| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#6
December 31st 05, 04:15 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
Another License Idea
wrote in message
oups.com... I missed where you explained why the bands needed to be divided by class. It's to serve as an upgrade incentive. Not everyone aspires to run high power. When I upgraded from Conditional to Extra (Advanced was closed) in 1963 I didn't need any spiffy new freqs or higher power to motivate me. Sounds like giving lollipops to children if they'll first eat their spinach. Is it more difficult to understand how to operate on 3524 than on 3526? Of course not. Good answer! 73, de Hans, K0HB Grand Exalted Liberator of the Electric Smoke |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access | Antenna | |||
| Another D-H* NCVEC proposal | Policy | |||
| FCC Amateur Radio Enforcement Letters for the Period Ending May 1, 2004 | General | |||
| Why You Don't Like The ARRL | Policy | |||
| There is no International Code Requirement and techs can operate HF according to FCC Rules | General | |||
Threaded Mode
