Pete Boyd wrote:
I'm thinking of getting a new handheld scanner, mainly for listening to
shortwave stations, the amateur radio bands, CB and airband. The above two
receivers seem appropriate (and about the same prince in the UK - £140).
I don't really understand the specs as to which is most sensitive. Anything
else I should be looking for?

Any other suggestions for other makes appreciated.

For shortwave, amateur HF and CB, handheld scanners are sub-optimal
performers. There are some nicely capable portable units, although not
in the walkie-talkie form factor, such as the Sangean 909, which are
*much* better performers in those bands.

--
St. John
One of the lessons of history is that nothing is often a good thing to
do and always a clever thing to say.
-Will Durant

"St. John Smythe" wrote in message
...
Pete Boyd wrote:
I'm thinking of getting a new handheld scanner, mainly for listening to
shortwave stations, the amateur radio bands, CB and airband. The above
two
receivers seem appropriate (and about the same prince in the UK - £140).
I don't really understand the specs as to which is most sensitive.
Anything
else I should be looking for?

Any other suggestions for other makes appreciated.

For shortwave, amateur HF and CB, handheld scanners are sub-optimal
performers. There are some nicely capable portable units, although not
in the walkie-talkie form factor, such as the Sangean 909, which are
*much* better performers in those bands.


THanks for your msg.
How are they when connected to a different antenna eg when I'm at home?

Pete

Pete Boyd wrote:

How are they when connected to a different antenna eg when I'm at home?

Which "they?"

--
St. John

"St. John Smythe" wrote in message
...
Pete Boyd wrote:

How are they when connected to a different antenna eg when I'm at home?

Which "they?"


The Icom or Yaesu.

Pete Boyd wrote:
"St. John Smythe" wrote in message

Which "they?"

The Icom or Yaesu.

Starting with the understanding that radio receivers represent
compromises between sensitivity, and selectivity and front end
overloading, the problem with the little receivers is that by the time
you get enough antenna on them to provide good signals, you may also
have overloaded them with either in-band or out-of-band signals.

As someone who appreciates compact things, it pains me to say this, but
scanners are best at scanning, and shortwave receivers are best at
shortwave. I use a BC246T for portable scanning, and a Sangean ATS-909
for portable shortwave. I would have much preferred to have a single
unit that did it all, but as far as I know, such a thing (good enough
filters, BFO at the right place in the passband, trunking) doesn't yet
exist.

--
St. John
Flugg's Law:
When you need to knock on wood is when you realize the
world is composed of vinyl, naugahyde and aluminum.

"St. John Smythe" wrote in message

For shortwave, amateur HF and CB, handheld scanners are sub-optimal
performers. There are some nicely capable portable units, although not
in the walkie-talkie form factor, such as the Sangean 909, which are
*much* better performers in those bands.


I certainly agree !

H.J. ( proud owner of a DX-398 )