LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #6   Report Post  
Old December 31st 05, 04:15 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
KØHB
 
Posts: n/a
Default Another License Idea

wrote in message
oups.com...

I missed where you explained why the bands needed to be divided by class.


It's to serve as an upgrade incentive. Not everyone aspires to run high
power.


When I upgraded from Conditional to Extra (Advanced was closed) in 1963 I didn't
need any spiffy new freqs or higher power to motivate me. Sounds like giving
lollipops to children if they'll first eat their spinach.

Is it more difficult to understand how to operate on 3524 than on 3526?


Of course not.


Good answer!

73, de Hans, K0HB
Grand Exalted Liberator of the Electric Smoke








 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access Lloyd Mitchell Antenna 43 October 26th 04 01:37 AM
Another D-H* NCVEC proposal Alun Policy 104 August 26th 04 12:12 PM
FCC Amateur Radio Enforcement Letters for the Period Ending May 1, 2004 private General 0 May 10th 04 09:39 PM
Why You Don't Like The ARRL Louis C. LeVine Policy 803 January 23rd 04 01:12 AM
There is no International Code Requirement and techs can operate HF according to FCC Rules JJ General 159 August 12th 03 12:25 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:59 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017