Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#28
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
PaPaPeng wrote:
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 16:28:57 -0500, Larry Edwards wrote: Scott Peterson Guilty! Are we safe now? This case as to the murder of a beautiful woman with a fetus by her husband upset me from the beginning. I avoided reading or hearing broadcasts. My question here is why were the two jurors dismissed? Were they splitting hairs on how absolute the evidence must be as is reflected in this thread? One was seen in conversation with one of Peterson's relatives (something like that, anyway). The second was doing individual study on SOMETHING -- you're only supposed to consider evidence that was presented in court, not play detective. Not known why the foreman was dismissed, the judge won't reveal that until after sentencing. -- Cheers, Bev ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "The way England treats her prisoners, she doesn't deserve to have any." --Oscar Wilde |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Gene Scott, satellites and MW | Dx | |||
Gene Scott, satellites and MW | Dx | |||
EH Scott 'morale' receiver | Boatanchors | |||
Leland Scott Is Innocent | CB | |||
Congratulations Scott | CB |