! :-) Okay, everyone fill out the Motive form in triplicate so that Mighty Mindcontrol Miccolis can JUDGE all for "rightness" in saying anything in here! Nor is Len a manufacturer of amateur radio equipment, nor does he have anything to do with FCC. Jimmie no work at FCC. Jimmie no work in electronics. Jimmie NOT "manufacturer of amateur radio equipment." Jimmie make state-of-the-art radio transmitter using vacuum tubes at cost of $100 in 1990s, show picture on home page. Must be single prototype of "new product". All cheer, applaud. More than 5-1/2 years ago, Len told us he was going for Extra, but didn't say when, and it hasn't happened yet. Keeps you guessing, donut? :-) Jimmie hasn't told us of his expertise in "parenting" either. Jimmie hasn't presented his degrees in pediatrics whereby he be Expert on raising chilluns. How can you conceive expertise? Jimmie get laid yet? And regardless of how someone replies to Len's posts here, Len will reply according to the profile. The "Profiler" show on TV got cancelled, Jimmie. Consider you self going same way... :-) It's just his way. "It ain't braggin' if ya done it." Why should anyone reply to his posts at all, Dave? Gosh, Ms. Profiler, you sure spent a lot of time on an INDIRECT reply, dintya? :-) You really DO waste a lot of your own time in here... |
#256
|
|||
|
|||
K=D8HB wrote: wrote How many years will it take for Miccolis to admit that he was wrong? I was wrong only once. That was the time I thought I was wrong but it tu= rned out that I wasn't. =20 Beep beep de Hans, K0HB Lighten up, Hans. |
#257
|
|||
|
|||
Dave Heil wrote: wrote: wrote: Dave Heil wrote: wrote: Dave Heil wrote: Intimidating Leonard H. Anderson? How does one intimidate a piranha? Len began personal attacks long before he got on the receiving end. Discussion of moderating a newsgroup is not a forbidden subject. I remember well when Leneoard was all upset that some regular poster here decided to meet on 40m CW. Len probably considered his right of free speech to be violated in that instance. Of course he was wrong. The fact is that your claim that Jim Miccolis prevented Len from posting here is utter nonsense. You're becoming well known for nonsense. The fact is that there are two sides to every story, and you clowns think you own both. You don't. Get used to it. That's three things offered by you as fact. Please provide any old evidence at all that what you've claimed, that Jim Miccolis prevented Len from presenting his views here. A single instance will do. Do you ever tire of being wrong? Do you ever tire of being an A1 Operator and work out of band Frenchmen on 6 meters? Do you? Why no, Brian, I've never tired of being an A-1 Op. Do you tire of being one? I have no certificate from Hiram, suitable for framing. But I do take pride in my station, my signal, and my operating abilities. And if I were aware that French hams were out of band, I wouldn't be completing circuits for them nor sending them QSL cards. bb |
#258
|
|||
|
|||
Dave Heil wrote: wrote: wrote: From: on Fri 2 Sep 2005 06:09 Dave Heil wrote: Len has never worked out of band Frenchmen on 6 meters. As far as I know, only you hold that distinction and title. He should be PROUD of it. Perhaps I'll petition my ARRL to come up with a new operating award. I encourage you to follow through with your idea. It is certain to be received with the attention it deserves. Fantastic! An endorsement from the World's Greatest DXer. I'll request that it be known as the "Heil Award," in your honor. Heil believes in the good-old-boys-pecking-order-in-club-house rule of only those tenured in licensing are "suitable" for "leadership." Heil doesn't want to understand that ALL U.S. civil radio is regulated and enforced by the FCC, NOT the licensees. And the Dept. of State is a vehicle for DX destinations. It can be, *if* you know what you're doing. I'm sure there were lines of comm types waiting for some of your destinations. Dave, off subject - are you eligible for military hops? But...Heil is easily upset and so he must VENT in here. What accounts for non-radio amateur Anderson's VENTING in here? You've haunted an amateur radio newsgroup for close to a decade. You weren't a radio amateur back then and you aren't a radio amateur now. Hmmmm? Why would Heil make such a statement? It must be close to a decade since Heil ceased being a paid worker in the "foreign service" of the Department of State. Absolutely NO evidence has been presented of his having learned ANY diplomacy there. There you go, Brian. Len's made another factual error. It won't be five years until the end of this year. Fair enough. Should I call him a liar at this point? Do I threaten bricks through windows, slashed tires, terrorized wives? Maybe I need to start a new thread about how Len might be homosexual or an idiot or both? Do I need to do anything? As to learning "ANY diplomacy", there is never an instance where an ambassador calls a communications type and says, "We've just received news from Washington. I want you to go to the Foreign Ministry and make a demarche". And there you have it. He was merely their messenger. Perhaps it soothes you to cling to that belief. In addition to sending messages, what else did you do? I'll bet you've retold your fascinating tale of BIG TIME HF work at ADA over fifty times. It is a story having nothing to do with amateur radio and everything to do with Len Anderson's desire to be recognized as somebody. Well, you're certainly recognized, Len. I especially like Jim's recounting amateur radio's contributions during WWII when there was no legal amateur radio operations in the USA. He cracks me up. Then there's Heil's thrilling tales of African adventures where he "synchronized" State Department communications via morsemanship in the 1980s... He opened and closed rtty circuits with CW? He surely did, but not on the same frequency as the RTTY circuit. What frequency? claiming that "radio communications paths were so poor that they would not support teleprinter/data modes." He was probably doing something wrong. Actually, I maintained the lowest QSY rate of any AFRECONE station. Is there an award for keeping folks on frequency too long? That part about claiming that propagation paths were so poor that there were times when they wouldn't support encrypted RTTY communications? It was absolutely true. Then again, neither you nor Len know where the other end of my circuit was. That'll just have to remain a mystery. I've operated on encrypted circuits as well. That we lacked enough frequencies to operate 24/7 is true. None of that has anything to do with amateur radio...unless one counts the entirety of the Department of State as an "amateur" effort of foreign policy. Do you think has an anti-U.S. Foreign Policy bias, Brian? I -could- pretend to not understand your question, but that would be too heilish. I think that Len has an anti-Heil bias. And when you apparently deny your professional radio experience, what are we to think? I think that you choose to not recognize your professional radio experience because it might get in the way of your denigrations of Len. "Sorry Len, State Dept. Communications IS Amateur Radio!" Hi, hi! You wrote it. It is your quote. Don't be surprised if you see it again. "Hi, hi!" A joke. You're welcome to bring it up again at anytime - as a joke. Tsk. In other government radio, the U.S. military has maintained teleprinter/data networks 24/7 in equatorial regions as well as elsewhere some THIRTY YEARS PRIOR to Heil's tale of inability to get a State Department radio circuit working. [Asmara, Eritrea, was the principal relay point for DCS/Starcom/ACAN linkage of Manila, Phillipines, to Pirmasens, FRG, kept open on 24/7 basis from 1948 to about 1978...Asmara can be considered to be in the "equatorial region" of the African continent] I would consider it so. But I only have a degree in Geography. With that degree, you'd likely be able to figure that Bissau and Freetown are across the continent from Asmara. When my old colleagues speak of the "West African Echo" they don't include East Africa. Go figure. I didn't work into nor did I work through Asmara. The missing piece of the puzzle for both of you is the location of the station I worked into. Good luck. Ascension. Heil is of the dictatorial view that ONLY licensed radio amateurs are worthy of commenting/talking/discussing ANYTHING about amateur radio...the "clubhouse" syndrome. Of course, such an attitude would NEGATE U.S. government regulation and enforcement of amateur radio since no Commissioner or FCC staffer is required to hold any amateur radio license grants. That's a dichotomy in thinking of Heil as a former employee of the U.S. government. It's also friggin' WEIRD. Len has discussed. Len had commented. I'm guessing that Len has talked, though there's no evidence of it here. Len has insulted. Len has denigrated. Len has belittled. I agree. Has Len been insulted? denigrated? belittled? As to the FCC staffer schpiel, it has been previously addressed a number of times. Len isn't an FCC staffer, nor is he a radio amateur. Nor are most FCC staffers, even the ones dealing directly with amateur radio. Heil may have spent too much time in the basement with his radios. Now *that* would be weird. My hamshack consists of two, adjacent second floor rooms. You told us you lived in a tarpaper shack. Heil (who claims to be a linguist of Hunnish) forgot, in another post, that the fictious name of "Dudley" was used by author Earnest K. Gann in his book, "Fate Is The Hunter." [my mention in here] Frank Gilliland and I used another fictitious name of "Dudly" in reference to another, a military pretender in here. There was no misspelling of "Dudley" at all, just the use of "Dudly" to differentiate from Gann's original name use. A shortened form of "Dudly" is "Dud" which also fits that other, the pretender. I see. It must be like your use of "Atila" to differentiate between the real "Attila" and your use of "beligerent" to differentiate between real warlike "belligerants". The name "Dudley" is an actual name. The name "Dudly" doesn't exist. Very UNPROFESSIONAL, Leonard; very UNPROFESSIONAL. It's less unprofessional than working out of band Frenchmen on 6 meters, IMHO. Heil attempts to word-play in a puerile game of trying to be the schoolmistress rapping the knuckles of "students" who make minor "typographical" errors in spelling. Dave is smug. I certainly can be from time to time. From time to time? Len used a couple of words three or more times each. He spelled them in the same incorrect way each time. They were not typographical errors. They were Len's spelling errors. Did you know that Len claims to be a PROFESSIONAL writer? Aye. You should see my son's textbooks.... I did not mention any Hun who wishes to conquer any ham world, only that Heil attempts to be a master of Hunnish language and the only "judge" on translations of Hunnish to English. Dave must be multi-lingual. If the word belligerent is based in Latin, then I am. Len seems to think it was used by Attila and his horde. What word would attila have used? |
#259
|
|||
|
|||
Dave Heil wrote: wrote: wrote: From: on Fri 2 Sep 2005 06:09 Dave Heil wrote: Len has never worked out of band Frenchmen on 6 meters. As far as I know, only you hold that distinction and title. He should be PROUD of it. Perhaps I'll petition my ARRL to come up with a new operating award. I encourage you to follow through with your idea. It is certain to be received with the attention it deserves. Heil believes in the good-old-boys-pecking-order-in-club-house rule of only those tenured in licensing are "suitable" for "leadership." Heil doesn't want to understand that ALL U.S. civil radio is regulated and enforced by the FCC, NOT the licensees. And the Dept. of State is a vehicle for DX destinations. It can be, *if* you know what you're doing. But...Heil is easily upset and so he must VENT in here. What accounts for non-radio amateur Anderson's VENTING in here? You've haunted an amateur radio newsgroup for close to a decade. You weren't a radio amateur back then and you aren't a radio amateur now. Hmmmm? Why would Heil make such a statement? It must be close to a decade since Heil ceased being a paid worker in the "foreign service" of the Department of State. Absolutely NO evidence has been presented of his having learned ANY diplomacy there. There you go, Brian. Len's made another factual error. It won't be five years until the end of this year. As to learning "ANY diplomacy", there is never an instance where an ambassador calls a communications type and says, "We've just received news from Washington. I want you to go to the Foreign Ministry and make a demarche". He was merely their messenger. Perhaps it soothes you to cling to that belief. I'll bet you've retold your fascinating tale of BIG TIME HF work at ADA over fifty times. It is a story having nothing to do with amateur radio and everything to do with Len Anderson's desire to be recognized as somebody. Well, you're certainly recognized, Len. I especially like Jim's recounting amateur radio's contributions during WWII when there was no legal amateur radio operations in the USA. He cracks me up. Then there's Heil's thrilling tales of African adventures where he "synchronized" State Department communications via morsemanship in the 1980s... He opened and closed rtty circuits with CW? He surely did, but not on the same frequency as the RTTY circuit. claiming that "radio communications paths were so poor that they would not support teleprinter/data modes." He was probably doing something wrong. Actually, I maintained the lowest QSY rate of any AFRECONE station. That part about claiming that propagation paths were so poor that there were times when they wouldn't support encrypted RTTY communications? It was absolutely true. Then again, neither you nor Len know where the other end of my circuit was. That'll just have to remain a mystery. None of that has anything to do with amateur radio...unless one counts the entirety of the Department of State as an "amateur" effort of foreign policy. Do you think has an anti-U.S. Foreign Policy bias, Brian? "Sorry Len, State Dept. Communications IS Amateur Radio!" Hi, hi! You wrote it. It is your quote. Don't be surprised if you see it again. Tsk. In other government radio, the U.S. military has maintained teleprinter/data networks 24/7 in equatorial regions as well as elsewhere some THIRTY YEARS PRIOR to Heil's tale of inability to get a State Department radio circuit working. [Asmara, Eritrea, was the principal relay point for DCS/Starcom/ACAN linkage of Manila, Phillipines, to Pirmasens, FRG, kept open on 24/7 basis from 1948 to about 1978...Asmara can be considered to be in the "equatorial region" of the African continent] I would consider it so. But I only have a degree in Geography. With that degree, you'd likely be able to figure that Bissau and Freetown are across the continent from Asmara. When my old colleagues speak of the "West African Echo" they don't include East Africa. Go figure. I didn't work into nor did I work through Asmara. The missing piece of the puzzle for both of you is the location of the station I worked into. Good luck. Heil is of the dictatorial view that ONLY licensed radio amateurs are worthy of commenting/talking/discussing ANYTHING about amateur radio...the "clubhouse" syndrome. Of course, such an attitude would NEGATE U.S. government regulation and enforcement of amateur radio since no Commissioner or FCC staffer is required to hold any amateur radio license grants. That's a dichotomy in thinking of Heil as a former employee of the U.S. government. It's also friggin' WEIRD. Len has discussed. Len had commented. I'm guessing that Len has talked, though there's no evidence of it here. Len has insulted. Len has denigrated. Len has belittled. As to the FCC staffer schpiel, it has been previously addressed a number of times. Len isn't an FCC staffer, nor is he a radio amateur. Heil may have spent too much time in the basement with his radios. Now *that* would be weird. My hamshack consists of two, adjacent second floor rooms. Heil (who claims to be a linguist of Hunnish) forgot, in another post, that the fictious name of "Dudley" was used by author Earnest K. Gann in his book, "Fate Is The Hunter." [my mention in here] Frank Gilliland and I used another fictitious name of "Dudly" in reference to another, a military pretender in here. There was no misspelling of "Dudley" at all, just the use of "Dudly" to differentiate from Gann's original name use. A shortened form of "Dudly" is "Dud" which also fits that other, the pretender. I see. It must be like your use of "Atila" to differentiate between the real "Attila" and your use of "beligerent" to differentiate between real warlike "belligerants". The name "Dudley" is an actual name. The name "Dudly" doesn't exist. Very UNPROFESSIONAL, Leonard; very UNPROFESSIONAL. It's less unprofessional than working out of band Frenchmen on 6 meters, IMHO. Heil attempts to word-play in a puerile game of trying to be the schoolmistress rapping the knuckles of "students" who make minor "typographical" errors in spelling. Dave is smug. I certainly can be from time to time. Len used a couple of words three or more times each. He spelled them in the same incorrect way each time. They were not typographical errors. They were Len's spelling errors. Did you know that Len claims to be a PROFESSIONAL writer? I did not mention any Hun who wishes to conquer any ham world, only that Heil attempts to be a master of Hunnish language and the only "judge" on translations of Hunnish to English. Dave must be multi-lingual. If the word belligerent is based in Latin, then I am. Len seems to think it was used by Attila and his horde. Dave K8MN |
#260
|
|||
|
|||
K=D8HB wrote: wrote I recall taking the GROL. Looked identical to the Amatuer Advanced exam. The GROL exam has Amateur Radio questions in it? I never knew that! Sunuvagun! Beep beep de Hans, K0HB You must be in league with the Four Morsemen. The physics of electronics and radio do not change with the type of license you test for. Best of luck. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
K8CPA Email | CB |