Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#30
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 18 Aug 2003 20:18:26 GMT, Never anonymous Bud
wrote: Separating himself from Baghdad Bob, Trs1 whined: It is not illegal to communicate for emergency reasons. That's NOT the FCC says. Actually, it is what they say. I believe it is even a question on the test for the Tech. Class license but I really don't feel like reading the entire question pool right now. Actually..here it is from an ARRL publication NOW YOU'RE TALKING used to study for the exam. After a paragraph recognizing that some radios can transmit out of band and warning of false or deceptive signals it says: "If you should require immediate emergency help, and you're using a voice mode, call MAYDAY. Use whatever frequency offers the best chance of getting a useful answer" "In a life or property-threatening emergency, you may send a distress call on any frequency, even outside the amateur bands, if you think doing so will bring help faster." "If you receive a distress signal, you are also allowed to transmit on any frequency to provide assistance." This is all under subelement T1E KB9WFK "You are behaving like a troll, disguising your attacks as reasonable discussion." 'Alan Connor' |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Low Power Communication Book | Antenna | |||
Big Blackout of 2003 free-form radio | Broadcasting | |||
Blackout and DX | Broadcasting | |||
WFAN running the "Best of Imus" during a blackout? | Broadcasting | |||
For Sale: Alinco DJ-X3 Wide-band Communication Receiver | Scanner |