About Us

October 28th 05, 12:33 AM

wrote:
Iitoi wrote:

I wonder if James

Do you mean me?

will continue to challenge the tally now that it
appears to support his view of the topic, or if the challenge is based
on "you can't trust someone who has no license".

I'm simply asking for an explanation of how the 'scorecard'
is derived. The questions are simple and straightforward,
but Len gets all upset when someone questions anything he
posts here.

Here are some of the questions:

1) Does anyone check Len's work? (it appears that only Len
does this)

We appoint you to do this.

2) Do the totals include only comments, or reply comments?
(it appears they include reply comments too)

You tell us.

3) Are multiple comments/reply comments from the same person counted,
even if they are not identical? (Len has filed at least 5 different
comments/reply comments on WT 05-235. Are they counted as 1 or 5 or
something else?)

You tell us.

4) How is it determined if a comment has a "valid address"?

You tell us.

Whether or not the person posting a "scorecard" has a license or no
license makes no difference to me.

Wunnerful. Tally it both ways and let us know if it made a difference.

Whether they are procodetest or
nocodetest also makes no difference to me.

But will you respect us in the morning?

I just want some direct answers to questions about the process of
generating the tallies. But such answers are considered insults
by Len.

Your questions will be answered in the details of you checking Len's
work, See Q/A #1 above.

Meanwhile, other parties are also counting the comments.

What other parties?

They
show each and every comment on a website, classify it, and provide a
link
to the comment so you can see for yourself. They're listed in
alphabetical order by the last name of the filer for easy reference,
and dupes stand out clearly.

73 de Jim, N2EY

Since someone else is also performing the tally, would you care to
compare/contrast the tallies?

October 28th 05, 12:36 AM

On 27 Oct 2005 16:33:17 -0700, wrote:

wrote:
Iitoi wrote:

I wonder if James

Do you mean me?

will continue to challenge the tally now that it
appears to support his view of the topic, or if the challenge is based
on "you can't trust someone who has no license".

I'm simply asking for an explanation of how the 'scorecard'
is derived. The questions are simple and straightforward,
but Len gets all upset when someone questions anything he
posts here.

Here are some of the questions:

1) Does anyone check Len's work? (it appears that only Len
does this)

We appoint you to do this.

2) Do the totals include only comments, or reply comments?
(it appears they include reply comments too)

You tell us.

3) Are multiple comments/reply comments from the same person counted,
even if they are not identical? (Len has filed at least 5 different
comments/reply comments on WT 05-235. Are they counted as 1 or 5 or
something else?)

You tell us.

4) How is it determined if a comment has a "valid address"?

You tell us.

Whether or not the person posting a "scorecard" has a license or no
license makes no difference to me.

Wunnerful. Tally it both ways and let us know if it made a difference.

Whether they are procodetest or
nocodetest also makes no difference to me.

But will you respect us in the morning?

I just want some direct answers to questions about the process of
generating the tallies. But such answers are considered insults
by Len.

Your questions will be answered in the details of you checking Len's
work, See Q/A #1 above.

Meanwhile, other parties are also counting the comments.

What other parties?

They
show each and every comment on a website, classify it, and provide a
link
to the comment so you can see for yourself. They're listed in
alphabetical order by the last name of the filer for easy reference,
and dupes stand out clearly.

73 de Jim, N2EY

Since someone else is also performing the tally, would you care to
compare/contrast the tallies?

obviously not he seem to prefer carping at Len

_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

October 28th 05, 04:14 AM

wrote:
On 27 Oct 2005 16:33:17 -0700, wrote:

wrote:
Iitoi wrote:

I wonder if James

Do you mean me?

will continue to challenge the tally now that it
appears to support his view of the topic, or if the challenge is based
on "you can't trust someone who has no license".

I'm simply asking for an explanation of how the 'scorecard'
is derived. The questions are simple and straightforward,
but Len gets all upset when someone questions anything he
posts here.

Here are some of the questions:

1) Does anyone check Len's work? (it appears that only Len
does this)

We appoint you to do this.

2) Do the totals include only comments, or reply comments?
(it appears they include reply comments too)

You tell us.

3) Are multiple comments/reply comments from the same person counted,
even if they are not identical? (Len has filed at least 5 different
comments/reply comments on WT 05-235. Are they counted as 1 or 5 or
something else?)

You tell us.

4) How is it determined if a comment has a "valid address"?

You tell us.

Whether or not the person posting a "scorecard" has a license or no
license makes no difference to me.

Wunnerful. Tally it both ways and let us know if it made a difference.

Whether they are procodetest or
nocodetest also makes no difference to me.

But will you respect us in the morning?

I just want some direct answers to questions about the process of
generating the tallies. But such answers are considered insults
by Len.

Your questions will be answered in the details of you checking Len's
work, See Q/A #1 above.

Meanwhile, other parties are also counting the comments.

What other parties?

They
show each and every comment on a website, classify it, and provide a
link
to the comment so you can see for yourself. They're listed in
alphabetical order by the last name of the filer for easy reference,
and dupes stand out clearly.

73 de Jim, N2EY

Since someone else is also performing the tally, would you care to
compare/contrast the tallies?

obviously not he seem to prefer carping at Len

Yep. He has no real interest in the issue since he's made up his mind
that the FCC is against his precious Morse Code exam. His only purpose
now is to try to discredit his primary antagonist before he departs
RRAP for Coslo's exclusive BBS.

October 28th 05, 04:17 AM

On 27 Oct 2005 20:14:29 -0700, wrote:

wrote:
On 27 Oct 2005 16:33:17 -0700, wrote:

wrote:
Iitoi wrote:

I wonder if James
cut

73 de Jim, N2EY

Since someone else is also performing the tally, would you care to
compare/contrast the tallies?

obviously not he seem to prefer carping at Len

Yep. He has no real interest in the issue since he's made up his mind
that the FCC is against his precious Morse Code exam. His only purpose
now is to try to discredit his primary antagonist before he departs
RRAP for Coslo's exclusive BBS.

amusing and sad how he and other go on Len's lack of license but are
still vitaly concerned about what he may say

_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

October 28th 05, 11:07 AM

wrote:
On 27 Oct 2005 20:14:29 -0700, wrote:

wrote:
On 27 Oct 2005 16:33:17 -0700, wrote:

wrote:
Iitoi wrote:

I wonder if James
cut

73 de Jim, N2EY

Since someone else is also performing the tally, would you care to
compare/contrast the tallies?

obviously not he seem to prefer carping at Len

Yep. He has no real interest in the issue since he's made up his mind
that the FCC is against his precious Morse Code exam. His only purpose
now is to try to discredit his primary antagonist before he departs
RRAP for Coslo's exclusive BBS.

amusing and sad how he and other go on Len's lack of license but are
still vitaly concerned about what he may say

Yep. They protest too loudly, drawing the attention to Len's words
which might otherwise not attract so much attention.

Have you seen the new thread where James points out Len being
uncomfortable with children participating in what Len believes to be a
primarily adult activity?

Hi!

October 28th 05, 11:17 PM

From: on Fri 28 Oct 2005 03:07

wrote:
On 27 Oct 2005 20:14:29 -0700, wrote:
wrote:
On 27 Oct 2005 16:33:17 -0700, wrote:
wrote:
Iitoi wrote:

Since someone else is also performing the tally, would you care to
compare/contrast the tallies?

obviously not he seem to prefer carping at Len

Yep. He has no real interest in the issue since he's made up his mind
that the FCC is against his precious Morse Code exam. His only purpose
now is to try to discredit his primary antagonist before he departs
RRAP for Coslo's exclusive BBS.

amusing and sad how he and other go on Len's lack of license but are
still vitaly concerned about what he may say

Yep. They protest too loudly, drawing the attention to Len's words
which might otherwise not attract so much attention.

...in one way that's good...in another, bad... :-)

Have you seen the new thread where James points out Len being
uncomfortable with children participating in what Len believes to be a
primarily adult activity?

Hi!

Tsk, tsk, tsk...I think Jimmie-James is all for children VOTING
in elections! Or perhaps, it is okay for children having state
drivers' licenses...maybe it being okay for them to go into
liquor stores to buy alcohol without age limit...or serving in
armed forces of the United States (like Jimmie Noserve)...get
married...piloting aircraft with legal license to do so in his
age-limit-less world?

James P. Miccolis has NOT answered a repeated question: How
many children has HE parented? He won't say, doesn't answer.

That's NOT the real subject of Jimmie-James' efforts. He is still
****ed at being confronted with opposite opinions in here by those
who will not accept HIS opinions. He MUST re-argue and re-argue
and re-argue old, Old, OLD issues from years back. Maybe he hopes
to "win" an old argument that way? I don't think so. If the
Muppets need a new character, I'd nominate him as "Miss ****y." :-)

Meanwhile, Jimmie-James keeps up his "Philly-tuff" personna asking
me if I'm "afraid" of anothers' tally on WT Docket 05-235. :-)

NPRM 05-143 is *THE* issue for U.S. amateur radio in this new
millennium. This is the end of the 15th week of filings in WT
Docket 05-235 and the total is (to 27th October) 3,174 total.
That's roughly 209 filings a week average, about four times
more than on 98-143 ("Restructuring") in its 11 month open
comment period.

Brian, you've posted (I have a copy along with others from rrap
who've filed on WT Docket 05-235) and so have others. But,
for all his macho morsemanship, neither James P. Miccolis nor
the mighty morsemen regulars in here have NOT filed!

Sunnuvagun!

October 29th 05, 02:55 AM

wrote:

Tsk, tsk, tsk...I think Jimmie-James is all for children
VOTING in elections!

I don't know who "Jimmie-James" is supposed to be, Len. But I'm
not "all for children VOTING in elections". I'm just opposed
to a minimum age requirement for an amateur radio license.

Or perhaps, it is okay for children having state
drivers' licenses...

I don't think it's okay for children to have driver's licenses. I'm
just opposed to a minimum age requirement for an amateur radio license.

maybe it being okay for them to go into
liquor stores to buy alcohol without age limit...

I don't think it's okay for children to buy alcohol. I'm just opposed
to a minimum age requirement for an amateur radio license.

or serving in armed forces of the United States

I don't think it's okay for children to serve in the military. I'm just
opposed to a minimum age requirement for an amateur radio license.

...get married...piloting aircraft with legal license to do so in his age-limit-less world?

I'm just opposed to a minimum age requirement for an amateur radio
license.

James P. Miccolis has NOT answered a repeated question: How
many children has HE parented? He won't say, doesn't answer.

Why should I answer that question, Len? You refuse to answer on-topic
questions, so why should anyone answer your off-topic ones?

That's NOT the real subject of Jimmie-James' efforts.

I don't know who "Jimmie-James" is supposed to be, Len.

He is still ****ed at being confronted with opposite
opinions in here by those who will not accept HIS opinions.

You're describing yourself, Len.

He MUST re-argue and re-argue
and re-argue old, Old, OLD issues from years back.

I know somebody who keeps telling old, Old, OLD stories of his service
at a radio station in Japan years back.

asking me if I'm "afraid" of anothers' tally on
WT Docket 05-235. :-)

Looks like you are afraid, Len.

NPRM 05-143 is *THE* issue for U.S. amateur radio in this new
millennium. This is the end of the 15th week of filings in WT
Docket 05-235 and the total is (to 27th October) 3,174 total.
That's roughly 209 filings a week average, about four times
more than on 98-143 ("Restructuring") in its 11 month open
comment period.

So?

Brian, you've posted (I have a copy along with others from
rrap
who've filed on WT Docket 05-235) and so have others. But,
for all his macho morsemanship, neither James P. Miccolis nor
the mighty morsemen regulars in here have NOT filed!

So? What's your point, Len?

I'll "file" when I want to.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Scorecard on WT Docket 05-235	[email protected]	Policy	140	November 24th 05 12:27 AM
Docket Scorecard	[email protected]	Policy	108	October 29th 05 12:02 AM
Docket 05-235 Scorecard	[email protected]	Policy	83	September 7th 05 05:32 PM
Lennie's Back In Form...Old Rant's...Same Form...	K4YZ	Policy	18	May 12th 05 11:59 PM
Lennie's Double Standard Once Again Revealed...BY Lennie!	Steve Robeson, K4CAP	Policy	22	October 21st 03 12:08 PM

Menu

About Us