Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21   Report Post  
Old October 6th 06, 06:53 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,324
Default Wellbrook ALA1530+ Vs. ALA100?


John Plimmer wrote:
It's just bliss
to have that phenomena that Guy describes: when the noise on the antenna's
is so low you start checking to see if in fact they are connected. It is
such a joy to hear stations thousand's of miles away waft in over the
airwaves as clear as a bell, yet the signal strength is so low it doesn't
even move your "S" meter. What a thrill!


It's a pity these sorts of locations are so few and far between. In
most locations, atmospheric noise is significant *all by itself*.

  #22   Report Post  
Old October 31st 06, 06:12 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
Rob Rob is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Oct 2006
Posts: 13
Default Wellbrook Shielded?

I think it was Seein-I-Dawg who commented about the Wellbrook ALA-1530
being shielded....

As far as I can tell, having looked at their site several times,
Wellbrook makes no such claims and points to the loop configuration as
the reason why it rejects some near field RFI. This is also born out
by the fact that they also sell an Indoor version of the antenna which
is packaged in a sort of plastic hula hoop, rather than in Aluminum
tubing. Wellbrook does make a very nice preamp and I suspect that the
ALA-100 WILL outperform the ALA-1530 and the ALA-330s with 50 feet of
wire on it. (I currently have an ALA-1530 and hope to have an ALA-100
shortly so I'll let you know.)

Rob


Steve wrote:
John Plimmer wrote:
It's just bliss
to have that phenomena that Guy describes: when the noise on the antenna's
is so low you start checking to see if in fact they are connected. It is
such a joy to hear stations thousand's of miles away waft in over the
airwaves as clear as a bell, yet the signal strength is so low it doesn't
even move your "S" meter. What a thrill!


It's a pity these sorts of locations are so few and far between. In
most locations, atmospheric noise is significant *all by itself*.


  #23   Report Post  
Old November 1st 06, 03:12 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 317
Default Wellbrook Shielded?


Rob wrote:
I think it was Seein-I-Dawg who commented about the Wellbrook ALA-1530
being shielded....

As far as I can tell, having looked at their site several times,
Wellbrook makes no such claims and points to the loop configuration as
the reason why it rejects some near field RFI. This is also born out
by the fact that they also sell an Indoor version of the antenna which
is packaged in a sort of plastic hula hoop, rather than in Aluminum
tubing. Wellbrook does make a very nice preamp and I suspect that the
ALA-100 WILL outperform the ALA-1530 and the ALA-330s with 50 feet of
wire on it. (I currently have an ALA-1530 and hope to have an ALA-100
shortly so I'll let you know.)

Rob


Steve wrote:
John Plimmer wrote:
It's just bliss
to have that phenomena that Guy describes: when the noise on the antenna's
is so low you start checking to see if in fact they are connected. It is
such a joy to hear stations thousand's of miles away waft in over the
airwaves as clear as a bell, yet the signal strength is so low it doesn't
even move your "S" meter. What a thrill!


It's a pity these sorts of locations are so few and far between. In
most locations, atmospheric noise is significant *all by itself*.


The Wellbrook loops are not shielded. The exposed metal is the loop.

The 1530+ high bandwidth version looks ineresting. You could justify
the cost if you use it for FM broadcast. Otherwise, get the ALA 100 and
roll your own loop.

  #24   Report Post  
Old November 1st 06, 04:02 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
Rob Rob is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Oct 2006
Posts: 13
Default Wellbrook Shielded?

Well, judging from my ALA1530, which I have partially disassembled,
there is wire running inside the Aluminum so the aluminum is not the
loop. The indoor version doesn't have any aluminum on it either as far
as I can tell, just a plastic outer covering.

Rob


wrote:
The Wellbrook loops are not shielded. The exposed metal is the loop.

The 1530+ high bandwidth version looks ineresting. You could justify
the cost if you use it for FM broadcast. Otherwise, get the ALA 100 and
roll your own loop.


  #25   Report Post  
Old November 1st 06, 04:08 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,494
Default Wellbrook Shielded?

In article . com,
"Rob" wrote:

Steve wrote:
John Plimmer wrote:
It's just bliss to have that phenomena that Guy describes: when
the noise on the antenna's is so low you start checking to see if
in fact they are connected. It is such a joy to hear stations
thousand's of miles away waft in over the airwaves as clear as a
bell, yet the signal strength is so low it doesn't even move your
"S" meter. What a thrill!


It's a pity these sorts of locations are so few and far between. In
most locations, atmospheric noise is significant *all by itself*.


I think it was Seein-I-Dawg who commented about the Wellbrook ALA-1530
being shielded....


That was a mistake. That Troll usually posts off topic political crap.

As far as I can tell, having looked at their site several times,
Wellbrook makes no such claims and points to the loop configuration
as the reason why it rejects some near field RFI.


The loop configuration is a reason that the antenna design will be
helpful in reducing local interference.

This is also born out by the fact that they also sell an Indoor
version of the antenna which is packaged in a sort of plastic hula
hoop, rather than in Aluminum tubing.


You and I both do not know what is inside the plastic tubing. It might
be shielded or it may not.

Wellbrook does make a very nice preamp and I suspect that the ALA-100
WILL outperform the ALA-1530 and the ALA-330s with 50 feet of wire on
it. (I currently have an ALA-1530 and hope to have an ALA-100
shortly so I'll let you know.)


Externally the antenna design is good way to go but it would depend on
how it was executed.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California


  #26   Report Post  
Old November 2nd 06, 03:56 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Oct 2006
Posts: 7
Default Wellbrook Shielded?


"Telamon" wrote

As far as I can tell, having looked at their site several times,
Wellbrook makes no such claims and points to the loop configuration
as the reason why it rejects some near field RFI.


The loop configuration is a reason that the antenna design will be
helpful in reducing local interference.


Why don't you explain the theory, Mr. Einstein.



  #27   Report Post  
Old November 22nd 06, 04:38 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
Rob Rob is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Oct 2006
Posts: 13
Default Wellbrook Shielded? Nope!

Actually,

I do know what is inside the plastic loop. If you search on Wellbrook
and look at some of the past topics about it, there is one where
someone was asking the shortwave shop (their distributor) about the
indoor plastic loop, and the guy from the shortwave shop replied that
it was flexible and just had wire inside of it, so it could be squished
through narrow openings to the attic, I assume.

Rob


Telamon wrote:
In article . com,
"Rob" wrote:

Steve wrote:
John Plimmer wrote:
It's just bliss to have that phenomena that Guy describes: when
the noise on the antenna's is so low you start checking to see if
in fact they are connected. It is such a joy to hear stations
thousand's of miles away waft in over the airwaves as clear as a
bell, yet the signal strength is so low it doesn't even move your
"S" meter. What a thrill!


It's a pity these sorts of locations are so few and far between. In
most locations, atmospheric noise is significant *all by itself*.


I think it was Seein-I-Dawg who commented about the Wellbrook ALA-1530
being shielded....


That was a mistake. That Troll usually posts off topic political crap.

As far as I can tell, having looked at their site several times,
Wellbrook makes no such claims and points to the loop configuration
as the reason why it rejects some near field RFI.


The loop configuration is a reason that the antenna design will be
helpful in reducing local interference.

This is also born out by the fact that they also sell an Indoor
version of the antenna which is packaged in a sort of plastic hula
hoop, rather than in Aluminum tubing.


You and I both do not know what is inside the plastic tubing. It might
be shielded or it may not.

Wellbrook does make a very nice preamp and I suspect that the ALA-100
WILL outperform the ALA-1530 and the ALA-330s with 50 feet of wire on
it. (I currently have an ALA-1530 and hope to have an ALA-100
shortly so I'll let you know.)


Externally the antenna design is good way to go but it would depend on
how it was executed.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California


  #28   Report Post  
Old November 22nd 06, 09:09 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 317
Default Wellbrook Shielded? Nope!


Rob wrote:
Actually,

I do know what is inside the plastic loop. If you search on Wellbrook
and look at some of the past topics about it, there is one where
someone was asking the shortwave shop (their distributor) about the
indoor plastic loop, and the guy from the shortwave shop replied that
it was flexible and just had wire inside of it, so it could be squished
through narrow openings to the attic, I assume.

Rob


This question keeps popping up on this newsgroup. Wellbrooks are not
shielded.

I still like the ALA100 because you can roll your own antenna.



Telamon wrote:
In article . com,
"Rob" wrote:

Steve wrote:
John Plimmer wrote:
It's just bliss to have that phenomena that Guy describes: when
the noise on the antenna's is so low you start checking to see if
in fact they are connected. It is such a joy to hear stations
thousand's of miles away waft in over the airwaves as clear as a
bell, yet the signal strength is so low it doesn't even move your
"S" meter. What a thrill!


It's a pity these sorts of locations are so few and far between. In
most locations, atmospheric noise is significant *all by itself*.


I think it was Seein-I-Dawg who commented about the Wellbrook ALA-1530
being shielded....


That was a mistake. That Troll usually posts off topic political crap.

As far as I can tell, having looked at their site several times,
Wellbrook makes no such claims and points to the loop configuration
as the reason why it rejects some near field RFI.


The loop configuration is a reason that the antenna design will be
helpful in reducing local interference.

This is also born out by the fact that they also sell an Indoor
version of the antenna which is packaged in a sort of plastic hula
hoop, rather than in Aluminum tubing.


You and I both do not know what is inside the plastic tubing. It might
be shielded or it may not.

Wellbrook does make a very nice preamp and I suspect that the ALA-100
WILL outperform the ALA-1530 and the ALA-330s with 50 feet of wire on
it. (I currently have an ALA-1530 and hope to have an ALA-100
shortly so I'll let you know.)


Externally the antenna design is good way to go but it would depend on
how it was executed.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California


  #29   Report Post  
Old November 22nd 06, 05:31 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Nov 2006
Posts: 5
Default Wellbrook Shielded? Nope!


wrote

This question keeps popping up on this newsgroup. Wellbrooks are not
shielded.


Invisable aluminum.


  #30   Report Post  
Old November 23rd 06, 05:06 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
Rob Rob is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Oct 2006
Posts: 13
Default Wellbrook Shielded? Nope!

Hi Miso,

I was just making a point for Tekamon. I really like them and know
they are not shielded. I'm hoping to get an ALA-100 for Christmas so I
can experiment with larger loops. It's obvious that Andy has a good
quiet preamp design and this,coupled with a carefully designed balanced
antenna, constitutes the 'magic' inside a Wellbrook.

Rob


wrote:
Rob wrote:
Actually,

I do know what is inside the plastic loop. If you search on Wellbrook
and look at some of the past topics about it, there is one where
someone was asking the shortwave shop (their distributor) about the
indoor plastic loop, and the guy from the shortwave shop replied that
it was flexible and just had wire inside of it, so it could be squished
through narrow openings to the attic, I assume.

Rob


This question keeps popping up on this newsgroup. Wellbrooks are not
shielded.

I still like the ALA100 because you can roll your own antenna.



Telamon wrote:
In article . com,
"Rob" wrote:

Steve wrote:
John Plimmer wrote:
It's just bliss to have that phenomena that Guy describes: when
the noise on the antenna's is so low you start checking to see if
in fact they are connected. It is such a joy to hear stations
thousand's of miles away waft in over the airwaves as clear as a
bell, yet the signal strength is so low it doesn't even move your
"S" meter. What a thrill!


It's a pity these sorts of locations are so few and far between. In
most locations, atmospheric noise is significant *all by itself*.

I think it was Seein-I-Dawg who commented about the Wellbrook ALA-1530
being shielded....

That was a mistake. That Troll usually posts off topic political crap.

As far as I can tell, having looked at their site several times,
Wellbrook makes no such claims and points to the loop configuration
as the reason why it rejects some near field RFI.

The loop configuration is a reason that the antenna design will be
helpful in reducing local interference.

This is also born out by the fact that they also sell an Indoor
version of the antenna which is packaged in a sort of plastic hula
hoop, rather than in Aluminum tubing.

You and I both do not know what is inside the plastic tubing. It might
be shielded or it may not.

Wellbrook does make a very nice preamp and I suspect that the ALA-100
WILL outperform the ALA-1530 and the ALA-330s with 50 feet of wire on
it. (I currently have an ALA-1530 and hope to have an ALA-100
shortly so I'll let you know.)

Externally the antenna design is good way to go but it would depend on
how it was executed.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wellbrook question [email protected] Shortwave 35 October 2nd 06 05:36 PM
Wellbrook ALA 100 with Rotator - Construction Details Guy Atkins Antenna 4 July 23rd 06 07:49 PM
Wellbrook ALA 100 with Rotator - Construction Details Guy Atkins Homebrew 4 July 23rd 06 07:49 PM
Wellbrook ALA 100 with Rotator - Construction Details Guy Atkins Shortwave 4 July 23rd 06 07:49 PM
Wellbrook Antenna Arrives Jay Shortwave 1 December 10th 05 05:16 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:27 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017