|
Definitely Not Qualified
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 00:58:21 GMT, "KØHB"
wrote in . net: snip anal fixations I haven't "posted a thing in here" for the simple reason this newsgroup does NOT accept binaries. Sure it does. See attached DD214 indicating over 21 years of active service, rank of E9, and Honorable service. Set. Point. Match. Beep beep de Hans, K0HB Works for me. Looks like it was typed with a standard IBM electric daisy-wheel and has a very slight paper misalignment. The scan looks like a third-generation copy -- I'm guessing that the original was xeroxed (or scanned and printed), the info scratched out (probably with a pencil, considering the smooth shading on the first three of your SSN), and then scanned for the pic. Am I close? It's kinda funny tho, the resolution is so high that your "E-9" kinda looks like "K-9"..... 8-) Anyway, this is not about you -- it's about Major Dud. Now if you and I can post -our- DD-214's, why can't Dudly? I also see that you made E-9 in about 19-1/2 years. I also see that the right side of the form clearly denotes your time in service, as does mine, as does every DD-214 since Socrates marched barefoot through the snow. So why do you think Dudly didn't know about that? And if Dudly's claim -is- true (which I highly doubt), why do you think he couldn't get promoted beyond GySgt (E-7) in nearly the same amount of time it took -you- to reach E-9? Major Dud might be a ham, and you might share some similar beliefs and/or opinions, but are those valid reasons to defend his fraudulent military service? BTW, many Usenet services and ISP's will block the posting of a binary to a non-binary groups, so Len may have a valid reason for believing what he said. However, if he wants he can email me a binary, I'll upload it to my server and post the link. I'll even offer to do the same for you just so you can quit posting biniaries. Ok? ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
Definitely Not Qualified
"Frank Gilliland" wrote BTW, many Usenet services and ISP's will block the posting of a binary to a non-binary groups, so Len may have a valid reason for believing what he said. Naw. He can see this, just like he saw (and commented on) the other binary I sent in the "SUQ QRQ" posting. Beep beep de Hans, K0HB |
Definitely Not Qualified
"Frank Gilliland" wrote I also see that you made E-9 in about 19-1/2 years. Actually 18 years, 6 months, 29 days (but who is counting). Beep beep de Hans, K0HB |
Definitely Not Qualified
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 02:34:20 GMT, "KØHB"
wrote in . net: "Frank Gilliland" wrote BTW, many Usenet services and ISP's will block the posting of a binary to a non-binary groups, so Len may have a valid reason for believing what he said. Naw. He can see this, just like he saw (and commented on) the other binary I sent in the "SUQ QRQ" posting. Newsgroup binary filters work both ways. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
Definitely Not Qualified
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 02:45:47 GMT, "KØHB"
wrote in et: "Frank Gilliland" wrote I also see that you made E-9 in about 19-1/2 years. Actually 18 years, 6 months, 29 days (but who is counting). My bad. However, that's actually -less- time than Major Dud claims to have served. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
Definitely Not Qualified
From: "K0HB" on Fri, Dec 16 2005 2:34 am
"Frank Gilliland" wrote BTW, many Usenet services and ISP's will block the posting of a binary to a non-binary groups, so Len may have a valid reason for believing what he said. Naw. He can see this, just like he saw (and commented on) the other binary I sent in the "SUQ QRQ" posting. Plain and simply INCORRECT superchief. I've never seen any binaries attached to messages in this newsgroup. You can send it to me as an attachment to private e-mail if you wish. However, caution on the contents. If it contains "male nudity" I will forward it to Jimmie who appreciates that sort of thing. BTW, don't try any farkling about "binaries" being the 10-bit code used in USASCII. "Binary files" in Usenetspeak refer to IMAGE files or executable files. The most bestest wonderfulest good luck on this now... |
Definitely Not Qualified
wrote I've never seen any binaries attached to messages in this newsgroup. I can see them just fine. I can post them just fine (a .jpg file in this case). Frank apparently can them just fine, because he commented about details which he could not have known without actually seeing the binary file. Beep beep de Hans, K0HB |
Definitely Not Qualified
wrote I've never seen any binaries attached to messages in this newsgroup. I can see them just fine. I can post them just fine (a .jpg file in this case). Frank apparently can them just fine, because he commented about details which he could not have known without actually seeing the binary file. Beep beep de Hans, K0HB |
Definitely Not Qualified
KØHB wrote: wrote I've never seen any binaries attached to messages in this newsgroup. I can see them just fine. I can post them just fine (a .jpg file in thiscase). Frank apparently can them just fine, because he commented about details which he could not have known without actually seeing the binary file. it depnds on what means you use to read the usenet Here on google I can see your binar over on free agent i can meanin you take the prise for the most posting by byte of anyone on RRAP Beep beep de Hans, K0HB |
Definitely Not Qualified
From: Frank Gilliland on Dec 15, 6:25 pm
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 00:58:21 GMT, "K0HB" snip I haven't "posted a thing in here" for the simple reason this newsgroup does NOT accept binaries. Sure it does. See attached DD214 indicating over 21 years of active service, rank of E9, and Honorable service. Set. Point. Match. WHAT "attached DD214"? BTW, Hansl, it is "Game. Set. Match." That's also the title of a trilogy written by Len Deighton. Anyway, this is not about you -- it's about Major Dud. Now if you and I can post -our- DD-214's, why can't Dudly? I also see that you made E-9 in about 19-1/2 years. I also see that the right side of the form clearly denotes your time in service, as does mine, as does every DD-214 since Socrates marched barefoot through the snow. So why do you think Dudly didn't know about that? And if Dudly's claim -is- true (which I highly doubt), why do you think he couldn't get promoted beyond GySgt (E-7) in nearly the same amount of time it took -you- to reach E-9? Major Dud might be a ham, and you might share some similar beliefs and/or opinions, but are those valid reasons to defend his fraudulent military service? Absolutely. U.S. Amateur Extras have to hang together. Especially if they are morsemen...and hate NCTAs. It must be an unwritten law or something wherein extras will only slap the wrists of other extras who get out of hand. For all the flag-waving and patriotic bunting installation done by Hans, he has been most gentle on that fraudulent Dudly the Imposter, the hero of "seven hostile actions." All he has done lately is argue about the names of COMSEC systems with Dudly. Doesn't Hans realize that Dud is NOT showing a good face of U.S. amateur radio to the public? BTW, many Usenet services and ISP's will block the posting of a binary to a non-binary groups, so Len may have a valid reason for believing what he said. However, if he wants he can email me a binary, I'll upload it to my server and post the link. I'll even offer to do the same for you just so you can quit posting biniaries. Ok? Thanks for the offer, Frank. If needs be I will take you up on that. But I don't see the need of that. If Hans wants to make like he is CNO berating his swabbies about DD-214s, that still doesn't change the fact that I've not only served Honorably but have several papers up on the subject of radio communications on another website plus an interview that was published in the Pacific Stars and Stripes. Major Dud hasn't published ONE thing about his active USMC life, no forms, no documents, not even a snapshot. All he has published now is the famous Booger shot of him in a poopy suit at QRZ, in the "uniform" of the CIVIL Air Patrol. |
Definitely Not Qualified
|
Definitely Not Qualified
On 15 Dec 2005 21:32:32 -0800, wrote in
.com: From: Frank Gilliland on Dec 15, 6:25 pm On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 00:58:21 GMT, "K0HB" snip I haven't "posted a thing in here" for the simple reason this newsgroup does NOT accept binaries. Sure it does. See attached DD214 indicating over 21 years of active service, rank of E9, and Honorable service. Set. Point. Match. WHAT "attached DD214"? www.icehouse.net/wirenut/dd-214.jpg ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
Definitely Not Qualified
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 05:17:19 GMT, "KØHB"
wrote in . net: wrote I've never seen any binaries attached to messages in this newsgroup. I can see them just fine. I can post them just fine (a .jpg file in this case). Frank apparently can them just fine, because he commented about details which he could not have known without actually seeing the binary file. Your posts that included binaries never showed up on Google. That's just one example of a filtered Usenet service like I was talking about. Irrelevant now, since I have reposted your .jpg as a link. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
Definitely Not Qualified
From: Frank Gilliland on Dec 16, 4:36 am
On 15 Dec 2005 21:32:32 -0800, wrote in From: Frank Gilliland on Dec 15, 6:25 pm On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 00:58:21 GMT, "K0HB" I haven't "posted a thing in here" for the simple reason this newsgroup does NOT accept binaries. Sure it does. See attached DD214 indicating over 21 years of active service, rank of E9, and Honorable service. Set. Point. Match. [the expression is "Game. Set. Match." Hans...from tennis] WHAT "attached DD214"? www.icehouse.net/wirenut/dd-214.jpg Okay, got it. Thanks Frank. I've believed Hans' service in the USN. I've believed yours. I've believed Brian Burke's service. I've believed Bill Sohl's. I've lived mine and have documents and hundreds of pictures to prove it. My DD-214 copy is recorded with the County Recorder of Winnebago, Illinois, something I did in 1956 as a resident there at the time. shrug Unfortunately for all those "who can see their attachments just fine," several ISPs just don't carry attachments on all groups. That's just the way it is. We'll just have to wait it out while all the pompous misdirection dies down on AMATEUR RADIO POLICY matters in this morseblog. :-) In getting back to the nitty-gritty of who lies and who tells the truth, all us readers have yet to see ANYTHING of Dudly the Imposter's documents, pictures, whatever from his heroic descriptions of being in "seven hostile actions." In case anyone is wondering, Dudly the Imposter (aka "K4YZ") is an amateur extra in the amateur radio service of the USA. We readers haven't seen a thing of Dudly actually operating his amateur radio station. All we get is the famous Booger Shot of him in a CIVIL Air Patrol "uniform" on QRZ.COM. Now, I'm rather convinced that Dudly wouldn't lie about his CIVIL Air Patrol "rank" but then flying a single engine aircraft doesn't have a helluvalot to do with AMATEUR RADIO. Neither CAP nor his claimed USMC helicopter maintenance crew "military experience" have anything to do with AMATEUR RADIO. Jimmie Miccolis (who never served in any military) says that Army RADIO on HF doesn't have anything to do with AMATEUR RADIO on HF...despite the fact that all the physics pertaining to RADIO generation and propagation are exactly the same... despite the fact that high-power vacuum tube HF transmitters of a half century ago generated and operated exactly the same as vacuum tube HF transmitters do today. [that's just the way it is] Davie Heil (who supposedly served in the USAF and did get into the Department of State of the USA..."he's from the government and is here to help") is of the opinion that one MUST get an amateur radio license before even thinking of posting in this morseblog, let alone getting a (horrors) Commercial radio license. Lots of "conflicts" going on in here. Meanwhile, the FCC has about 3,803 filings in WT Docket 05-235 to look through and decide what will be the next major step in changed United States amateur radio regulations that will affect NEWCOMERS to amateur radio far more than the already-licensed. The already-licensed-in-amateur-radio-in-highest-morse-class apparently don't give a thing about the future of newcomers as long as they don't upset their personal needs of rank, status, title, and privilege. shrug May the already-licensed-in-amateur-radio-in-highest-morse- class enjoy the lump of coal in their Christmas stockings. They can wear that with pride as they hobble down to the lodge to sip their rum and tell tales of mighty morsemanship derring-do of the old days. bit bit |
Definitely Not Qualified
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 05:17:19 GMT, "KØHB"
wrote in . net: wrote I've never seen any binaries attached to messages in this newsgroup. I can see them just fine. I can post them just fine (a .jpg file in this case). Frank apparently can them just fine, because he commented about details which he could not have known without actually seeing the binary file. Hey Hans, I deleted the file like you asked in your email. But like I said in my reply (that was blocked by your anti-spamware), what you posted is now public information and is included in more than a few Usenet archives, regardless of whether it's on my site or not. IOW, if you don't want something made public then don't post it in a public forum....... even Dudly understands -that- much.....!!! Oh, and in the future, when you email someone, it would be a basic and decent courtesy to put them in your address list so they don't have to deal with some automated crap from your anti-spamware. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
Definitely Not Qualified
On 16 Dec 2005 11:32:19 -0800, wrote in
.com: From: Frank Gilliland on Dec 16, 4:36 am snip www.icehouse.net/wirenut/dd-214.jpg now deleted, as per Han's request Okay, got it. Thanks Frank. snip In getting back to the nitty-gritty of who lies and who tells the truth, all us readers have yet to see ANYTHING of Dudly the Imposter's documents, pictures, whatever from his heroic descriptions of being in "seven hostile actions." I looked for a shibboleth in his seven+ years of posts, but there are none. I handed him a few and they bounced right off his thick skull. I even set a couple traps and he got caught in both. Now he can't even come up with the definition of "73". Major Dud is a well-rounded (pun intended) bull**** artist..... er, make that a -starving- bull**** artist. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
Definitely Not Qualified
From: Dave Heil on Dec 15, 11:24 pm
wrote: From: Frank Gilliland on Dec 15, 6:25 pm On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 00:58:21 GMT, "K0HB" What "fraudulent Dudly the Imposter", Len? The hero of "seven hostile actions" also known as "K4YZ." What factoids have you coughed up about Steve's military service? Tsk, tsk, tsk. One can't prove a NEGATIVE, sweetums. :-) Since Dudly can't offer any proof whatsoever of his "military service," I say he's a damn LIAR about that. If Dudly can prove his military service with some evidence, fine. However, he's NOT done that in seven years. You've done a lot of flailing but have offered up precisely zip. "Attached" is a ZIP file showing Dudly's military service. It's an easy download. File size is 0 bytes. Heck, Len, *you* aren't showing a good face of the public to amateur radio. Hello? I'm not *IN* amateur radio. You are the one gnashing and crying and cursing about that... :-) Oh, yes, YOU are the one who told me I should have gotten an amateur radio license BEFORE I got my commercial radio license! YOU are the one saying I don't have any business being in here without a ham license! Tsk. :-) You seem to have brought those thing up a time or twenty. For those of you who have great difficulty in understanding that RADIO exists outside of amateurdom, it needs to be repeated as often as required for understanding. That's just the way it is... Major Dud hasn't published ONE thing about his active USMC life, no forms, no documents, not even a snapshot. All he has published now is the famous Booger shot of him in a poopy suit at QRZ, in the "uniform" of the CIVIL Air Patrol. So? So...what has the CAP to do with United States amateur radio? Are hams supposed to have moustaches with boogers in them? So...what have you said about your morsebuddy's famous claim: "The FCC doesn't license amateur radio." ? :-) |
Definitely Not Qualified
wrote Doesn't Hans realize that Dud is NOT showing a good face of U.S. amateur radio to the public? I'm not assigned Shore Patrol duty, so couldn't care less about conduct-unbecoming-an-amateur. Not in my job description. Maybe Len has an old MP brassard could patrol for good faces here? Beep beep de Hans, K0HB |
Definitely Not Qualified
wrote [the expression is "Game. Set. Match." Hans...from tennis] This is rec.radio.tennis.policy? Don't think so. But when it becomes that, then I'll worry about tennis expressions. Set. Match. FIRE! (Don't yell "fire" in a crowded newsgripe!) Beep beep de Hans, K0HB |
Definitely Not Qualified
wrote ...and it give you a chance to relate your "hotshot CW op" stories all about how good you were with morsemanship as radio hero of some fleet or other IN the Persian Gulf area. Gee, and here I thought your struggle was all about the morse TEST, but turns out you don't like to hear about morse operating either, huh! Hey, why don't you take down your "bragging rights" certificate as one of the senior morse hot shots and digitize it, make it available to all of us to see and admire and gush over? Already did that, but since you seem to be binary-impaired here, check your email inbox. Beep beep de Hans, K0HB |
Definitely Not Qualified
wrote:
Sorry, but the last REAL SERVING IN THE MILITARY President was James Earle Carter, USN, His middle name is spelled "Earl". Not "Earle". Can't you get anyhting right? ;-) Spelling isn't rocket science, Len :-) and George Herbert Walker Bush, USNR, and Gerald Rudolph Ford, USNR. [living that is] Our current President served as an F-102 pilot in the Texas Air National Guard. See: http://www.whitehouse.gov/president/gwbbio.html Does that service not count for you, Len? President Ronald Reagan (yes, he's dead) also served: http://www.wpafb.af.mil/museum/history/wwii/rr.htm None of them had any direct contact with amateur radio. How do you know for sure, Len? |
Definitely Not Qualified
On 16 Dec 2005 15:41:15 -0800, wrote in
.com: snip Our current President served as an F-102 pilot in the Texas Air National Guard. Must have been hell for him..... waiting a whole day to find out if his daddy had enough pull to get him out of Nam, applying for waivers to go play politics during the times he was supposed to be training, and didn't even fly during his final months because he couldn't keep an appointment for a physical. An honest-to-god war hero he is. President Ronald Reagan (yes, he's dead) also served: http://www.wpafb.af.mil/museum/history/wwii/rr.htm I liked this actor much better: http://www.wpafb.af.mil/museum/history/wwii/js.htm ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
Quote:
The Man in the Maze QRU at Baboquivari Peak |
Definitely Not Qualified
From: "K0HB" on Fri, Dec 16 2005 3:14 pm
wrote [the expression is "Game. Set. Match." Hans...from tennis] This is rec.radio.tennis.policy? Don't think so. This is morse.code.uber.alles.policy? This is old.sea.horses.beeping.policy? This is rime.of.ancient.mariner.policy? [not "rhyme" Jimmie] Don't think so. Set. Match. FIRE! (Don't yell "fire" in a crowded newsgripe!) Tsk, you got it WRONG again! It is - Don't yell THEATER in a crowded firehouse. applause |
Definitely Not Qualified
From: "K0HB" on Fri, Dec 16 2005 3:15 pm
wrote ...and it give you a chance to relate your "hotshot CW op" stories all about how good you were with morsemanship as radio hero of some fleet or other IN the Persian Gulf area. Gee, and here I thought your struggle was all about the morse TEST, but turns out you don't like to hear about morse operating either, huh! Surprise, surprise, Gomer! :-) Does the morse code TEST involve old sea dog legends? I don't think so. 1964 was 41 years ago, Hans. By then I'd already had my Honorable Discharge for 4 years and had been working on Ku Band monopulse radar sets and test sets for same. For the first of the Grumman Intruders (A-6?) in the USN. DoD contract. All solid state except for the klystron RF generator in the hand-held RF unit. Hey, why don't you take down your "bragging rights" certificate as one of the senior morse hot shots and digitize it, make it available to all of us to see and admire and gush over? Already did that, but since you seem to be binary-impaired here, check your email inbox. Yes, UNSOLICITED private mail received. It's a good thing there was no "male nudity" involved...Jimmie would have been very upset...Dudly might have tried to put up another private home page, this time maybe entitled "Don't Trust Hans Brakob, Master Grief!" :-) BTW, I am NOT "binary-impaired." Google put the locks on binary attachments, not me or my computer(s). Had AOL still provided newsgroup forwarding, binary attachments would still have been locked out. That's just the way it is... Maybe you have an old SP brassard you can put on and police Google, read them the Articles of the UCMJ? |
Definitely Not Qualified
From: on Dec 16, 3:41 pm
wrote: Sorry, but the last REAL SERVING IN THE MILITARY President was James Earle Carter, USN, His middle name is spelled "Earl". Not "Earle". Can't you get anyhting right? ;-) "Anyhting?" Go to: http://www.history.navy.mil/faqs/faq60-14.htm You WILL find that it is EARLE with an ending E, just like his father spelled it. Also in Wikipedia, a couple of Almanacs, etc. Spelling isn't rocket science, Len :-) That's true, Jimmie. I've worked WITH rocket scientists (and engineers) at Rocketdyne Division of (then) Rockwell International (now a Division of Boeing who purchased them a few years ago). Have you worked WITH rocket scientists, Jimmie? Have you ever been a part of an SSME (Space Shuttle Main Engine) test firing to test LOX flow instrumentation? I have. Up on "Coca Site" of the Santa Susannah Field Test Laboratories in the mountains between Los Angeles and Ventura Counties. Have you worked IN the space business, Jimmie? Have you helped "reach the threshold of space" with a ham balloon? and George Herbert Walker Bush, USNR, and Gerald Rudolph Ford, USNR. [living that is] Our current President served as an F-102 pilot in the Texas Air National Guard. I thought I wrote that? Do you know what an F-102 is, Jimmie? Do you know the difference between it and an F-106, Jimmie? I've had my hands inside both of them at Hughes Aircraft Company field in Culver City, CA. Took part in testing of the MA-1 fire control system for the F-106, initially using the F-102 as a test bed. That was in 1958-1960. MA-1 was the first - and probably last - vacuum tube based digital computer airborne fire-control system. Interesting stuff to know what that MA-1 could do... See: http://www.whitehouse.gov/president/gwbbio.html Does that service not count for you, Len? Not particularly. Dubya was never activated from the Air Guard during a war time, Jimmie. None of them had any direct contact with amateur radio. How do you know for sure, Len? If they did, QST would have had an orgasmic issue special! :-) BWAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
Definitely Not Qualified
From: "K0HB" on Fri, Dec 16 2005 11:11 pm
wrote Doesn't Hans realize that Dud is NOT showing a good face of U.S. amateur radio to the public? I'm not assigned Shore Patrol duty, so couldn't care less about conduct-unbecoming-an-amateur. Not in my job description. Hans doesn't believe in U.S. amateur radio being "self- regulating?" Ach, zo! Maybe Len has an old MP brassard could patrol for good faces here? Nope. I only worked WITH the CID at Camp Drake, not with the MP detachment there. As you were... |
Definitely Not Qualified
wrote Hans doesn't believe in U.S. amateur radio being "self- regulating?" Ach, zo! This is amateur radio? I thought it was rec.amateur.tennis.policy! Silly me! Ach, ptuey! Beep beep de Hans, K0HB |
Definitely Not Qualified
KØHB wrote: wrote Hans doesn't believe in U.S. amateur radio being "self- regulating?" Ach, zo! This is amateur radio? I thought it was rec.amateur.tennis.policy! Silly me! yep silly you nice of you to admit it Ach, ptuey! Beep beep de Hans, K0HB |
Article 125?
|
Definitely Not Qualified
|
Definitely Not Qualified
"The FCC doesn't license amateur radio." ? :-) Do you mean the one where he stated that he made an error? Do you ever acknowledge your errors, Len? Dave K8MN Dave: To respond to Lennie is not much different than addressing a Micky Mouse actor with a lung full of Helium. All you get is a high-pitched squeal and a great amount of unintelligible babble. Lennie is a Troll. Dan said it best. Ignore him. |
Definitely Not Qualified
wrote:
From: on Dec 16, 3:41 pm wrote: Sorry, but the last REAL SERVING IN THE MILITARY President was James Earle Carter, USN, His middle name is spelled "Earl". Not "Earle". Can't you get anyhting right? ;-) "Anyhting?" Yes, Leonarde, "anyhting". A typo. You seem to go ape over them, so I toss in one or two just to keep you happy, Go to: http://www.history.navy.mil/faqs/faq60-14.htm You WILL find that it is EARLE with an ending E, just like his father spelled it. Other sources say differently. Spelling isn't rocket science, Len :-) That's true, So why are you so bad at it? ;-) I've worked WITH rocket scientists (and engineers) at Rocketdyne Division of (then) Rockwell International (now a Division of Boeing who purchased them a few years ago). As you flitted from job to job.... Does having worked for "rocket scientists" somehow make your opinions about amateur radio policy better or superior to those of anyone else, Len? You seem to think it does. Have you ever been a part of an SSME (Space Shuttle Main Engine) test firing to test LOX flow instrumentation? I have. Up on "Coca Site" of the Santa Susannah Field Test Laboratories in the mountains between Los Angeles and Ventura Counties. Does that somehow make your opinions about amateur radio policy better or superior to those of anyone else, Len? You seem to think it does. and George Herbert Walker Bush, USNR, and Gerald Rudolph Ford, USNR. [living that is] Our current President served as an F-102 pilot in the Texas Air National Guard. I thought I wrote that? No, you didn't. I wrote it. Do you know what an F-102 is....? Yes, I do, Len. Do you know what an FT-102 is, Len? Do you know the difference between it and an F-106, Jimmie? Yes, I do, Len. Do you the difference between an FT-102 and an FT-101? I've had my hands inside both of them at Hughes Aircraft Company field in Culver City, CA. I've had my hands inside all kinds of things, Len. Took part in testing of the MA-1 fire control system for the F-106, initially using the F-102 as a test bed. That was in 1958-1960. MA-1 was the first - and probably last - vacuum tube based digital computer airborne fire-control system. Interesting stuff to know what that MA-1 could do... Does that somehow make your opinions about amateur radio policy better or superior to those of anyone else, Len? You seem to think it does. Besides - how do we know any of these "rocket scientist" claims of yours are true? You're big on demanding "proof" of all sorts of stuff, and rejecting people's claims. Why should we accept your claims? Pictures and verbiage on someone's website aren't "proof". See: http://www.whitehouse.gov/president/gwbbio.html Does that service not count for you, Len? Not particularly. Is that a yes or a no? Dubya was never activated from the Air Guard during a war time, So what? Does someone's military service only count if they are "activated during a war time"? Let's see....Dan, W4NTI, was certainly "activated during a war time". He was the target of your "few ounces of pressure" posts. Dave, K8MN was certainly "activated during a war time". He was the target of your classic "feldwebel post". I don't know if you consider Hans, K0HB, to have been "activated during a war time", but you sure don't show him much respect even though he has more military service than you. And he's NCTA! Perhaps what really bothers you about K0HB is that he has better stories, and tells them better, than you do. And while Hans is against the Morse Code test, and has been for a long time, he's *for* Morse Code *use*. That seems to bother you no end. Which proves that you're not just against the *test*, but against Morse Code *use*. And a whole bunch of other things. None of them had any direct contact with amateur radio. How do you know for sure, Len? If they did, QST would have had an orgasmic issue special! :-) Nope. They didn't have one about K7UGA. Wrong again, Len! |
Definitely Not Qualified
|
Definitely Not Qualified
wrote I don't know if you consider Hans, K0HB, to have been "activated during a war time", but you sure don't show him much respect even though he has more military service than you. And he's NCTA! During my service (1958 to 1988) the US did not declare war on any other nation. Beep beep de Hans, K0HB |
Definitely Not Qualified
"KØHB" wrote in message: Hans SYCOPHANT & HANS wrote: I don't know if you consider Hans, K0HB, to have been "activated during a war time", but you sure don't show him much respect even though he has more military service than you. And he's NCTA! During my service (1958 to 1988) the US did not declare war on any other nation. Beep beep de Hans, K0HB Then how do you account for the five Medals of Honor you have? Are you wearing all five to the Legion Christmas party? Lloyd |
Definitely Not Qualified
From: on Dec 17, 4:27 am
wrote: From: on Dec 16, 3:41 pm wrote: Sorry, but the last REAL SERVING IN THE MILITARY President was James Earle Carter, USN, His middle name is spelled "Earl". Not "Earle". Can't you get anyhting right? ;-) You screwed up typing the word "anything" and now try to get out of it by saying it was "deliberate." Bull****. Go to: http://www.history.navy.mil/faqs/faq60-14.htm You WILL find that it is EARLE with an ending E, just like his father spelled it. Other sources say differently. "Other sources?" The United States Navy, from whose Naval Academy James Earle Carter graduated, spelled it "Earle." The United States Navy, in which Lieutenant James Earle Carter served, spelled it "Earle." James Earle Carter, when he chooses to use his full legal name, spells it "Earle." But, Jimmie Miccolis, self-proclaimed Master of All Things, is "other sources" who claim to "know better." shrug Spelling isn't rocket science, Len :-) I've worked WITH rocket scientists (and engineers) at Rocketdyne Division of (then) Rockwell International (now a Division of Boeing who purchased them a few years ago). As you flitted from job to job.... Advancing in salary and responsibility each time... Does having worked for "rocket scientists" somehow make your opinions about amateur radio policy better or superior to those of anyone else, Len? You seem to think it does. Tsk, tsk, tsk, "other sources," don't try to bulldoze a mountain out of your little ant-hill faux pas. When you've had some experience in REAL wordsmithing as an article-seller and editing, you come on back. Nowhere in Title 47 C.F.R. is it stated that an AMATEUR radio license grant makes YOU "superior" to anyone in anything, regardless of license class. So far in here, all you've done is to posture and post (seemingly endlessly) about how "right" you are in everything and how everyone who disagrees with you is so terribly "wrong." Does that somehow make your opinions about amateur radio policy better or superior to those of anyone else, Len? If I want to find out the correct spelling of the legal name of a President of the United States, I can find it. I don't need "other sources." So far your little toy bulldozer hasn't made much of a dent in that faux pas "spelling" ant-hill of yours. Here's a DOS Tip, "official sources:" Don't try to correct the USN, the Naval Academy, the Naval Bureau of Personnel, the official United States Navy History site, the state of Georgia, or the United States Government on the spelling of a former President's name. I've had my hands inside all kinds of things, Len. Then isn't it time you washed your hands of this little spelling faux pas of yours? Besides - how do we know any of these "rocket scientist" claims of yours are true? You're big on demanding "proof" of all sorts of stuff, and rejecting people's claims. Why should we accept your claims? Pictures and verbiage on someone's website aren't "proof". Contact the Personnel Department of Rocketdyne Division of Boeing Aircraft in Canoga Park, CA. Do you need their mailing address? If so, contact your "other sources." I can name ALL of my employers from part-time during high school onward, and have. Have you done the same? No? Why not? Perhaps those "other sources" have your employment details? I'm sure they must, since you carefully AVOID stating anything yourself. Perhaps what really bothers you about K0HB is that he has better stories, and tells them better, than you do. I have no stories of "CW operating," Jimmie. Never used morse code mode in over a half century, haven't been required to in either military or civilian occupations. As to "telling them better," show your chops as a PAID-by-others editor and wordsmith FIRST. You are so highly biased in favor of morse mode that you are incapable of objectively critiquing any "story" for any mass media publication other than some "CW organization." Hans sent me a copy of his "Speed Key" credential from the United States Navy. Do you have one of those? Or do your "other sources" have it? You were never in the USN or USNR. You were never in the Persian Gulf region. You were never in the service of the military of the United States. We (other than "other sources") don't know if you ever did any radio communications in professional/commercial radio other than AMATEUR. You are carefully ambiguous and non-specific about that. Just like Dudly the Imposter. [on living Presidents of the United States] None of them had any direct contact with amateur radio. How do you know for sure, Len? If they did, QST would have had an orgasmic issue special! :-) Nope. They didn't have one about K7UGA. Senator Barry Goldwater was never elected President of the United States. He LOST. Wrong again, Len! No, I'm right...Barry Goldwater didn't get elected President. I'm really not concerned about how WRONG your "other sources" are, Jimmie. Now put that little toy bulldozer away. No matter how much you shovel it, that little spelling ant-hill faux pas is NOT going to get larger. Go play with your AMATEUR radios. That will keep you in the house and busy this Saturday night. |
Definitely Not Qualified
wrote in message
YAWN |
More Real Estate Follies
KØHB wrote: wrote Do you really believe that? Gee, do ya think that the ITU is a member of the IARU? Beep beep de Hans, K0HB Do you? |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:13 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com