an old friend wrote:
Frank Gilliland wrote:
On 16 Nov 2005 07:52:58 -0800, "an old friend"
wrote in .com:

Civic" duty does not imply any requirement to agree with a narrow
minded proven bogot like yourself

ROTFLMMFAO!!!!!

it is funny i suppose in some sence that it needs to be evn stated is
not as funny

"Bogot" is funny in many "sences".

Dave K8MN

On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 18:24:34 GMT, Dave Heil wrote
in et:

Frank Gilliland wrote:
On 16 Nov 2005 07:52:58 -0800, "an old friend"
wrote in .com:

Civic" duty does not imply any requirement to agree with a narrow
minded proven bogot like yourself


ROTFLMMFAO!!!!!

Yeah. I found the word "bogot" kind of amusing myself.


And here comes Dave to the rescue!

So how do you like being Major Dud's lapdog?










----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

Frank Gilliland wrote:
On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 18:24:34 GMT, Dave Heil wrote
in et:

Frank Gilliland wrote:
On 16 Nov 2005 07:52:58 -0800, "an old friend"
wrote in .com:
Civic" duty does not imply any requirement to agree with a narrow
minded proven bogot like yourself

ROTFLMMFAO!!!!!
Yeah. I found the word "bogot" kind of amusing myself.


And here comes Dave to the rescue!

So how do you like being Major Dud's lapdog?

How do you figure, Frank? I made no comment on what Steve (there is no
"Major Dud") wrote. I commented on what Mark wrote and on what you
wrote. Who was it that I was supposed to rescue?

Dave K8MN

an old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
an old friend wrote:
ah I guess Dave does not like american doing their civic duty

CIVIC DUTY...?!?!?

yes civic duty
cuting stevie crying

Keep telling yourself it's "crying", Greaseball.

I "dared" to challenge one of Lennie's comments to the FCC in
EXACTLY the same manner and he went on for Y E A R S about how I
allegedly tried to challenge his "right" to seek redress from the
government! ! ! !

becuase you did

you tried to get the FCC to violate the Consititution of the US becuase
you don't like Len anderson. Personaly I am glad you did, made anything
else you tired to say all but unread

No, I did not "try to get the FCC to violate the Constitution",
Markie.

I presented some FACTS that Lennie didn't want aired.

Lennie goes one further! He actually "WARNS" the commentor about
HIS comments IN THE REPLY TO THE FCC ! ! ! ! ! !

WTF is LENNIE to "WARN" anyone...?!?! He doesn't even qualify to
be a school crossing guard!

rant away Stevie boy

What "rant", Greaseball?

Lennie DID utter a "warning" in his "reply comments".

And I reiterate my QUESTION...WTF is Lennie top "warn"
ANYone...?!?!

all you are doing is proving that you do not respect the Constitution
or the process of law

Uhhhhhhhhhhhh...yeah.


Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight.

There is ABSOLUTELY NOTHING "civic" about Lennie's intent or
comments. It was nothing but hateful bile polished by self-promoting
pontification.

showing do you don't know the meaning of the word "civic"

No...showing YOU don't know the meaning of the word "civic".

Lennie (allegedly) did his "civic" duty with his first comment to
the Commission.

Each subsequent "Reply Comment" has been one personal attack after
another.

Nothing more.

Civic" duty does not imply any requirement to agree with a narrow
minded proven bogot like yourself

Personal attacks in a federal process is NOT "civic duty".

Nice try, Greaseball.

Steve, K4YZ

an old friend wrote:

it is funny i suppose in some sence that it needs to be evn stated is
not as funny

What's "funny" is your abuse of the King's English in an attempt
to discuss "civics".

Steve, K4YZ

Frank Gilliland wrote:
On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 18:24:34 GMT, Dave Heil wrote
in et:

Frank Gilliland wrote:
On 16 Nov 2005 07:52:58 -0800, "an old friend"
wrote in .com:

Civic" duty does not imply any requirement to agree with a narrow
minded proven bogot like yourself

ROTFLMMFAO!!!!!

Yeah. I found the word "bogot" kind of amusing myself.

And here comes Dave to the rescue!

So how do you like being Major Dud's lapdog?

Cute, coming from a twice court martialed, dishonorably discharged
ex-Marine who's major passtime is to bounce in Markie's lap saying
"Tell me another lie, Pinnochio! Tell me another one!"

Steve, K4YZ

Dave Heil wrote:
Frank Gilliland wrote:
On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 18:24:34 GMT, Dave Heil wrote
in et:

Frank Gilliland wrote:
On 16 Nov 2005 07:52:58 -0800, "an old friend"
wrote in .com:
Civic" duty does not imply any requirement to agree with a narrow
minded proven bogot like yourself

ROTFLMMFAO!!!!!
Yeah. I found the word "bogot" kind of amusing myself.

And here comes Dave to the rescue!

So how do you like being Major Dud's lapdog?

How do you figure, Frank? I made no comment on what Steve (there is no
"Major Dud") wrote. I commented on what Mark wrote and on what you
wrote. Who was it that I was supposed to rescue?

Frankie's inability to keep attributions straight has already been
well established. This came as no surprise.

Steve, K4YZ

Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
It should come as no surprise that Len Anderson's eight pages of
pontificating, self-important reply to the comments of Robert G.
Rightsell read almost exactly like his frequent pontificating,
self-important rants in r.r.a.p.

It should come as no suprise that Dave/K8MN has just posted his longest
post ever not providing the details or tips for aspiring DXers, but in
rediculing someone who has had an -almost- lifelong interest in radio.

"Rediculing"? You've spent so much time conversing with Mark that
you're starting to write like him.

Dave is trying to insult me.

If I'd wanted to post an
instructional message on DXing, I'd likely post it to the DX newsgroup.

Do you need directions?

In my comments to the Commission, I did not find it necessary to target
a single individual or group, nor did I use terms like "puffery",
"egregious" or "insulting".

Perhaps you have no passion for the subject matter.

Your organ grinder pal

Organ grinder pal?

Are you trying to insult someone? In your comments on RRAP, why do you
find it necessary to target single individuals and groups?

hasn't yet taken the
first baby step toward obtaining an amateur radio license in all these
many years. He hasn't gotten into amateur radio. He isn't in amateur
radio. He will not be in amateur radio, no matter what he writes here.

I guess Len is relegated to a life of professional radio.

Carry on, little red-hatted monkey.

More insults? Way to go, Dave. Pillar of the radio community. Good
DX!

K4YZ wrote:
an old friend wrote:

it is funny i suppose in some sence that it needs to be evn stated is
not as funny

What's "funny" is your abuse of the King's English in an attempt
to discuss "civics".

Steve, K4YZ

Let "The King" enforce his English.

wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
It should come as no surprise that Len Anderson's eight pages of
pontificating, self-important reply to the comments of Robert G.
Rightsell read almost exactly like his frequent pontificating,
self-important rants in r.r.a.p.

It should come as no suprise that Dave/K8MN has just posted his longest
post ever not providing the details or tips for aspiring DXers, but in
rediculing someone who has had an -almost- lifelong interest in radio.

"Rediculing"? You've spent so much time conversing with Mark that
you're starting to write like him.

Dave is trying to insult me.

I'll have to admit, Brain...

Dave could NEVER insult you half as well as you insult yourself...

If I'd wanted to post an
instructional message on DXing, I'd likely post it to the DX newsgroup.

Do you need directions?

Do you know of one? It certainly doesn't seem so from what we've
seen posted here from you in the past, Brain.

In my comments to the Commission, I did not find it necessary to target
a single individual or group, nor did I use terms like "puffery",
"egregious" or "insulting".

Perhaps you have no passion for the subject matter.

So...

If Lennie doesn't insult and demean the other commentor, he's not
"passion(ate)" about what he's commenting on?

He had to write seven attack "replies" to the FCC on this docket
alone?

Your organ grinder pal

Organ grinder pal?

Are you trying to insult someone? In your comments on RRAP, why do you
find it necessary to target single individuals and groups?

If it's not a single person or a group, what is it?

And Brain...

You ARE Lennie's red-hatted monkey.

hasn't yet taken the
first baby step toward obtaining an amateur radio license in all these
many years. He hasn't gotten into amateur radio. He isn't in amateur
radio. He will not be in amateur radio, no matter what he writes here.

I guess Len is relegated to a life of professional radio.

No...he COULD have had a life in "professional radio".

Very little of any of Lennie's CV deals with "radio".
Carry on, little red-hatted monkey.

More insults? Way to go, Dave. Pillar of the radio community. Good
DX!

Lame redirect, Brain. Ineffective, transparent.

Steve, K4YZ