It should come as no surprise that Len Anderson's eight pages of
pontificating, self-important reply to the comments of Robert G.
Rightsell read almost exactly like his frequent pontificating,
self-important rants in r.r.a.p.

"Craft", "guild", "union", "self-styled elite group of traditionalists",
they're all there. Len's obligatory references to his military
experience of more than a half-century ago are there, but he carefully
reworked his "24/7" statement so that he personally isn't described as
having worked 24 hours per day for a week.

Leonard's remarks are carefully loaded with numerous references to
copious footnotes. One lets the Commission in on what PROFESSIONAL
periodicals he receives. Another tells the Commission of the woeful
failure of Fessenden's experiments in the use of amplitude modulated
telephony.

In typical Andersonesque fashion, Len calls some of Rightsell's comments
"not only egregious but an outright insult, not only to those of us who
worked responsibly in radio communications long ago, but to all the
planners of radio communications *in every other service except radio
amateurism* since the end of World War 2. [Isn't it supposed to be
"World War II"?] Len opines, "To be blunt, Mr. Rightsell engages in
self-puffery and nonsense". Additionally, our Leonard provides the
Commissioner's a lecture in a rundown of decade by decade progress in
the development of radio.

Len can't resist a few jabs at Joe Speroni's talley of comments on
05-235. He makes certain that the Commission is aware that Speroni is
"an unabashed proponent of radiotelegraphy in amateur radio, and has
been so for years" as if it were an unknown that Mr. Anderson is an
unabashed proponent of doing away with morse code exam in amateur radio
(and has been such for years).

Leonard H. Anderson, despite his self-declared several decades of
interest in amateur radio, nine years or so of posts to r.r.a.p and a
claim that he was going for an "Extra right out of the box" is *still
not a radio amateur*. On the positive side for Mr. Anderson, he is
still holding on to his tiny, dusty Johnson.

Dave K8MN

ah I guess Dave does not like american doing their civic duty
Dave Heil wrote:
It should come as no surprise that Len Anderson's eight pages of
pontificating, self-important reply to the comments of Robert G.
Rightsell read almost exactly like his frequent pontificating,
self-important rants in r.r.a.p.

"Craft", "guild", "union", "self-styled elite group of traditionalists",
they're all there. Len's obligatory references to his military
experience of more than a half-century ago are there, but he carefully
reworked his "24/7" statement so that he personally isn't described as
having worked 24 hours per day for a week.

Leonard's remarks are carefully loaded with numerous references to
copious footnotes. One lets the Commission in on what PROFESSIONAL
periodicals he receives. Another tells the Commission of the woeful
failure of Fessenden's experiments in the use of amplitude modulated
telephony.

In typical Andersonesque fashion, Len calls some of Rightsell's comments
"not only egregious but an outright insult, not only to those of us who
worked responsibly in radio communications long ago, but to all the
planners of radio communications *in every other service except radio
amateurism* since the end of World War 2. [Isn't it supposed to be
"World War II"?] Len opines, "To be blunt, Mr. Rightsell engages in
self-puffery and nonsense". Additionally, our Leonard provides the
Commissioner's a lecture in a rundown of decade by decade progress in
the development of radio.

Len can't resist a few jabs at Joe Speroni's talley of comments on
05-235. He makes certain that the Commission is aware that Speroni is
"an unabashed proponent of radiotelegraphy in amateur radio, and has
been so for years" as if it were an unknown that Mr. Anderson is an
unabashed proponent of doing away with morse code exam in amateur radio
(and has been such for years).

Leonard H. Anderson, despite his self-declared several decades of
interest in amateur radio, nine years or so of posts to r.r.a.p and a
claim that he was going for an "Extra right out of the box" is *still
not a radio amateur*. On the positive side for Mr. Anderson, he is
still holding on to his tiny, dusty Johnson.

Dave K8MN

an old friend wrote:
ah I guess Dave does not like american doing their civic duty

CIVIC DUTY...?!?!?

BBBWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

I "dared" to challenge one of Lennie's comments to the FCC in
EXACTLY the same manner and he went on for Y E A R S about how I
allegedly tried to challenge his "right" to seek redress from the
government! ! ! !

Lennie goes one further! He actually "WARNS" the commentor about
HIS comments IN THE REPLY TO THE FCC ! ! ! ! ! !

WTF is LENNIE to "WARN" anyone...?!?! He doesn't even qualify to
be a school crossing guard!

There is ABSOLUTELY NOTHING "civic" about Lennie's intent or
comments. It was nothing but hateful bile polished by self-promoting
pontification.

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
an old friend wrote:
ah I guess Dave does not like american doing their civic duty

CIVIC DUTY...?!?!?

yes civic duty
cuting stevie crying

I "dared" to challenge one of Lennie's comments to the FCC in
EXACTLY the same manner and he went on for Y E A R S about how I
allegedly tried to challenge his "right" to seek redress from the
government! ! ! !

becuase you did

you tried to get the FCC to violate the Consititution of the US becuase
you don't like Len anderson. Personaly I am glad you did, made anything
else you tired to say all but unread


Lennie goes one further! He actually "WARNS" the commentor about
HIS comments IN THE REPLY TO THE FCC ! ! ! ! ! !

WTF is LENNIE to "WARN" anyone...?!?! He doesn't even qualify to
be a school crossing guard!

rant away Stevie boy

all you are doing is proving that you do not respect the Constitution
or the process of law

There is ABSOLUTELY NOTHING "civic" about Lennie's intent or
comments. It was nothing but hateful bile polished by self-promoting
pontification.

showing do you don't know the meaning of the word "civic"

Civic" duty does not imply any requirement to agree with a narrow
minded proven bogot like yourself

Steve, K4YZ

On 16 Nov 2005 07:52:58 -0800, "an old friend"
wrote in .com:

snip
There is ABSOLUTELY NOTHING "civic" about Lennie's intent or
comments. It was nothing but hateful bile polished by self-promoting
pontification.

showing do you don't know the meaning of the word "civic"

Civic" duty does not imply any requirement to agree with a narrow
minded proven bogot like yourself


ROTFLMMFAO!!!!!







----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

Frank Gilliland wrote:
On 16 Nov 2005 07:52:58 -0800, "an old friend"
wrote in .com:

snip
There is ABSOLUTELY NOTHING "civic" about Lennie's intent or
comments. It was nothing but hateful bile polished by self-promoting
pontification.

showing do you don't know the meaning of the word "civic"

Civic" duty does not imply any requirement to agree with a narrow
minded proven bogot like yourself


ROTFLMMFAO!!!!!

it is funny i suppose in some sence that it needs to be evn stated is
not as funny








----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

Frank Gilliland wrote:
On 16 Nov 2005 07:52:58 -0800, "an old friend"
wrote in .com:

Civic" duty does not imply any requirement to agree with a narrow
minded proven bogot like yourself


ROTFLMMFAO!!!!!

Yeah. I found the word "bogot" kind of amusing myself.

Dave K8MN

an old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
an old friend wrote:
ah I guess Dave does not like american doing their civic duty

CIVIC DUTY...?!?!?

yes civic duty
cuting stevie crying

Keep telling yourself it's "crying", Greaseball.

I "dared" to challenge one of Lennie's comments to the FCC in
EXACTLY the same manner and he went on for Y E A R S about how I
allegedly tried to challenge his "right" to seek redress from the
government! ! ! !

becuase you did

you tried to get the FCC to violate the Consititution of the US becuase
you don't like Len anderson. Personaly I am glad you did, made anything
else you tired to say all but unread

No, I did not "try to get the FCC to violate the Constitution",
Markie.

I presented some FACTS that Lennie didn't want aired.

Lennie goes one further! He actually "WARNS" the commentor about
HIS comments IN THE REPLY TO THE FCC ! ! ! ! ! !

WTF is LENNIE to "WARN" anyone...?!?! He doesn't even qualify to
be a school crossing guard!

rant away Stevie boy

What "rant", Greaseball?

Lennie DID utter a "warning" in his "reply comments".

And I reiterate my QUESTION...WTF is Lennie top "warn"
ANYone...?!?!

all you are doing is proving that you do not respect the Constitution
or the process of law

Uhhhhhhhhhhhh...yeah.


Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight.

There is ABSOLUTELY NOTHING "civic" about Lennie's intent or
comments. It was nothing but hateful bile polished by self-promoting
pontification.

showing do you don't know the meaning of the word "civic"

No...showing YOU don't know the meaning of the word "civic".

Lennie (allegedly) did his "civic" duty with his first comment to
the Commission.

Each subsequent "Reply Comment" has been one personal attack after
another.

Nothing more.

Civic" duty does not imply any requirement to agree with a narrow
minded proven bogot like yourself

Personal attacks in a federal process is NOT "civic duty".

Nice try, Greaseball.

Steve, K4YZ

an old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
an old friend wrote:
ah I guess Dave does not like american doing their civic duty
CIVIC DUTY...?!?!?

yes civic duty
cuting stevie crying

I "dared" to challenge one of Lennie's comments to the FCC in
EXACTLY the same manner and he went on for Y E A R S about how I
allegedly tried to challenge his "right" to seek redress from the
government! ! ! !

becuase you did

you tried to get the FCC to violate the Consititution of the US becuase
you don't like Len anderson. Personaly I am glad you did, made anything
else you tired to say all but unread

Let me be certain that I understand you correctly (whew!), Mark. You
claim that Len was doing his civic duty as an American (we'll leave out
those nearly 300,000,000 shirkers who were *not* doing their civic duty
in commenting or replying to comments on 05-235), but when Steve did
something similar, he was trying to get the FCC to violate the
Constitution. Is that about it? Do you think that Len doesn't like Mr.
Rightsell or Extra Class licensees?

Show us that you know the meaning of the word "civic", Mark. If that
doesn't work for you, show us that you know the meaning of the word "civet".

Dave K8MN

Dave Heil wrote:
It should come as no surprise that Len Anderson's eight pages of
pontificating, self-important reply to the comments of Robert G.
Rightsell read almost exactly like his frequent pontificating,
self-important rants in r.r.a.p.

It should come as no suprise that Dave/K8MN has just posted his longest
post ever not providing the details or tips for aspiring DXers, but in
rediculing someone who has had an -almost- lifelong interest in radio.

Way to go, Dave. Pillar of the radio community. Good DX!