| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#14
November 21st 05, 04:46 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
Regulation-by-Bandwidth Petition Filed by ARRL
K4YZ wrote: nobodys old friend wrote: Jim Hampton wrote: wrote in message oups.com... http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2005/11/15/1/?nc=1 Note how much wider the 'phone bands would become under the proposal. 73 de Jim, N2EY Hello, Jim Well, does this mean an SSB signal with either reduced or full carrier so I can use a 9 KHz audio bandwidth (better than a 4.5 KHz bandwidth). Audioooooo ...  Of course, one could use the 4.5 KHz (nice audio) bandwidth with double sideband, full carrier, but shift the carrier 90 degrees for interesting effects too ... Where's my sideswiper? 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA ps - doesn't 10 meters run from 25 MHz to 32 MHz? Or something like that? given the flaming I got over not knowing what some aphabet soup meant I wonder what will happen to Jim for blowing that one 10 meters BTW extends from 28MHZ to 29.7MHZ 12 meter as an aside runs from 24.890 *24.990 Stand-by for more "flaming", Mark. I know the concept may be a bit foreign to you, but Jim hampton was being facetious. menaing we see again your doublt standard |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| ARRL Admits Mistakes in Regulation By Bandwidth Proposal | Policy | |||
| Open Letter to K1MAN | Policy | |||
| ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx | |||
| ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | General | |||
| ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx | |||
Threaded Mode
