Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
KØHB wrote:
wrote First, it assumes that hams with the various license classes stay only in their respective subbands, in that you won't find Extras in the Advanced and General parts, or Advanceds in the General parts, etc. But that's not how it works. You've got it all bass-ackwards, Jim. No, just the opposite, Hans. My "experiment" presumes that you won't find Advanced in the Extra portion of the band, and you won't find Generals in either the Advanced or Extra segments. And you usually won't! But you *will* find Extras in the Advanced and General parts of the band, and Advanceds in the General part of the band. Thus, if incentive licensing is working, there ought to be a noticeable difference in operator/technical skills evident between the opposite ends of the band segments. That difference, if it exists, would be diluted by the Extras in the Advanced and General sections, and the Advanceds in the General section. Muddies the waters, as it were. There's also the effect of the bandplans. The lower parts of the subbands are often where the DX and DXers hang out, so you hear more pileups and less discussion. Many of the "watering holes" for various interests and modes are intentionally placed in the General sections: AM is near 3885, PSK31 is around 3579, QRP is around 3540, etc. As you so ably point out, that difference doesn't seem to exist. It's interesting that you suggest the experiment on 'phone, not CW ;-) I rest my case. No benefits of incentive licensing are observed in the real world. There are other experiments to try. For example, look in the amateur radio publications - particularly the most technical- and operating-skill-emphasis ones like QEX and NCJ - and see what license classes the authors of the best articles hold. wrote I would expect less sophisticated discussions in the Advanced/Extra portions simply because the Generals may be more apt to be seeking knowledge where the Extras may be inclined to relax. Dee, you should submit this as the funniest-rrap-paragraph-of-the-month. A good one! But lemme tellya what I recall from the late 1960s.... I remember the howling and cussing over the coming of the then-new regs. I was surprised that so many hams that were older and more experienced than I were so upset about having to take more exams. You'd have thought that the Advanced and Extra writtens were EE courses, and that the 20 wpm Morse Code exams were world-class. Or something. But after a bit of listening and questioning, the situation became clear. Most of those complaining had been licensed after the Great Giveaway of Christmas 1952, and had little or no knowledge of how things were before Generals and Conditionals got all privileges. Many of those who complained the loudest had started out as Novices, studied and practiced like mad during their Novice year, and then upgraded to General or Conditional. Once they'd gotten to the General/Conditional level, they basically sat back and considered themselves "fully qualified", and relaxed. What really ticked them off was that FCC was saying there was more to learn! It didn't help their addytood when young squirts like me started showing up with Advanceds and Extras....back when Extras made up less than 2% of US hams.... What was even funnier was when some of the worst complainers and moaners started working towards the Advanced and Extra and found they could pass those exams. They discovered that 20 wasn't all that fast if you actually *used* Morse Code on the air for a while, and that knowing the technical stuff in the books well enough to pass the exams didn't take an EE degree. Soon there were Advanceds and Extras all over the place and it was no big deal. Now the circle is complete... 73 de Jim, N2EY |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Utillity freq List; | Shortwave | |||
DX test Results | Shortwave | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy | |||
DX test Results | Broadcasting | |||
DX test Results | Shortwave |