K4YZ wrote:
wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

Lennie said, in another thread:

What other thread? Why couldn't you comment to Len IN that other
thread?

Why?

Is there a "fee-per-thread" here?

Just curious why you have the predeliction for starting new threads
when almost everyone else is satisfied to stay on-thread and on-topic.

But...

but.....

but.....

BRAIN!

You and Lennie are ALL ABOUT NOT following "everyone else"...

So what's the deal?

Do we all just follow the Pied Piper and dance to one tune?

Len is on-topic far more often than you.

Or is it OK to do what you want? I mean, afterall, MOST people
consider lying and deceit to be undesireable, antisocial behaviour, yet
you, Lennie and Mark do it at will. How come YOU don't do what
"everyone else" considers proper?

Giving an opinion is not lying. Just because you don't like someone's
opinion doesn't mean "thier" lying. Saying that opinions are lies is
in itself a lie.

"Thier's" not enough time in the day to discuss your antisocial
behavio[u]r.

Is there a "rule" that says I can't "spin off" any given set of
comments, observations, etc, without incurring some fine or

Or what? Finish up whatever thought you might have been having.

Why was it necessary to start yet another thread?

Why?

Is there a "fee-per-thread" here?

Just curious why you have the predeliction for starting new threads
when almost everyone else is satisfied to stay on-thread and on-topic.

Who's staying "on thread" and "on-topic"...?!?!

You're certainly not.

BBBWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

Brainie make funnie!

Steve got caught and embarassed, laughs at hisself.

Is your newsreader so poor that you have to start thread after thread
after thread just so you don't have to scroll through others postings?

Sheesh!

Guess you don't like having your buddy's nose rubbed in his own
excrement, Brain, and I can't say I blame you...

I see only your excrement smeared across RRAP.

You mistake "my" excrement for Lennie's and yours being fed bck to
you.

"back"

Sorry Steve, it's your excrement that you smear across the net.

Stop doing it and it won't be as embarrassing.

Keep lying and acting the way you do and the rest will just
follow.

I've "laid off" on numerous occassions just ot have you and one of
your cohorts drag it right back into the pit.

So stop lying and try to be a little less antisocial.

But it is HIS excrement and the fact of the matter is that the
shoe DOES fit...

Hey, by the way, what would you call someone who can magically "sommon
the elemental forces of the universe?"

"summon", Brain.

Not my imagination. That's exactly how Han's spelled it.

And you weren't bright enough to fix it.

OK.

See the quotations???

Are they Pagans?

Beats me...But I know that Mother Nature allows me to USE some of
those, "elemental forces", so that's fine by me.

Ah! Another Pagan.

How do you figure?

Are you gay, too?

No, why do you ask?

You always link being Pagan and gayness together.

Dispicable comments snipped.

wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

Lennie said, in another thread:

What other thread? Why couldn't you comment to Len IN that other
thread?

Why?

Is there a "fee-per-thread" here?

Just curious why you have the predeliction for starting new threads
when almost everyone else is satisfied to stay on-thread and on-topic.

But...

but.....

but.....

BRAIN!

You and Lennie are ALL ABOUT NOT following "everyone else"...

So what's the deal?

Do we all just follow the Pied Piper and dance to one tune?

Len is on-topic far more often than you.

No he's not.

He's repeatedly stated that his ONLY reason for being "here" is to
"debate" the Morse Code test issue.

More often than not he's ranting off on the "Mighty Morsemen"
tangent without even mentioning the tests.

Or is it OK to do what you want? I mean, afterall, MOST people
consider lying and deceit to be undesireable, antisocial behaviour, yet
you, Lennie and Mark do it at will. How come YOU don't do what
"everyone else" considers proper?

Giving an opinion is not lying. Just because you don't like someone's
opinion doesn't mean "thier" lying. Saying that opinions are lies is
in itself a lie.

It's a lie when the content is presented in such a way as to
present it as 'fact' when indeed reality is different.

Take your 'ARES won't respond' claims for example.

Past AND current events have proven it wrong. It was wrong when
you uttered it the first time and it's wrong now.

"Thier's" not enough time in the day to discuss your antisocial
behavio[u]r.

But there's plenty of time to discuss your mistruths?

Is there a "rule" that says I can't "spin off" any given set of
comments, observations, etc, without incurring some fine or

Or what? Finish up whatever thought you might have been having.

Put a period after the "fine", Brain, and you'll be all set.

Need me to put you in a high chair and put a bib on you too...?!?!

Why was it necessary to start yet another thread?

Why?

Is there a "fee-per-thread" here?

Just curious why you have the predeliction for starting new threads
when almost everyone else is satisfied to stay on-thread and on-topic.

Who's staying "on thread" and "on-topic"...?!?!

You're certainly not.

Sure I am.

BBBWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

Brainie make funnie!

Steve got caught and embarassed, laughs at hisself.

Nope.

Laughing at YOU, Brainie!

Is your newsreader so poor that you have to start thread after thread
after thread just so you don't have to scroll through others postings?

Sheesh!

Guess you don't like having your buddy's nose rubbed in his own
excrement, Brain, and I can't say I blame you...

I see only your excrement smeared across RRAP.

You mistake "my" excrement for Lennie's and yours being fed bck to
you.

"back"

Sorry Steve, it's your excrement that you smear across the net.

Nope.

You can stop lying any time now, Brain. We won't miss it.

Stop doing it and it won't be as embarrassing.

Keep lying and acting the way you do and the rest will just
follow.

I've "laid off" on numerous occassions just ot have you and one of
your cohorts drag it right back into the pit.

So stop lying and try to be a little less antisocial.

I've done that. Repeatedly. Only to have you dig right back in
with the same decitful, mistruthful bile when you think "the coast is
clear".

But it is HIS excrement and the fact of the matter is that the
shoe DOES fit...

Hey, by the way, what would you call someone who can magically "sommon
the elemental forces of the universe?"

"summon", Brain.

Not my imagination. That's exactly how Han's spelled it.

And you weren't bright enough to fix it.

OK.

See the quotations???

And you still couldn't fix it?

Are they Pagans?

Beats me...But I know that Mother Nature allows me to USE some of
those, "elemental forces", so that's fine by me.

Ah! Another Pagan.

How do you figure?

Are you gay, too?

No, why do you ask?

You always link being Pagan and gayness together.

No, I don't.

However in MARKIE'S case they ARE one in the same...He IS gay and
he IS a pagan..or at least claims to be...

Dispicable comments snipped.

What's "dispicable" about them? You are acting like you need some
companionship...I am sure Markie will accomodate you. You have so much
in common.

Steve, K4YZ

On 27 Oct 2005 04:37:48 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote:


wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

Lennie said, in another thread:

What other thread? Why couldn't you comment to Len IN that other
thread?

Why?

Is there a "fee-per-thread" here?

Just curious why you have the predeliction for starting new threads
when almost everyone else is satisfied to stay on-thread and on-topic.

But...

but.....

but.....

BRAIN!

You and Lennie are ALL ABOUT NOT following "everyone else"...

So what's the deal?

Do we all just follow the Pied Piper and dance to one tune?

Len is on-topic far more often than you.

No he's not.

He's repeatedly stated that his ONLY reason for being "here" is to
"debate" the Morse Code test issue.

More often than not he's ranting off on the "Mighty Morsemen"
tangent without even mentioning the tests.

which right on target if a bit wordy

Or is it OK to do what you want? I mean, afterall, MOST people
consider lying and deceit to be undesireable, antisocial behaviour, yet
you, Lennie and Mark do it at will. How come YOU don't do what
"everyone else" considers proper?

Giving an opinion is not lying. Just because you don't like someone's
opinion doesn't mean "thier" lying. Saying that opinions are lies is
in itself a lie.

It's a lie when the content is presented in such a way as to
present it as 'fact' when indeed reality is different.

Take your 'ARES won't respond' claims for example.

Past AND current events have proven it wrong. It was wrong when
you uttered it the first time and it's wrong now.

cuting all after Stevie first lie of of the post

_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

wrote:
On 27 Oct 2005 04:37:48 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote:


wrote:

K4YZ wrote:

wrote:

Len is on-topic far more often than you.

No he's not.

He's repeatedly stated that his ONLY reason for being "here" is to
"debate" the Morse Code test issue.

More often than not he's ranting off on the "Mighty Morsemen"
tangent without even mentioning the tests.


which right on target if a bit wordy

How is that "right on target"? It isn't civil and he isn't debating.
He isn't a radio amateur who uses CW and he isn't a radio amateur who
uses any other mode. He is a pathetic geezer with no stake in amateur
radio and an he has an ax to grind.

Dave K8MN

On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 22:15:56 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:

wrote:
On 27 Oct 2005 04:37:48 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote:


wrote:

K4YZ wrote:

wrote:

Len is on-topic far more often than you.

No he's not.

He's repeatedly stated that his ONLY reason for being "here" is to
"debate" the Morse Code test issue.

More often than not he's ranting off on the "Mighty Morsemen"
tangent without even mentioning the tests.


which right on target if a bit wordy

How is that "right on target"?

by being right on target
It isn't civil and he isn't debating.

I think Len would that MMM isn't civl but then neither are the MMM, as
to debating that would seem to be a matter of semantics

He isn't a radio amateur who uses CW and he isn't a radio amateur who
uses any other mode.

so?

He is a pathetic geezer .
and you complain about uncivil?

...with no stake in amateur
radio ..

given the number of times we have tried discussing the public nature
of radio and the FACT there is only so BW and all como type want it
and more of it Everyone having any kind of radio or interested the
uses made of radio he certainly and you know why .... so I feel that
part of the statement rises to the level of "lie" not mere opinion

...and an he has an ax to grind.

so what? like you and Steve and dan andd.... even myself don't

Dave K8MN

_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
On 27 Oct 2005 04:37:48 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote:
wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
wrote:

Len is on-topic far more often than you.

No he's not.

Big Lie #1.

He's repeatedly stated that his ONLY reason for being "here" is to
"debate" the Morse Code test issue.

More often than not he's ranting off on the "Mighty Morsemen"
tangent without even mentioning the tests.

which right on target if a bit wordy

How is that "right on target"? It isn't civil and he isn't debating.

Steve quoted nothing about civility. That would be Pot/Kettle/Black.
But since you bring up civility, you say nothing about Steve's
civility. Steve isn't civil and he isn't debating. Standard Mighty
Macho Morse Man double-standard technique. Hi!

He isn't a radio amateur who uses CW and he isn't a radio amateur who
uses any other mode.

Are you trying to say that he isn't a radio amateur? I think Len
self-identified on that one.

He is a pathetic geezer with no stake in amateur
radio and an he has an ax to grind.

Dave K8MN

"He is a pathetic geezer with no stake in amateur radio and [an] he has
an ax[e] to grind."

So says the Mighty Macho Morse Man.

wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:

wrote:

On 27 Oct 2005 04:37:48 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote:

wrote:

K4YZ wrote:

wrote:

Len is on-topic far more often than you.

No he's not.


Big Lie #1.


He's repeatedly stated that his ONLY reason for being "here" is to
"debate" the Morse Code test issue.

More often than not he's ranting off on the "Mighty Morsemen"
tangent without even mentioning the tests.

which right on target if a bit wordy

How is that "right on target"? It isn't civil and he isn't debating.


Steve quoted nothing about civility.

That's nice. Len claims to be here for civil debate of the morse
testing issue. The problem is, he isn't civil and spends very little of
his time debating.

That would be Pot/Kettle/Black.

Would it? Did Steve claim to be here for civil debate of morse testing?

But since you bring up civility, you say nothing about Steve's
civility. Steve isn't civil and he isn't debating.


Standard Mighty
Macho Morse Man double-standard technique. Hi!

Come to think of it, Cheesey, you don't seem to be here for civility or
debate. What was that thing about a pot and a kettle?


He isn't a radio amateur who uses CW and he isn't a radio amateur who
uses any other mode.


Are you trying to say that he isn't a radio amateur? I think Len
self-identified on that one.

Great. Then I'm sure that he won't have any difficulties with my
identification of him. Len has difficulties with those who use morse,
those who favor retention of morse testing and even with those radio
amateurs who use other modes.


He is a pathetic geezer with no stake in amateur
radio and an he has an ax to grind.

...an ax[e] to grind.

Please purchase a dictionary.


So says the Mighty Macho Morse Man.

Which poster claims to be a Mighty Macho Morse Man?

Dave K8MN

On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 03:47:52 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:

wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:

wrote:

On 27 Oct 2005 04:37:48 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote:

wrote:

K4YZ wrote:

wrote:

Len is on-topic far more often than you.

No he's not.


Big Lie #1.


He's repeatedly stated that his ONLY reason for being "here" is to
"debate" the Morse Code test issue.

More often than not he's ranting off on the "Mighty Morsemen"
tangent without even mentioning the tests.

which right on target if a bit wordy

How is that "right on target"? It isn't civil and he isn't debating.


Steve quoted nothing about civility.

That's nice. Len claims to be here for civil debate of the morse
testing issue. The problem is, he isn't civil and spends very little of
his time debating.

when did he say he came here For CIVIL deabte?



That would be Pot/Kettle/Black.

Would it? Did Steve claim to be here for civil debate of morse testing?

he does claim to be civil


But since you bring up civility, you say nothing about Steve's
civility. Steve isn't civil and he isn't debating.


Standard Mighty
Macho Morse Man double-standard technique. Hi!

Come to think of it, Cheesey, you don't seem to be here for civility or
debate. What was that thing about a pot and a kettle?

what nobody is civil but you?

right meet the kettle



He isn't a radio amateur who uses CW and he isn't a radio amateur who
uses any other mode.


Are you trying to say that he isn't a radio amateur? I think Len
self-identified on that one.

Great. Then I'm sure that he won't have any difficulties with my
identification of him. Len has difficulties with those who use morse,
those who favor retention of morse testing and even with those radio
amateurs who use other modes.


He is a pathetic geezer with no stake in amateur
radio and an he has an ax to grind.

...an ax[e] to grind.

Please purchase a dictionary.


So says the Mighty Macho Morse Man.

Which poster claims to be a Mighty Macho Morse Man?

you are not honest enough to claim it

Dave K8MN

_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

wrote:
On 27 Oct 2005 04:37:48 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote:


wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

Lennie said, in another thread:

What other thread? Why couldn't you comment to Len IN that other
thread?

Why?

Is there a "fee-per-thread" here?

Just curious why you have the predeliction for starting new threads
when almost everyone else is satisfied to stay on-thread and on-topic.

But...

but.....

but.....

BRAIN!

You and Lennie are ALL ABOUT NOT following "everyone else"...

So what's the deal?

Do we all just follow the Pied Piper and dance to one tune?

Len is on-topic far more often than you.

No he's not.

Big Lie #1.

He's repeatedly stated that his ONLY reason for being "here" is to
"debate" the Morse Code test issue.

More often than not he's ranting off on the "Mighty Morsemen"
tangent without even mentioning the tests.

which right on target if a bit wordy

At least it has to do with what's wrong with Morse testing.

Or is it OK to do what you want? I mean, afterall, MOST people
consider lying and deceit to be undesireable, antisocial behaviour, yet
you, Lennie and Mark do it at will. How come YOU don't do what
"everyone else" considers proper?

Giving an opinion is not lying. Just because you don't like someone's
opinion doesn't mean "thier" lying. Saying that opinions are lies is
in itself a lie.

It's a lie when the content is presented in such a way as to
present it as 'fact' when indeed reality is different.

Take your 'ARES won't respond' claims for example.

Past AND current events have proven it wrong. It was wrong when
you uttered it the first time and it's wrong now.

cuting all after Stevie first lie of of the post

I count this one as Big Lie #2. But I stuck with it and counted 5 or
6. I'm letting him do some research so he can correct one of them.
But he won't. He'd rather be a liar.

wrote:
wrote:

On 27 Oct 2005 04:37:48 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote:


wrote:

K4YZ wrote:

He's repeatedly stated that his ONLY reason for being "here" is to
"debate" the Morse Code test issue.

More often than not he's ranting off on the "Mighty Morsemen"
tangent without even mentioning the tests.

which right on target if a bit wordy


At least it has to do with what's wrong with Morse testing.

Not at all. It has more to do with what's wrong with Len. If you read
his windy diatribes, you'd think he'd been beaten with a rusty Vibroplex
as a child.

Dave K8MN