K4YZ wrote:
nobodys old friend wrote:
Jim Hampton wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...
http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2005/11/15/1/?nc=1

Note how much wider the 'phone bands would become under the proposal.

73 de Jim, N2EY

Hello, Jim

Well, does this mean an SSB signal with either reduced or full carrier so I
can use a 9 KHz audio bandwidth (better than a 4.5 KHz bandwidth).
Audioooooo ...

Of course, one could use the 4.5 KHz (nice audio) bandwidth with double
sideband, full carrier, but shift the carrier 90 degrees for interesting
effects too ...

Where's my sideswiper?

73 from Rochester, NY
Jim AA2QA
ps - doesn't 10 meters run from 25 MHz to 32 MHz? Or something like that?

given the flaming I got over not knowing what some aphabet soup meant I
wonder what will happen to Jim for blowing that one 10 meters BTW
extends from 28MHZ to 29.7MHZ 12 meter as an aside runs from 24.890
*24.990

Stand-by for more "flaming", Mark.

I know the concept may be a bit foreign to you, but Jim hampton
was being facetious.

menaing we see again your doublt standard

raped an old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
nobodys old friend wrote:
Jim Hampton wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...
http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2005/11/15/1/?nc=1

Note how much wider the 'phone bands would become under the proposal.

73 de Jim, N2EY

Hello, Jim

Well, does this mean an SSB signal with either reduced or full carrier so I
can use a 9 KHz audio bandwidth (better than a 4.5 KHz bandwidth).
Audioooooo ...

Of course, one could use the 4.5 KHz (nice audio) bandwidth with double
sideband, full carrier, but shift the carrier 90 degrees for interesting
effects too ...

Where's my sideswiper?

73 from Rochester, NY
Jim AA2QA
ps - doesn't 10 meters run from 25 MHz to 32 MHz? Or something like that?

given the flaming I got over not knowing what some aphabet soup meant I
wonder what will happen to Jim for blowing that one 10 meters BTW
extends from 28MHZ to 29.7MHZ 12 meter as an aside runs from 24.890
*24.990

Stand-by for more "flaming", Mark.

I know the concept may be a bit foreign to you, but Jim hampton
was being facetious.

menaing we see again your doublt standard

"Menaing" that we see that you are ill-prepared mto discuss radio
policy issues and that you have no understanding of what's going on
around you.

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
raped an old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
nobodys old friend wrote:
Jim Hampton wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...
http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2005/11/15/1/?nc=1

Note how much wider the 'phone bands would become under the proposal.

73 de Jim, N2EY

Hello, Jim

Well, does this mean an SSB signal with either reduced or full carrier so I
can use a 9 KHz audio bandwidth (better than a 4.5 KHz bandwidth).
Audioooooo ...

Of course, one could use the 4.5 KHz (nice audio) bandwidth with double
sideband, full carrier, but shift the carrier 90 degrees for interesting
effects too ...

Where's my sideswiper?

73 from Rochester, NY
Jim AA2QA
ps - doesn't 10 meters run from 25 MHz to 32 MHz? Or something like that?

given the flaming I got over not knowing what some aphabet soup meant I
wonder what will happen to Jim for blowing that one 10 meters BTW
extends from 28MHZ to 29.7MHZ 12 meter as an aside runs from 24.890
*24.990

Stand-by for more "flaming", Mark.

I know the concept may be a bit foreign to you, but Jim hampton
was being facetious.

menaing we see again your doublt standard

"Menaing" that we see that you are ill-prepared mto discuss radio
policy issues and that you have no understanding of what's going on
around you.

Steve, K4YZ

Steve, it appears that you changed Mark's attribution from "an old
friend" to "raped an old friend."

Why did you do that?

wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
raped an old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
nobodys old friend wrote:
Jim Hampton wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...
http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2005/11/15/1/?nc=1

Note how much wider the 'phone bands would become under the proposal.

73 de Jim, N2EY

Hello, Jim

Well, does this mean an SSB signal with either reduced or full carrier so I
can use a 9 KHz audio bandwidth (better than a 4.5 KHz bandwidth).
Audioooooo ...

Of course, one could use the 4.5 KHz (nice audio) bandwidth with double
sideband, full carrier, but shift the carrier 90 degrees for interesting
effects too ...

Where's my sideswiper?

73 from Rochester, NY
Jim AA2QA
ps - doesn't 10 meters run from 25 MHz to 32 MHz? Or something like that?

given the flaming I got over not knowing what some aphabet soup meant I
wonder what will happen to Jim for blowing that one 10 meters BTW
extends from 28MHZ to 29.7MHZ 12 meter as an aside runs from 24.890
*24.990

Stand-by for more "flaming", Mark.

I know the concept may be a bit foreign to you, but Jim hampton
was being facetious.

menaing we see again your doublt standard

"Menaing" that we see that you are ill-prepared mto discuss radio
policy issues and that you have no understanding of what's going on
around you.

Steve, K4YZ

Steve, it appears that you changed Mark's attribution from "an old
friend" to "raped an old friend."

he does it all the time

has evn had the nerve to claim that caling me mark as he does that ****
is being nice to me

Why did you do that?

wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
raped an old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
nobodys old friend wrote:
cut
menaing we see again your doublt standard

"Menaing" that we see that you are ill-prepared mto discuss radio
policy issues and that you have no understanding of what's going on
around you.

Steve, K4YZ

Steve, it appears that you changed Mark's attribution from "an old
friend" to "raped an old friend."

Why did you do that?

becuase he is a sick SoB that thinks rape is the proper subject of
jokes

set that against his "outrage" over my caling some one an elitist bitch
(iw ould have called her an elitist bastartd had she been male that
seems the convetions)

now by Stevies other statement in that thread I suppose that we may
asume by HIS use of the word he endorses rape and similar sex crimes
and is in fact guilty of them himself in real life

an old friend wrote:
wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
raped an old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
nobodys old friend wrote:
cut
menaing we see again your doublt standard

"Menaing" that we see that you are ill-prepared mto discuss radio
policy issues and that you have no understanding of what's going on
around you.

Steve, K4YZ

Steve, it appears that you changed Mark's attribution from "an old
friend" to "raped an old friend."

Why did you do that?

becuase he is a sick SoB that thinks rape is the proper subject of
jokes

set that against his "outrage" over my caling some one an elitist bitch
(iw ould have called her an elitist bastartd had she been male that
seems the convetions)

now by Stevies other statement in that thread I suppose that we may
asume by HIS use of the word he endorses rape and similar sex crimes
and is in fact guilty of them himself in real life

Steve is many things. I'd put "ass" as #1 on his list, followed by
"liar" then "delusional," not necessarily in that order. Actually,
"liar" could be listed several times. I don't think there's enough
bandwidth to complete the list, though.

He made an agreement to be civil and couldn't last even 24 hours.

wrote:

He made an agreement to be civil and couldn't last even 24 hours.

As it pertains to you, Brian, you've not proven otherwise.

But then one-way agreements seem to be the only one's you "agree"
to, and only then if it serves you.

Perhaps we'd be more accurate calling you "Diode".

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
wrote:

He made an agreement to be civil and couldn't last even 24 hours.

As it pertains to you, Brian, you've not proven otherwise.

But then one-way agreements seem to be the only one's you "agree"
to, and only then if it serves you.

Perhaps we'd be more accurate calling you "Diode".

Steve, K4YZ

Perhaps today you can extend your agreement to be civil to all on this
group. No small type/font or disclaimers. Best of Luck and Happy
Thanksgiving.

bb

K4YZ wrote:
wrote:

He made an agreement to be civil and couldn't last even 24 hours.

As it pertains to you, Brian, you've not proven otherwise.

Brain did not prove it youdid that for him

But then one-way agreements seem to be the only one's you "agree"
to, and only then if it serves you.

no Brain nor myself are stupid enough to "sign" on to an agree ment
that you are breaking before we even read about it

Perhaps we'd be more accurate calling you "Diode".

more civl than some of your modes address

you have no standard of personal behavoir, you prove that daily

indeed You don't even understand the concept of one

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
raped an old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
nobodys old friend wrote:
Jim Hampton wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...
http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2005/11/15/1/?nc=1

Note how much wider the 'phone bands would become under the proposal.

73 de Jim, N2EY

Hello, Jim

Well, does this mean an SSB signal with either reduced or full carrier so I
can use a 9 KHz audio bandwidth (better than a 4.5 KHz bandwidth).
Audioooooo ...

Of course, one could use the 4.5 KHz (nice audio) bandwidth with double
sideband, full carrier, but shift the carrier 90 degrees for interesting
effects too ...

Where's my sideswiper?

73 from Rochester, NY
Jim AA2QA
ps - doesn't 10 meters run from 25 MHz to 32 MHz? Or something like that?

given the flaming I got over not knowing what some aphabet soup meant I
wonder what will happen to Jim for blowing that one 10 meters BTW
extends from 28MHZ to 29.7MHZ 12 meter as an aside runs from 24.890
*24.990

Stand-by for more "flaming", Mark.

I know the concept may be a bit foreign to you, but Jim hampton
was being facetious.

menaing we see again your doublt standard

"Menaing" that we see that you are ill-prepared mto discuss radio
policy issues and that you have no understanding of what's going on
around you.

nope meaning you are bent on flaming for anything I type at all

you are a fraud your bigest fraud is presenting yourself as human at
all

Steve, K4YZ