an Old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
wrote:
On 10 Jan 2006 10:18:38 -0800, "cmdr buzz corey"

according a few lwayer friend of mine (we talking about this last
week)

Uh huh...Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iight.

right I lunch mostly on wedes with some freinds some of whom are
lawyers

Uh huh.

Right.

a signature which is the requirementof the law is what ever the user
wants

to illustrate in test

if I says "lsfgjlgaselfgsadjl" is my signature then it is

In your case, Markie, the courts will be satisfied with (and
probably would actually prefer) that you just make an "X".

meaning all you are doing is flaming me dispite the fact every word i
have posted is a true

No...What you stated was ludicrous. Not unexpected, but ludicrous
nonetheless.

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
an Old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
wrote:
On 10 Jan 2006 10:18:38 -0800, "cmdr buzz corey"

according a few lwayer friend of mine (we talking about this last
week)

Uh huh...Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iight.

right I lunch mostly on wedes with some freinds some of whom are
lawyers

Uh huh.

Right.

a signature which is the requirementof the law is what ever the user
wants

to illustrate in test

if I says "lsfgjlgaselfgsadjl" is my signature then it is

In your case, Markie, the courts will be satisfied with (and
probably would actually prefer) that you just make an "X".

meaning all you are doing is flaming me dispite the fact every word i
have posted is a true

No...What you stated was ludicrous. Not unexpected, but ludicrous
nonetheless.

you consider the turth ludicrous? well we already knew that

Steve, K4YZ