Jim Hampton wrote:
"6H4Ballast" wrote in message
groups.com...

wrote in message
oups.com...
http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2005/11/15/1/?nc=1

Note how much wider the 'phone bands would become under the proposal.
73 de Jim, N2EY

That's fine by me as just 20% of hams who use HF
also use CW on a regular basis.


And I'm not afraid to switch to CW right in that phone band when someone
tries to jump on me. Been there, worn that T-shirt. Funny how 75 watts of
cw can get through a kilowatt AM station.


73 from Rochester, NY
Jim AA2QA

Mighty Macho Morse Man?

K4YZ wrote:
raped an old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
nobodys old friend wrote:
Jim Hampton wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...
http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2005/11/15/1/?nc=1

Note how much wider the 'phone bands would become under the proposal.

73 de Jim, N2EY

Hello, Jim

Well, does this mean an SSB signal with either reduced or full carrier so I
can use a 9 KHz audio bandwidth (better than a 4.5 KHz bandwidth).
Audioooooo ...

Of course, one could use the 4.5 KHz (nice audio) bandwidth with double
sideband, full carrier, but shift the carrier 90 degrees for interesting
effects too ...

Where's my sideswiper?

73 from Rochester, NY
Jim AA2QA
ps - doesn't 10 meters run from 25 MHz to 32 MHz? Or something like that?

given the flaming I got over not knowing what some aphabet soup meant I
wonder what will happen to Jim for blowing that one 10 meters BTW
extends from 28MHZ to 29.7MHZ 12 meter as an aside runs from 24.890
*24.990

Stand-by for more "flaming", Mark.

I know the concept may be a bit foreign to you, but Jim hampton
was being facetious.

menaing we see again your doublt standard

"Menaing" that we see that you are ill-prepared mto discuss radio
policy issues and that you have no understanding of what's going on
around you.

nope meaning you are bent on flaming for anything I type at all

you are a fraud your bigest fraud is presenting yourself as human at
all

Steve, K4YZ

wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
raped an old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
nobodys old friend wrote:
Jim Hampton wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...
http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2005/11/15/1/?nc=1

Note how much wider the 'phone bands would become under the proposal.

73 de Jim, N2EY

Hello, Jim

Well, does this mean an SSB signal with either reduced or full carrier so I
can use a 9 KHz audio bandwidth (better than a 4.5 KHz bandwidth).
Audioooooo ...

Of course, one could use the 4.5 KHz (nice audio) bandwidth with double
sideband, full carrier, but shift the carrier 90 degrees for interesting
effects too ...

Where's my sideswiper?

73 from Rochester, NY
Jim AA2QA
ps - doesn't 10 meters run from 25 MHz to 32 MHz? Or something like that?

given the flaming I got over not knowing what some aphabet soup meant I
wonder what will happen to Jim for blowing that one 10 meters BTW
extends from 28MHZ to 29.7MHZ 12 meter as an aside runs from 24.890
*24.990

Stand-by for more "flaming", Mark.

I know the concept may be a bit foreign to you, but Jim hampton
was being facetious.

menaing we see again your doublt standard

"Menaing" that we see that you are ill-prepared mto discuss radio
policy issues and that you have no understanding of what's going on
around you.

Steve, K4YZ

Steve, it appears that you changed Mark's attribution from "an old
friend" to "raped an old friend."

he does it all the time

has evn had the nerve to claim that caling me mark as he does that ****
is being nice to me

Why did you do that?

wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
raped an old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
nobodys old friend wrote:
cut
menaing we see again your doublt standard

"Menaing" that we see that you are ill-prepared mto discuss radio
policy issues and that you have no understanding of what's going on
around you.

Steve, K4YZ

Steve, it appears that you changed Mark's attribution from "an old
friend" to "raped an old friend."

Why did you do that?

becuase he is a sick SoB that thinks rape is the proper subject of
jokes

set that against his "outrage" over my caling some one an elitist bitch
(iw ould have called her an elitist bastartd had she been male that
seems the convetions)

now by Stevies other statement in that thread I suppose that we may
asume by HIS use of the word he endorses rape and similar sex crimes
and is in fact guilty of them himself in real life

an old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
raped an old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
nobodys old friend wrote:
Jim Hampton wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...
http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2005/11/15/1/?nc=1

Note how much wider the 'phone bands would become under the proposal.

73 de Jim, N2EY

Hello, Jim

Well, does this mean an SSB signal with either reduced or full carrier so I
can use a 9 KHz audio bandwidth (better than a 4.5 KHz bandwidth).
Audioooooo ...

Of course, one could use the 4.5 KHz (nice audio) bandwidth with double
sideband, full carrier, but shift the carrier 90 degrees for interesting
effects too ...

Where's my sideswiper?

73 from Rochester, NY
Jim AA2QA
ps - doesn't 10 meters run from 25 MHz to 32 MHz? Or something like that?

given the flaming I got over not knowing what some aphabet soup meant I
wonder what will happen to Jim for blowing that one 10 meters BTW
extends from 28MHZ to 29.7MHZ 12 meter as an aside runs from 24.890
*24.990

Stand-by for more "flaming", Mark.

I know the concept may be a bit foreign to you, but Jim hampton
was being facetious.

menaing we see again your doublt standard

"Menaing" that we see that you are ill-prepared mto discuss radio
policy issues and that you have no understanding of what's going on
around you.

nope meaning you are bent on flaming for anything I type at all

Nope...MEANING that you are ill-prepared to duscuss radio policy
issues and that you have no understanding of what's going on around
you.

you are a fraud your bigest fraud is presenting yourself as human at
all

The "fraud" here is the drafted gay pagan Army Chemical Corps
colonel who doesn't know that freebanders operate from 25 to 32Mhz.

Steve, K4YZ

"6H4Ballast" wrote in message
That's fine by me as just 20% of hams who use HF
also use CW on a regular basis.

"20% of hams", or "20% of hams who responded to a particular survey"?

Now if you ran that same survey by a group of QRP homebrewers, the result
would be closer to 100%.

Statistics is a powerful tool only if care is taken in how the sample
population is chosen. But remember, the results only apply to that *sample*,
not an *entire* population (unless sample = entire, which is quite rare).

73, Jeff KH6O


--
Chief Petty Officer, U.S. Coast Guard
Mathematics Lecturer, University of Hawaii System

an old friend wrote:
wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
raped an old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
nobodys old friend wrote:
cut
menaing we see again your doublt standard

"Menaing" that we see that you are ill-prepared mto discuss radio
policy issues and that you have no understanding of what's going on
around you.

Steve, K4YZ

Steve, it appears that you changed Mark's attribution from "an old
friend" to "raped an old friend."

Why did you do that?

becuase he is a sick SoB that thinks rape is the proper subject of
jokes

set that against his "outrage" over my caling some one an elitist bitch
(iw ould have called her an elitist bastartd had she been male that
seems the convetions)

now by Stevies other statement in that thread I suppose that we may
asume by HIS use of the word he endorses rape and similar sex crimes
and is in fact guilty of them himself in real life

Steve is many things. I'd put "ass" as #1 on his list, followed by
"liar" then "delusional," not necessarily in that order. Actually,
"liar" could be listed several times. I don't think there's enough
bandwidth to complete the list, though.

He made an agreement to be civil and couldn't last even 24 hours.

wrote in message
oups.com...

Jim Hampton wrote:
"6H4Ballast" wrote in message
groups.com...

wrote in message
oups.com...
http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2005/11/15/1/?nc=1

Note how much wider the 'phone bands would become under the
proposal.
73 de Jim, N2EY

That's fine by me as just 20% of hams who use HF
also use CW on a regular basis.


And I'm not afraid to switch to CW right in that phone band when someone
tries to jump on me. Been there, worn that T-shirt. Funny how 75 watts
of
cw can get through a kilowatt AM station.


73 from Rochester, NY
Jim AA2QA

Mighty Macho Morse Man?


Nope, just reality. W2OY learned that lesson the hard way )

I really don't care one way or the other about code - but most folks have no
idea how much information can be passed via that keyer. In my day, I'd pass
dang near as much info in a given time as a teletype. Assuming, of course,
the teletype operator could type that fast or was using an automatic
send/receive teletype (with tape reader where the tape could be typed in
advance of sending it).

A lot of folks can't even type 40 or 50 words per minute.


73 from Rochester, NY
Jim AA2QA

"Jim Hampton" wrote in message
...

I really don't care one way or the other about code - but most folks have
no
idea how much information can be passed via that keyer. In my day, I'd
pass
dang near as much info in a given time as a teletype.
/////// B.S. Snipped here/////////



Oh how the tales of dariing do and "how great I am" grow
taller and taller and more spectacular, as the years go by
and more alcohol is ingested..........ROTFLMAO!

"anon" wrote in message
...

"Jim Hampton" wrote in message
...

I really don't care one way or the other about code - but most folks
have
no
idea how much information can be passed via that keyer. In my day, I'd
pass
dang near as much info in a given time as a teletype.
/////// B.S. Snipped here/////////



Oh how the tales of dariing do and "how great I am" grow
taller and taller and more spectacular, as the years go by
and more alcohol is ingested..........ROTFLMAO!





Didn't take you long to reply. Who's ingesting alcohol? I've to go to work
tomorrow morning (like 5:00 AM). What is your excuse?

I've put perfect copy on paper using a manual typewriter at 40 words per
minute. A number of minutes' worth. My mention of 40 or 50 words per
minute was a reference to some of the wonder boys whose great exploits
simply consist of 'cut and paste' on the Internet.

I'm simply saying that a good operator can likely keep up with most folks
that are trying to enter original content and not simply pass along a
digital picture, or a 'cut-and-paste' from someone else.

Then again, original content might be something you aren't familiar with.


With due regard,
Jim AA2QA