|
Regulation-by-Bandwidth Petition Filed by ARRL
Jim Hampton wrote: "6H4Ballast" wrote in message groups.com... wrote in message oups.com... http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2005/11/15/1/?nc=1 Note how much wider the 'phone bands would become under the proposal. 73 de Jim, N2EY That's fine by me as just 20% of hams who use HF also use CW on a regular basis. And I'm not afraid to switch to CW right in that phone band when someone tries to jump on me. Been there, worn that T-shirt. Funny how 75 watts of cw can get through a kilowatt AM station. 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA Mighty Macho Morse Man? |
Regulation-by-Bandwidth Petition Filed by ARRL
K4YZ wrote: raped an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: nobodys old friend wrote: Jim Hampton wrote: wrote in message oups.com... http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2005/11/15/1/?nc=1 Note how much wider the 'phone bands would become under the proposal. 73 de Jim, N2EY Hello, Jim Well, does this mean an SSB signal with either reduced or full carrier so I can use a 9 KHz audio bandwidth (better than a 4.5 KHz bandwidth). Audioooooo ... ;) Of course, one could use the 4.5 KHz (nice audio) bandwidth with double sideband, full carrier, but shift the carrier 90 degrees for interesting effects too ... Where's my sideswiper? 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA ps - doesn't 10 meters run from 25 MHz to 32 MHz? Or something like that? given the flaming I got over not knowing what some aphabet soup meant I wonder what will happen to Jim for blowing that one 10 meters BTW extends from 28MHZ to 29.7MHZ 12 meter as an aside runs from 24.890 *24.990 Stand-by for more "flaming", Mark. I know the concept may be a bit foreign to you, but Jim hampton was being facetious. menaing we see again your doublt standard "Menaing" that we see that you are ill-prepared mto discuss radio policy issues and that you have no understanding of what's going on around you. nope meaning you are bent on flaming for anything I type at all you are a fraud your bigest fraud is presenting yourself as human at all Steve, K4YZ |
Tennessee Nurse Steven J Robeson, LPN
|
Regulation-by-Bandwidth Petition Filed by ARRL
an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: raped an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: nobodys old friend wrote: Jim Hampton wrote: wrote in message oups.com... http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2005/11/15/1/?nc=1 Note how much wider the 'phone bands would become under the proposal. 73 de Jim, N2EY Hello, Jim Well, does this mean an SSB signal with either reduced or full carrier so I can use a 9 KHz audio bandwidth (better than a 4.5 KHz bandwidth). Audioooooo ... ;) Of course, one could use the 4.5 KHz (nice audio) bandwidth with double sideband, full carrier, but shift the carrier 90 degrees for interesting effects too ... Where's my sideswiper? 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA ps - doesn't 10 meters run from 25 MHz to 32 MHz? Or something like that? given the flaming I got over not knowing what some aphabet soup meant I wonder what will happen to Jim for blowing that one 10 meters BTW extends from 28MHZ to 29.7MHZ 12 meter as an aside runs from 24.890 *24.990 Stand-by for more "flaming", Mark. I know the concept may be a bit foreign to you, but Jim hampton was being facetious. menaing we see again your doublt standard "Menaing" that we see that you are ill-prepared mto discuss radio policy issues and that you have no understanding of what's going on around you. nope meaning you are bent on flaming for anything I type at all Nope...MEANING that you are ill-prepared to duscuss radio policy issues and that you have no understanding of what's going on around you. you are a fraud your bigest fraud is presenting yourself as human at all The "fraud" here is the drafted gay pagan Army Chemical Corps colonel who doesn't know that freebanders operate from 25 to 32Mhz. Steve, K4YZ |
Regulation-by-Bandwidth Petition Filed by ARRL
"6H4Ballast" wrote in message
That's fine by me as just 20% of hams who use HF also use CW on a regular basis. "20% of hams", or "20% of hams who responded to a particular survey"? Now if you ran that same survey by a group of QRP homebrewers, the result would be closer to 100%. Statistics is a powerful tool only if care is taken in how the sample population is chosen. But remember, the results only apply to that *sample*, not an *entire* population (unless sample = entire, which is quite rare). 73, Jeff KH6O -- Chief Petty Officer, U.S. Coast Guard Mathematics Lecturer, University of Hawaii System |
Tennessee Nurse Steven J Robeson, LPN
an old friend wrote: wrote: K4YZ wrote: raped an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: nobodys old friend wrote: cut menaing we see again your doublt standard "Menaing" that we see that you are ill-prepared mto discuss radio policy issues and that you have no understanding of what's going on around you. Steve, K4YZ Steve, it appears that you changed Mark's attribution from "an old friend" to "raped an old friend." Why did you do that? becuase he is a sick SoB that thinks rape is the proper subject of jokes set that against his "outrage" over my caling some one an elitist bitch (iw ould have called her an elitist bastartd had she been male that seems the convetions) now by Stevies other statement in that thread I suppose that we may asume by HIS use of the word he endorses rape and similar sex crimes and is in fact guilty of them himself in real life Steve is many things. I'd put "ass" as #1 on his list, followed by "liar" then "delusional," not necessarily in that order. Actually, "liar" could be listed several times. I don't think there's enough bandwidth to complete the list, though. He made an agreement to be civil and couldn't last even 24 hours. |
Regulation-by-Bandwidth Petition Filed by ARRL
wrote in message oups.com... Jim Hampton wrote: "6H4Ballast" wrote in message groups.com... wrote in message oups.com... http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2005/11/15/1/?nc=1 Note how much wider the 'phone bands would become under the proposal. 73 de Jim, N2EY That's fine by me as just 20% of hams who use HF also use CW on a regular basis. And I'm not afraid to switch to CW right in that phone band when someone tries to jump on me. Been there, worn that T-shirt. Funny how 75 watts of cw can get through a kilowatt AM station. 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA Mighty Macho Morse Man? Nope, just reality. W2OY learned that lesson the hard way :)) I really don't care one way or the other about code - but most folks have no idea how much information can be passed via that keyer. In my day, I'd pass dang near as much info in a given time as a teletype. Assuming, of course, the teletype operator could type that fast or was using an automatic send/receive teletype (with tape reader where the tape could be typed in advance of sending it). A lot of folks can't even type 40 or 50 words per minute. 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA |
Regulation-by-Bandwidth Petition Filed by ARRL
"Jim Hampton" wrote in message ... I really don't care one way or the other about code - but most folks have no idea how much information can be passed via that keyer. In my day, I'd pass dang near as much info in a given time as a teletype. /////// B.S. Snipped here///////// Oh how the tales of dariing do and "how great I am" grow taller and taller and more spectacular, as the years go by and more alcohol is ingested..........ROTFLMAO! |
Regulation-by-Bandwidth Petition Filed by ARRL
"anon" wrote in message ... "Jim Hampton" wrote in message ... I really don't care one way or the other about code - but most folks have no idea how much information can be passed via that keyer. In my day, I'd pass dang near as much info in a given time as a teletype. /////// B.S. Snipped here///////// Oh how the tales of dariing do and "how great I am" grow taller and taller and more spectacular, as the years go by and more alcohol is ingested..........ROTFLMAO! Didn't take you long to reply. Who's ingesting alcohol? I've to go to work tomorrow morning (like 5:00 AM). What is your excuse? I've put perfect copy on paper using a manual typewriter at 40 words per minute. A number of minutes' worth. My mention of 40 or 50 words per minute was a reference to some of the wonder boys whose great exploits simply consist of 'cut and paste' on the Internet. I'm simply saying that a good operator can likely keep up with most folks that are trying to enter original content and not simply pass along a digital picture, or a 'cut-and-paste' from someone else. Then again, original content might be something you aren't familiar with. With due regard, Jim AA2QA |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:33 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com