Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message oups.com... Jim Hampton wrote: "6H4Ballast" wrote in message groups.com... wrote in message oups.com... http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2005/11/15/1/?nc=1 Note how much wider the 'phone bands would become under the proposal. 73 de Jim, N2EY That's fine by me as just 20% of hams who use HF also use CW on a regular basis. And I'm not afraid to switch to CW right in that phone band when someone tries to jump on me. Been there, worn that T-shirt. Funny how 75 watts of cw can get through a kilowatt AM station. 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA Mighty Macho Morse Man? Nope, just reality. W2OY learned that lesson the hard way ![]() I really don't care one way or the other about code - but most folks have no idea how much information can be passed via that keyer. In my day, I'd pass dang near as much info in a given time as a teletype. Assuming, of course, the teletype operator could type that fast or was using an automatic send/receive teletype (with tape reader where the tape could be typed in advance of sending it). A lot of folks can't even type 40 or 50 words per minute. 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ARRL Admits Mistakes in Regulation By Bandwidth Proposal | Policy | |||
Open Letter to K1MAN | Policy | |||
ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx | |||
ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | General | |||
ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx |