On 2 Jan 2006 15:57:47 -0800, wrote:


an Old friend wrote:
wrote:
KØHB wrote:
wrote

Deciding that the power level of 50 W is acceptable for Class B, but
100 W is not, is just a matter of judgement. It's the same kind of
judgement as saying that 3500-3525 kHz is not allowed for all
license classes.

Not the same at all, Jim.

How is it any different? They're both a matter of judgement, not
some absolute scientific or engineering fact or limit.

There is a clear safety advantage to lower power for less experienced users,
especially if you don't have a strenuous examination of safety issues.

Agreed!

But setting the line at 50 W output is purely a matter of judgement. Is
a
50 W transmitter somehow "safe" at the proposed testing level, but not
a 100 W transmitter?

Consider that if the 50 W license were created, a considerable
number of new Class B hams would probably use 100-150 W rigs
and simply not run them at full power.

indeed the exactl elevel of course arbitary

As if you'd know, Markie. You can't even afford third hand equipment
from the bargin bin.

what you dreaming about little boy

I guess you don't count my new IC 910 H but that doesn't count

_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

wrote:
On 2 Jan 2006 15:57:47 -0800, wrote:


an Old friend wrote:
wrote:
KØHB wrote:
wrote

Deciding that the power level of 50 W is acceptable for Class B,but
100 W is not, is just a matter of judgement. It's the same kind of
judgement as saying that 3500-3525 kHz is not allowed for all
license classes.

Not the same at all, Jim.

How is it any different? They're both a matter of judgement, not
some absolute scientific or engineering fact or limit.

There is a clear safety advantage to lower power for less experienced users,
especially if you don't have a strenuous examination of safety issues.

Agreed!

But setting the line at 50 W output is purely a matter of judgement.Is
a
50 W transmitter somehow "safe" at the proposed testing level, but not
a 100 W transmitter?

Consider that if the 50 W license were created, a considerable
number of new Class B hams would probably use 100-150 W rigs
and simply not run them at full power.

indeed the exactl elevel of course arbitary

As if you'd know, Markie. You can't even afford third hand equipment
from the bargin bin.

You know what I always am dreaming about little boys

We know, Markie, we know.

I guess you don't count my new IC 910 H but that doesn't count

More Markie lies. You can't afford to pay your utility bills, much less
get a new radio.

On 2 Jan 2006 16:16:24 -0800, wrote:


wrote:
On 2 Jan 2006 15:57:47 -0800, wrote:


an Old friend wrote:
wrote:
KØHB wrote:
wrote

Deciding that the power level of 50 W is acceptable for Class B, but
100 W is not, is just a matter of judgement. It's the same kind of
judgement as saying that 3500-3525 kHz is not allowed for all
license classes.

Not the same at all, Jim.

How is it any different? They're both a matter of judgement, not
some absolute scientific or engineering fact or limit.

There is a clear safety advantage to lower power for less experienced users,
especially if you don't have a strenuous examination of safety issues.

Agreed!

But setting the line at 50 W output is purely a matter of judgement. Is
a
50 W transmitter somehow "safe" at the proposed testing level, but not
a 100 W transmitter?

Consider that if the 50 W license were created, a considerable
number of new Class B hams would probably use 100-150 W rigs
and simply not run them at full power.

indeed the exactl elevel of course arbitary

As if you'd know, Markie. You can't even afford third hand equipment
from the bargin bin.

You know what I always am dreaming about little boys

We know, Markie, we know.

you know you are lying and a forgery just like your bussy steve

"what you dreaming about little boy"

was the original

I guess you don't count my new IC 910 H but that doesn't count

More Markie lies. You can't afford to pay your utility bills, much less
get a new radio.

why do think I can pay my utilly bills? of course as I install more
solar cells and wind units I increasingly don't have a utility bil

what a matter stalker you can't them?

_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

On Mon, 02 Jan 2006 20:13:59 -0500, wrote:
On 2 Jan 2006 16:16:24 -0800, wrote:

More Markie lies. You can't afford to pay your utility bills, much less
get a new radio.

why do think I can pay my utilly bills? of course as I install more
solar cells and wind units I increasingly don't have a utility bil

But you have bills for the cells and the wind units and the maintain of
them and the install of them all of which can be lots more money than
paying for electric tricity. It is like them hibrid cars which cost so
much that it is cheaper to buy gas for a regular car. consumer report
say it so.

sometimes hugging trees isnt realy very smart. only dum peoples do it.

Tood, NOGL
_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

On 3 Jan 2006 09:58:37 +0800, (NOGL) wrote:


On Mon, 02 Jan 2006 20:13:59 -0500, wrote:
On 2 Jan 2006 16:16:24 -0800, wrote:

More Markie lies. You can't afford to pay your utility bills, much less
get a new radio.

why do think I can pay my utilly bills? of course as I install more
solar cells and wind units I increasingly don't have a utility bil

But you have bills for the cells and the wind units and the maintain of
them and the install of them all of which can be lots more money than
paying for electric tricity.

I don't haveto pay to have them instaled and and once I have paid for
a unit it is mine mainatnce on solar is cleaning them idoit, wind unit
require just a little more maintance but it isn't hard to DIY

more when now yes but we all know that power prices are only going up
It is like them hibrid cars which cost so
much that it is cheaper to buy gas for a regular car. consumer report
say it so.

yea they hybrids don't tlook that good, ecomonical, often the case
with first gen tech, but solar and wind systems in there 20 plus
generation of tech

sometimes hugging trees isnt realy very smart.

sometimes tree hugging isn't very samrt but the number do makes sense

solar wind unit pay a return on investment of from 10 to 20 %
only dum peoples do it.

Tood, NOGL
_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account