LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #15   Report Post  
Old January 1st 06, 10:42 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
an_old_friend
 
Posts: n/a
Default Another License Idea


wrote:
From:
on Sat, Dec 31 2005 3:29 pm


wrote:
From: on Dec 30, 5:56 pm
wrote:

cut

Ghettos. Reminds me of some European social engineering of the 30's.


Good grief, we CAN'T speak like that in here!

The "lower end" of "the bands" MUST be kept open for the
PRIVELEGED CLASS to beep in total comfort. So "it has always
been and so shall it always be..."


indeed the ARRL tried to pander to people Jim with code for extra class
proposal

cut

It did give us a bunch of Technicians (General incognito) who couldn't
do 13WPM.


As far as I'm concerned, the "NEED" to do morse code at any
rate was an arbitrary, unneccessary regulation back in the
60s. Ancient morsemen didn't think so and pressured the
government to keep that "vital" necessity (or whatever they
called it before Homeland Security needed morse for "the war
on terror). So the morse code test stayed in.


after the origial reason to know morse was stated as the need for the
govt to be able to warn Ham off their trnasmsittion but even that
"need" was bogus after if the Voice ham could hear the Morse signal and
could not understand it then he could just qsy somewhere else if he did
not hear the morse signal it not matter if he could understand it or
not

We could have done away with Morse Code tsts as early as the first AM
voice set, might have been a bit choatic at first, but it have been
done logicaly have done away when ever there was first voice
cut



 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access Lloyd Mitchell Antenna 43 October 26th 04 01:37 AM
Another D-H* NCVEC proposal Alun Policy 104 August 26th 04 12:12 PM
FCC Amateur Radio Enforcement Letters for the Period Ending May 1, 2004 private General 0 May 10th 04 09:39 PM
Why You Don't Like The ARRL Louis C. LeVine Policy 803 January 23rd 04 01:12 AM
There is no International Code Requirement and techs can operate HF according to FCC Rules JJ General 159 August 12th 03 12:25 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:14 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017