K4YZ wrote:
wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
It should come as no surprise that Len Anderson's eight pages of
pontificating, self-important reply to the comments of Robert G.
Rightsell read almost exactly like his frequent pontificating,
self-important rants in r.r.a.p.

It should come as no suprise that Dave/K8MN has just posted his longest
post ever not providing the details or tips for aspiring DXers, but in
rediculing someone who has had an -almost- lifelong interest in radio.

"Rediculing"? You've spent so much time conversing with Mark that
you're starting to write like him.

Dave is trying to insult me.

I'll have to admit, Brain...

Dave could NEVER insult you half as well as you insult yourself...

But you're a proven liar, so what am I to believe?

If I'd wanted to post an
instructional message on DXing, I'd likely post it to the DX newsgroup.

Do you need directions?

Do you know of one? It certainly doesn't seem so from what we've
seen posted here from you in the past, Brain.

I do just fine.

In my comments to the Commission, I did not find it necessary to target
a single individual or group, nor did I use terms like "puffery",
"egregious" or "insulting".

Perhaps you have no passion for the subject matter.

So...

If Lennie doesn't insult and demean the other commentor, he's not
"passion(ate)" about what he's commenting on?

Perhaps you should ask Len?

He had to write seven attack "replies" to the FCC on this docket
alone?

Hmmmm? Seven attacks? Rings a bell.

Your organ grinder pal

Organ grinder pal?

Are you trying to insult someone? In your comments on RRAP, why do you
find it necessary to target single individuals and groups?

If it's not a single person or a group, what is it?

And Brain...

You ARE Lennie's red-hatted monkey.

And you're a proven liar, so what am I to believe?

hasn't yet taken the
first baby step toward obtaining an amateur radio license in all these
many years. He hasn't gotten into amateur radio. He isn't in amateur
radio. He will not be in amateur radio, no matter what he writes here.

I guess Len is relegated to a life of professional radio.

No...he COULD have had a life in "professional radio".

Very little of any of Lennie's CV deals with "radio".

"A" NCOIC of Okinawa MARS. State Militia comms officer. CAP comms
officer. Hi!

Carry on, little red-hatted monkey.

More insults? Way to go, Dave. Pillar of the radio community. Good
DX!

Lame redirect, Brain. Ineffective, transparent.

Steve, K4YZ

"Your Honor, I STRENUOUSLY Object!"

Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
It should come as no surprise that Len Anderson's eight pages of
pontificating, self-important reply to the comments of Robert G.
Rightsell read almost exactly like his frequent pontificating,
self-important rants in r.r.a.p.
It should come as no suprise that Dave/K8MN has just posted his longest
post ever not providing the details or tips for aspiring DXers, but in
rediculing someone who has had an -almost- lifelong interest in radio.
"Rediculing"? You've spent so much time conversing with Mark that
you're starting to write like him.

Dave is trying to insult me.

Yep, I'm responding in kind to your usual red-hatted monkey routine.

No. You're responding in your usual smug way.

If I'd wanted to post an
instructional message on DXing, I'd likely post it to the DX newsgroup.

Do you need directions?

"Redicule"?

D-I-R-E-C-T-I-O-N-S. Do you need some?

In my comments to the Commission, I did not find it necessary to target
a single individual or group, nor did I use terms like "puffery",
"egregious" or "insulting".

Perhaps you have no passion for the subject matter.

Perhaps Windy just got his feathers ruffled in comments on an endeavor
in which he is not a participant.

He is participating in the comments and the replies. At the
Government's invitation.

Your organ grinder pal

Organ grinder pal?

Yep, as Hans Brakob has pointed out on a number of occasions, Len is the
organ grinder; you are the red-hatted monkey.

Hans the Dump Huck caller?

Are you trying to insult someone?

Are you insulted that I've pointed out the obvious?

Do you still require D-I-R-E-C-T-I-O-N-S?

In your comments on RRAP, why do you
find it necessary to target single individuals and groups?

I don't just target single individuals, Brian. Married folks are fair game.

I notice that you're taken with Mark's wife.

...hasn't yet taken the
first baby step toward obtaining an amateur radio license in all these
many years. He hasn't gotten into amateur radio. He isn't in amateur
radio. He will not be in amateur radio, no matter what he writes here.

I guess Len is relegated to a life of professional radio.

Len is relegated to his retirement from professional radio and to no
connection with amateur radio.

You never know when one will come out of retirement.

Carry on, little red-hatted monkey.

More insults? Way to go, Dave. Pillar of the radio community. Good
DX!

Examine your comments to my post and get back to me.

Dave K8MN

Not interested in your smug attitude and insulting behavio[u]r. But
thanks.

wrote

We have NOT seen where any other radio amateur has
ever "worked" him on the amateur bands.

(Best observed using non-porportional font)

HyperLog extract station K0HB

Date ¦Time¦Call ¦rcv¦snt¦Bnd¦QRG ¦Emm¦PWR ¦Name ¦QTH
11/19/00¦0052¦K4YZ ¦59 ¦59 ¦20 ¦14.191¦A3J¦100 ¦Steve ¦Dunlap, TN ¦
11/05/00¦0111¦K4YZ ¦599¦599¦20 ¦14.032¦A1A¦100 ¦Steve ¦Dunlap, TN ¦

July 2001 issue of QST reports that K4YZ earned a "Clean Sweep" trophy for
working at least one station in each of the 80 ARRL and RAC sections during the
phone Sweepstakes contest the previous November. PDF available for viewing on
the web at http://www.arrl.org/contests/results...one-sweeps.pdf

Sunuvagun!

wrote:
From: "K4YZ" on Wed 16 Nov 2005 20:30
wrote:
From: on Nov 16, 2:20 am
Dave Heil wrote:

In my comments to the Commission, I did not find it necessary to target
a single individual or group, nor did I use terms like "puffery",
"egregious" or "insulting".

Poor baby. Does Davie think that all against the code test
are equivalent to "two-year-olds refusing peas at dinner"
as Robert Rightsell did?

And once again Lennie digs in with personal attacks...Yet INSISTS
that he doesn't do such things...

I don't.

Sure you do! Did it several times in the current docket alone.
What was it...FOURTEEN in the last...?!?!

SNIP

I'm "just asking questions," Jimmie.

Me too.

Tsk, tsk, tsk. Dudly the Imposter is in no position to "ask."

Who's Dudly the Imposter?

The rest of us readers have been waiting impatiently for the
PROOF of Dudly's claims. Those haven't appeared. Not for
seven years. All we have are PERSONAL INSULTS as "responses"
such as the one following:

That you refuse to follow up on references is YOUR "problem",
Lennie...Not mine.

Why don't you treat yourself to a REAL mental health
provider...?!?! Not that correspondence school nitwit you married.

Sad to see Dudly the Imposter beginning to slide off the
edge of reality into the terribly abyss of insanity.

Nope.

Dudly tries to insult my wife, a holder of three degrees
obtained at Beloit College, Beloit WI, University of Illinois
at Champaign-Urbana, University of Wisconsin at Madison,
Madison, WI. That's a BA, two MSs, residence studies not
through "correspondence schools." She was licensed in both
Illinois (working for the state) and Washington (private
practice) as a Social Services Counselor (supervisor while
in Illinois). I've explained that all before, but Dud
keeps on with his personal insults against family of anyone
he considers an "enemy."

But not a BIT of it pertains to YOU or AMATEUR RADIO.

Yet you'd like us to consider your wife's alleged accomplishments
as somehow being germane to the ongoing proceedings and part of YOUR
"accomplishments".

I compliment you on "marrying up", but "up" to what? I can't
imagne a woman of character or breeding of any significance marrying
the likes of you. Not willingly or soberly, anyway....

As to "nitwit," I don't remember my wife's IQ rating back
in high school days (our Class of 1951 was given a two-
week long battery of tests by U of I as part of a state-
wide study) but it was quite high.

Obviously not high enough. She married you.

While my wife HAS worked with mentally-deranged persons...(SNIP)

I think you meant "...has lived with A mentally-deranged
PERSON [singular].

(UNSNIP)....I need NO extra
information from her to recognize abberant behavior such
as Dudly the Imposter has done in here. Such irrational
behavior is easily spotted after being an observant adult
for a long period of time.

Again, obvioulsy not.

She can't see, or can't control, the deceitful
obsessive-compulsive right under her nose, which either makes her
blind, incompetent, or suffering the Alzheimer's you accuse others of
suffering.

So which is it?

Big SNIP

This thread started out concerning NPRM 05-143 and WT Docket
05-235.

No...THIS thread started out recognizing your verbose, vile and
windy pontifications in your "Reply to Reply Comments".

Those are policy issues that have recently been
before the U.S. amateur community. I think it should stay
that way and NOT plunge into the irrational chasm of Dudly
at war with his enemies. He can never win that war.

I've already won.



Putz.

Steve, K4YZ

wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
wrote:

"Rediculing"? You've spent so much time conversing with Mark that
you're starting to write like him.

Dave is trying to insult me.

I'll have to admit, Brain...

Dave could NEVER insult you half as well as you insult yourself...

But you're a proven liar, so what am I to believe?

You can't believe yourself...?!?!

Steve, K4YZ

KØHB wrote:
wrote

We have NOT seen where any other radio amateur has
ever "worked" him on the amateur bands.

(Best observed using non-porportional font)

HyperLog extract station K0HB

Date ¦Time¦Call ¦rcv¦snt¦Bnd¦QRG ¦Emm¦PWR ¦Name ¦QTH
11/19/00¦0052¦K4YZ ¦59 ¦59 ¦20 ¦14.191¦A3J¦100 ¦Steve ¦Dunlap, TN ¦
11/05/00¦0111¦K4YZ ¦599¦599¦20 ¦14.032¦A1A¦100 ¦Steve ¦Dunlap, TN ¦

July 2001 issue of QST reports that K4YZ earned a "Clean Sweep" trophy for
working at least one station in each of the 80 ARRL and RAC sections during the
phone Sweepstakes contest the previous November. PDF available for viewing on
the web at http://www.arrl.org/contests/results...one-sweeps.pdf

Sunuvagun!

Twice in one day...thanks again, Hans. I actually worked TWO
Clean Sweeps that year...Phone and CW. K0HB was the one and only MN
contact for the CW sweep, and one of two in the phone.

But it only puts another LennieRant into the "Not Truthful"
column...I've linked my DXCC award a couple of times in respose to
similar rants. That was in 2000.

Seems they convieniently "forget" as the need arises.

73 es Tnx Again.....

Steve, K4YZ

Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
In my comments to the Commission, I did not find it necessary to target
a single individual or group, nor did I use terms like "puffery",
"egregious" or "insulting".

That's just typical Len behavior, Dave. Check the reply comments about
ARRL, and the one about Extra Class licenses, etc.

Len can't seem to differentiate between the type of stuff he writes here
and a document he submits to the FCC.

I disagree! The difference is quite clear.

Here, Len uses emoticons and SHOUTS by using all capitals. His
submissions to FCC are full of italics, bold text, and numbered
footnotes.

Other than that, there's not much difference....

What Len fails to understand is that such carryings-on are simply
delaying the R&O.

...and may well have the result of making his comments appear less
credible to the Commission.

I remember Len referring to FCC Chairman Powell as "Mikey". As if he'd
actually address Mr. Powell that way....

Your organ grinder pal hasn't yet taken the
first baby step toward obtaining an amateur radio license in all these
many years.

Actually that's not quite true, Dave.

Some months back, Len mentioned here that he had once, way back
in the 1950s,

actually, the early 1960s

set about learning Morse Code. Claimed he'd actually
gotten up to about 6-8 wpm or so before deciding all the 'hard work'
wasn't worth it. That was just about the time 27 MHz cb came along,
and he jumped on that.

Other way around - he was on cb first.

In his own words, he just "GAVE UP".

Your point may be valid but I learned the Morse Code in the Scouts,
before I had any idea of becoming a ham. The fellow who taught it did
it right. There was no counting of dots and dashes. He linked the
letter sounds to groups of words like "here comes the bride" for "Q".
It wasn't work; it was fun. Brushing up my code a couple of years later
before taking the Novice exam wasn't any work either.

I learned it by listening to hams using Morse Code on 80 meters. I
first had
to build myself a receiver, though.

What I think happened is this: Len discovered that unlike "book
learning",
he didn't pick up on the Morse Code in a few quick lessons. For him it
took some 'hard work' to learn, and that conflicted with his view of
himself
as a 'professional in radio-electronics'. Not only that, but learning
Morse
Code would not help Len 'PROFESSIONALLY' - there was no money
reward waiting. So he gave up.

I agree.

Basically, it comes down to the fact that Len thinks he's too good to
have to learn Morse Code - or anything else - for an amateur radio
license.

He hasn't gotten into amateur radio. He isn't in amateur
radio. He will not be in amateur radio, no matter what he writes here.

Which would lead any logical person to wonder why he's so interested
in amateur radio regulations. He won't say *why* all this matters so
much to him.

He bears a long time grudge?

Sure seems that way.

After all, it's been possible to get a Technician class license without
a code test for more than 14 years. All FCC-issued amateur licenses
have been available for just a 5 wpm code test for 15 years now.

73 de Jim, N2EY

wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:

What I think happened is this: Len discovered that unlike "book
learning",
he didn't pick up on the Morse Code in a few quick lessons. For him it
took some 'hard work' to learn, and that conflicted with his view of
himself
as a 'professional in radio-electronics'. Not only that, but learning
Morse
Code would not help Len 'PROFESSIONALLY' - there was no money
reward waiting. So he gave up.

I agree.

Basically, it comes down to the fact that Len thinks he's too good to
have to learn Morse Code - or anything else - for an amateur radio
license.

I still believe that Lennie had some "run-in" with an Amateur at
some point. No doubt Lennie tried to bluff the other Amatuer into
"signing off" on a Conditional or other such thing since he already
professed to "know it all".

His one and only attempt to get a license by deceit rebuffed, he's
set upon a mission to undermine Amateur Radio at any and all
opportunities. To hell with the mere mortals, HE was a PROFESSIONAL!

Steve, K4YZ

From: on Nov 17, 4:31 pm


wrote:
From: "K4YZ" on Wed 16 Nov 2005 20:30

Poor redirect. Strong on "victimization" twist.

Dudly been watching Law shows, trying to pick up their lingo?

Are we now going to be treated to "judge" Dudly and ANOTHER
fictitious "career?" :-)

Guessing game. Match the Quote with the author.

"Your Honor, I STRENUOUSLY Object!"

"I stand on the wall...."

"I served in other, unmentionable ways..."

Choices: Steve, Steve, and Jim.

HAHAHAHAH...answers are in the same order. That's a no-brainer.

Meanwhile, Dudly is busy, busy kissing Hans' ass for that
navel regulation of 2005. Dudly doesn't realize that the
effective-date regulation is only for NOW, not 13 to 31
years past.

Jimmie Noserve no comment on this. Jimmie pays ALL of his
own clothes out of his allowance. He still has his baby
shoes and those are busy, busy stepping right along.

wrote:

Meanwhile, Dudly is busy, busy kissing Hans' ass for that
navel regulation of 2005. Dudly doesn't realize that the
effective-date regulation is only for NOW, not 13 to 31
years past.

It doesn't matter when the CURRENT regulation was updated.

A quick review of the order suffix indicates it's a much-ammended
order.

A five minute phone call could verify my original statements.

Unfortunately you are incapable of that simple task.

Or unwilling...In short, a COWARD.

Steve, K4YZ