| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
As another police airwave user I have to say it is an utterly ****e system.
Officer safety IS being compromised. Airwave drops out completely on a regular basis in the control rooms, the 'hang time' to transmit is as long as EIGHT seconds sometimes - utterly useless during a pursuit or something. The BUSY message is almost permantently on and it is just NOT designed for busy areas on a Fri/Sat night with lots of officers using it. Do they expect us to f**ing run down the street texting on the damn thing to get updates? The sooner the Federation and Unison or whoever the lazy arse reps are, get together and thrash it out with the Chief Constables - the sooner officers can start seeing improvements and have confidence in the system. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sun, 24 Apr 2005 19:07:56 +0000, chas wrote:
As another police airwave user I have to say it is an utterly ****e system. Officer safety IS being compromised. Airwave drops out completely on a regular basis in the control rooms, the 'hang time' to transmit is as long as EIGHT seconds sometimes - utterly useless during a pursuit or something. The BUSY message is almost permantently on and it is just NOT designed for busy areas on a Fri/Sat night with lots of officers using it. Do they expect us to f**ing run down the street texting on the damn thing to get updates? I'm not being rude, but I find difficult to believe that people are seriously considering using texting as a communications system. It's all right if you want to send HOW U DUDE but it's not really useful beyond that. IMO in the mobile world it's more of an expensive gimmick than anything else. Are you Cops just being given cheap modified mobile phones ? |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Paul Robson wrote:
Are you Cops just being given cheap modified mobile phones ? Sounds like the lower end Motorola Tetra handhelds, really more a phone than a real, tough radio ![]() regards - Ralph -- Want to get in touch? http://www.radio-link.net/whereisralph.txt |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Paul Robson wrote: On Sun, 24 Apr 2005 19:07:56 +0000, chas wrote: snip Are you Cops just being given cheap modified mobile phones ? See for yourself: http://www.nokia.com/nokia/0,,62313,00.html Adam. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
chas wrote: As another police airwave user I have to say it is an utterly ****e system. Officer safety IS being compromised. Airwave drops out completely on a regular basis in the control rooms, the 'hang time' to transmit is as long as EIGHT seconds sometimes - utterly useless during a pursuit or something. The BUSY message is almost permantently on and it is just NOT designed for busy areas on a Fri/Sat night with lots of officers using it. Chas thanks for bringing that up, I knew I had forgotten something. The hang time for us can, as you say, creep up towards the 10 second area on busy nights. This is not simply waiting for someone else to get off the air, but purely the time it takes for the system to stop faffing around and give you permission to speak. Of course, whilst waiting for this 'hang' to clear, if comms speak you start the whole damn process all over again. I have actually given up trying to pass a relatively urgent update before now and typed it out on the MDT instead. Do they expect us to f**ing run down the street texting on the damn thing to get updates? I can't get my head around the texting process sitting down let alone running after someone and trying to do it! The process is just too complicated... and I'm no luddite.. I easily get through 300 text messages a month on my private mobile. The sooner the Federation and Unison or whoever the lazy arse reps are, get together and thrash it out with the Chief Constables - the sooner officers can start seeing improvements and have confidence in the system. Call me a cynic but I cannot see the Federation or Unison or whoever actually making any difference. Forces have committed so much time and money on the project that it will be an admission that they cocked up to back down now. It's a similar story with SAP.. if your force uses that poor excuse for a system for time management then you know what I mean... Adam. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
SAP?
Don't get me started on f***** SAP. Airwave is Son of SAP! And just as ****e! And Airwave is integrated with our SAP. Meanwhile - despite having SAP for nearly THREE years - we are still keeping paper records and only people retiring or resigning have their quota pots made correct. But back to Airwave - or ****ewave as it is known (amongst other more affectionate terms) our handsets do not have the GPS built into them. Just as well really. From what I understand it makes the sets even bigger and more cumbersome. Just what you need when trying to press the red button in the midst of a chavvy brawl. chas |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Whenever I have been in town and an officer has been using an airwave radio
he/she always appears to be struggling to hear what is being said. With the old analogue motorolas they always were belting out the audio so everyone could hear. Is this another fault of airwave? BTW Sepura radios are what they are using round here. Melv "Concerned Officer" wrote in message oups.com... chas wrote: As another police airwave user I have to say it is an utterly ****e system. Officer safety IS being compromised. Airwave drops out completely on a regular basis in the control rooms, the 'hang time' to transmit is as long as EIGHT seconds sometimes - utterly useless during a pursuit or something. The BUSY message is almost permantently on and it is just NOT designed for busy areas on a Fri/Sat night with lots of officers using it. Chas thanks for bringing that up, I knew I had forgotten something. The hang time for us can, as you say, creep up towards the 10 second area on busy nights. This is not simply waiting for someone else to get off the air, but purely the time it takes for the system to stop faffing around and give you permission to speak. Of course, whilst waiting for this 'hang' to clear, if comms speak you start the whole damn process all over again. I have actually given up trying to pass a relatively urgent update before now and typed it out on the MDT instead. Do they expect us to f**ing run down the street texting on the damn thing to get updates? I can't get my head around the texting process sitting down let alone running after someone and trying to do it! The process is just too complicated... and I'm no luddite.. I easily get through 300 text messages a month on my private mobile. The sooner the Federation and Unison or whoever the lazy arse reps are, get together and thrash it out with the Chief Constables - the sooner officers can start seeing improvements and have confidence in the system. Call me a cynic but I cannot see the Federation or Unison or whoever actually making any difference. Forces have committed so much time and money on the project that it will be an admission that they cocked up to back down now. It's a similar story with SAP.. if your force uses that poor excuse for a system for time management then you know what I mean... Adam. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Melv wrote: Whenever I have been in town and an officer has been using an airwave radio he/she always appears to be struggling to hear what is being said. With the old analogue motorolas they always were belting out the audio so everyone could hear. I have no experience with the Sepura you mention, but certainly the Nokia's are awful when it comes to clarity. That's clarity from the radio itself, rather than blaming poor signal/too much contention on the talkgroup/aerial site. The Nokia's have volume which goes from 0 (speakers off) to 10 (blown speaker). However the trouble is if the volume is set to 4, you can't hear it with even minor background noise, and if set to 5 or above which is ideally where it needs to be, then it is so distorted you can't make out what is being said anyway. The speaker size when compared to the old Motorola bricks (and no doubt the quality thereof), is **** poor. Nokia make good mobiles. That is what they should stick to; Their radios are crap. Headsets have been distributed to us, but they are *worse* than the ones you get free with your average Nokia cellphone. One knock and the microphone becomes disloged inside the casing and the end result when transmitting is it sounds like you have your head up your arse. A far better device would be an attachable parrot just like in the old days! Better quality speaker, better quality microphone, nice big PTT button and still the option of an in-ear piece. A. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| I'm Cutting Back (OT) | Shortwave | |||
| not cutting excess wire beyond antenna | Antenna | |||
| Cutting your own | General | |||
| Cutting your own | General | |||