Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Cmdr Buzz Corey" wrote in message ... Ernest W Block wrote: "Cmdr Buzz Corey" wrote in message m... Ernest W Block wrote: "Dr CB Nomore" wrote in message ... why do you hams bother with a license? the Tenth Ammendment clearly allows anyone to operate any radio without a license on any frequency at anytime or place. I posed this question to U.S. Senator Hillary Clinton's office and was told that a "blanket license" covered channels 1-40. All channels above 40 are unassigned and no license is required to operate there. The same thing applies to all channels below channel one. However, hams operating below channel one are limited to 500 watts, while hams operating above channel 40 can run unlimited power. 7 thirds, Ernie Pure BS. Senator Hitlery's office doesn't know squat about the FCC rules. Well of course her *office* doesn't know squat about FCC rules, but her FCC specialist staff member did and does know about FCC rules, especially since she is in contact with one of the commissioners. You really need to take a look at your aggressive attitude. 7 thirds, Ernie Her staff member obviously doesn't know squat either. The frequencies below and above cb channels 1-40 *are* allocated to other services and to operate on those frequencies without the proper permit or license is illegal. Hams can only operate on frequencies allocated to the amateur radio service and are not limited to 500 watts. Sounds like her staff member is as stupid as you are. I think Roger can help you. Poor 2test wogie can't even help himself. Two things come to mind. One, you have resorted to name calling, which means you have lost the argument. Two, Democrats always resort to name calling when they are losing an argument, so it would appear you are a Democrat. Lastly, your whole premise is moot, since the Tenth Ammendment trumps all regulation of radio frequencies, thereby making the FCC an outlaw agency, with no basis in our Constitution. BTW, Roger is a Democrat, and a very liberal one too. He's on SSI, so that is not surprising. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ernest W Block wrote:
Two things come to mind. One, you have resorted to name calling, which means you have lost the argument. Really? What name calling? Two, Democrats always resort to name calling when they are losing an argument, so it would appear you are a Democrat. And you are incorrect again, but then what's new about that? Lastly, your whole premise is moot, since the Tenth Ammendment trumps all regulation of radio frequencies, thereby making the FCC an outlaw agency, with no basis in our Constitution. Wanna bet? Your ignorance knows no bounds. BTW, Roger is a Democrat, and a very liberal one too. He's on SSI, so that is not surprising. No it isn't. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Cmdr Buzz Corey" wrote in message ... Ernest W Block wrote: Two things come to mind. One, you have resorted to name calling, which means you have lost the argument. Really? What name calling? Two, Democrats always resort to name calling when they are losing an argument, so it would appear you are a Democrat. And you are incorrect again, but then what's new about that? Lastly, your whole premise is moot, since the Tenth Ammendment trumps all regulation of radio frequencies, thereby making the FCC an outlaw agency, with no basis in our Constitution. Wanna bet? Your ignorance knows no bounds. BTW, Roger is a Democrat, and a very liberal one too. He's on SSI, so that is not surprising. No it isn't. You enjoy arguing with Roger more, so go for it! |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Cmdr Buzz Corey" wrote in message ... Ernest W Block wrote: Two things come to mind. One, you have resorted to name calling, which means you have lost the argument. Really? What name calling? Two, Democrats always resort to name calling when they are losing an argument, so it would appear you are a Democrat. And you are incorrect again, but then what's new about that? Lastly, your whole premise is moot, since the Tenth Ammendment trumps all regulation of radio frequencies, thereby making the FCC an outlaw agency, with no basis in our Constitution. Wanna bet? Your ignorance knows no bounds. BTW, Roger is a Democrat, and a very liberal one too. He's on SSI, so that is not surprising. ..Waaal, whutdya 'spect fum them thar fellers that thanks their coax must be a certain length thar, shore thang thar, mercy me thar. Why, them fellers went down to Joe Blow's reddio shop thar and got one of them thar reddios and leenyars and extree channels thar and WHAM! They is them thar rediddio experts now thar, shore thang thar mercy me, gre't day thar, garr-an-tole ye thar, mercy sakes alive thar and I heered hit fum the trailer park thar whirr they is all them trailers and antanners thar. Them CB fellers shore is got them smarts 'bout reddidios thar........ I'm impressed......................................... ............. N O T! ![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Docket Scorecard | Policy | |||
Open Letter to K1MAN | Policy | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part Two (Communicator License) | Policy | |||
Ham radio's REAL ememy | Policy |