See This One
http://www.roanoke.com/news/roanoke%5C31333.html
AND
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9228945/#storyContinued
AND
http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2005/08/30/1/

While some of you are bashing Ham Radio -- these folks are helping Katrina
Victims

--
CL -- I doubt, therefore I might be !

Caveat Lector wrote:
See This One
http://www.roanoke.com/news/roanoke%5C31333.html
AND
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9228945/#storyContinued
AND
http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2005/08/30/1/

While some of you are bashing Ham Radio -- these folks are helping Katrina
Victims

Bshing Ham radio hmmm.... I gues another stevie clone at work
questioning ONE ham is bashing all hams.

Is it Stevie or is it just another fellow who has been brain washed

Hard to tell

--
CL -- I doubt, therefore I might be !

an_old_friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:

an_old_friend wrote:

Dave Heil wrote:


cut

Of course you haven't they don't talk about that in Morse Code

During FD 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2005, none of the ops present sat about
chatting in morse code. I use any number of modes in my amateur radio
operation, Mark.

You do as you can; I'll do as I choose.


I can use any mode I want Dave we have had that dicussion before even
CW if I like

Super, Mark. Next Field Day, you do your CW thing with a PC and morse
reading software. I'll do it the old-fashioned way and work CW only.
We'll see if you can really operate CW or whether you're blowing smoke.
If I don't beat you by a 10:1 QSO ratio, I'll relent and consider you a
real CW op. I'm even willing to proclaim it here if you accept the
challenge. Logs must be submitted to the ARRL.

but of course you have no sense of humor either

I'm responding to you, aren't I?

Dave K8MN

Dave Heil wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:

an_old_friend wrote:

Dave Heil wrote:


cut

Of course you haven't they don't talk about that in Morse Code

During FD 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2005, none of the ops present sat about
chatting in morse code. I use any number of modes in my amateur radio
operation, Mark.

You do as you can; I'll do as I choose.


I can use any mode I want Dave we have had that dicussion before even
CW if I like

Super, Mark. Next Field Day, you do your CW thing with a PC and morse
reading software. I'll do it the old-fashioned way and work CW only.
We'll see if you can really operate CW or whether you're blowing smoke.
If I don't beat you by a 10:1 QSO ratio, I'll relent and consider you a
real CW op. I'm even willing to proclaim it here if you accept the
challenge. Logs must be submitted to the ARRL.

but of course you have no sense of humor either

I'm responding to you, aren't I?

more nonsesne from Dave

Dave K8MN

an old friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:

an_old_friend wrote:

Dave Heil wrote:


an_old_friend wrote:


Dave Heil wrote:


cut


Of course you haven't they don't talk about that in Morse Code

During FD 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2005, none of the ops present sat about
chatting in morse code. I use any number of modes in my amateur radio
operation, Mark.

You do as you can; I'll do as I choose.


I can use any mode I want Dave we have had that dicussion before even
CW if I like

Super, Mark. Next Field Day, you do your CW thing with a PC and morse
reading software. I'll do it the old-fashioned way and work CW only.
We'll see if you can really operate CW or whether you're blowing smoke.
If I don't beat you by a 10:1 QSO ratio, I'll relent and consider you a
real CW op. I'm even willing to proclaim it here if you accept the
challenge. Logs must be submitted to the ARRL.


but of course you have no sense of humor either

I'm responding to you, aren't I?

more nonsesne from Dave

What nonsense, Mark? You said you could use CW. Use it. Take up the
challenge. I've given you ten to one odds. You make 100 QSOs and I'd
have to make at least 1,000 to win. How easy do I have to make it for you?

I'm a no-"nonsesne" kind of guy.

Dave K8MN

"Dave Heil" wrote in message
ink.net...
an old friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:

an_old_friend wrote:

Dave Heil wrote:


an_old_friend wrote:


Dave Heil wrote:


cut


Of course you haven't they don't talk about that in Morse Code

During FD 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2005, none of the ops present sat about
chatting in morse code. I use any number of modes in my amateur radio
operation, Mark.

You do as you can; I'll do as I choose.


I can use any mode I want Dave we have had that dicussion before even
CW if I like

Super, Mark. Next Field Day, you do your CW thing with a PC and morse
reading software. I'll do it the old-fashioned way and work CW only.
We'll see if you can really operate CW or whether you're blowing smoke.
If I don't beat you by a 10:1 QSO ratio, I'll relent and consider you a
real CW op. I'm even willing to proclaim it here if you accept the
challenge. Logs must be submitted to the ARRL.


but of course you have no sense of humor either

I'm responding to you, aren't I?

more nonsesne from Dave

What nonsense, Mark? You said you could use CW. Use it. Take up the
challenge. I've given you ten to one odds. You make 100 QSOs and I'd
have to make at least 1,000 to win. How easy do I have to make it for
you?

I'm a no-"nonsesne" kind of guy.

Dave K8MN

Dave,

Everything is "nonsesne" to him. Especially those that disagree with him.
Which seems to be most everyone.

Dan/W4NTI

Dave Heil wrote:
an old friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:

an_old_friend wrote:

Dave Heil wrote:


an_old_friend wrote:


Dave Heil wrote:


cut


Of course you haven't they don't talk about that in Morse Code

During FD 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2005, none of the ops present sat about
chatting in morse code. I use any number of modes in my amateur radio
operation, Mark.

You do as you can; I'll do as I choose.


I can use any mode I want Dave we have had that dicussion before even
CW if I like

Super, Mark. Next Field Day, you do your CW thing with a PC and morse
reading software. I'll do it the old-fashioned way and work CW only.
We'll see if you can really operate CW or whether you're blowing smoke.
If I don't beat you by a 10:1 QSO ratio, I'll relent and consider you a
real CW op. I'm even willing to proclaim it here if you accept the
challenge. Logs must be submitted to the ARRL.


but of course you have no sense of humor either

I'm responding to you, aren't I?

more nonsesne from Dave

but again proving you aren't reading, the nonsense is your claim that
you have a sense of humor

What nonsense, Mark? You said you could use CW. Use it. Take up the
challenge. I've given you ten to one odds. You make 100 QSOs and I'd
have to make at least 1,000 to win. How easy do I have to make it for you?

Why take you up on a challenge? What do I gain? If I shoudl prvail you
will not adknoweldge it or admit to it. if I should fail then you will
keep going on about til you become a SK. I have work CW on FD and
frankly this year I am looking forward to trying FD from Home with my
own station, and to have fun doing it, so I am bussy and you are
offering a challenge with no upside, to replace my plans. and then you
dare wonder why I am not interested


I'm a no-"nonsesne" kind of guy.

you are full of nonsense, and full of **** for that matter

Dave K8MN

Dan/W4NTI wrote:
"Dave Heil" wrote in message
ink.net...

an old friend wrote:

Dave Heil wrote:


an_old_friend wrote:


Dave Heil wrote:



an_old_friend wrote:



Dave Heil wrote:


cut



Of course you haven't they don't talk about that in Morse Code

During FD 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2005, none of the ops present sat about
chatting in morse code. I use any number of modes in my amateur radio
operation, Mark.

You do as you can; I'll do as I choose.


I can use any mode I want Dave we have had that dicussion before even
CW if I like

Super, Mark. Next Field Day, you do your CW thing with a PC and morse
reading software. I'll do it the old-fashioned way and work CW only.
We'll see if you can really operate CW or whether you're blowing smoke.
If I don't beat you by a 10:1 QSO ratio, I'll relent and consider you a
real CW op. I'm even willing to proclaim it here if you accept the
challenge. Logs must be submitted to the ARRL.



but of course you have no sense of humor either

I'm responding to you, aren't I?

more nonsesne from Dave

What nonsense, Mark? You said you could use CW. Use it. Take up the
challenge. I've given you ten to one odds. You make 100 QSOs and I'd
have to make at least 1,000 to win. How easy do I have to make it for
you?

I'm a no-"nonsesne" kind of guy.

Dave K8MN


Dave,

Everything is "nonsesne" to him. Especially those that disagree with him.
Which seems to be most everyone.

In all honesty, I think anything written is perplexing to Mark. He
assumes that if it is nonsense to him, it is nonsense to all--a sort of
equal opportunity confusion.

I made him an easy challenge. Even a guy who uses code-reading software
and a PC should be able to generate 100 QSOs during a 24-hour FD period.
Maybe I'm being unfair to him. Perhaps I need to give him a 15:1 ratio
as an advantage. I've offered to publicly acknowledge him as a real CW
op if he wins. I think I should be able to claim something if he loses.
Perhaps he could kiss my ass on the fifty-yard line at a WVU home
football game if he falls short.

Maybe he has re-thought his claim about his being able to use CW.

Dave K8MN

Dave Heil wrote:
Dan/W4NTI wrote:
"Dave Heil" wrote in message
ink.net...
cut
Maybe he has re-thought his claim about his being able to use CW.

nope I just don't bet with folks that are not trustworthy

Dave K8MN

an old friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:

an old friend wrote:

Dave Heil wrote:


an_old_friend wrote:


Dave Heil wrote:



an_old_friend wrote:



Dave Heil wrote:


cut



Of course you haven't they don't talk about that in Morse Code

During FD 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2005, none of the ops present sat about
chatting in morse code. I use any number of modes in my amateur radio
operation, Mark.

You do as you can; I'll do as I choose.


I can use any mode I want Dave we have had that dicussion before even
CW if I like

Super, Mark. Next Field Day, you do your CW thing with a PC and morse
reading software. I'll do it the old-fashioned way and work CW only.
We'll see if you can really operate CW or whether you're blowing smoke.
If I don't beat you by a 10:1 QSO ratio, I'll relent and consider you a
real CW op. I'm even willing to proclaim it here if you accept the
challenge. Logs must be submitted to the ARRL.



but of course you have no sense of humor either

I'm responding to you, aren't I?

more nonsesne from Dave


but again proving you aren't reading, the nonsense is your claim that
you have a sense of humor

I'm responding to you, aren't I?

What nonsense, Mark? You said you could use CW. Use it. Take up the
challenge. I've given you ten to one odds. You make 100 QSOs and I'd
have to make at least 1,000 to win. How easy do I have to make it for you?


Why take you up on a challenge? What do I gain? If I shoudl prvail you
will not adknoweldge it or admit to it. if I should fail then you will
keep going on about til you become a SK. I have work CW on FD and
frankly this year I am looking forward to trying FD from Home with my
own station, and to have fun doing it, so I am bussy and you are
offering a challenge with no upside, to replace my plans. and then you
dare wonder why I am not interested


I'm a no-"nonsesne" kind of guy.


you are full of nonsense, and full of **** for that matter

Does this mean that you do not accept the very generous challenge I've
put before you?

Dave K8MN