Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
T-bone wrote:
wrote in news:1105980741.679905.177450 @c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com: [clipped] So yes, people advertsing their scanners as UNBLOCKED !!!!! are really saying very little in practice - The only good reason to pay a premium to get one would be to bank on the possibility that some other service of interest will eventually move into this frequency region. That's not entirely true. Take Icom, and Yaesu, for example. When they block out the cellular portion fo the spectrum, they block out additional bandwidth below, and above the frequencies that the FCC requires them to omit. So you may not be able to monitor perfectly legal trunked systems, because they fall into this blocked-overlap, so to speak. In addition to that , many radios have to block portions of the spectrum that are in an entirely different band, due to the possibility of receiving cellular images. So you end up with a very crippled radio! Bill Crocker |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
John Boehner's cellular conversation was intercepted by Alice and John Martin. | Scanner | |||
FS: ICOM IC-R3 with CELLULAR | Scanner | |||
Cellular through glass mounting | Antenna | |||
inmarsat receiving | Scanner | |||
Technical question for receiving TV signals by a loop Antenna | Antenna |