On 21 Jan 2006 00:46:49 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:


wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 17:14:28 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:

an old friend wrote:
you post a fraudulant apology and then you claim you did not post it
you don't get the truce that apology asked for

what you did is called theft by deception

It is ridiculous for you to assume that Steve made the post with an
offer of truce since he has never ever used such language in any post.

yhe has used worse language and uses simliar language often

Nope. Never.

yes often
_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

wrote:
On 21 Jan 2006 00:46:49 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 17:14:28 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:

an old friend wrote:
you post a fraudulant apology and then you claim you did not post it
you don't get the truce that apology asked for

what you did is called theft by deception

It is ridiculous for you to assume that Steve made the post with an
offer of truce since he has never ever used such language in any post.

yhe has used worse language and uses simliar language often

Nope. Never.

yes often

Nope.

Steve, K4YZ

On 22 Jan 2006 07:32:05 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:


wrote:
On 21 Jan 2006 00:46:49 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 17:14:28 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:

an old friend wrote:
you post a fraudulant apology and then you claim you did not post it
you don't get the truce that apology asked for

what you did is called theft by deception

It is ridiculous for you to assume that Steve made the post with an
offer of truce since he has never ever used such language in any post.

yhe has used worse language and uses simliar language often

Nope. Never.

yes often

Nope.

yep

Steve, K4YZ

_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account