| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#13
January 10th 06, 04:38 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
more **** of seve trying to hijack yet another thread into personal attack
On 10 Jan 2006 03:41:01 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
wrote: On 8 Jan 2006 05:49:23 GMT, (Jeffrey Herman) wrote: wrote: BTW as a abeleiver in motivation is all why is it that you only made CPO not some officer rank...(SNIP) Well, I'm #8 on this year's list for SCPO (E-8) but I'm considering submitted my package for Warrant Officer. Never could go full officer due to the age cutoff. in part is becuase in your eagerness to flame me you did not bother reading the exchange Jeff was the one claiming that motivation was everything It certainly is. Motivation will take you as far as you can possibly go, but it certainly can't overcome such barriers as age cutoffs. Motivation also can't create more openings for a particular position than already exist. If X motivated people are competing for Y openings of a position, and Y X, then some of those motivated folks won't win. Because they're motivated, those that lose will try again next time. that is what you said sir you said the only rason for deifferences in education level and other things was motivation changing you story, now you adknow that isn't Was that a sentence or a paragraph? yes Was there a meaning to it? yes This is proof that given a typewritter and opportunity, even a monkey can bang out a few "words". so my point is made you are not telling the truth Your point is that you did nothing of the sort. nope my point was and remains that Jeff was lying when he started this motivation thread Now, last I checked, there were no age barriers for advancing in amateur radio, nor were there any limitations on the number licensees in any particular class. So, those that are motivated will advance; those that aren't, won't. now you claim only age limits are valid Uhhhhhhh...Markie...?!?! He specifically said "...there are no age barriers for advancing in amateur radio..." so So WHY did you insist in the very next "sentence" you wrote that he said something different? I insisted no such thing? you lied there Steve when are you going to wake up and smel what you are shoveling Perhaps because all the shovelling is being done at your house, Markie. nope you lied again Jeff is the one talking **** here claiming theat motivation is the all there is as a factor then shoveling all the **** about i"t no no that isn't what I(jef) said" ..And Jeff doesn't impress me as being the kind to "go slumming" in his free time. well there you are wrong any time spent in RRAP is sluming I feel as if I'm teaching a first-grader common-sense facts. you may feel that way t what you are doing is lying And you're perpetuating your reputation as an idiot by making such assinine statements. nothing assine there another lie therefore your statement is more proper at proving that Jeff is not a memebr of the armed forces You apparently don't realize that the USCG is the only armed force outside of the DoD. you are assuming sir incorrectly as you were incorrect in your earlier stament that motivation is everything which you now back pedal to motvation is everything escept... More random words seeking organization and meaning.\ another lie nothing rnadom at all cuting the off topic rant What was "off topic" was your reply vis-a-vis Jeff's last comments. nothing of topic about my coments what was off topic was a elcture on the coast gaurd whcih was jeffs divertion (UNSNIP)...or for that matter why was your motivation only enough to be a lecurer, not a full professor or even dept head of Mathematics?? It's a long story, but suffice it to say that I used up my seven years in the PhD program (that's all that's alloted), so ended up with just the masters degree. Motivation can't overcome seven-year time limits meaning motiation isn't everthing and you lied when you said it was That's not what he said. it what what he said Had you acutally obtained the education YOU claim, Markie, you'd know that in most cases any classwork applied toward a doctorate level program has a window of application. Exceed the window and the old work is no longer applicable. indeed that is true whcih proves my point that Jeff lied when claimed motivation was the only difference cuasing people to have differenteeducational level. it isn't as he know say there are several other therefore He Motivation is all premise is a lie . That's all I'll say about that, for I know you're baiting me, and I know better than to bite. meaning you are not honest to deal with that fact you have put out a statement as tture with at best lots of holes More meaningless words. nope Indeed you have bitten enough Coming from you, Markie, I am sure that was meant to be a compliment. then you are a fool but we knew that your claim that Motivation is sole difference in educational levels you yourself have just admitted is not true No, he did not. yes he did but in materail long since snipped from the thread why not be a man and admit you mispoke Then he WOULD be lying. nope it would be telling the truth Still no 73 for you, ty I find the use the terms offisive I am sure you do...what ever "offisive" means... more mindless bashing you realy are unable to read Steve, K4YZ _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Really Hans, no call to be rude | General | |||
| Radio call letters: What do they mean? | Shortwave | |||
| FCC resumes issuing calls. | Policy | |||
| FCC Vanity Call Sign Dispute | Policy | |||
| OLD motorola trunking information | Scanner | |||
Threaded Mode
