Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
ShawnD2112 wrote:
I've never understood why top posting is seen as such an evil thing. What am I missing? Two reasons: One, as a thread progresses, a mix of top and bottom posting becomes confusing when someone wants to look back through the quoted material. Since most posters to newsgroups bottom post, that is the de facto standard method. Email users typically top post, so that becomes the standard for email. Two, top posters often quote the entire text below their reply without editing it. That makes the replies longer than they need to be. You often see a one line "me too" post, followed by several hundred lines of quote. Bottom posters seem to be more into the habit of quoting only what is necessary to retain continuity, so it keeps the length of the posts under control. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Can't speak for anybody else, but I top post so that those that have already
read the previous messages can easily see my response, it's right there at the top. For those that need to be brought up to speed, (generally a minority), they can scroll down to read the previous messages, which are included intact (usually) so they can see everything in each message in it's proper context. What amazes me is how bent out of shape some people get over top-posting. It's a matter of preference, what you like vs. what I like. Just like the people who can't/won't use proper, grammatically correct English (I'm speaking of those with English as their native language here), including proper capitalization and punctuation. It annoys me to read these posts, but I'm not going to make a big flaming war out of it. I don't insist on perfection from others, as I'm not perfect myself. Nor do I expect others to conform to my personal standards. It just isn't that big a deal. M "James Robinson" wrote in message ... ShawnD2112 wrote: I've never understood why top posting is seen as such an evil thing. What am I missing? Two reasons: One, as a thread progresses, a mix of top and bottom posting becomes confusing when someone wants to look back through the quoted material. Since most posters to newsgroups bottom post, that is the de facto standard method. Email users typically top post, so that becomes the standard for email. Two, top posters often quote the entire text below their reply without editing it. That makes the replies longer than they need to be. You often see a one line "me too" post, followed by several hundred lines of quote. Bottom posters seem to be more into the habit of quoting only what is necessary to retain continuity, so it keeps the length of the posts under control. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
I just killfile them.
Now, tell me, what was the above comment saying what would cause me to kill file them? Because someone top posts? Because people won't use proper English? Or is it the lack of punctuation some people use? Top posting, as you see, does not do well at making it clear what the comment the poster is answering. Also, if you have many folks that are killfiled involved in the conversation, or your response is more than a day or so old, it is sometime very tricky figuring out who you are responding to. There is also the fact that 90% plus do not top post. Is the rest of the world wrong? -- Jim in NC "M.S." wrote in message news Can't speak for anybody else, but I top post so that those that have already read the previous messages can easily see my response, it's right there at the top. For those that need to be brought up to speed, (generally a minority), they can scroll down to read the previous messages, which are included intact (usually) so they can see everything in each message in it's proper context. What amazes me is how bent out of shape some people get over top-posting. It's a matter of preference, what you like vs. what I like. Just like the people who can't/won't use proper, grammatically correct English (I'm speaking of those with English as their native language here), including proper capitalization and punctuation. It annoys me to read these posts, but I'm not going to make a big flaming war out of it. I don't insist on perfection from others, as I'm not perfect myself. Nor do I expect others to conform to my personal standards. It just isn't that big a deal. M "James Robinson" wrote in message ... ShawnD2112 wrote: I've never understood why top posting is seen as such an evil thing. What am I missing? Two reasons: One, as a thread progresses, a mix of top and bottom posting becomes confusing when someone wants to look back through the quoted material. Since most posters to newsgroups bottom post, that is the de facto standard method. Email users typically top post, so that becomes the standard for email. Two, top posters often quote the entire text below their reply without editing it. That makes the replies longer than they need to be. You often see a one line "me too" post, followed by several hundred lines of quote. Bottom posters seem to be more into the habit of quoting only what is necessary to retain continuity, so it keeps the length of the posts under control. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.797 / Virus Database: 541 - Release Date: 11/15/2004 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 01:35:45 -0600, "M.S." wrote:
Can't speak for anybody else, but I top post so that those that have already read the previous messages can easily see my response, it's right there at the top. For those that need to be brought up to speed, (generally a minority), they can scroll down to read the previous messages, which are included intact (usually) so they can see everything in each message in it's proper context. What amazes me is how bent out of shape some people get over top-posting. It's a matter of preference, what you like vs. what I like. Just like the people who can't/won't use proper, grammatically correct English (I'm speaking of those with English as their native language here), including proper capitalization and punctuation. It annoys me to read these posts, but I'm not going to make a big flaming war out of it. I don't insist on perfection from others, as I'm not perfect myself. Nor do I expect others to conform to my personal standards. It just isn't that big a deal. Four more postings like yours and this thread will die off from lack of acrimony. :-) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 12:18:12 GMT, James Robinson
wrote: ShawnD2112 wrote: I've never understood why top posting is seen as such an evil thing. What am I missing? Two reasons: smip Two, top posters often quote the entire text below their reply without editing it. That makes the replies longer than they need to be. You often see a one line "me too" post, followed by several hundred lines of quote. Bottom posters seem to be more into the habit of quoting only what is necessary to retain continuity, so it keeps the length of the posts under control. Dreamer. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
'keyclowns' prevail | CB | |||
Pilot Travel Centers Fined $125,000! | CB | |||
'keyclowns' prevail! | Policy | |||
Montgomery Wards Model: Airline 62-2500 | Boatanchors | |||
Montgomery Wards Model: Airline 62-2500 | Equipment |