Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() KØHB wrote: wrote Deciding that the power level of 50 W is acceptable for Class B, but 100 W is not, is just a matter of judgement. It's the same kind of judgement as saying that 3500-3525 kHz is not allowed for all license classes. Not the same at all, Jim. There is a clear safety advantage to lower power for less experienced users, especially if you don't have a strenuous examination of safety issues. You are correct. As you have stated yourself, there is absolutely no fundamental difference between operating at 3524 vs 3526, obviating any rational regulatory reason for carving up the bands to provide private reservations for higher class licensees. Yep. Jim starts saying things that he wishes he hadn't when faced with one of your restructuring ideas. On the last one, he said that a Morse Code exam would be a barrier to Morse Code use. That statement could have been made by Carl, and it would have been false. It could have been made by Bill Sohl, and it would have been false. It could have been made by Len Anderson and it would have been false. But it was made by Jim, and it has always been true. 73, de Hans, K0HB bb |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access | Antenna | |||
Another D-H* NCVEC proposal | Policy | |||
FCC Amateur Radio Enforcement Letters for the Period Ending May 1, 2004 | General | |||
Why You Don't Like The ARRL | Policy | |||
There is no International Code Requirement and techs can operate HF according to FCC Rules | General |