dxAce schrieb:


Volker Tonn wrote:


dx'tard wrote:


Use the very best 50 ohm coax you can afford.

bull****...


Well, in your previous post you stated that "You will hardly notice any loss..."

That implies that one WILL notice...

Loser! You should quote correctly -not destroying the content- 'tard.
A 50 ohm AirComm-plus cable costs three times as much as a lowloss 75
ohm TV-cable with the same loss.
And it gives pretty much the same results -if not better- on a broadband
antenna like a discone on consumer grade VHF/UHF-receivers wich do not
have a straight 50-ohm impedance. In most cases it varies between 30 and
150 ohms depending on the frequency you are receiving. So there is a
good chance a 75 ohm cable works even better than a 50 ohm cable with
the same loss. In worst case you will have an impedance mismatch loss of
3dB, but in most cases you will have a 3dB win depending on the scanner
you are using and frequency you are receiving.
There are few scannists who would buy or can afford a 0,70 US$/ft cable
for a 100ft run. So a good (lowloss!) TV-cable is really worth a try.

Volker Tonn wrote:

dxAce schrieb:


Volker Tonn wrote:


dx'tard wrote:


Use the very best 50 ohm coax you can afford.

bull****...


Well, in your previous post you stated that "You will hardly notice any loss..."

That implies that one WILL notice...

Loser! You should quote correctly -not destroying the content- 'tard.
A 50 ohm AirComm-plus cable costs three times as much as a lowloss 75
ohm TV-cable with the same loss.
And it gives pretty much the same results -if not better- on a broadband
antenna like a discone on consumer grade VHF/UHF-receivers wich do not
have a straight 50-ohm impedance. In most cases it varies between 30 and
150 ohms depending on the frequency you are receiving. So there is a
good chance a 75 ohm cable works even better than a 50 ohm cable with
the same loss. In worst case you will have an impedance mismatch loss of
3dB, but in most cases you will have a 3dB win depending on the scanner
you are using and frequency you are receiving.
There are few scannists who would buy or can afford a 0,70 US$/ft cable
for a 100ft run. So a good (lowloss!) TV-cable is really worth a try.

Shove it, NAZI boy!

dxAce
Michigan
USA

On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 18:38:37 -0400, dxAce wrote:



Volker Tonn wrote:

dxAce schrieb:


Volker Tonn wrote:


dx'tard wrote:


Use the very best 50 ohm coax you can afford.

bull****...


Well, in your previous post you stated that "You will hardly notice any loss..."

That implies that one WILL notice...

Loser! You should quote correctly -not destroying the content- 'tard.

[snip]


Shove it, NAZI boy!


Well *this* sure went downhill fast.

asym schrieb:



Well *this* sure went downhill fast.

It's allwas the same when dx'tard runs out of arguements...

Volker Tonn wrote:

asym schrieb:


Well *this* sure went downhill fast.

It's allwas the same when dx'tard runs out of arguements...

Volker Tonn wrote:

asym schrieb:


Well *this* sure went downhill fast.

It's allwas the same when dx'tard runs out of arguements...

What the heck makes you think I ran out of arguments?

dxAce
Michigan
USA

http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm

dx'tard wrote:


What the heck makes you think I ran out of arguments?

You just proved it.
Learn something about Edwin's law...

Volker Tonn wrote:

dx'tard wrote:


What the heck makes you think I ran out of arguments?

You just proved it.
Learn something about Edwin's law...

You need to re-learn Eisenhower's law.

How many years has it been since you've had your ass kicked?

Don't make Curtis come pay you a visit.

On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 23:59:16 +0200, Volker Tonn
said in rec.radio.scanner:


dx'tard wrote:


What the heck makes you think I ran out of arguments?

You just proved it.
Learn something about Edwin's law...

I think you meant Godwin's Law, but that's the first thing I thought
of too.

dx'tard wrote:


Shove it, NAZI boy!



You're a LOSER, 'tard.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
DEFINATELY!
^^^^^^^^^^^^