Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Regulation-by-Bandwidth Petition Filed by ARRL
Jim Hampton wrote: wrote in message oups.com... http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2005/11/15/1/?nc=1 Note how much wider the 'phone bands would become under the proposal. 73 de Jim, N2EY Hello, Jim Well, does this mean an SSB signal with either reduced or full carrier so I can use a 9 KHz audio bandwidth (better than a 4.5 KHz bandwidth). Audioooooo ... Of course, one could use the 4.5 KHz (nice audio) bandwidth with double sideband, full carrier, but shift the carrier 90 degrees for interesting effects too ... Where's my sideswiper? 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA ps - doesn't 10 meters run from 25 MHz to 32 MHz? Or something like that? given the flaming I got over not knowing what some aphabet soup meant I wonder what will happen to Jim for blowing that one 10 meters BTW extends from 28MHZ to 29.7MHZ 12 meter as an aside runs from 24.890 *24.990 meaning jim has called the B band and the 10 meter combined with a section above that as 10 metters amuch bigger error i sghould think than my not knowing some alphabet soup but Stevie will show his double standard again |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Regulation-by-Bandwidth Petition Filed by ARRL
nobodys old friend wrote:
Jim Hampton wrote: wrote in message oups.com... http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2005/11/15/1/?nc=1 Note how much wider the 'phone bands would become under the proposal. 73 de Jim, N2EY Hello, Jim Well, does this mean an SSB signal with either reduced or full carrier so I can use a 9 KHz audio bandwidth (better than a 4.5 KHz bandwidth). Audioooooo ... Of course, one could use the 4.5 KHz (nice audio) bandwidth with double sideband, full carrier, but shift the carrier 90 degrees for interesting effects too ... Where's my sideswiper? 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA ps - doesn't 10 meters run from 25 MHz to 32 MHz? Or something like that? given the flaming I got over not knowing what some aphabet soup meant I wonder what will happen to Jim for blowing that one 10 meters BTW extends from 28MHZ to 29.7MHZ 12 meter as an aside runs from 24.890 *24.990 Stand-by for more "flaming", Mark. I know the concept may be a bit foreign to you, but Jim hampton was being facetious. Those who participate in "freebanding" consider that part of the spectrum (25Mhz to 32Mhz) to be "theirs". That is the range that many "export CB's" cover when "opened" for "freeband" operation. meaning jim has called the B band and the 10 meter combined with a section above that as 10 metters amuch bigger error i sghould think than my not knowing some alphabet soup "B band"...?!?! I won't even venture a guess. Your scope of awareness of present day reality of "radio policy and practice" is far too narrow, Mark. As for "alphabet soup", it's part of what you're supposed to know as a Commission licensee... No one expects you to memorize them, however you should be able to RECOGNIZE them, realize what they are and look them up in the proper regulation and then comply with the regulation. but Stevie will show his double standard again Nope. Just pointing out that you are, once again, ill-prepared to address the subjects, Mark. You tried to "redress" Jim Hampton based on YOUR lack of understanding, not HIS "error" for refering to it as "10 meters". Steve, K4YZ |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Regulation-by-Bandwidth Petition Filed by ARRL
"K4YZ" wrote in message ups.com... nobodys old friend wrote: Jim Hampton wrote: wrote in message oups.com... http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2005/11/15/1/?nc=1 Note how much wider the 'phone bands would become under the proposal. 73 de Jim, N2EY Hello, Jim Well, does this mean an SSB signal with either reduced or full carrier so I can use a 9 KHz audio bandwidth (better than a 4.5 KHz bandwidth). Audioooooo ... Of course, one could use the 4.5 KHz (nice audio) bandwidth with double sideband, full carrier, but shift the carrier 90 degrees for interesting effects too ... Where's my sideswiper? 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA ps - doesn't 10 meters run from 25 MHz to 32 MHz? Or something like that? given the flaming I got over not knowing what some aphabet soup meant I wonder what will happen to Jim for blowing that one 10 meters BTW extends from 28MHZ to 29.7MHZ 12 meter as an aside runs from 24.890 *24.990 Stand-by for more "flaming", Mark. I know the concept may be a bit foreign to you, but Jim hampton was being facetious. Those who participate in "freebanding" consider that part of the spectrum (25Mhz to 32Mhz) to be "theirs". That is the range that many "export CB's" cover when "opened" for "freeband" operation. meaning jim has called the B band and the 10 meter combined with a section above that as 10 metters amuch bigger error i sghould think than my not knowing some alphabet soup "B band"...?!?! I won't even venture a guess. Your scope of awareness of present day reality of "radio policy and practice" is far too narrow, Mark. As for "alphabet soup", it's part of what you're supposed to know as a Commission licensee... No one expects you to memorize them, however you should be able to RECOGNIZE them, realize what they are and look them up in the proper regulation and then comply with the regulation. but Stevie will show his double standard again Nope. Just pointing out that you are, once again, ill-prepared to address the subjects, Mark. You tried to "redress" Jim Hampton based on YOUR lack of understanding, not HIS "error" for refering to it as "10 meters". Steve, K4YZ Hello, Steve Yep, tongue way way into cheek LOL ) Especially when I say "or something like that" ... BTW, double sideband with a 90 shifted full carrier yields phase modulation. I would almost suspect that might be legal under the "regulation by bandwidth", but am not sure. Currently, only in the high end of 10 meters and above (along with standard FM). Something like 29 to 29.7 MHz. Somewhere around there. At this point, I'd mention that if I were to fire up FM on 10 meters, I'd sure as heck break out the rules as I am not exactly sure where it is permitted on 10 or the exact frequency of the FM repeaters on 10. Ya can't know everything; as long as you can look it up, you'll be fine 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Regulation-by-Bandwidth Petition Filed by ARRL
K4YZ wrote: nobodys old friend wrote: Jim Hampton wrote: wrote in message oups.com... http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2005/11/15/1/?nc=1 Note how much wider the 'phone bands would become under the proposal. 73 de Jim, N2EY Hello, Jim Well, does this mean an SSB signal with either reduced or full carrier so I can use a 9 KHz audio bandwidth (better than a 4.5 KHz bandwidth). Audioooooo ... Of course, one could use the 4.5 KHz (nice audio) bandwidth with double sideband, full carrier, but shift the carrier 90 degrees for interesting effects too ... Where's my sideswiper? 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA ps - doesn't 10 meters run from 25 MHz to 32 MHz? Or something like that? given the flaming I got over not knowing what some aphabet soup meant I wonder what will happen to Jim for blowing that one 10 meters BTW extends from 28MHZ to 29.7MHZ 12 meter as an aside runs from 24.890 *24.990 Stand-by for more "flaming", Mark. I know the concept may be a bit foreign to you, but Jim hampton was being facetious. menaing we see again your doublt standard |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Regulation-by-Bandwidth Petition Filed by ARRL
raped an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: nobodys old friend wrote: Jim Hampton wrote: wrote in message oups.com... http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2005/11/15/1/?nc=1 Note how much wider the 'phone bands would become under the proposal. 73 de Jim, N2EY Hello, Jim Well, does this mean an SSB signal with either reduced or full carrier so I can use a 9 KHz audio bandwidth (better than a 4.5 KHz bandwidth). Audioooooo ... Of course, one could use the 4.5 KHz (nice audio) bandwidth with double sideband, full carrier, but shift the carrier 90 degrees for interesting effects too ... Where's my sideswiper? 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA ps - doesn't 10 meters run from 25 MHz to 32 MHz? Or something like that? given the flaming I got over not knowing what some aphabet soup meant I wonder what will happen to Jim for blowing that one 10 meters BTW extends from 28MHZ to 29.7MHZ 12 meter as an aside runs from 24.890 *24.990 Stand-by for more "flaming", Mark. I know the concept may be a bit foreign to you, but Jim hampton was being facetious. menaing we see again your doublt standard "Menaing" that we see that you are ill-prepared mto discuss radio policy issues and that you have no understanding of what's going on around you. Steve, K4YZ |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Tennessee Nurse Steven J Robeson, LPN was: Regulation-by-Bandwidth Petition Filed by ARRL
K4YZ wrote: raped an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: nobodys old friend wrote: Jim Hampton wrote: wrote in message oups.com... http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2005/11/15/1/?nc=1 Note how much wider the 'phone bands would become under the proposal. 73 de Jim, N2EY Hello, Jim Well, does this mean an SSB signal with either reduced or full carrier so I can use a 9 KHz audio bandwidth (better than a 4.5 KHz bandwidth). Audioooooo ... Of course, one could use the 4.5 KHz (nice audio) bandwidth with double sideband, full carrier, but shift the carrier 90 degrees for interesting effects too ... Where's my sideswiper? 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA ps - doesn't 10 meters run from 25 MHz to 32 MHz? Or something like that? given the flaming I got over not knowing what some aphabet soup meant I wonder what will happen to Jim for blowing that one 10 meters BTW extends from 28MHZ to 29.7MHZ 12 meter as an aside runs from 24.890 *24.990 Stand-by for more "flaming", Mark. I know the concept may be a bit foreign to you, but Jim hampton was being facetious. menaing we see again your doublt standard "Menaing" that we see that you are ill-prepared mto discuss radio policy issues and that you have no understanding of what's going on around you. Steve, K4YZ Steve, it appears that you changed Mark's attribution from "an old friend" to "raped an old friend." Why did you do that? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Tennessee Nurse Steven J Robeson, LPN
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Tennessee Nurse Steven J Robeson, LPN
an old friend wrote: wrote: K4YZ wrote: raped an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: nobodys old friend wrote: cut menaing we see again your doublt standard "Menaing" that we see that you are ill-prepared mto discuss radio policy issues and that you have no understanding of what's going on around you. Steve, K4YZ Steve, it appears that you changed Mark's attribution from "an old friend" to "raped an old friend." Why did you do that? becuase he is a sick SoB that thinks rape is the proper subject of jokes set that against his "outrage" over my caling some one an elitist bitch (iw ould have called her an elitist bastartd had she been male that seems the convetions) now by Stevies other statement in that thread I suppose that we may asume by HIS use of the word he endorses rape and similar sex crimes and is in fact guilty of them himself in real life Steve is many things. I'd put "ass" as #1 on his list, followed by "liar" then "delusional," not necessarily in that order. Actually, "liar" could be listed several times. I don't think there's enough bandwidth to complete the list, though. He made an agreement to be civil and couldn't last even 24 hours. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Regulation-by-Bandwidth Petition Filed by ARRL
K4YZ wrote: raped an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: nobodys old friend wrote: Jim Hampton wrote: wrote in message oups.com... http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2005/11/15/1/?nc=1 Note how much wider the 'phone bands would become under the proposal. 73 de Jim, N2EY Hello, Jim Well, does this mean an SSB signal with either reduced or full carrier so I can use a 9 KHz audio bandwidth (better than a 4.5 KHz bandwidth). Audioooooo ... Of course, one could use the 4.5 KHz (nice audio) bandwidth with double sideband, full carrier, but shift the carrier 90 degrees for interesting effects too ... Where's my sideswiper? 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA ps - doesn't 10 meters run from 25 MHz to 32 MHz? Or something like that? given the flaming I got over not knowing what some aphabet soup meant I wonder what will happen to Jim for blowing that one 10 meters BTW extends from 28MHZ to 29.7MHZ 12 meter as an aside runs from 24.890 *24.990 Stand-by for more "flaming", Mark. I know the concept may be a bit foreign to you, but Jim hampton was being facetious. menaing we see again your doublt standard "Menaing" that we see that you are ill-prepared mto discuss radio policy issues and that you have no understanding of what's going on around you. nope meaning you are bent on flaming for anything I type at all you are a fraud your bigest fraud is presenting yourself as human at all Steve, K4YZ |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ARRL Admits Mistakes in Regulation By Bandwidth Proposal | Policy | |||
Open Letter to K1MAN | Policy | |||
ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx | |||
ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | General | |||
ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx |