Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Is it legal to drive through Burger King drive-thru with safetylights installed in/on your car???
On Dec 16, 9:51*am, "Frank Arthur" wrote:
You are the joke "radioguy" . The Burger King sign says "no videorecording or *photography allowed". It doesn't say yo cn't have a camera or camcorder. It says you cannot take photographs or video recording. What's your problem? Either don't go to Burger King r if you go follow their rules. Having safety lights that transmit pictures is photography, as far as Burger King is concerned. I already had a BK manager tell me to get rid of my "camera" that I was NOT taking any pictures with inside since "cameras aren't allowed and are illegal inside here". The reason I didn't take any pictures wth that "camera" was because it was NOT a "camera", but WAS a radio and tv set. Lots of people take their radios into Burger King and listen to them with headphones out. The idiot manager thought that my radio was a camera. And he wasn't a young kid either. he was a middle aged man. I don't go there much anymore anyways, but it does have serious legal implications. Suppose I'm on the public street and happen to get in a car accident that's not my fault, but is completely the othe guy's fault and his car makes mine end up in Burger King's parking lot. I can now be charged with illegallyy violating Burger Kings rules "no photograpgy allowed". Even though I never intended to be at Burger King. Since "evidence obtained illegally" is not permitted to be used as evidence in court, I would then now be unable to use the pictures from the safety lights that would prove the accident was not my fault while I'm n court. While I would be able to legally use thiose same safety light pictures as evidence in court as long as my car happened to spin and land somewhere off of Burger King property. But if my car spins and happens to land on Burger King property, that same legal evidence is now illegal evidence. Also, some Burger Kings also have the "no videorecording or photography allowed" signs posted on their drive through windows where you pick up your food. If that rule was just meant for the inside of the building, why is it posted where the drive through customers see it? And if it's meant to address just the employees, why is it positioned so that the drive throughcustomers see it? It seems the only reason to have it there is if the rule was meant for the whole premises, both inside and outside the building. Also futher legal implications: I don't know why BK has that rule, but if it's because you don't want your employees photographed, get this: A car with safety lights installed does NOT even have to be on BK at all to photograph your employees. A car with safety lights installed can be completely on the city-owned public streets and as long as your employees are in sight of whatever the safety lights see, the safety lights WILL transmit live motion pictures of your employees. And other people can then videorecord your employess from their own home by recording those safety ligt transmissions. Once a viideorecording is made, it's a simple matter to make stills from that video or even simpler, instead of bothering to make stills, just put up the video as you recorded in, in full glorious full motion video. Since no one wa on BK property, and the videos of BK employees was not inteninall made by the person with the safety lights, and thepeople at home recording were just recording tv signl they just happen to recieve, and they were not recording any transmissions from BK cameras but were recording transmissions from the safety light cameras, and BK has no authority over the person with the safety light cameras since they were never on BK property. What can and can't be installe on cars is the business of whoever in the state controls vehicle laws, NOT the business of Burger King. And I very much doubt that any city,county, or state would even consider, let alone passing a law that makes it against the law to have SAFETY LIGHTS that protects kids more installe on your vehicle. And if some city, county, or state government was stupid enough to actually pass a law making it against the law to have SAFETY LIGHTS that protect kids moe installed on your vehicle, I think that city, county, or state would find theirselves in a unch of political hot water, a bunch of legal hot water, and involved in a bunch of court cases. As far as I can see, I have not found aanything in my local city, county, or state laws yet that state having SAFETY LIGHTS installed on your car is against the law. If they were, then why are the legal national chain stores allowed to kegally sell them? Along with other stores that are not national chain stores. I'm not sure if the safety lights also transmit sound besides just pictures or not, so maybe people watching the safety light transmissions at home might even be able to hear what your employees are saying in addition to seeing them, while scanner listerners would be able to hear them in such a case. And all the while with both the car and safety lights never ever ever bein on Burger King property at all. So take that, Burger King. hahahahahahahahahaha. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
MD-75 Motor Drive | Antenna | |||
Christmas Drive for DAB | Broadcasting | |||
FS: SYQUEST 1.0 GHZ DRIVE. | Swap | |||
Valiant "Drive Pot" | Boatanchors | |||
Valiant "Drive Pot" | Boatanchors |