![]() |
how a policy issue for a change...local bandplaning
an_old_friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote: KØHB wrote: "an Old friend" wrote I was trying to tlak the subject in general merely giving an example ??????????????????????? His local gang was tlaking to their new club official. None of them knew anything about frequencies used for 6m AM operation. not at all I was trying to spark an On Topic discussion HERE about how folks would go about local band planing It is "band planning", Mark and it isn't done on a local basis. It is done on a national and regional basis. If we decided to implement a local band plan for 2m here, the 2m users in Pittsburgh, Morgantown, Parkersburg, Marietta and Columbus would be in a dither. You told us of your lack of knowledge of where 6m AM activity might be found. A couple of us told you. Now you'll undoubtedly string us along for a number of posts as you did over the 60m "band". Dave K8MN all the bitching about the Off topic stuff |
how a policy issue for a change...local bandplaning
|
how a policy issue for a change...local bandplaning
|
how a policy issue for a change...local bandplaning
Dave Heil wrote: an_old_friend wrote: Dave Heil wrote: KØHB wrote: "an Old friend" wrote I was trying to tlak the subject in general merely giving an example ??????????????????????? His local gang was tlaking to their new club official. None of them knew anything about frequencies used for 6m AM operation. not at all I was trying to spark an On Topic discussion HERE about how folks would go about local band planing It is "band planning", Mark and it isn't done on a local basis. according the ARRL it can be It is done on a national and regional basis. If we decided to implement a local band plan for 2m here, the 2m users in Pittsburgh, Morgantown, Parkersburg, Marietta and Columbus would be in a dither. so? You told us of your lack of knowledge of where 6m AM activity might be found. can't you tell the turth about anything A couple of us told you. Now you'll undoubtedly string us along for a number of posts as you did over the 60m "band". Dave K8MN all the bitching about the Off topic stuff |
how a policy issue for a change...local bandplaning
K4YZ wrote: wrote: KØHB wrote: "an Old friend" wrote I was trying to tlak the subject in general merely giving an example ??????????????????????? Hans appears incapable. Incapable of what? Try your local frequency coordinating body, perhaps the repeater coordinating body for 6M, if that is your interest. Each state or locality is different. Half right...Again... Or why not simply use the band plan suggestions as they appear in the Repeater Guide? the band plans themselve mention the possiblity of local varriations Guess the suggestions made were too simplistic? We HAVE to have a fight over this? guess you do I was just trying to spark On topic discussion related to the prupose of NG on a subject I have always been curious about Steve, K4YZ |
how a policy issue for a change...local bandplaning
an_old_friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote: an_old_friend wrote: Dave Heil wrote: KØHB wrote: "an Old friend" wrote I was trying to tlak the subject in general merely giving an example ??????????????????????? His local gang was tlaking to their new club official. None of them knew anything about frequencies used for 6m AM operation. not at all I was trying to spark an On Topic discussion HERE about how folks would go about local band planing It is "band planning", Mark and it isn't done on a local basis. according the ARRL it can be Really? Here's the url for the ARRL band plans. Please point out the portion dealing with local variations. http://www.arrl.org/FandES/field/reg.../bandplan.html It is done on a national and regional basis. If we decided to implement a local band plan for 2m here, the 2m users in Pittsburgh, Morgantown, Parkersburg, Marietta and Columbus would be in a dither. so? Whaddya mean, "so"? If everyone takes it upon himself to implement a "local band plan" then there isn't any band plan. FM ops interfere with SSB ops, packet ops interfere with FM repeater operation and repeaters interfere with each other. Where's that IQ of 248 that you've claimed? While we're on that topic, there's some interesting info to be found at: http://www.ufomind.com/misc/1997/dec/d28-001.shtml It say, in part: "To answer your question, we can simply pickup a 1989 copy of the Guinness Book of World Records . Marilyn Vos Savant is listed on page 26 as having the highest recorded IQ . It says '...as a ten year old she achieved a ceiling score for 23-year-olds, thus giving her an IQ of 228.' Her record was retired to the guinness hall of fame because scores that high are no longer possible due to a lowering of test score ceilings. (As I'm sure you're already guessing it's because scores that high weren't very valid in the first place.) Most other reference books state Marilyn Vos Savant's, IQ at 190, and still the highest ever recorded." That'd make your claim preposterous. You told us of your lack of knowledge of where 6m AM activity might be found. can't you tell the turth about anything Here's the "turth", the whole "turth" and nothing but the "turth": "been chatting with some locals interested in some AM stuff on 6M and prehaps elsewhere planety of really unsed rf 'real estate' but little mention of anything but ssb cw and Fm on the bandplans" --Mark Morgan There you go, Colonel. "Planety" of material on "unsed" rf real estate for you to chew on. A couple of us told you. Now you'll undoubtedly string us along for a number of posts as you did over the 60m "band". ....and you've already begun! Dave K8MN |
how a policy issue for a change...local bandplaning
Dave Heil wrote: wrote: KØHB wrote: "an Old friend" wrote I was trying to tlak the subject in general merely giving an example ??????????????????????? Hans appears incapable. Try your local frequency coordinating body, perhaps the repeater coordinating body for 6M, if that is your interest. Each state or locality is different. Not for 6m AM, SSB or CW it isn't. No? Every state and locality can be different. One size does not fit all. Read your ARRL repeater guide. Notice all the caveats wrt band plans, coordination, and even spacing. Do you know of any 6m AM repeaters anywhere? Dave K8MN Do you know why there can't be? |
how a policy issue for a change...local bandplaning
K4YZ wrote: wrote: KØHB wrote: "an Old friend" wrote I was trying to tlak the subject in general merely giving an example ??????????????????????? Hans appears incapable. Incapable of what? Incapable of everything that he was responding to. Try your local frequency coordinating body, perhaps the repeater coordinating body for 6M, if that is your interest. Each state or locality is different. Half right...Again... 100% Correct, Again. As Usual. Or why not simply use the band plan suggestions as they appear in the Repeater Guide? Too easy. Amateur radio is supposed to be a challenge. Gotta "work hard." Guess the suggestions made were too simplistic? We HAVE to have a fight over this? Steve, K4YZ With fists and axe handles. "Gangs of New York" and all that. |
how a policy issue for a change...local bandplaning
an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: KØHB wrote: "an Old friend" wrote I was trying to tlak the subject in general merely giving an example ??????????????????????? Hans appears incapable. Incapable of what? Try your local frequency coordinating body, perhaps the repeater coordinating body for 6M, if that is your interest. Each state or locality is different. Half right...Again... Or why not simply use the band plan suggestions as they appear in the Repeater Guide? the band plans themselve mention the possiblity of local varriations Oooh! Ouch!! No!!! Say it ain't so.... The MMM have spoken, and the ARRL Repeater Guide is Wrong, Wrongg, WRONGGG!!! Guess the suggestions made were too simplistic? We HAVE to have a fight over this? guess you do A$$hole Flambe' gotta have a fight. I was just trying to spark On topic discussion related to the prupose of NG on a subject I have always been curious about Yikes! Whatever possessed you to try an on-topic discussion? Hope my reply helped. You're in Michigan? Do you want to coordinator's info? |
how a policy issue for a change...local bandplaning
Dave Heil wrote: an_old_friend wrote: Dave Heil wrote: KØHB wrote: "an Old friend" wrote I was trying to tlak the subject in general merely giving an example ??????????????????????? His local gang was tlaking to their new club official. None of them knew anything about frequencies used for 6m AM operation. not at all I was trying to spark an On Topic discussion HERE about how folks would go about local band planing It is "band planning", Mark and it isn't done on a local basis. It can be on vhf and above frequencies. You just need to open your mind a little, a very little. It is done on a national and regional basis. If we decided to implement a local band plan for 2m here, the 2m users in Pittsburgh, Morgantown, Parkersburg, Marietta and Columbus would be in a dither. There is still room for local variation in a regional plan. You told us of your lack of knowledge of where 6m AM activity might be found. A couple of us told you. Now you'll undoubtedly string us along for a number of posts as you did over the 60m "band". Dave K8MN Perhaps he and other associates have no 6M crystal for where the AM activity might be found and wants a local variation. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:18 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com