| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#22
January 3rd 06, 03:43 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
Another License Idea
KØHB wrote: wrote obviating any rational regulatory reason for carving up the bands to provide private reservations for higher class licensees. Instead, what you propose is keeping the "lower class" at a low power level, even though the power limit proposed is not backed by any real safety issue. The world tires of your transparent trolling, Jim, but I'll humor you. the wolrd does not hear Jim thank the gods My proposed low limit on power (we can niggle over how low is appropriate) is intended to protect the newcomer and his/her neighbors from the potentialsafety hazards of QRO RF. Your proposed graduated levels of "private frequency reserves" has no rational regulatory justification. It's pure 19th century-liberal social engineering. 73, de Hans, K0HB |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access | Antenna | |||
| Another D-H* NCVEC proposal | Policy | |||
| FCC Amateur Radio Enforcement Letters for the Period Ending May 1, 2004 | General | |||
| Why You Don't Like The ARRL | Policy | |||
| There is no International Code Requirement and techs can operate HF according to FCC Rules | General | |||
Threaded Mode
