Dreaming of finger ****ing Tayleor Robeson
commode buzz corey wrote:
whiny**** lloydie wrote:

Wrong, Slater, you should really go hide behind yet another name,
coward.

You should come out from behind the curtians 2test coward. LOL!!
Who is Slater? More of your fantasizing?

That is if you can stay sober enough. Hey, you beat any animals
lately, Commander? You have gotten arrested for animal cruelty, after
all........

LOL

LOL Commode Buzz Corey does indeed have charges against him for
sodomizing those sheep. LOLLOLLOLLOLLOL

"FREEPORT, OH/GLENDALE, WV: The FCC wrote Advanced licensee Steven A.
Tunder, N8WGM, and General licensee Roger L. Wiseman, KC8JBO, on March
29, 2000, advising that it had been made aware of "an ongoing personal
dispute" between the two men that included allegations of interference
or jamming on 20 meters. FCC Special Counsel for Amateur Radio
Enforcement Riley Hollingsworth cautioned Tunder and Wiseman to review
§97.1 of the Amateur Radio rules and "to make certain that whatever
disputes that may exist are not carried over to Amateur Radio
frequencies." Hollingsworth invited the two licensees to contact him to
discuss the matter. Last November 9, the FCC sent Wiseman a Warning
Notice in response to allegations of deliberate and malicious
interference on 20 meters."

"GLENDALE, WV: The FCC requested July 11, 2000, that Roger L. Wiseman,
KC8JBO, retake the General examination elements under the supervision
of an ARRL-VEC volunteer examiner team. Wiseman must appear for
retesting by September 11, 2000, or his license will be canceled.
Applicants appearing for re-examination are granted an Amateur Radio
license consistent with the elements passed. The FCC had written
Wiseman on March 29, 2000, advising that it had been made aware of "an
ongoing personal dispute" between Wiseman and another licensee that
included allegations of interference or jamming on 20 meters. FCC
Special Counsel for Amateur Radio Enforcement Riley Hollingsworth
invited the two licensees to contact him to discuss the matter.
Additionally, the FCC had sent Wiseman a Warning Notice last November
in response to allegations of deliberate and malicious interference on
20 meters."


LOL at the Glendale retard!

"cmdr buzz corey" wrote in message
ups.com...
"FREEPORT, OH/GLENDALE, WV: The FCC wrote Advanced licensee Steven A.
Tunder, N8WGM, and General licensee Roger L. Wiseman, KC8JBO, on March
29, 2000, advising that it had been made aware of "an ongoing personal
dispute" between the two men that included allegations of interference
or jamming on 20 meters. FCC Special Counsel for Amateur Radio
Enforcement Riley Hollingsworth cautioned Tunder and Wiseman to review
§97.1 of the Amateur Radio rules and "to make certain that whatever
disputes that may exist are not carried over to Amateur Radio
frequencies." Hollingsworth invited the two licensees to contact him to
discuss the matter. Last November 9, the FCC sent Wiseman a Warning
Notice in response to allegations of deliberate and malicious
interference on 20 meters."

"GLENDALE, WV: The FCC requested July 11, 2000, that Roger L. Wiseman,
KC8JBO, retake the General examination elements under the supervision
of an ARRL-VEC volunteer examiner team. Wiseman must appear for
retesting by September 11, 2000, or his license will be canceled.
Applicants appearing for re-examination are granted an Amateur Radio
license consistent with the elements passed. The FCC had written
Wiseman on March 29, 2000, advising that it had been made aware of "an
ongoing personal dispute" between Wiseman and another licensee that
included allegations of interference or jamming on 20 meters. FCC
Special Counsel for Amateur Radio Enforcement Riley Hollingsworth
invited the two licensees to contact him to discuss the matter.
Additionally, the FCC had sent Wiseman a Warning Notice last November
in response to allegations of deliberate and malicious interference on
20 meters."


LOL at the Glendale retard!
/

But yet the social misfit maintains that there is NOTHING in the letter that
stated anything about malicious interference.
What part of, " in response to allegations of deliberate and malicious
interference on
20 meters." does Roger think we do not understand?
Hmmm...I don't see a single mention anywhere in these articles that alludes
to Roger being "invited" to retest because he was initially tested via the
VEC program, as Roger claims. I do see comments made about "jamming",
"interference" and "deliberate and malicious interference".
Of course that is Roger's story, and he's sticking to it. He never could
tell the truth.

Anon wrote:

But yet the social misfit maintains that there is NOTHING in the letter that
stated anything about malicious interference.
What part of, " in response to allegations of deliberate and malicious
interference on

That is still the ARRL news release, not the actual letter.

20 meters." does Roger think we do not understand?

Roger isn't posting, dumbass.

Hmmm...I don't see a

Of course you don't. Your malformed bald head is wedged up your fat
ass.

From: (LRod)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: 14.313 Jamming.K9BSD, N9PGE, and KK9G.
Message-ID:
References:
s.it

X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.21/32.243
Lines: 41
X-Trace:
npbhgpngjbkmjfegdbdpiflmbcekedmfhojhikkbagflhcboak lfjkplkonophhikjjlgnhjkiogimbnbgackcbpannchokbekkj flfncmkmngeibpdbhojbajjenkiigmijeekfoggfnklbkpodeb jebifnnkim
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 00:27:01 EDT
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 03:14:02 GMT


On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 20:32:06 -0500, "Rick Phillips" NoSpam@NoSpam
wrote:


If you are going to tell it, tell it straight. THAT person only recieved ONE
warning letter and was made to retest, yet the letter did not give
interference as being the reason for the retest.
This newsgroup has already hashed and rehashed THAT person's retest, ad
nauseaum.

One letter?
No "interference"?

Read everything closely. There were three letters sent.

The letters to both Wiseman and Tunder were a preemptive "warning"
that did not allege any activities. That hardly qualifies as a warning
in the context of someone having actually done something.

The letter with the warning in it ALLEGED interference, and warned of
consequences.

The retest letter made no reference to interference; in fact gave no
reason for requiring the retest. Such a request is part of the
Volunteer Examining program. It could have been made for any number of
reasons that may have had nothing to do with any of the addressee's
actions. An investigation into the VE group that gave the test, would
be a good example.

Only one letter was a warning referring to interference.

So, yes; if you are going to tell it, tell it straight.


LRod

Master Woodbutcher and seasoned termite

Shamelessly whoring my website since 1999

http://www.woodbutcher.net

wrote:

So, yes; if you are going to tell it, tell it straight.


LRod

Master Woodbutcher and seasoned termite

Shamelessly whoring my website since 1999

http://www.woodbutcher.net


I love lrod long time once. not again though cause he just lie there say
nothing.

NOGL wrote:
wrote:

cut


I love lrod long time once. not again though cause he just lie there say
nothing.

N0GL almost certainyl not write

but who did

beased theposting action I know k4yz and Frank with no call were online
posting to RRAP

mostly case then k4yz was foreging some more on RRAP

an_old_friend wrote:
NOGL wrote:

wrote:


cut

I love lrod long time once. not again though cause he just lie there say
nothing.


N0GL almost certainyl not write

but who did

lrod very hot. no good in bed though.

On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 06:15:37 -0600, NOGL wrote:

wrote:

So, yes; if you are going to tell it, tell it straight.


LRod

Master Woodbutcher and seasoned termite

Shamelessly whoring my website since 1999

http://www.woodbutcher.net


I love lrod long time once. not again though cause he just lie there say
nothing.

everyone should be advised that The following person
has been advocating the abuse of elders making false charges of child rape, rape in general forges post and name

he may also be making flase reports of abusing other in order to attak and cow his foes
he also shows signs of being dangerously unstable

STEVEN J ROBESON
151 12TH AVE NW
WINCHESTER TN 37398
931-967-6282

BTW with the exalant response steve you can look forward to seeing this email addy on RRAP a while
and all done by steve express permission
Mark Morgan


_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

Kiddie raper and has gotten 4 letters from the FCC
commode buzz corey wrote:
"ARRL news releases..not actual letters

Poor Butt Cornholer, he tries and tries and can't get the job done.

I notice in the press relese your asshole buddy Steve Tunder got a
letter..LOL @ the Freeport ****head!

L LOL at the Lameo Patrol's Commode Butt Cornholer

Funny how others can see right through your **** poor logic, Butt
Cornholer....

From: (LRod)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: 14.313 Jamming.K9BSD, N9PGE, and KK9G.
Message-ID:
References:
s.it

X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.21/32.243
Lines: 41
X-Trace:
npbhgpngjbkmjfegdbdpiflmbcekedmfhojhikkbagflhcboak lfjkplkonophhikjjlgnhjkiogimbnbgackcbpannchokbekkj flfncmkmngeibpdbhojbajjenkiigmijeekfoggfnklbkpodeb jebifnnkim
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 00:27:01 EDT
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 03:14:02 GMT


On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 20:32:06 -0500, "Rick Phillips" NoSpam@NoSpam
wrote:


If you are going to tell it, tell it straight. THAT person only recieved ONE
warning letter and was made to retest, yet the letter did not give
interference as being the reason for the retest.
This newsgroup has already hashed and rehashed THAT person's retest, ad
nauseaum.

One letter?
No "interference"?

Read everything closely. There were three letters sent.

The letters to both Wiseman and Tunder were a preemptive "warning"
that did not allege any activities. That hardly qualifies as a warning
in the context of someone having actually done something.

The letter with the warning in it ALLEGED interference, and warned of
consequences.

The retest letter made no reference to interference; in fact gave no
reason for requiring the retest. Such a request is part of the
Volunteer Examining program. It could have been made for any number of
reasons that may have had nothing to do with any of the addressee's
actions. An investigation into the VE group that gave the test, would
be a good example.

Only one letter was a warning referring to interference.

So, yes; if you are going to tell it, tell it straight.


LRod

Master Woodbutcher and seasoned termite

Shamelessly whoring my website since 1999

http://www.woodbutcher.net


LOL @ Butt Cornholer the convicted child molester.

wrote:
Kiddie raper and has gotten 4 letters from the FCC
commode buzz corey wrote:
"ARRL news releases..not actual letters

Poor Butt Cornholer, he tries and tries and can't get the job done.

I notice in the press relese your asshole buddy Steve Tunder got a
letter..LOL @ the Freeport ****head!

L LOL at the Lameo Patrol's Commode Butt Cornholer

Funny how others can see right through your **** poor logic, Butt
Cornholer....

GLENDALE, WV: The FCC sent a Warning Notice November 9, 1999, to
General
licensee Roger L. Wiseman, KC8JBO, citing evidence that the licensee
had
been "deliberately and maliciously interfering with the radio
operations
of other licensed amateurs" on 20 meters. "This interference has
occurred at various times in the last several months and includes
broadcasting music and other unidentified transmissions," said a letter
from FCC Special Counsel for Amateur Radio Enforcement Riley
Hollingsworth. Hollingsworth warned that continued operation of the
type
described could result in a fine or license revocation proceeding, and

Spin it anyway you want 2test, but we all know why you had to retest.

LOL at 2test wogie, the Glendale retard, best cleaner-outer of
port-a-potties in the county.