Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() K4YZ wrote: wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: Dave Heil wrote: I'm not in manufacturing. Sure you are. Nope. Sure you are. I'm not responsible for other people's kids, but I donate to Toys for Tots. A project of the United States Marine Corps Reserve...That's gotta get you grinding your teeth a bit! I think the Marines are a great bunch of people. I think that people that try to catch a ride on "thier" coattails aren't. Me to...That's why I am glad Frankie got court martialed. That's "Frank." Remember our little agreement? And Frank wasn't a USMC Reservist. You've not been paying attention...but then that's not new either. So you do or you don't want the Morse Code exam kept as a licensing requirement? Make up your minds. Mine's already made up. I said it clearly before. I don't like the way things have gone, but it IS a democratic society. I'd like to see some part of it stay and have explained myn reasons why. It's no mystery...Unless you've not been paying attention. I've paid attention to your mixed messages. I was just asking which way you were going with it yesterday. Notice to Len: Start playing nice with these guys when they start playing nice with you. Uhhhhhh..... Brian.... Jim Miccolis has NEVER called the putz anything BUT "Len" or "Leonard" or any other abbreviation of his name that Lennie didn't himself use, yet Lennie's pelted him for YEARS with NUMEROUS diminutives. You have too, yet I have NEVER seen Jim refer to YOU as anything except "Brian", "Burke", or by your callsign. We'll start with you. Once you've reformed, we'll work with Jim. There's nothing to work with with Jim. He's already establsihed a track record of NOT calling people by diminutives. He doesn't do it to Lennie...he doesn't do it to Mark or you. So...What's YOUR excuse for doing it to him? Like I said, we'll start with you and when you've shown improvement for some period of time, we can move on to Jim. Jim may take only a minute or two, but I'm trying to be inclusive here. My duty as a friend to Len and good citizen of RRAP is now satisfied. No...Your duty as a "good citizen" will be done when you publically state, and then STICK TO IT, your intent to not initiate or perpetuate the use of diminutives towards people who don't use them on you. I call you "Steve" at least 99% of the time. And you mimick Lennie's diminutives. And Frankies. I "mimick" nothing. I call Jim by his name more than 99% of the time. I do slip up once in a while and refer to him as Quitefine. I wonder why I do that? Me too. But I wonder WHY you call him "Rev Jim", "Jimmie", "Reverend Jim" AT ALL, Brian. You're not paying attention to attributions. I've ceased calling him Rev Jim because of his unRev-like bahavior. I do not call him "Jimmie" He's never done anything similar to you that I am even remotelya ware of.... I was through with Jim when he said that a Morse Code test would be a barrier to Morse Code use, then tried to reneg on it. Yet it is precisely true and is what I've been on here about. Now Jim is only about being Len's adversary. He's run out of substance. Now what do you call me? As of yesterday, I'll call you Brian until you slip back into some other practice. There is no other "practice." The things I have posted today are Quitesimilar the the things that I posted last week. It is you who must reach for a higher standard. A year ago I called you "Brian"...I did slip a couple of times and immediately apologized for it... A year ago.... And Yes, Brian, I will do the same for you, effective with THIS post...assuming you do and continue the same. Otherwise, it's right on back to the mudslinging. I don't beleive you. We've gone this route before. Yet I continue to call you Steve and you continue with the diminuitives. "believe" Yes we HAVE gone this rout before...And when you started back in on the diminutives and mistruths, I asked you point-blank if that's what you wanted. You indicated you "could take anything you can hand out".... The diminuitives AND the mistruths. The diminuitives are posted by other people, but the "mistruths" part... That's where this whole thing is going to fall apart. You don't have a good concept on what constitutes the truth. OK...We played your game. Tired yet? You're exhausting me, Steve. I don't know how much longer I can keep this up for. We'll see how long you last this time. No... We'll see how long YOU last, Brian. Steve, K4YZ Steve, I have no problem being civil with people on RRAP. Been doing most of my time here. Like your concept on truth, you have trouble differentiating between me and other posters on RRAP. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() K4YZ wrote: wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: Dave Heil wrote: I'm not in manufacturing. Sure you are. Nope. Sure you are. you are the fabricator Stevie I'm not responsible for other people's kids, but I donate to Toys for Tots. A project of the United States Marine Corps Reserve...That's gotta get you grinding your teeth a bit! I think the Marines are a great bunch of people. I think that people that try to catch a ride on "thier" coattails aren't. Me to...That's why I am glad Frankie got court martialed. then you are sick proven yet again You've not been paying attention...but then that's not new either. So you do or you don't want the Morse Code exam kept as a licensing requirement? Make up your minds. Mine's already made up. I said it clearly before. I don't like the way things have gone, but it IS a democratic society. I'd like to see some part of it stay and have explained myn reasons why. It's no mystery...Unless you've not been paying attention. it is just you keep changing your story or do you prfer the term spining prehaps you are so decietful you can't ask for water when you are htristy Notice to Len: Start playing nice with these guys when they start playing nice with you. Uhhhhhh..... Brian.... Jim Miccolis has NEVER called the putz anything BUT "Len" or "Leonard" or any other abbreviation of his name that Lennie didn't himself use, yet Lennie's pelted him for YEARS with NUMEROUS diminutives. You have too, yet I have NEVER seen Jim refer to YOU as anything except "Brian", "Burke", or by your callsign. We'll start with you. Once you've reformed, we'll work with Jim. There's nothing to work with with Jim. gues you did not read "ONCE YOU refromed" He's already establsihed a track record of NOT calling people by diminutives. He doesn't do it to Lennie...he doesn't do it to Mark or you. So...What's YOUR excuse for doing it to him? what excuse is needed Even hans understands that he is not entitled to only be insulted in the same maner as he insults My duty as a friend to Len and good citizen of RRAP is now satisfied. No...Your duty as a "good citizen" will be done when you publically state, and then STICK TO IT, your intent to not initiate or perpetuate the use of diminutives towards people who don't use them on you. I call you "Steve" at least 99% of the time. And you mimick Lennie's diminutives. And Frankies. I call Jim by his name more than 99% of the time. I do slip up once in a while and refer to him as Quitefine. I wonder why I do that? Me too. But I wonder WHY you call him "Rev Jim", "Jimmie", "Reverend Jim" AT ALL, Brian. He's never done anything similar to you that I am even remotelya ware of.... becuase it does not work to do so Now what do you call me? As of yesterday, I'll call you Brian until you slip back into some other practice. A year ago I called you "Brian"...I did slip a couple of times and immediately apologized for it... And Yes, Brian, I will do the same for you, effective with THIS post...assuming you do and continue the same. Otherwise, it's right on back to the mudslinging. I don't beleive you. We've gone this route before. Yet I continue to call you Steve and you continue with the diminuitives. "believe" Yes we HAVE gone this rout before...And when you started back in on the diminutives and mistruths, I asked you point-blank if that's what you wanted. You indicated you "could take anything you can hand out".... when are you going to start telling the turth? OK...We played your game. Tired yet? We'll see how long you last this time. No... We'll see how long YOU last, Brian. we await your starting Steve, K4YZ |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: We'll see how long you last this time. No... We'll see how long YOU last, Brian. we await your starting I'm not sure if Steve actually started, but if he did, he didn't last 24 hours before he started yet another new thread posting my name and callsign and demanding answers. Did you see in another thread where he changed your attribution from "an old friend" to "raped an old friend"? What a jerk. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: We'll see how long you last this time. No... We'll see how long YOU last, Brian. we await your starting I'm not sure if Steve actually started, but if he did, he didn't last 24 hours before he started yet another new thread posting my name and callsign and demanding answers. Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm.... I don't remember EVER saying I wouldn't mention your name nor ask you questions, including one's that might embarrass you. That's assinine, Brian. Are you embarrassed of your own name? Are you not willing to PUT your REAL name behind your words? I DID say I'd take a more civil tone with you inexchange for the same consideration. Apparently the offer fell on deaf ears and unwilling flesh. Did you see in another thread where he changed your attribution from "an old friend" to "raped an old friend"? That was Markie...Not you. So...Are you not up to the one-on-one civility thingy, Brian? What a jerk. Yes, you're sure shaping up that way, despite your assertions to the contrary. Steve, K4YZ |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() K4YZ wrote: wrote: an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: We'll see how long you last this time. No... We'll see how long YOU last, Brian. we await your starting I'm not sure if Steve actually started, but if he did, he didn't last 24 hours before he started yet another new thread posting my name and callsign and demanding answers. Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm.... I don't remember EVER saying I wouldn't mention your name nor ask you questions, including one's that might embarrass you. That's assinine, Brian. Are you embarrassed of your own name? Are you not willing to PUT your REAL name behind your words? I DID say I'd take a more civil tone with you inexchange for the same consideration. when were you going to start? Apparently the offer fell on deaf ears and unwilling flesh. what offer? to get something you want Stevie you have to offer something of value to person you want something from it is a point you constantly seem to overlook makes it clear you are stupid but we all know that by now Did you see in another thread where he changed your attribution from "an old friend" to "raped an old friend"? That was Markie...Not you. BYS you should not be answering a a reply made to me So...Are you not up to the one-on-one civility thingy, Brian? when civility is offered it is returned Brain and I are quite civil even when we disagree obviously you can't read or haven't bothered to read What a jerk. Yes, you're sure shaping up that way, despite your assertions to the contrary. projecting agian Steve, K4YZ |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() K4YZ wrote: wrote: an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: We'll see how long you last this time. No... We'll see how long YOU last, Brian. we await your starting I'm not sure if Steve actually started, but if he did, he didn't last 24 hours before he started yet another new thread posting my name and callsign and demanding answers. Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm.... I don't remember EVER saying I wouldn't mention your name nor ask you questions, including one's that might embarrass you. That's assinine, Brian. Are you embarrassed of your own name? Are you not willing to PUT your REAL name behind your words? I DID say I'd take a more civil tone with you inexchange for the same consideration. Apparently the offer fell on deaf ears and unwilling flesh. Stvie just feels he is specail entitled to consideration beyond other men Did you see in another thread where he changed your attribution from "an old friend" to "raped an old friend"? That was Markie...Not you. So...Are you not up to the one-on-one civility thingy, Brian? you are not into civlity at all What a jerk. Yes, you're sure shaping up that way, despite your assertions to the contrary. Steve, K4YZ |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: We'll see how long you last this time. No... We'll see how long YOU last, Brian. we await your starting I'm not sure if Steve actually started, but if he did, he didn't last 24 hours before he started yet another new thread posting my name and callsign and demanding answers. Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm.... I don't remember EVER saying I wouldn't mention your name nor ask you questions, including one's that might embarrass you. That's assinine, Brian. Are you embarrassed of your own name? Are you not willing to PUT your REAL name behind your words? I DID say I'd take a more civil tone with you inexchange for the same consideration. Apparently the offer fell on deaf ears and unwilling flesh. Stvie just feels he is specail entitled to consideration beyond other men "Stevie" Nope. But if you expect me to hold to certain rules and standards, then you'd best be holding to them yourself. Brian has an 8 year history of his own of verbally abusing people who do not so treat him, specifically the absuses towards Dave and Jim that he refuses to address. You and he both can whine all you want to about the alleged victimization you attribute to me, but you both have yourselves to blame for it. I'm holding the line so far on Brian but I'll hit the Lottery before you ever manage to get your act together. Did you see in another thread where he changed your attribution from "an old friend" to "raped an old friend"? That was Markie...Not you. So...Are you not up to the one-on-one civility thingy, Brian? you are not into civlity at all And you've just exemplified why you deserve the title "liar". Don't want anymore "Markie" and references to your misdeeds in claiming to be a Colonel, etc etc etc? Apologize. Say you'll stop the "Stevie" and withdraw your allegations of "stalking", "lying", "harrassment" etc etc etc and we'll be on the road to recovery. Can't bring yourself to do it? Then stop whining about the way you get treated because you'll be getting exactly what you deserve. Steve, K4YZ |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() K4YZ wrote: an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: cut That's assinine, Brian. Are you embarrassed of your own name? Are you not willing to PUT your REAL name behind your words? I DID say I'd take a more civil tone with you inexchange for the same consideration. Apparently the offer fell on deaf ears and unwilling flesh. Stvie just feels he is specail entitled to consideration beyond other men "Stevie" Nope. But if you expect me to hold to certain rules and standards, then you'd best be holding to them yourself. I expect you to hold yopurself to YOUR own standards. That I hold differeing standard is something I am quite proud of I don't carry on about things like Stevie and markie while tlaking about Rape aids or pedophilia You want to hold other to your standards and then not keep to them yourself Brian has an 8 year history of his own of verbally abusing people who do not so treat him, specifically the absuses towards Dave and Jim that he refuses to address. you have a history of abusive yourself Dave and Jim are insulting Dave on almost every occasion jim mor eoccasionaly I no of no reason Brain or myself my only choose to return the same sort of insults for insulting behavoir I choose the manner in which I choose to respond to insults, as is my right Brain would appear to do the same You and he both can whine all you want to about the alleged victimization you attribute to me, but you both have yourselves to blame for it. that is right nothing you do is YOUR fault everyone makes you be so abusive I'm holding the line so far on Brian but I'll hit the Lottery before you ever manage to get your act together. Did you see in another thread where he changed your attribution from "an old friend" to "raped an old friend"? That was Markie...Not you. So...Are you not up to the one-on-one civility thingy, Brian? you are not into civlity at all And you've just exemplified why you deserve the title "liar". no I haven't you have never been civil here you showed calling people lazy and degenerated from there Don't want anymore "Markie" and references to your misdeeds in claiming to be a Colonel, etc etc etc? Apologize. Say you'll stop the "Stevie" and withdraw your allegations of "stalking", "lying", "harrassment" etc etc etc and we'll be on the road to recovery. you now want to lie? it would be a lie to say I think you tell the truth much if at all You overlook your threatening behavoir, your claims of threatening acts Can't bring yourself to do it? Then stop whining about the way you get treated because you'll be getting exactly what you deserve. everybody makes stevie act like a **** head, nothing is stevies fault grow up you spolied brat Steve, K4YZ |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Stevie doesn't get it is about HIS words such as these | Policy | |||
Can Stevie be trusted to make professional treament of a pagan? | Policy | |||
Stevie Claims "action" more like missing in action most likely | Policy | |||
IT WILL NEVER END, PEEPEEHOLIC, NEVER! | CB | |||
STEVIE IS A PEEPEEHOLIC | CB |